Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Informal Logic |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Informal Logic, 26, 2008, 3, S. 259 |
Format: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Unbestimmt |
veröffentlicht: |
University of Windsor Leddy Library
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Blair, J. Anthony Blair, J. Anthony |
---|---|
author |
Blair, J. Anthony |
spellingShingle |
Blair, J. Anthony Informal Logic Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction Philosophy |
author_sort |
blair, j. anthony |
spelling |
Blair, J. Anthony 0824-2577 0824-2577 University of Windsor Leddy Library Philosophy http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v26i3.454 <jats:p>Informal logic began in the 1970s as a critique of then-current theoretical assumptions in the teaching of argument analysis and evaluation in philosophy departments in the U.S. and Canada. The last 35 years have seen significant developments in informal logic and critical thinking theory. The paper is a pilot study of the influence of these advances in theory on what is taught in courses on argument analysis and critical thinking in U.S. and Canadian philosophy departments. Its finding, provisional and much-qualified, is that the theoretical developments and refinements have had limited impact on instruction in leading philosophy departments.</jats:p> Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction Informal Logic |
doi_str_mv |
10.22329/il.v26i3.454 |
facet_avail |
Online Free |
finc_class_facet |
Philosophie |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjIzMjkvaWwudjI2aTMuNDU0 |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjIzMjkvaWwudjI2aTMuNDU0 |
institution |
DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 |
imprint |
University of Windsor Leddy Library, 2008 |
imprint_str_mv |
University of Windsor Leddy Library, 2008 |
issn |
0824-2577 |
issn_str_mv |
0824-2577 |
language |
Undetermined |
mega_collection |
University of Windsor Leddy Library (CrossRef) |
match_str |
blair2008informallogicsinfluenceonphilosophyinstruction |
publishDateSort |
2008 |
publisher |
University of Windsor Leddy Library |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Informal Logic |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
title_unstemmed |
Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
title_full |
Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
title_fullStr |
Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
title_short |
Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
title_sort |
informal logic’s influence on philosophy instruction |
topic |
Philosophy |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v26i3.454 |
publishDate |
2008 |
physical |
259 |
description |
<jats:p>Informal logic began in the 1970s as a critique of then-current theoretical assumptions in the teaching of argument analysis and evaluation in philosophy departments in the U.S. and Canada. The last 35 years have seen significant developments in informal logic and critical thinking theory. The paper is a pilot study of the influence of these advances in theory on what is taught in courses on argument analysis and critical thinking in U.S. and Canadian philosophy departments. Its finding, provisional and much-qualified, is that the theoretical developments and refinements have had limited impact on instruction in leading philosophy departments.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
0 |
container_title |
Informal Logic |
container_volume |
26 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792326418113232902 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T12:21:11.335Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Informal+Logic%E2%80%99s+Influence+on+Philosophy+Instruction&rft.date=2008-02-28&genre=article&issn=0824-2577&volume=26&issue=3&pages=259&jtitle=Informal+Logic&atitle=Informal+Logic%E2%80%99s+Influence+on+Philosophy+Instruction&aulast=Blair&aufirst=J.+Anthony&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.22329%2Fil.v26i3.454&rft.language%5B0%5D=und |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792326418113232902 |
author | Blair, J. Anthony |
author_facet | Blair, J. Anthony, Blair, J. Anthony |
author_sort | blair, j. anthony |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 0 |
container_title | Informal Logic |
container_volume | 26 |
description | <jats:p>Informal logic began in the 1970s as a critique of then-current theoretical assumptions in the teaching of argument analysis and evaluation in philosophy departments in the U.S. and Canada. The last 35 years have seen significant developments in informal logic and critical thinking theory. The paper is a pilot study of the influence of these advances in theory on what is taught in courses on argument analysis and critical thinking in U.S. and Canadian philosophy departments. Its finding, provisional and much-qualified, is that the theoretical developments and refinements have had limited impact on instruction in leading philosophy departments.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.22329/il.v26i3.454 |
facet_avail | Online, Free |
finc_class_facet | Philosophie |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjIzMjkvaWwudjI2aTMuNDU0 |
imprint | University of Windsor Leddy Library, 2008 |
imprint_str_mv | University of Windsor Leddy Library, 2008 |
institution | DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1 |
issn | 0824-2577 |
issn_str_mv | 0824-2577 |
language | Undetermined |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T12:21:11.335Z |
match_str | blair2008informallogicsinfluenceonphilosophyinstruction |
mega_collection | University of Windsor Leddy Library (CrossRef) |
physical | 259 |
publishDate | 2008 |
publishDateSort | 2008 |
publisher | University of Windsor Leddy Library |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Informal Logic |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Blair, J. Anthony 0824-2577 0824-2577 University of Windsor Leddy Library Philosophy http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v26i3.454 <jats:p>Informal logic began in the 1970s as a critique of then-current theoretical assumptions in the teaching of argument analysis and evaluation in philosophy departments in the U.S. and Canada. The last 35 years have seen significant developments in informal logic and critical thinking theory. The paper is a pilot study of the influence of these advances in theory on what is taught in courses on argument analysis and critical thinking in U.S. and Canadian philosophy departments. Its finding, provisional and much-qualified, is that the theoretical developments and refinements have had limited impact on instruction in leading philosophy departments.</jats:p> Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction Informal Logic |
spellingShingle | Blair, J. Anthony, Informal Logic, Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction, Philosophy |
title | Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
title_full | Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
title_fullStr | Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
title_short | Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
title_sort | informal logic’s influence on philosophy instruction |
title_unstemmed | Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction |
topic | Philosophy |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v26i3.454 |