author_facet Massonnet, François
Barthélemy, Antoine
Worou, Koffi
Fichefet, Thierry
Vancoppenolle, Martin
Rousset, Clément
Moreno-Chamarro, Eduardo
Massonnet, François
Barthélemy, Antoine
Worou, Koffi
Fichefet, Thierry
Vancoppenolle, Martin
Rousset, Clément
Moreno-Chamarro, Eduardo
author Massonnet, François
Barthélemy, Antoine
Worou, Koffi
Fichefet, Thierry
Vancoppenolle, Martin
Rousset, Clément
Moreno-Chamarro, Eduardo
spellingShingle Massonnet, François
Barthélemy, Antoine
Worou, Koffi
Fichefet, Thierry
Vancoppenolle, Martin
Rousset, Clément
Moreno-Chamarro, Eduardo
Geoscientific Model Development
On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
Polymers and Plastics
General Environmental Science
author_sort massonnet, françois
spelling Massonnet, François Barthélemy, Antoine Worou, Koffi Fichefet, Thierry Vancoppenolle, Martin Rousset, Clément Moreno-Chamarro, Eduardo 1991-9603 Copernicus GmbH Polymers and Plastics General Environmental Science http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3745-2019 <jats:p>Abstract. The ice thickness distribution (ITD) is one of the core constituents of modern sea ice models. The ITD accounts for the unresolved spatial variability of sea ice thickness within each model grid cell. While there is a general consensus on the added physical realism brought by the ITD, how to discretize it remains an open question. Here, we use the ocean–sea ice general circulation model, Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) version 3.6 and Louvain-la-Neuve sea Ice Model (LIM) version 3 (NEMO3.6-LIM3), forced by atmospheric reanalyses to test how the ITD discretization (number of ice thickness categories, positions of the category boundaries) impacts the simulated mean Arctic and Antarctic sea ice states. We find that winter ice volumes in both hemispheres increase with the number of categories and attribute that increase to a net enhancement of basal ice growth rates. The range of simulated mean winter volumes in the various experiments amounts to ∼30 % and ∼10 % of the reference values (run with five categories) in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively. This suggests that the way the ITD is discretized has a significant influence on the model mean state, all other things being equal. We also find that the existence of a thick category with lower bounds at ∼4 and ∼2 m for the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively, is a prerequisite for allowing the storage of deformed ice and therefore for fostering thermodynamic growth in thinner categories. Our analysis finally suggests that increasing the resolution of the ITD without changing the lower limit of the upper category results in small but not negligible variations of ice volume and extent. Our study proposes for the first time a bi-polar process-based explanation of the origin of mean sea ice state changes when the ITD discretization is modified. The sensitivity experiments conducted in this study, based on one model, emphasize that the choice of category positions, especially of thickest categories, has a primary influence on the simulated mean sea ice states while the number of categories and resolution have only a secondary influence. It is also found that the current default discretization of the NEMO3.6-LIM3 model is sufficient for large-scale present-day climate applications. In all cases, the role of the ITD discretization on the simulated mean sea ice state has to be appreciated relative to other influences (parameter uncertainty, forcing uncertainty, internal climate variability). </jats:p> On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model Geoscientific Model Development
doi_str_mv 10.5194/gmd-12-3745-2019
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Chemie und Pharmazie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNTE5NC9nbWQtMTItMzc0NS0yMDE5
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNTE5NC9nbWQtMTItMzc0NS0yMDE5
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Copernicus GmbH, 2019
imprint_str_mv Copernicus GmbH, 2019
issn 1991-9603
issn_str_mv 1991-9603
language English
mega_collection Copernicus GmbH (CrossRef)
match_str massonnet2019onthediscretizationoftheicethicknessdistributioninthenemo36lim3globaloceanseaicemodel
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Copernicus GmbH
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Geoscientific Model Development
source_id 49
title On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_unstemmed On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_full On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_fullStr On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_full_unstemmed On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_short On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_sort on the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the nemo3.6-lim3 global ocean–sea ice model
topic Polymers and Plastics
General Environmental Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3745-2019
publishDate 2019
physical 3745-3758
