Eintrag weiter verarbeiten

Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Zeitschriftentitel: Journal of Global Oncology
Personen und Körperschaften: Li, X.
In: Journal of Global Oncology, 4, 2018, Supplement 2, S. 13s-13s
Format: E-Article
Sprache: Englisch
veröffentlicht:
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Schlagwörter:
author_facet Li, X.
Li, X.
author Li, X.
spellingShingle Li, X.
Journal of Global Oncology
Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
Oncology
Cancer Research
author_sort li, x.
spelling Li, X. 2378-9506 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Oncology Cancer Research http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jgo.18.43000 <jats:p> Background: Urolithiasis (UL, urinary tract stone disease) has been reported to increase subsequent cancers in the urinary tract. Recently, we showed data that surveillance bias may be an important confounder in the reported associations. Aim: In the present approach we want to address the question of possible cancer risk posed by UL mechanistically. Both UL and cancer have strong genetic components and we hypothesize that familial association between UL and cancer may be plausible. We thus assess familial risks between UL and cancer, hoping to find an explanation why UL may pose a risk of cancer. Methods: UL patients were identified from hospital inpatient and outpatient records and they were organized in families based on the multigeneration register into which also national cancer data were linked. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated for cancer in the offspring generation when parents were diagnosed with UL, and conversely for UL when parents were diagnosed with cancer. Results: Familial risks between UL and cancer were generally small and inconsistent providing no convincing support of genetic sharing between UL and cancer. However, bladder UL was associated weakly with prostate cancer, and ureter and bladder UL were associated with salivary gland cancer. The current study did not provide data in support of UL leading to systemic cancers. Nor did we find any strong support for the induction of local tumors in the urinary tract; however, as the cause for local tumors may be chronic mechanical wear and inflammation, a family study may not find such a link. Conclusion: We found support for a weak familial association of bladder UL and prostate cancer but could not distinguish between genetic or familial prostate hyperplasia mechanisms. Unexpected findings showed associations of ureter and bladder UL with salivary gland cancers. The likely initial link was familial predisposition to both salivary gland and urinary tract stones but the necessary final link between salivary gland stones and salivary gland cancer needs yet to be demonstrated. </jats:p> Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer Journal of Global Oncology
doi_str_mv 10.1200/jgo.18.43000
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qZ28uMTguNDMwMDA
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qZ28uMTguNDMwMDA
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018
imprint_str_mv American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018
issn 2378-9506
issn_str_mv 2378-9506
language English
mega_collection American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (CrossRef)
match_str li2018familialrisksbetweenurolithiasisandcancer
publishDateSort 2018
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Global Oncology
source_id 49
title Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
title_unstemmed Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
title_full Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
title_fullStr Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
title_short Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
title_sort familial risks between urolithiasis and cancer
topic Oncology
Cancer Research
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jgo.18.43000
publishDate 2018
physical 13s-13s
description <jats:p> Background: Urolithiasis (UL, urinary tract stone disease) has been reported to increase subsequent cancers in the urinary tract. Recently, we showed data that surveillance bias may be an important confounder in the reported associations. Aim: In the present approach we want to address the question of possible cancer risk posed by UL mechanistically. Both UL and cancer have strong genetic components and we hypothesize that familial association between UL and cancer may be plausible. We thus assess familial risks between UL and cancer, hoping to find an explanation why UL may pose a risk of cancer. Methods: UL patients were identified from hospital inpatient and outpatient records and they were organized in families based on the multigeneration register into which also national cancer data were linked. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated for cancer in the offspring generation when parents were diagnosed with UL, and conversely for UL when parents were diagnosed with cancer. Results: Familial risks between UL and cancer were generally small and inconsistent providing no convincing support of genetic sharing between UL and cancer. However, bladder UL was associated weakly with prostate cancer, and ureter and bladder UL were associated with salivary gland cancer. The current study did not provide data in support of UL leading to systemic cancers. Nor did we find any strong support for the induction of local tumors in the urinary tract; however, as the cause for local tumors may be chronic mechanical wear and inflammation, a family study may not find such a link. Conclusion: We found support for a weak familial association of bladder UL and prostate cancer but could not distinguish between genetic or familial prostate hyperplasia mechanisms. Unexpected findings showed associations of ureter and bladder UL with salivary gland cancers. The likely initial link was familial predisposition to both salivary gland and urinary tract stones but the necessary final link between salivary gland stones and salivary gland cancer needs yet to be demonstrated. </jats:p>
container_issue Supplement 2
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Global Oncology
container_volume 4
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792327758373715979
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:42:00.349Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Familial+Risks+Between+Urolithiasis+and+Cancer&rft.date=2018-10-01&genre=article&issn=2378-9506&volume=4&issue=Supplement+2&pages=13s-13s&jtitle=Journal+of+Global+Oncology&atitle=Familial+Risks+Between+Urolithiasis+and+Cancer&aulast=Li&aufirst=X.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1200%2Fjgo.18.43000&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792327758373715979
author Li, X.
