Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , |
| In: | ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, III-1, 2016, S. 143-149 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Copernicus GmbH
|
| author_facet |
Sirmacek, Beril Shen, Yueqian Lindenbergh, Roderik Zlatanova, Sisi Diakite, Abdoulaye Sirmacek, Beril Shen, Yueqian Lindenbergh, Roderik Zlatanova, Sisi Diakite, Abdoulaye |
|---|---|
| author |
Sirmacek, Beril Shen, Yueqian Lindenbergh, Roderik Zlatanova, Sisi Diakite, Abdoulaye |
| spellingShingle |
Sirmacek, Beril Shen, Yueqian Lindenbergh, Roderik Zlatanova, Sisi Diakite, Abdoulaye ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| author_sort |
sirmacek, beril |
| spelling |
Sirmacek, Beril Shen, Yueqian Lindenbergh, Roderik Zlatanova, Sisi Diakite, Abdoulaye 2194-9050 Copernicus GmbH http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-iii-1-143-2016 <jats:p>We present a comparison of point cloud generation and quality of data acquired by Zebedee (Zeb1) and Leica C10 devices which are used in the same building interior. Both sensor devices come with different practical and technical advantages. As it could be expected, these advantages come with some drawbacks. Therefore, depending on the requirements of the project, it is important to have a vision about what to expect from different sensors. In this paper, we provide a detailed analysis of the point clouds of the same room interior acquired from Zeb1 and Leica C10 sensors. First, it is visually assessed how different features appear in both the Zeb1 and Leica C10 point clouds. Next, a quantitative analysis is given by comparing local point density, local noise level and stability of local normals. Finally, a simple 3D room plan is extracted from both the Zeb1 and the Leica C10 point clouds and the lengths of constructed line segments connecting corners of the room are compared. The results show that Zeb1 is far superior in ease of data acquisition. No heavy handling, hardly no measurement planning and no point cloud registration is required from the operator. The resulting point cloud has a quality in the order of centimeters, which is fine for generating a 3D interior model of a building. Our results also clearly show that fine details of for example ornaments are invisible in the Zeb1 data. If point clouds with a quality in the order of millimeters are required, still a high-end laser scanner like the Leica C10 is required, in combination with a more sophisticated, time-consuming and elaborative data acquisition and processing approach.</jats:p> COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| doi_str_mv |
10.5194/isprsannals-iii-1-143-2016 |
| facet_avail |
Online |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNTE5NC9pc3Byc2FubmFscy1paWktMS0xNDMtMjAxNg |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNTE5NC9pc3Byc2FubmFscy1paWktMS0xNDMtMjAxNg |
| institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Zwi2 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
| imprint |
Copernicus GmbH, 2016 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Copernicus GmbH, 2016 |
| issn |
2194-9050 |
| issn_str_mv |
2194-9050 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Copernicus GmbH (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
sirmacek2016comparisonofzeb1andleicac10indoorlaserscanningpointclouds |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| publisher |
Copernicus GmbH |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title_unstemmed |
COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title_full |
COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title_fullStr |
COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title_short |
COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title_sort |
comparison of zeb1 and leica c10 indoor laser scanning point clouds |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-iii-1-143-2016 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| physical |
143-149 |
| description |
<jats:p>We present a comparison of point cloud generation and quality of data acquired by Zebedee (Zeb1) and Leica C10 devices which are used in the same building interior. Both sensor devices come with different practical and technical advantages. As it could be expected, these advantages come with some drawbacks. Therefore, depending on the requirements of the project, it is important to have a vision about what to expect from different sensors. In this paper, we provide a detailed analysis of the point clouds of the same room interior acquired from Zeb1 and Leica C10 sensors. First, it is visually assessed how different features appear in both the Zeb1 and Leica C10 point clouds. Next, a quantitative analysis is given by comparing local point density, local noise level and stability of local normals. Finally, a simple 3D room plan is extracted from both the Zeb1 and the Leica C10 point clouds and the lengths of constructed line segments connecting corners of the room are compared. The results show that Zeb1 is far superior in ease of data acquisition. No heavy handling, hardly no measurement planning and no point cloud registration is required from the operator. The resulting point cloud has a quality in the order of centimeters, which is fine for generating a 3D interior model of a building. Our results also clearly show that fine details of for example ornaments are invisible in the Zeb1 data. If point clouds with a quality in the order of millimeters are required, still a high-end laser scanner like the Leica C10 is required, in combination with a more sophisticated, time-consuming and elaborative data acquisition and processing approach.</jats:p> |
| container_start_page |
143 |
| container_title |
ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| container_volume |