description <jats:p>Abstract. The ice thickness distribution (ITD) is one of the core constituents of modern sea ice models. The ITD accounts for the unresolved spatial variability of sea ice thickness within each model grid cell. While there is a general consensus on the added physical realism brought by the ITD, how to discretize it remains an open question. Here, we use the ocean–sea ice general circulation model, Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) version 3.6 and Louvain-la-Neuve sea Ice Model (LIM) version 3 (NEMO3.6-LIM3), forced by atmospheric reanalyses to test how the ITD discretization (number of ice thickness categories, positions of the category boundaries) impacts the simulated mean Arctic and Antarctic sea ice states. We find that winter ice volumes in both hemispheres increase with the number of categories and attribute that increase to a net enhancement of basal ice growth rates. The range of simulated mean winter volumes in the various experiments amounts to ∼30 % and ∼10 % of the reference values (run with five categories) in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively. This suggests that the way the ITD is discretized has a significant influence on the model mean state, all other things being equal. We also find that the existence of a thick category with lower bounds at ∼4 and ∼2 m for the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively, is a prerequisite for allowing the storage of deformed ice and therefore for fostering thermodynamic growth in thinner categories. Our analysis finally suggests that increasing the resolution of the ITD without changing the lower limit of the upper category results in small but not negligible variations of ice volume and extent. Our study proposes for the first time a bi-polar process-based explanation of the origin of mean sea ice state changes when the ITD discretization is modified. The sensitivity experiments conducted in this study, based on one model, emphasize that the choice of category positions, especially of thickest categories, has a primary influence on the simulated mean sea ice states while the number of categories and resolution have only a secondary influence. It is also found that the current default discretization of the NEMO3.6-LIM3 model is sufficient for large-scale present-day climate applications. In all cases, the role of the ITD discretization on the simulated mean sea ice state has to be appreciated relative to other influences (parameter uncertainty, forcing uncertainty, internal climate variability). </jats:p>
container_issue 8
container_start_page 3745
container_title Geoscientific Model Development
container_volume 12
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792347947602542599
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T18:03:21.382Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=On+the+discretization+of+the+ice+thickness+distribution++in+the++NEMO3.6-LIM3+global+ocean%E2%80%93sea+ice+model&rft.date=2019-08-27&genre=article&issn=1991-9603&volume=12&issue=8&spage=3745&epage=3758&pages=3745-3758&jtitle=Geoscientific+Model+Development&atitle=On+the+discretization+of+the+ice+thickness+distribution++in+the++NEMO3.6-LIM3+global+ocean%E2%80%93sea+ice+model&aulast=Moreno-Chamarro&aufirst=Eduardo&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.5194%2Fgmd-12-3745-2019&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792347947602542599
author Massonnet, François, Barthélemy, Antoine, Worou, Koffi, Fichefet, Thierry, Vancoppenolle, Martin, Rousset, Clément, Moreno-Chamarro, Eduardo
author_facet Massonnet, François, Barthélemy, Antoine, Worou, Koffi, Fichefet, Thierry, Vancoppenolle, Martin, Rousset, Clément, Moreno-Chamarro, Eduardo, Massonnet, François, Barthélemy, Antoine, Worou, Koffi, Fichefet, Thierry, Vancoppenolle, Martin, Rousset, Clément, Moreno-Chamarro, Eduardo
author_sort massonnet, françois
container_issue 8
container_start_page 3745
container_title Geoscientific Model Development
container_volume 12
description <jats:p>Abstract. The ice thickness distribution (ITD) is one of the core constituents of modern sea ice models. The ITD accounts for the unresolved spatial variability of sea ice thickness within each model grid cell. While there is a general consensus on the added physical realism brought by the ITD, how to discretize it remains an open question. Here, we use the ocean–sea ice general circulation model, Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) version 3.6 and Louvain-la-Neuve sea Ice Model (LIM) version 3 (NEMO3.6-LIM3), forced by atmospheric reanalyses to test how the ITD discretization (number of ice thickness categories, positions of the category boundaries) impacts the simulated mean Arctic and Antarctic sea ice states. We find that winter ice volumes in both hemispheres increase with the number of categories and attribute that increase to a net enhancement of basal ice growth rates. The range of simulated mean winter volumes in the various experiments amounts to ∼30 % and ∼10 % of the reference values (run with five categories) in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively. This suggests that the way the ITD is discretized has a significant influence on the model mean state, all other things being equal. We also find that the existence of a thick category with lower bounds at ∼4 and ∼2 m for the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively, is a prerequisite for allowing the storage of deformed ice and therefore for fostering thermodynamic growth in thinner categories. Our analysis finally suggests that increasing the resolution of the ITD without changing the lower limit of the upper category results in small but not negligible variations of ice volume and extent. Our study proposes for the first time a bi-polar process-based explanation of the origin of mean sea ice state changes when the ITD discretization is modified. The sensitivity experiments conducted in this study, based on one model, emphasize that the choice of category positions, especially of thickest categories, has a primary influence on the simulated mean sea ice states while the number of categories and resolution have only a secondary influence. It is also found that the current default discretization of the NEMO3.6-LIM3 model is sufficient for large-scale present-day climate applications. In all cases, the role of the ITD discretization on the simulated mean sea ice state has to be appreciated relative to other influences (parameter uncertainty, forcing uncertainty, internal climate variability). </jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.5194/gmd-12-3745-2019
