author_facet Herbert, C.
Kwa, W.
Nakano, S.
James, K.
Moiseenko, V.
Wu, J.
Schellenberg, D.
Liu, M.
Herbert, C.
Kwa, W.
Nakano, S.
James, K.
Moiseenko, V.
Wu, J.
Schellenberg, D.
Liu, M.
author Herbert, C.
Kwa, W.
Nakano, S.
James, K.
Moiseenko, V.
Wu, J.
Schellenberg, D.
Liu, M.
spellingShingle Herbert, C.
Kwa, W.
Nakano, S.
James, K.
Moiseenko, V.
Wu, J.
Schellenberg, D.
Liu, M.
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
Cancer Research
Oncology
author_sort herbert, c.
spelling Herbert, C. Kwa, W. Nakano, S. James, K. Moiseenko, V. Wu, J. Schellenberg, D. Liu, M. 1533-0346 1533-0338 SAGE Publications Cancer Research Oncology http://dx.doi.org/10.7785/tcrt.2012.500338 <jats:p> Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for patients with early stage lung cancer. Treatment duration can be &gt;30 minutes per fraction with non-coplanar 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Whilst this is generally well tolerated, faster delivery techniques are desirable. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for fast delivery of radiation treatment. The purpose of this planning study was to compare SBRT with 3D-CRT and VMAT, with VMAT plans generated using both single arc and 3 non-coplanar partial arcs. Ten patients who previously underwent SBRT (48 Gy in 4 fractions) with 3D-CRT were selected. VMAT plans were generated to treat the PTV while limiting doses to organs at risk. Cumulative dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were compared between the 3 techniques using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. Treatment delivery time was also assessed. Both VMAT techniques covered target volumes more conformally than 3D-CRT with a mean V48/V<jats:sub>PTV</jats:sub> of 1.21 for 3D-CRT, 1.03 for 3 arc plans and 1.01 for single arc plans (ρ = 0.005). Dose constraints to organs at risk were met using all three techniques. Mean lung doses were 2.93 Gy for 3D-CRT, 2.87 Gy for single arc and 2.73 Gy for the 3 arc technique (3-arc vs. 3D-CRT: ρ = 0.009). Lung V20 for 3D-CRT, 1 arc and 3 arcs were 3.24%, 2.89% and 2.73%, respectively (3-arc vs. 3D-CRT: ρ = 0.028). Mean time to deliver a single fraction was 13 minutes for 3D-CRT, 9.2 minutes for 3 arcs and 5.5 minutes for 1 arc. VMAT resulted in improved conformality compared to 3D-CRT. The 3 arc technique appears to have the lowest dose to lung although the magnitude is unlikely to be clinically significant. The main advantage of VMAT over 3D-CRT is faster treatment delivery time. Shortened treatment times are anticipated to improve tolerability of this treatment and reduce the chance of error due to intra-fraction motion. </jats:p> Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
doi_str_mv 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500338
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNzc4NS90Y3J0LjIwMTIuNTAwMzM4
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNzc4NS90Y3J0LjIwMTIuNTAwMzM4
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint SAGE Publications, 2013
imprint_str_mv SAGE Publications, 2013
issn 1533-0346
1533-0338
issn_str_mv 1533-0346
1533-0338
language English
mega_collection SAGE Publications (CrossRef)
match_str herbert2013stereotacticbodyradiotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyversus3dnoncoplanarconformalradiotherapyforthetreatmentofearlystagelungcancer
publishDateSort 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
source_id 49
title Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
title_unstemmed Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
title_full Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
