Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , , , |
| In: | Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia, 88, 2016, 4, S. 308 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Unbestimmt |
| veröffentlicht: |
PAGEPress Publications
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Anastasi, Giuseppina Subba, Enrica Pappalardo, Rosa Macchione, Luciano Ricotta, Gioacchino Muscarà, Graziella Lembo, Francesco Magno, Carlo Anastasi, Giuseppina Subba, Enrica Pappalardo, Rosa Macchione, Luciano Ricotta, Gioacchino Muscarà, Graziella Lembo, Francesco Magno, Carlo |
|---|---|
| author |
Anastasi, Giuseppina Subba, Enrica Pappalardo, Rosa Macchione, Luciano Ricotta, Gioacchino Muscarà, Graziella Lembo, Francesco Magno, Carlo |
| spellingShingle |
Anastasi, Giuseppina Subba, Enrica Pappalardo, Rosa Macchione, Luciano Ricotta, Gioacchino Muscarà, Graziella Lembo, Francesco Magno, Carlo Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia Urology |
| author_sort |
anastasi, giuseppina |
| spelling |
Anastasi, Giuseppina Subba, Enrica Pappalardo, Rosa Macchione, Luciano Ricotta, Gioacchino Muscarà, Graziella Lembo, Francesco Magno, Carlo 2282-4197 1124-3562 PAGEPress Publications Urology http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2016.4.308 <jats:p>Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy is regarded as the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis. The majority of patients perceive TRUS-guided prostate biopsy as a physically and psychologically traumatic experience. We aimed to compare in this paper the efficacy of three different anesthesia techniques to control the pain during the procedure. Materials and methods: 150 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy were randomly divided into three groups. Group A included 50 patients who received one hour before the procedure a mixture of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine, Group B: 50 patients who received intrarectal local anesthetic administration (lidocaine 5 ml 10%) and lidocaine local spray 15 % and Group C included 50 patients who received periprostatic block anesthesia (lidocaine 10 ml 10%). Visual analogue scale (VAS) of patients in different groups was evaluated at the end of the biopsy and 30 minutes after the procedure. Results: The VAS of patients in Group A was 1.32 ± 0.65 (VAS I) and 2.47 ± 0.80 (VAS II). In group B the VAS of patients was 1.09 ± 0.47 (VAS I) and 1.65 ± 0.61 (VAS II). In group C the VAS of patients was 2.63 ± 0.78 (VAS I) and 1.70 ± 0.85 (VAS II). There was no statistically significant difference in term of VAS I between group A and B. A statistically significant difference was determined in terms of VAS II between group A and B. There was no statistically significant difference in term of VAS between group B and C. Conclusions: The most effective of the three methods for pain control we used was intrarectal local anesthetic administration and lidocaine local spray 15% that enables an ideal patient comfort.</jats:p> Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia |
| doi_str_mv |
10.4081/aiua.2016.4.308 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNDA4MS9haXVhLjIwMTYuNC4zMDg |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNDA4MS9haXVhLjIwMTYuNC4zMDg |
| institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
| imprint |
PAGEPress Publications, 2016 |
| imprint_str_mv |
PAGEPress Publications, 2016 |
| issn |
2282-4197 1124-3562 |
| issn_str_mv |
2282-4197 1124-3562 |
| language |
Undetermined |
| mega_collection |
PAGEPress Publications (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
anastasi2016transrectalultrasoundtrusguidedprostatebiopsythreedifferenttypesoflocalanesthesia |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| publisher |
PAGEPress Publications |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_unstemmed |
Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_full |
Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_fullStr |
Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_short |
Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_sort |
transrectal ultrasound (trus) guided prostate biopsy: three different types of local anesthesia |
| topic |
Urology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2016.4.308 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| physical |
308 |
| description |
<jats:p>Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy is regarded as the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis. The majority of patients perceive TRUS-guided prostate biopsy as a physically and psychologically traumatic experience. We aimed to compare in this paper the efficacy of three different anesthesia techniques to control the pain during the procedure. Materials and methods: 150 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy were randomly divided into three groups. Group A included 50 patients who received one hour before the procedure a mixture of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine, Group B: 50 patients who received intrarectal local anesthetic administration (lidocaine 5 ml 10%) and lidocaine local spray 15 % and Group C included 50 patients who received periprostatic block anesthesia (lidocaine 10 ml 10%). Visual analogue scale (VAS) of patients in different groups was evaluated at the end of the biopsy and 30 minutes after the procedure. Results: The VAS of patients in Group A was 1.32 ± 0.65 (VAS I) and 2.47 ± 0.80 (VAS II). In group B the VAS of patients was 1.09 ± 0.47 (VAS I) and 1.65 ± 0.61 (VAS II). In group C the VAS of patients was 2.63 ± 0.78 (VAS I) and 1.70 ± 0.85 (VAS II). There was no statistically significant difference in term of VAS I between group A and B. A statistically significant difference was determined in terms of VAS II between group A and B. There was no statistically significant difference in term of VAS between group B and C. Conclusions: The most effective of the three methods for pain control we used was intrarectal local anesthetic administration and lidocaine local spray 15% that enables an ideal patient comfort.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
4 |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| container_title |
Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia |
| container_volume |