author_facet Li, X., Li, X.
author_sort li, x.
container_issue Supplement 2
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Global Oncology
container_volume 4
description <jats:p> Background: Urolithiasis (UL, urinary tract stone disease) has been reported to increase subsequent cancers in the urinary tract. Recently, we showed data that surveillance bias may be an important confounder in the reported associations. Aim: In the present approach we want to address the question of possible cancer risk posed by UL mechanistically. Both UL and cancer have strong genetic components and we hypothesize that familial association between UL and cancer may be plausible. We thus assess familial risks between UL and cancer, hoping to find an explanation why UL may pose a risk of cancer. Methods: UL patients were identified from hospital inpatient and outpatient records and they were organized in families based on the multigeneration register into which also national cancer data were linked. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated for cancer in the offspring generation when parents were diagnosed with UL, and conversely for UL when parents were diagnosed with cancer. Results: Familial risks between UL and cancer were generally small and inconsistent providing no convincing support of genetic sharing between UL and cancer. However, bladder UL was associated weakly with prostate cancer, and ureter and bladder UL were associated with salivary gland cancer. The current study did not provide data in support of UL leading to systemic cancers. Nor did we find any strong support for the induction of local tumors in the urinary tract; however, as the cause for local tumors may be chronic mechanical wear and inflammation, a family study may not find such a link. Conclusion: We found support for a weak familial association of bladder UL and prostate cancer but could not distinguish between genetic or familial prostate hyperplasia mechanisms. Unexpected findings showed associations of ureter and bladder UL with salivary gland cancers. The likely initial link was familial predisposition to both salivary gland and urinary tract stones but the necessary final link between salivary gland stones and salivary gland cancer needs yet to be demonstrated. </jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1200/jgo.18.43000
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qZ28uMTguNDMwMDA
imprint American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018
imprint_str_mv American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 2378-9506
issn_str_mv 2378-9506
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:42:00.349Z
match_str li2018familialrisksbetweenurolithiasisandcancer
mega_collection American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (CrossRef)
physical 13s-13s
publishDate 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Global Oncology
source_id 49
spelling Li, X. 2378-9506 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Oncology Cancer Research http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jgo.18.43000 <jats:p> Background: Urolithiasis (UL, urinary tract stone disease) has been reported to increase subsequent cancers in the urinary tract. Recently, we showed data that surveillance bias may be an important confounder in the reported associations. Aim: In the present approach we want to address the question of possible cancer risk posed by UL mechanistically. Both UL and cancer have strong genetic components and we hypothesize that familial association between UL and cancer may be plausible. We thus assess familial risks between UL and cancer, hoping to find an explanation why UL may pose a risk of cancer. Methods: UL patients were identified from hospital inpatient and outpatient records and they were organized in families based on the multigeneration register into which also national cancer data were linked. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated for cancer in the offspring generation when parents were diagnosed with UL, and conversely for UL when parents were diagnosed with cancer. Results: Familial risks between UL and cancer were generally small and inconsistent providing no convincing support of genetic sharing between UL and cancer. However, bladder UL was associated weakly with prostate cancer, and ureter and bladder UL were associated with salivary gland cancer. The current study did not provide data in support of UL leading to systemic cancers. Nor did we find any strong support for the induction of local tumors in the urinary tract; however, as the cause for local tumors may be chronic mechanical wear and inflammation, a family study may not find such a link. Conclusion: We found support for a weak familial association of bladder UL and prostate cancer but could not distinguish between genetic or familial prostate hyperplasia mechanisms. Unexpected findings showed associations of ureter and bladder UL with salivary gland cancers. The likely initial link was familial predisposition to both salivary gland and urinary tract stones but the necessary final link between salivary gland stones and salivary gland cancer needs yet to be demonstrated. </jats:p> Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer Journal of Global Oncology
spellingShingle Li, X., Journal of Global Oncology, Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer, Oncology, Cancer Research
title Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
title_full Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
title_fullStr Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
title_short Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
title_sort familial risks between urolithiasis and cancer
title_unstemmed Familial Risks Between Urolithiasis and Cancer
topic Oncology, Cancer Research
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jgo.18.43000