author_facet Kiselev, Mikhail
Kiselev, Mikhail
author Kiselev, Mikhail
spellingShingle Kiselev, Mikhail
Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review
Carl Schmitt in the USSR
General Social Sciences
author_sort kiselev, mikhail
spelling Kiselev, Mikhail 1728-192X National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE) General Social Sciences http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2020-2-276-309 <jats:p>The article is devoted to the problem of the perception in the USSR of C. Schmitt and his works. It is shown that the Russian Empire paid attention to and criticized Schmitt’s 1912 work Law and Judgment. Soviet readers in the 1920s–1940s were already acquainted with the content of Schmitt’s key works such as Political Romanticism, Dictatorship, The Historical and Spiritual State of Modern Parliamentarism, Political Theology, The Concept of Political, The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations, and On the Three Types of Juristic Thought, and a discussion of these works was a part of the intellectual life of the USSR in the 1920s–1940s. Moreover, Soviet Marxist-theorists of law, while criticizing Schmitt’s ideas, agreed with some of his ideas regarding the criticism of the bourgeois state and law until 1933. However, after 1933, Schmitt’s works in the USSR turned into an object of harsh criticism, and he himself was proclaimed a key fascist theoretician of state and law. Since the late 1940s, because of the so-called struggle with “cosmopolitanism”, Schmitt’s works received less attention. In the 1950s–1970s, Schmitt’s works appeared only in some critical statements, and the works of Soviet authors of the 1920s-1940s about Schmitt actually fell into oblivion. A new wave of interest in Schmitt began only in the second half of the 1980s, and his works can already be considered in the context of the intellectual history of modern Russia.</jats:p> Carl Schmitt in the USSR Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review
doi_str_mv 10.17323/1728-192x-2020-2-276-309
facet_avail Online
Free
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTczMjMvMTcyOC0xOTJ4LTIwMjAtMi0yNzYtMzA5
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTczMjMvMTcyOC0xOTJ4LTIwMjAtMi0yNzYtMzA5
institution DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
imprint National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE), 2020
imprint_str_mv National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE), 2020
issn 1728-192X
issn_str_mv 1728-192X
language Undetermined
mega_collection National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE) (CrossRef)
match_str kiselev2020carlschmittintheussr
publishDateSort 2020
publisher National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review
source_id 49
title Carl Schmitt in the USSR
title_unstemmed Carl Schmitt in the USSR
title_full Carl Schmitt in the USSR
title_fullStr Carl Schmitt in the USSR
title_full_unstemmed Carl Schmitt in the USSR
title_short Carl Schmitt in the USSR
title_sort carl schmitt in the ussr
topic General Social Sciences
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2020-2-276-309
publishDate 2020
physical 276-309
description <jats:p>The article is devoted to the problem of the perception in the USSR of C. Schmitt and his works. It is shown that the Russian Empire paid attention to and criticized Schmitt’s 1912 work Law and Judgment. Soviet readers in the 1920s–1940s were already acquainted with the content of Schmitt’s key works such as Political Romanticism, Dictatorship, The Historical and Spiritual State of Modern Parliamentarism, Political Theology, The Concept of Political, The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations, and On the Three Types of Juristic Thought, and a discussion of these works was a part of the intellectual life of the USSR in the 1920s–1940s. Moreover, Soviet Marxist-theorists of law, while criticizing Schmitt’s ideas, agreed with some of his ideas regarding the criticism of the bourgeois state and law until 1933. However, after 1933, Schmitt’s works in the USSR turned into an object of harsh criticism, and he himself was proclaimed a key fascist theoretician of state and law. Since the late 1940s, because of the so-called struggle with “cosmopolitanism”, Schmitt’s works received less attention. In the 1950s–1970s, Schmitt’s works appeared only in some critical statements, and the works of Soviet authors of the 1920s-1940s about Schmitt actually fell into oblivion. A new wave of interest in Schmitt began only in the second half of the 1980s, and his works can already be considered in the context of the intellectual history of modern Russia.</jats:p>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 276
container_title Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review
container_volume 19
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792327009061306377
