author_facet Turner, Mark
Turner, Mark
author Turner, Mark
spellingShingle Turner, Mark
Veterinary Evidence
Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
author_sort turner, mark
spelling Turner, Mark 2396-9776 RCVS Knowledge http://dx.doi.org/10.18849/ve.v1i4.69 <jats:p>In human medicine, the management of care to ensure safety for the service-user constitutes an important element of the patient ‘journey.’ The name given to this discipline is patient safety. It is founded upon those elements of good medical practice which help avoid or mitigate human error. Investigations in the U.S. first highlighted the alarming extent of medical error: Brennan et al. (1991) concluded that in the state of New York, the overall rate of adverse events was approximately 4% for hospitalised patients, which equated to over 13,000 deaths a year. Doctors looked to other safety critical industries and aviation in particular (Reason 1995), to address this phenomenon: there is now a wealth of research on the impact of various safety initiatives on measurable rates of harm. The World Health Organisation’s ‘Safe Surgery Saves Lives’ initiative - a campaign that advocates the use of a surgical checklist to standardise aspects of peri-operative care - is one example of aviation methodology successfully employed in a clinical setting (van Klei et al. 2012). The critical importance of effective communication, leadership and situational awareness has also been discussed at length in the human patient safety literature.ObjectivesVeterinary patient safety is an analogous discipline and researchers have attempted to understand more about the topic of veterinary medical error. However, the evidence-base for veterinary patient safety is sparse. This presentation aims to summarise the evidence to date and highlight the benefits in practice of an emerging subject. MethodA search of the terms veterinary patient safety on the PubMed database from 1990 to 2016 was performed.Findings15 articles were identified as contributing to the veterinary patient safety literature.OutcomeThe available literature has addressed a number of areas. The use of checklists in a clinical setting has been proven to reduce the incidence of specific undesirable events: alterations to a standard anaesthetic protocol in light of a clinical audit led to a demonstrable improvement in one North American university hospital (Hofmeister et al. 2014).Research into the progenitors of mistakes in practice reveal the effect of poor communication and a lack of team work (Kinnison et al. 2015). Research has also investigated vets’ attitudes toward error and their experiences of it. The psychological precursors to error in our industry seem to mirror those found in human medicine (Oxtoby et al. 2015). The evidence supporting a new attitude and approach to veterinary patient safety is growing.</jats:p> Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice Veterinary Evidence
doi_str_mv 10.18849/ve.v1i4.69
facet_avail Online
Free
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTg4NDkvdmUudjFpNC42OQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTg4NDkvdmUudjFpNC42OQ
institution DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
imprint RCVS Knowledge, 2016
imprint_str_mv RCVS Knowledge, 2016
issn 2396-9776
issn_str_mv 2396-9776
language Undetermined
mega_collection RCVS Knowledge (CrossRef)
match_str turner2016mistakeserrorsandfoulupspracticebasedevidenceforevidencebasedpractice
publishDateSort 2016
publisher RCVS Knowledge
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Veterinary Evidence
source_id 49
title Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_unstemmed Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_full Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_fullStr Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_full_unstemmed Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_short Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_sort mistakes, errors and foul-ups: practice-based evidence for evidence based practice
url http://dx.doi.org/10.18849/ve.v1i4.69
publishDate 2016
physical
description <jats:p>In human medicine, the management of care to ensure safety for the service-user constitutes an important element of the patient ‘journey.’ The name given to this discipline is patient safety. It is founded upon those elements of good medical practice which help avoid or mitigate human error.  Investigations in the U.S. first highlighted the alarming extent of medical error: Brennan et al. (1991) concluded that in the state of New York, the overall rate of adverse events was approximately 4% for hospitalised patients, which equated to over 13,000 deaths a year. Doctors looked to other safety critical industries and aviation in particular (Reason 1995), to address this phenomenon: there is now a wealth of research on the impact of various safety initiatives on measurable rates of harm. The World Health Organisation’s ‘Safe Surgery Saves Lives’ initiative - a campaign that advocates the use of a surgical checklist to standardise aspects of peri-operative care - is one example of aviation methodology successfully employed in a clinical setting (van Klei et al. 2012). The critical importance of effective communication, leadership and situational awareness has also been discussed at length in the human patient safety literature.ObjectivesVeterinary patient safety is an analogous discipline and researchers have attempted to understand more about the topic of veterinary medical error. However, the evidence-base for veterinary patient safety is sparse.  This presentation aims to summarise the evidence to date and highlight the benefits in practice of an emerging subject. MethodA search of the terms veterinary patient safety on the PubMed database from 1990 to 2016 was performed.Findings15 articles were identified as contributing to the veterinary patient safety literature.OutcomeThe available literature has addressed a number of areas. The use of checklists in a clinical setting has been proven to reduce the incidence of specific undesirable events: alterations to a standard anaesthetic protocol in light of a clinical audit led to a demonstrable improvement in one North American university hospital (Hofmeister et al. 2014).Research into the progenitors of mistakes in practice reveal the effect of poor communication and a lack of team work (Kinnison et al. 2015). Research has also investigated vets’ attitudes toward error and their experiences of it. The psychological precursors to error in our industry seem to mirror those found in human medicine (Oxtoby et al. 2015). The evidence supporting a new attitude and approach to veterinary patient safety is growing.</jats:p>
container_issue 4
container_start_page 0
container_title Veterinary Evidence
container_volume 1
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792326449115430915