88 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792329267685621764 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T13:06:27.857Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Transrectal+ultrasound+%28TRUS%29+guided+prostate+biopsy%3A+Three+different+types+of+local+anesthesia&rft.date=2016-12-30&genre=article&issn=1124-3562&volume=88&issue=4&pages=308&jtitle=Archivio+Italiano+di+Urologia+e+Andrologia&atitle=Transrectal+ultrasound+%28TRUS%29+guided+prostate+biopsy%3A+Three+different+types+of+local+anesthesia&aulast=Magno&aufirst=Carlo&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.4081%2Faiua.2016.4.308&rft.language%5B0%5D=und |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792329267685621764 |
| author | Anastasi, Giuseppina, Subba, Enrica, Pappalardo, Rosa, Macchione, Luciano, Ricotta, Gioacchino, Muscarà, Graziella, Lembo, Francesco, Magno, Carlo |
| author_facet | Anastasi, Giuseppina, Subba, Enrica, Pappalardo, Rosa, Macchione, Luciano, Ricotta, Gioacchino, Muscarà, Graziella, Lembo, Francesco, Magno, Carlo, Anastasi, Giuseppina, Subba, Enrica, Pappalardo, Rosa, Macchione, Luciano, Ricotta, Gioacchino, Muscarà, Graziella, Lembo, Francesco, Magno, Carlo |
| author_sort | anastasi, giuseppina |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 0 |
| container_title | Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia |
| container_volume | 88 |
| description | <jats:p>Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy is regarded as the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis. The majority of patients perceive TRUS-guided prostate biopsy as a physically and psychologically traumatic experience. We aimed to compare in this paper the efficacy of three different anesthesia techniques to control the pain during the procedure. Materials and methods: 150 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy were randomly divided into three groups. Group A included 50 patients who received one hour before the procedure a mixture of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine, Group B: 50 patients who received intrarectal local anesthetic administration (lidocaine 5 ml 10%) and lidocaine local spray 15 % and Group C included 50 patients who received periprostatic block anesthesia (lidocaine 10 ml 10%). Visual analogue scale (VAS) of patients in different groups was evaluated at the end of the biopsy and 30 minutes after the procedure. Results: The VAS of patients in Group A was 1.32 ± 0.65 (VAS I) and 2.47 ± 0.80 (VAS II). In group B the VAS of patients was 1.09 ± 0.47 (VAS I) and 1.65 ± 0.61 (VAS II). In group C the VAS of patients was 2.63 ± 0.78 (VAS I) and 1.70 ± 0.85 (VAS II). There was no statistically significant difference in term of VAS I between group A and B. A statistically significant difference was determined in terms of VAS II between group A and B. There was no statistically significant difference in term of VAS between group B and C. Conclusions: The most effective of the three methods for pain control we used was intrarectal local anesthetic administration and lidocaine local spray 15% that enables an ideal patient comfort.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4081/aiua.2016.4.308 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuNDA4MS9haXVhLjIwMTYuNC4zMDg |
| imprint | PAGEPress Publications, 2016 |
| imprint_str_mv | PAGEPress Publications, 2016 |
| institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
| issn | 2282-4197, 1124-3562 |
| issn_str_mv | 2282-4197, 1124-3562 |
| language | Undetermined |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T13:06:27.857Z |
| match_str | anastasi2016transrectalultrasoundtrusguidedprostatebiopsythreedifferenttypesoflocalanesthesia |
| mega_collection | PAGEPress Publications (CrossRef) |
| physical | 308 |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | PAGEPress Publications |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Anastasi, Giuseppina Subba, Enrica Pappalardo, Rosa Macchione, Luciano Ricotta, Gioacchino Muscarà, Graziella Lembo, Francesco Magno, Carlo 2282-4197 1124-3562 PAGEPress Publications Urology http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2016.4.308 <jats:p>Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy is regarded as the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis. The majority of patients perceive TRUS-guided prostate biopsy as a physically and psychologically traumatic experience. We aimed to compare in this paper the efficacy of three different anesthesia techniques to control the pain during the procedure. Materials and methods: 150 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy were randomly divided into three groups. Group A included 50 patients who received one hour before the procedure a mixture of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine, Group B: 50 patients who received intrarectal local anesthetic administration (lidocaine 5 ml 10%) and lidocaine local spray 15 % and Group C included 50 patients who received periprostatic block anesthesia (lidocaine 10 ml 10%). Visual analogue scale (VAS) of patients in different groups was evaluated at the end of the biopsy and 30 minutes after the procedure. Results: The VAS of patients in Group A was 1.32 ± 0.65 (VAS I) and 2.47 ± 0.80 (VAS II). In group B the VAS of patients was 1.09 ± 0.47 (VAS I) and 1.65 ± 0.61 (VAS II). In group C the VAS of patients was 2.63 ± 0.78 (VAS I) and 1.70 ± 0.85 (VAS II). There was no statistically significant difference in term of VAS I between group A and B. A statistically significant difference was determined in terms of VAS II between group A and B. There was no statistically significant difference in term of VAS between group B and C. Conclusions: The most effective of the three methods for pain control we used was intrarectal local anesthetic administration and lidocaine local spray 15% that enables an ideal patient comfort.</jats:p> Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia |
| spellingShingle | Anastasi, Giuseppina, Subba, Enrica, Pappalardo, Rosa, Macchione, Luciano, Ricotta, Gioacchino, Muscarà, Graziella, Lembo, Francesco, Magno, Carlo, Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia, Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia, Urology |
| title | Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_full | Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_fullStr | Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_full_unstemmed | Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_short | Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_sort | transrectal ultrasound (trus) guided prostate biopsy: three different types of local anesthesia |
| title_unstemmed | Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy: Three different types of local anesthesia |
| topic | Urology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2016.4.308 |