title_short Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
title_sort stereotactic body radiotherapy: volumetric modulated arc therapy versus 3d non-coplanar conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of early stage lung cancer
topic Cancer Research
Oncology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.7785/tcrt.2012.500338
publishDate 2013
physical 511-516
description <jats:p> Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for patients with early stage lung cancer. Treatment duration can be &gt;30 minutes per fraction with non-coplanar 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Whilst this is generally well tolerated, faster delivery techniques are desirable. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for fast delivery of radiation treatment. The purpose of this planning study was to compare SBRT with 3D-CRT and VMAT, with VMAT plans generated using both single arc and 3 non-coplanar partial arcs. Ten patients who previously underwent SBRT (48 Gy in 4 fractions) with 3D-CRT were selected. VMAT plans were generated to treat the PTV while limiting doses to organs at risk. Cumulative dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were compared between the 3 techniques using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. Treatment delivery time was also assessed. Both VMAT techniques covered target volumes more conformally than 3D-CRT with a mean V48/V<jats:sub>PTV</jats:sub> of 1.21 for 3D-CRT, 1.03 for 3 arc plans and 1.01 for single arc plans (ρ = 0.005). Dose constraints to organs at risk were met using all three techniques. Mean lung doses were 2.93 Gy for 3D-CRT, 2.87 Gy for single arc and 2.73 Gy for the 3 arc technique (3-arc vs. 3D-CRT: ρ = 0.009). Lung V20 for 3D-CRT, 1 arc and 3 arcs were 3.24%, 2.89% and 2.73%, respectively (3-arc vs. 3D-CRT: ρ = 0.028). Mean time to deliver a single fraction was 13 minutes for 3D-CRT, 9.2 minutes for 3 arcs and 5.5 minutes for 1 arc. VMAT resulted in improved conformality compared to 3D-CRT. The 3 arc technique appears to have the lowest dose to lung although the magnitude is unlikely to be clinically significant. The main advantage of VMAT over 3D-CRT is faster treatment delivery time. Shortened treatment times are anticipated to improve tolerability of this treatment and reduce the chance of error due to intra-fraction motion. </jats:p>
container_issue 6
container_start_page 511
container_title Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
container_volume 12
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792333299965755393
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:10:32.976Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Stereotactic+Body+Radiotherapy%3A+Volumetric+Modulated+Arc+Therapy+versus+3D+Non-Coplanar+Conformal+Radiotherapy+for+the+Treatment+of+Early+Stage+Lung+Cancer&rft.date=2013-12-01&genre=article&issn=1533-0338&volume=12&issue=6&spage=511&epage=516&pages=511-516&jtitle=Technology+in+Cancer+Research+%26+Treatment&atitle=Stereotactic+Body+Radiotherapy%3A+Volumetric+Modulated+Arc+Therapy+versus+3D+Non-Coplanar+Conformal+Radiotherapy+for+the+Treatment+of+Early+Stage+Lung+Cancer&aulast=Liu&aufirst=M.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.7785%2Ftcrt.2012.500338&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792333299965755393
author Herbert, C., Kwa, W., Nakano, S., James, K., Moiseenko, V., Wu, J., Schellenberg, D., Liu, M.
author_facet Herbert, C., Kwa, W., Nakano, S., James, K., Moiseenko, V., Wu, J., Schellenberg, D., Liu, M., Herbert, C., Kwa, W., Nakano, S., James, K., Moiseenko, V., Wu, J., Schellenberg, D., Liu, M.
author_sort herbert, c.