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:21:40.972Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Mistakes%2C+Errors+and+Foul-Ups%3A+Practice-Based+Evidence+for+Evidence+Based+Practice&rft.date=2016-11-23&genre=article&issn=2396-9776&volume=1&issue=4&jtitle=Veterinary+Evidence&atitle=Mistakes%2C+Errors+and+Foul-Ups%3A+Practice-Based+Evidence+for+Evidence+Based+Practice&aulast=Turner&aufirst=Mark&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.18849%2Fve.v1i4.69&rft.language%5B0%5D=und
SOLR
_version_ 1792326449115430915
author Turner, Mark
author_facet Turner, Mark, Turner, Mark
author_sort turner, mark
container_issue 4
container_start_page 0
container_title Veterinary Evidence
container_volume 1
description <jats:p>In human medicine, the management of care to ensure safety for the service-user constitutes an important element of the patient ‘journey.’ The name given to this discipline is patient safety. It is founded upon those elements of good medical practice which help avoid or mitigate human error.  Investigations in the U.S. first highlighted the alarming extent of medical error: Brennan et al. (1991) concluded that in the state of New York, the overall rate of adverse events was approximately 4% for hospitalised patients, which equated to over 13,000 deaths a year. Doctors looked to other safety critical industries and aviation in particular (Reason 1995), to address this phenomenon: there is now a wealth of research on the impact of various safety initiatives on measurable rates of harm. The World Health Organisation’s ‘Safe Surgery Saves Lives’ initiative - a campaign that advocates the use of a surgical checklist to standardise aspects of peri-operative care - is one example of aviation methodology successfully employed in a clinical setting (van Klei et al. 2012). The critical importance of effective communication, leadership and situational awareness has also been discussed at length in the human patient safety literature.ObjectivesVeterinary patient safety is an analogous discipline and researchers have attempted to understand more about the topic of veterinary medical error. However, the evidence-base for veterinary patient safety is sparse.  This presentation aims to summarise the evidence to date and highlight the benefits in practice of an emerging subject. MethodA search of the terms veterinary patient safety on the PubMed database from 1990 to 2016 was performed.Findings15 articles were identified as contributing to the veterinary patient safety literature.OutcomeThe available literature has addressed a number of areas. The use of checklists in a clinical setting has been proven to reduce the incidence of specific undesirable events: alterations to a standard anaesthetic protocol in light of a clinical audit led to a demonstrable improvement in one North American university hospital (Hofmeister et al. 2014).Research into the progenitors of mistakes in practice reveal the effect of poor communication and a lack of team work (Kinnison et al. 2015). Research has also investigated vets’ attitudes toward error and their experiences of it. The psychological precursors to error in our industry seem to mirror those found in human medicine (Oxtoby et al. 2015). The evidence supporting a new attitude and approach to veterinary patient safety is growing.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.18849/ve.v1i4.69
facet_avail Online, Free
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTg4NDkvdmUudjFpNC42OQ
imprint RCVS Knowledge, 2016
imprint_str_mv RCVS Knowledge, 2016
institution DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1
issn 2396-9776
issn_str_mv 2396-9776
language Undetermined
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:21:40.972Z
match_str turner2016mistakeserrorsandfoulupspracticebasedevidenceforevidencebasedpractice
mega_collection RCVS Knowledge (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher RCVS Knowledge
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Veterinary Evidence
source_id 49
spelling Turner, Mark 2396-9776 RCVS Knowledge http://dx.doi.org/10.18849/ve.v1i4.69 <jats:p>In human medicine, the management of care to ensure safety for the service-user constitutes an important element of the patient ‘journey.’ The name given to this discipline is patient safety. It is founded upon those elements of good medical practice which help avoid or mitigate human error. Investigations in the U.S. first highlighted the alarming extent of medical error: Brennan et al. (1991) concluded that in the state of New York, the overall rate of adverse events was approximately 4% for hospitalised patients, which equated to over 13,000 deaths a year. Doctors looked to other safety critical industries and aviation in particular (Reason 1995), to address this phenomenon: there is now a wealth of research on the impact of various safety initiatives on measurable rates of harm. The World Health Organisation’s ‘Safe Surgery Saves Lives’ initiative - a campaign that advocates the use of a surgical checklist to standardise aspects of peri-operative care - is one example of aviation methodology successfully employed in a clinical setting (van Klei et al. 2012). The critical importance of effective communication, leadership and situational awareness has also been discussed at length in the human patient safety literature.ObjectivesVeterinary patient safety is an analogous discipline and researchers have attempted to understand more about the topic of veterinary medical error. However, the evidence-base for veterinary patient safety is sparse. This presentation aims to summarise the evidence to date and highlight the benefits in practice of an emerging subject. MethodA search of the terms veterinary patient safety on the PubMed database from 1990 to 2016 was performed.Findings15 articles were identified as contributing to the veterinary patient safety literature.OutcomeThe available literature has addressed a number of areas. The use of checklists in a clinical setting has been proven to reduce the incidence of specific undesirable events: alterations to a standard anaesthetic protocol in light of a clinical audit led to a demonstrable improvement in one North American university hospital (Hofmeister et al. 2014).Research into the progenitors of mistakes in practice reveal the effect of poor communication and a lack of team work (Kinnison et al. 2015). Research has also investigated vets’ attitudes toward error and their experiences of it. The psychological precursors to error in our industry seem to mirror those found in human medicine (Oxtoby et al. 2015). The evidence supporting a new attitude and approach to veterinary patient safety is growing.</jats:p> Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice Veterinary Evidence
spellingShingle Turner, Mark, Veterinary Evidence, Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_full Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_fullStr Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_full_unstemmed Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_short Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_sort mistakes, errors and foul-ups: practice-based evidence for evidence based practice
title_unstemmed Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
url http://dx.doi.org/10.18849/ve.v1i4.69