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Chemie und Pharmazie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNTE5NC9nbWQtMTItMzc0NS0yMDE5
imprint Copernicus GmbH, 2019
imprint_str_mv Copernicus GmbH, 2019
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 1991-9603
issn_str_mv 1991-9603
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T18:03:21.382Z
match_str massonnet2019onthediscretizationoftheicethicknessdistributioninthenemo36lim3globaloceanseaicemodel
mega_collection Copernicus GmbH (CrossRef)
physical 3745-3758
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Copernicus GmbH
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Geoscientific Model Development
source_id 49
spelling Massonnet, François Barthélemy, Antoine Worou, Koffi Fichefet, Thierry Vancoppenolle, Martin Rousset, Clément Moreno-Chamarro, Eduardo 1991-9603 Copernicus GmbH Polymers and Plastics General Environmental Science http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3745-2019 <jats:p>Abstract. The ice thickness distribution (ITD) is one of the core constituents of modern sea ice models. The ITD accounts for the unresolved spatial variability of sea ice thickness within each model grid cell. While there is a general consensus on the added physical realism brought by the ITD, how to discretize it remains an open question. Here, we use the ocean–sea ice general circulation model, Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) version 3.6 and Louvain-la-Neuve sea Ice Model (LIM) version 3 (NEMO3.6-LIM3), forced by atmospheric reanalyses to test how the ITD discretization (number of ice thickness categories, positions of the category boundaries) impacts the simulated mean Arctic and Antarctic sea ice states. We find that winter ice volumes in both hemispheres increase with the number of categories and attribute that increase to a net enhancement of basal ice growth rates. The range of simulated mean winter volumes in the various experiments amounts to ∼30 % and ∼10 % of the reference values (run with five categories) in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively. This suggests that the way the ITD is discretized has a significant influence on the model mean state, all other things being equal. We also find that the existence of a thick category with lower bounds at ∼4 and ∼2 m for the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively, is a prerequisite for allowing the storage of deformed ice and therefore for fostering thermodynamic growth in thinner categories. Our analysis finally suggests that increasing the resolution of the ITD without changing the lower limit of the upper category results in small but not negligible variations of ice volume and extent. Our study proposes for the first time a bi-polar process-based explanation of the origin of mean sea ice state changes when the ITD discretization is modified. The sensitivity experiments conducted in this study, based on one model, emphasize that the choice of category positions, especially of thickest categories, has a primary influence on the simulated mean sea ice states while the number of categories and resolution have only a secondary influence. It is also found that the current default discretization of the NEMO3.6-LIM3 model is sufficient for large-scale present-day climate applications. In all cases, the role of the ITD discretization on the simulated mean sea ice state has to be appreciated relative to other influences (parameter uncertainty, forcing uncertainty, internal climate variability). </jats:p> On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model Geoscientific Model Development
spellingShingle Massonnet, François, Barthélemy, Antoine, Worou, Koffi, Fichefet, Thierry, Vancoppenolle, Martin, Rousset, Clément, Moreno-Chamarro, Eduardo, Geoscientific Model Development, On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model, Polymers and Plastics, General Environmental Science
title On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_full On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_fullStr On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_full_unstemmed On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_short On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_sort on the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the nemo3.6-lim3 global ocean–sea ice model
title_unstemmed On the discretization of the ice thickness distribution in the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global ocean–sea ice model
topic Polymers and Plastics, General Environmental Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3745-2019