container_issue 6
container_start_page 511
container_title Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
container_volume 12
description <jats:p> Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for patients with early stage lung cancer. Treatment duration can be &gt;30 minutes per fraction with non-coplanar 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Whilst this is generally well tolerated, faster delivery techniques are desirable. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for fast delivery of radiation treatment. The purpose of this planning study was to compare SBRT with 3D-CRT and VMAT, with VMAT plans generated using both single arc and 3 non-coplanar partial arcs. Ten patients who previously underwent SBRT (48 Gy in 4 fractions) with 3D-CRT were selected. VMAT plans were generated to treat the PTV while limiting doses to organs at risk. Cumulative dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were compared between the 3 techniques using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. Treatment delivery time was also assessed. Both VMAT techniques covered target volumes more conformally than 3D-CRT with a mean V48/V<jats:sub>PTV</jats:sub> of 1.21 for 3D-CRT, 1.03 for 3 arc plans and 1.01 for single arc plans (ρ = 0.005). Dose constraints to organs at risk were met using all three techniques. Mean lung doses were 2.93 Gy for 3D-CRT, 2.87 Gy for single arc and 2.73 Gy for the 3 arc technique (3-arc vs. 3D-CRT: ρ = 0.009). Lung V20 for 3D-CRT, 1 arc and 3 arcs were 3.24%, 2.89% and 2.73%, respectively (3-arc vs. 3D-CRT: ρ = 0.028). Mean time to deliver a single fraction was 13 minutes for 3D-CRT, 9.2 minutes for 3 arcs and 5.5 minutes for 1 arc. VMAT resulted in improved conformality compared to 3D-CRT. The 3 arc technique appears to have the lowest dose to lung although the magnitude is unlikely to be clinically significant. The main advantage of VMAT over 3D-CRT is faster treatment delivery time. Shortened treatment times are anticipated to improve tolerability of this treatment and reduce the chance of error due to intra-fraction motion. </jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500338
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNzc4NS90Y3J0LjIwMTIuNTAwMzM4
imprint SAGE Publications, 2013
imprint_str_mv SAGE Publications, 2013
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 1533-0346, 1533-0338
issn_str_mv 1533-0346, 1533-0338
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:10:32.976Z
match_str herbert2013stereotacticbodyradiotherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyversus3dnoncoplanarconformalradiotherapyforthetreatmentofearlystagelungcancer
mega_collection SAGE Publications (CrossRef)
physical 511-516
publishDate 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
source_id 49
spelling Herbert, C. Kwa, W. Nakano, S. James, K. Moiseenko, V. Wu, J. Schellenberg, D. Liu, M. 1533-0346 1533-0338 SAGE Publications Cancer Research Oncology http://dx.doi.org/10.7785/tcrt.2012.500338 <jats:p> Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for patients with early stage lung cancer. Treatment duration can be &gt;30 minutes per fraction with non-coplanar 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Whilst this is generally well tolerated, faster delivery techniques are desirable. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for fast delivery of radiation treatment. The purpose of this planning study was to compare SBRT with 3D-CRT and VMAT, with VMAT plans generated using both single arc and 3 non-coplanar partial arcs. Ten patients who previously underwent SBRT (48 Gy in 4 fractions) with 3D-CRT were selected. VMAT plans were generated to treat the PTV while limiting doses to organs at risk. Cumulative dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were compared between the 3 techniques using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. Treatment delivery time was also assessed. Both VMAT techniques covered target volumes more conformally than 3D-CRT with a mean V48/V<jats:sub>PTV</jats:sub> of 1.21 for 3D-CRT, 1.03 for 3 arc plans and 1.01 for single arc plans (ρ = 0.005). Dose constraints to organs at risk were met using all three techniques. Mean lung doses were 2.93 Gy for 3D-CRT, 2.87 Gy for single arc and 2.73 Gy for the 3 arc technique (3-arc vs. 3D-CRT: ρ = 0.009). Lung V20 for 3D-CRT, 1 arc and 3 arcs were 3.24%, 2.89% and 2.73%, respectively (3-arc vs. 3D-CRT: ρ = 0.028). Mean time to deliver a single fraction was 13 minutes for 3D-CRT, 9.2 minutes for 3 arcs and 5.5 minutes for 1 arc. VMAT resulted in improved conformality compared to 3D-CRT. The 3 arc technique appears to have the lowest dose to lung although the magnitude is unlikely to be clinically significant. The main advantage of VMAT over 3D-CRT is faster treatment delivery time. Shortened treatment times are anticipated to improve tolerability of this treatment and reduce the chance of error due to intra-fraction motion. </jats:p> Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
spellingShingle Herbert, C., Kwa, W., Nakano, S., James, K., Moiseenko, V., Wu, J., Schellenberg, D., Liu, M., Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer, Cancer Research, Oncology
title Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
title_full Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
title_short Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
title_sort stereotactic body radiotherapy: volumetric modulated arc therapy versus 3d non-coplanar conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of early stage lung cancer
title_unstemmed Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
topic Cancer Research, Oncology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.7785/tcrt.2012.500338