author_facet Adler, N E
Milstein, A
Adler, N E
Milstein, A
author Adler, N E
Milstein, A
spellingShingle Adler, N E
Milstein, A
American Journal of Public Health
Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
author_sort adler, n e
spelling Adler, N E Milstein, A 0090-0036 1541-0048 American Public Health Association Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.73.10.1182 <jats:p> A five-component measurement method was developed and applied to the 1981 impact statements of 30 Professional Standards Review Organizations (PSROs) by four blind raters familiar with the PSRO program. High inter-rater reliability (.95) was achieved. Rater's scores for each PSRO were then averaged and regressed against five variables predicted to affect PSRO impact: geographical density of PSROs; PSRO affiliation with a medical society; surgical necessity review; use of data profiles; and pre-existing Medicare hospitalization rates. As a set, the variables accounted for 44 per cent of the variance in PSRO performance (p less than .05). When entered in stepwise regression, geographical density and use of surgical necessity review accounted for the largest share of the variance. The findings are believed to reflect the recency of PSRO motivation to demonstrate significant impact, and the value of surgical necessity review as an indicator of PSRO courage to risk unpleasant backlash from their medical communities. </jats:p> Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs. American Journal of Public Health
doi_str_mv 10.2105/ajph.73.10.1182
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEwNS9hanBoLjczLjEwLjExODI
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEwNS9hanBoLjczLjEwLjExODI
institution DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
imprint American Public Health Association, 1983
imprint_str_mv American Public Health Association, 1983
issn 1541-0048
0090-0036
issn_str_mv 1541-0048
0090-0036
language English
mega_collection American Public Health Association (CrossRef)
match_str adler1983evaluatingtheimpactofphysicianpeerreviewfactorsassociatedwithsuccessfulpsros
publishDateSort 1983
publisher American Public Health Association
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series American Journal of Public Health
source_id 49
title Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
title_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
title_full Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
title_fullStr Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
title_short Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
title_sort evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful psros.
topic Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.73.10.1182
publishDate 1983
physical 1182-1185
description <jats:p> A five-component measurement method was developed and applied to the 1981 impact statements of 30 Professional Standards Review Organizations (PSROs) by four blind raters familiar with the PSRO program. High inter-rater reliability (.95) was achieved. Rater's scores for each PSRO were then averaged and regressed against five variables predicted to affect PSRO impact: geographical density of PSROs; PSRO affiliation with a medical society; surgical necessity review; use of data profiles; and pre-existing Medicare hospitalization rates. As a set, the variables accounted for 44 per cent of the variance in PSRO performance (p less than .05). When entered in stepwise regression, geographical density and use of surgical necessity review accounted for the largest share of the variance. The findings are believed to reflect the recency of PSRO motivation to demonstrate significant impact, and the value of surgical necessity review as an indicator of PSRO courage to risk unpleasant backlash from their medical communities. </jats:p>
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1182
container_title American Journal of Public Health
container_volume 73
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792333654998908942
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:16:09.902Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Evaluating+the+impact+of+physician+peer+review%3A+factors+associated+with+successful+PSROs.&rft.date=1983-10-01&genre=article&issn=1541-0048&volume=73&issue=10&spage=1182&epage=1185&pages=1182-1185&jtitle=American+Journal+of+Public+Health&atitle=Evaluating+the+impact+of+physician+peer+review%3A+factors+associated+with+successful+PSROs.&aulast=Milstein&aufirst=A&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2105%2Fajph.73.10.1182&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792333654998908942
author Adler, N E, Milstein, A
author_facet Adler, N E, Milstein, A, Adler, N E, Milstein, A
author_sort adler, n e
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1182
container_title American Journal of Public Health
container_volume 73
description <jats:p> A five-component measurement method was developed and applied to the 1981 impact statements of 30 Professional Standards Review Organizations (PSROs) by four blind raters familiar with the PSRO program. High inter-rater reliability (.95) was achieved. Rater's scores for each PSRO were then averaged and regressed against five variables predicted to affect PSRO impact: geographical density of PSROs; PSRO affiliation with a medical society; surgical necessity review; use of data profiles; and pre-existing Medicare hospitalization rates. As a set, the variables accounted for 44 per cent of the variance in PSRO performance (p less than .05). When entered in stepwise regression, geographical density and use of surgical necessity review accounted for the largest share of the variance. The findings are believed to reflect the recency of PSRO motivation to demonstrate significant impact, and the value of surgical necessity review as an indicator of PSRO courage to risk unpleasant backlash from their medical communities. </jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.2105/ajph.73.10.1182
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjEwNS9hanBoLjczLjEwLjExODI
imprint American Public Health Association, 1983
imprint_str_mv American Public Health Association, 1983
institution DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3
issn 1541-0048, 0090-0036
issn_str_mv 1541-0048, 0090-0036
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:16:09.902Z
match_str adler1983evaluatingtheimpactofphysicianpeerreviewfactorsassociatedwithsuccessfulpsros
mega_collection American Public Health Association (CrossRef)
physical 1182-1185
publishDate 1983
publishDateSort 1983
publisher American Public Health Association
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series American Journal of Public Health
source_id 49
spelling Adler, N E Milstein, A 0090-0036 1541-0048 American Public Health Association Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.73.10.1182 <jats:p> A five-component measurement method was developed and applied to the 1981 impact statements of 30 Professional Standards Review Organizations (PSROs) by four blind raters familiar with the PSRO program. High inter-rater reliability (.95) was achieved. Rater's scores for each PSRO were then averaged and regressed against five variables predicted to affect PSRO impact: geographical density of PSROs; PSRO affiliation with a medical society; surgical necessity review; use of data profiles; and pre-existing Medicare hospitalization rates. As a set, the variables accounted for 44 per cent of the variance in PSRO performance (p less than .05). When entered in stepwise regression, geographical density and use of surgical necessity review accounted for the largest share of the variance. The findings are believed to reflect the recency of PSRO motivation to demonstrate significant impact, and the value of surgical necessity review as an indicator of PSRO courage to risk unpleasant backlash from their medical communities. </jats:p> Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs. American Journal of Public Health
spellingShingle Adler, N E, Milstein, A, American Journal of Public Health, Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs., Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
title Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
title_full Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
title_fullStr Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
title_short Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
title_sort evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful psros.
title_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.
topic Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.73.10.1182