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:30:33.274Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Carl+Schmitt+in+the+USSR&rft.date=2020-01-01&genre=article&issn=1728-192X&volume=19&issue=2&spage=276&epage=309&pages=276-309&jtitle=Sotsiologicheskoe+Obozrenie+%2F+Russian+Sociological+Review&atitle=Carl+Schmitt+in+the+USSR&aulast=Kiselev&aufirst=Mikhail&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.17323%2F1728-192x-2020-2-276-309&rft.language%5B0%5D=und
SOLR
_version_ 1792327009061306377
author Kiselev, Mikhail
author_facet Kiselev, Mikhail, Kiselev, Mikhail
author_sort kiselev, mikhail
container_issue 2
container_start_page 276
container_title Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review
container_volume 19
description <jats:p>The article is devoted to the problem of the perception in the USSR of C. Schmitt and his works. It is shown that the Russian Empire paid attention to and criticized Schmitt’s 1912 work Law and Judgment. Soviet readers in the 1920s–1940s were already acquainted with the content of Schmitt’s key works such as Political Romanticism, Dictatorship, The Historical and Spiritual State of Modern Parliamentarism, Political Theology, The Concept of Political, The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations, and On the Three Types of Juristic Thought, and a discussion of these works was a part of the intellectual life of the USSR in the 1920s–1940s. Moreover, Soviet Marxist-theorists of law, while criticizing Schmitt’s ideas, agreed with some of his ideas regarding the criticism of the bourgeois state and law until 1933. However, after 1933, Schmitt’s works in the USSR turned into an object of harsh criticism, and he himself was proclaimed a key fascist theoretician of state and law. Since the late 1940s, because of the so-called struggle with “cosmopolitanism”, Schmitt’s works received less attention. In the 1950s–1970s, Schmitt’s works appeared only in some critical statements, and the works of Soviet authors of the 1920s-1940s about Schmitt actually fell into oblivion. A new wave of interest in Schmitt began only in the second half of the 1980s, and his works can already be considered in the context of the intellectual history of modern Russia.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.17323/1728-192x-2020-2-276-309
facet_avail Online, Free
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTczMjMvMTcyOC0xOTJ4LTIwMjAtMi0yNzYtMzA5
imprint National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE), 2020
imprint_str_mv National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE), 2020
institution DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1
issn 1728-192X
issn_str_mv 1728-192X
language Undetermined
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:30:33.274Z
match_str kiselev2020carlschmittintheussr
mega_collection National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE) (CrossRef)
physical 276-309
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review
source_id 49
spelling Kiselev, Mikhail 1728-192X National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE) General Social Sciences http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2020-2-276-309 <jats:p>The article is devoted to the problem of the perception in the USSR of C. Schmitt and his works. It is shown that the Russian Empire paid attention to and criticized Schmitt’s 1912 work Law and Judgment. Soviet readers in the 1920s–1940s were already acquainted with the content of Schmitt’s key works such as Political Romanticism, Dictatorship, The Historical and Spiritual State of Modern Parliamentarism, Political Theology, The Concept of Political, The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations, and On the Three Types of Juristic Thought, and a discussion of these works was a part of the intellectual life of the USSR in the 1920s–1940s. Moreover, Soviet Marxist-theorists of law, while criticizing Schmitt’s ideas, agreed with some of his ideas regarding the criticism of the bourgeois state and law until 1933. However, after 1933, Schmitt’s works in the USSR turned into an object of harsh criticism, and he himself was proclaimed a key fascist theoretician of state and law. Since the late 1940s, because of the so-called struggle with “cosmopolitanism”, Schmitt’s works received less attention. In the 1950s–1970s, Schmitt’s works appeared only in some critical statements, and the works of Soviet authors of the 1920s-1940s about Schmitt actually fell into oblivion. A new wave of interest in Schmitt began only in the second half of the 1980s, and his works can already be considered in the context of the intellectual history of modern Russia.</jats:p> Carl Schmitt in the USSR Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review
spellingShingle Kiselev, Mikhail, Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review, Carl Schmitt in the USSR, General Social Sciences
title Carl Schmitt in the USSR
title_full Carl Schmitt in the USSR
title_fullStr Carl Schmitt in the USSR
title_full_unstemmed Carl Schmitt in the USSR
title_short Carl Schmitt in the USSR
title_sort carl schmitt in the ussr
title_unstemmed Carl Schmitt in the USSR
topic General Social Sciences
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2020-2-276-309