III-1 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792334750602493966 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:33:10.754Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=COMPARISON+OF+ZEB1+AND+LEICA+C10+INDOOR+LASER+SCANNING+POINT+CLOUDS&rft.date=2016-06-02&genre=article&issn=2194-9050&volume=III-1&spage=143&epage=149&pages=143-149&jtitle=ISPRS+Annals+of+Photogrammetry%2C+Remote+Sensing+and+Spatial+Information+Sciences&atitle=COMPARISON+OF+ZEB1+AND+LEICA+C10+INDOOR+LASER+SCANNING+POINT+CLOUDS&aulast=Diakite&aufirst=Abdoulaye&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.5194%2Fisprsannals-iii-1-143-2016&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792334750602493966 |
| author | Sirmacek, Beril, Shen, Yueqian, Lindenbergh, Roderik, Zlatanova, Sisi, Diakite, Abdoulaye |
| author_facet | Sirmacek, Beril, Shen, Yueqian, Lindenbergh, Roderik, Zlatanova, Sisi, Diakite, Abdoulaye, Sirmacek, Beril, Shen, Yueqian, Lindenbergh, Roderik, Zlatanova, Sisi, Diakite, Abdoulaye |
| author_sort | sirmacek, beril |
| container_start_page | 143 |
| container_title | ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| container_volume | III-1 |
| description | <jats:p>We present a comparison of point cloud generation and quality of data acquired by Zebedee (Zeb1) and Leica C10 devices which are used in the same building interior. Both sensor devices come with different practical and technical advantages. As it could be expected, these advantages come with some drawbacks. Therefore, depending on the requirements of the project, it is important to have a vision about what to expect from different sensors. In this paper, we provide a detailed analysis of the point clouds of the same room interior acquired from Zeb1 and Leica C10 sensors. First, it is visually assessed how different features appear in both the Zeb1 and Leica C10 point clouds. Next, a quantitative analysis is given by comparing local point density, local noise level and stability of local normals. Finally, a simple 3D room plan is extracted from both the Zeb1 and the Leica C10 point clouds and the lengths of constructed line segments connecting corners of the room are compared. The results show that Zeb1 is far superior in ease of data acquisition. No heavy handling, hardly no measurement planning and no point cloud registration is required from the operator. The resulting point cloud has a quality in the order of centimeters, which is fine for generating a 3D interior model of a building. Our results also clearly show that fine details of for example ornaments are invisible in the Zeb1 data. If point clouds with a quality in the order of millimeters are required, still a high-end laser scanner like the Leica C10 is required, in combination with a more sophisticated, time-consuming and elaborative data acquisition and processing approach.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5194/isprsannals-iii-1-143-2016 |
| facet_avail | Online |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNTE5NC9pc3Byc2FubmFscy1paWktMS0xNDMtMjAxNg |
| imprint | Copernicus GmbH, 2016 |
| imprint_str_mv | Copernicus GmbH, 2016 |
| institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zwi2, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
| issn | 2194-9050 |
| issn_str_mv | 2194-9050 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:33:10.754Z |
| match_str | sirmacek2016comparisonofzeb1andleicac10indoorlaserscanningpointclouds |
| mega_collection | Copernicus GmbH (CrossRef) |
| physical | 143-149 |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Copernicus GmbH |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Sirmacek, Beril Shen, Yueqian Lindenbergh, Roderik Zlatanova, Sisi Diakite, Abdoulaye 2194-9050 Copernicus GmbH http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-iii-1-143-2016 <jats:p>We present a comparison of point cloud generation and quality of data acquired by Zebedee (Zeb1) and Leica C10 devices which are used in the same building interior. Both sensor devices come with different practical and technical advantages. As it could be expected, these advantages come with some drawbacks. Therefore, depending on the requirements of the project, it is important to have a vision about what to expect from different sensors. In this paper, we provide a detailed analysis of the point clouds of the same room interior acquired from Zeb1 and Leica C10 sensors. First, it is visually assessed how different features appear in both the Zeb1 and Leica C10 point clouds. Next, a quantitative analysis is given by comparing local point density, local noise level and stability of local normals. Finally, a simple 3D room plan is extracted from both the Zeb1 and the Leica C10 point clouds and the lengths of constructed line segments connecting corners of the room are compared. The results show that Zeb1 is far superior in ease of data acquisition. No heavy handling, hardly no measurement planning and no point cloud registration is required from the operator. The resulting point cloud has a quality in the order of centimeters, which is fine for generating a 3D interior model of a building. Our results also clearly show that fine details of for example ornaments are invisible in the Zeb1 data. If point clouds with a quality in the order of millimeters are required, still a high-end laser scanner like the Leica C10 is required, in combination with a more sophisticated, time-consuming and elaborative data acquisition and processing approach.</jats:p> COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| spellingShingle | Sirmacek, Beril, Shen, Yueqian, Lindenbergh, Roderik, Zlatanova, Sisi, Diakite, Abdoulaye, ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title | COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title_full | COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title_fullStr | COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title_full_unstemmed | COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title_short | COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| title_sort | comparison of zeb1 and leica c10 indoor laser scanning point clouds |
| title_unstemmed | COMPARISON OF ZEB1 AND LEICA C10 INDOOR LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-iii-1-143-2016 |