author_facet Yang, P.
Yang, P.
author Yang, P.
spellingShingle Yang, P.
The Education and science journal
Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Education
author_sort yang, p.
spelling Yang, P. 2310-5828 1994-5639 Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Education http://dx.doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-2-78-97 <jats:p><jats:italic>Introduction.</jats:italic> The concept of outcomes-based education (OBE) was first put forward in 1981 by the educator W. Spady, and has been widely valued and applied in a rapid speed. During the next 10 years, OBE has formed a relatively complete theoretical system and became the mainstream ideas of national education reform in the United States, Britain, Canada and other counties. At present, the technology and tools of OBE, despite the criticism, remain relevant for the development and optimisation of the humanities education system.</jats:p><jats:p>The <jats:italic>aim</jats:italic> of the present research is to study and analyse the theory of OBE and the practice on the application of pedagogical principles for modernisation of the humanities education in China.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Results and scientific novelty.</jats:italic> Chinese education certification system has made notable progress in recent years. More universities and colleges are pursuing a quality improvement strategy focused on three main components – learning outcomes, student personality and continuous improvement. OBE establishes the same priorities; OBE is considered as a special type of effective pedagogical design. The features of this model implementation are briefly described – the structure of the training process, its stages and characteristics. The opportunities for improving humanities education based on OBE framework were considered. The OBE operates within the framework of the following core issues: the things students learn and the extent of student success, not the manner of learning; the place, the time of learning and the duration of training.</jats:p><jats:p>OBE process implies ultimate involvement of students’ individual cognitive abilities to master competencies, which help adapt to future life. The knowledge of actual material (content of the programme) is not the key element of the education process, but the skills of knowledge application are important when solving specific tasks. The curricula, educational process, its methods, tools are adjusted, rebuilt and replaced if they do not contribute to the development of such skills, e. g. the results of the training determine its system and act not as a goal, but as a means of achieving it. The structure of results manages all educational activities, and their evaluation is carried out according to clear initially defined criteria, combined with flexible personalised requirements in order to get students to fully self-realise personal potential during a training course. To improve the initial design of curriculum, it is necessary to provide constant feedback “student-teacher”. The teacher has to organise and focus the learning process to give each student confidence in the acquired experience and to guarantee his or her success in further professional activities and life in general.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Practical significance.</jats:italic> The OBE concept fully complies with the needs and demands of modern society and modern people – it is no coincidence that such training has become one of the most popular forms of education in many countries, including the field of the humanities education in China. The present research leads to the conclusion that in the humanities field, notably in the teaching of foreign languages, a significant improvement in the quality of training of students can be achieved through the use of OBE teaching tools. In this model of training, practice is more important than theory. Moreover, this model assumes understanding to be more valuable than memory; the traditional “cramming” of educational information by students can be completely excluded; also, such model provides an opportunity to establish a continuous productive dialogue between the participants of educational process and to transform a classroom into a laboratory. The student becomes an active, self-motivated and responsible actor of his or her own individual educational trajectory, not a passive consumer of information, and the teacher – active assistant and coordinator of education.</jats:p> Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE) The Education and science journal
doi_str_mv 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-2-78-97
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Pädagogik
Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTc4NTMvMTk5NC01NjM5LTIwMjAtMi03OC05Nw
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTc4NTMvMTk5NC01NjM5LTIwMjAtMi03OC05Nw
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University, 2020
imprint_str_mv Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University, 2020
issn 2310-5828
1994-5639
issn_str_mv 2310-5828
1994-5639
language Undetermined
mega_collection Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University (CrossRef)
match_str yang2020humanitieseducationreformexplorationandpracticeunderoutcomesbasededucationobe
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series The Education and science journal
source_id 49
title Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
title_unstemmed Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
title_full Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
title_fullStr Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
title_full_unstemmed Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
title_short Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
title_sort humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (obe)
topic Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Education
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-2-78-97
publishDate 2020
physical 78-97
description <jats:p><jats:italic>Introduction.</jats:italic> The concept of outcomes-based education (OBE) was first put forward in 1981 by the educator W. Spady, and has been widely valued and applied in a rapid speed. During the next 10 years, OBE has formed a relatively complete theoretical system and became the mainstream ideas of national education reform in the United States, Britain, Canada and other counties. At present, the technology and tools of OBE, despite the criticism, remain relevant for the development and optimisation of the humanities education system.</jats:p><jats:p>The <jats:italic>aim</jats:italic> of the present research is to study and analyse the theory of OBE and the practice on the application of pedagogical principles for modernisation of the humanities education in China.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Results and scientific novelty.</jats:italic> Chinese education certification system has made notable progress in recent years. More universities and colleges are pursuing a quality improvement strategy focused on three main components – learning outcomes, student personality and continuous improvement. OBE establishes the same priorities; OBE is considered as a special type of effective pedagogical design. The features of this model implementation are briefly described – the structure of the training process, its stages and characteristics. The opportunities for improving humanities education based on OBE framework were considered. The OBE operates within the framework of the following core issues: the things students learn and the extent of student success, not the manner of learning; the place, the time of learning and the duration of training.</jats:p><jats:p>OBE process implies ultimate involvement of students’ individual cognitive abilities to master competencies, which help adapt to future life. The knowledge of actual material (content of the programme) is not the key element of the education process, but the skills of knowledge application are important when solving specific tasks. The curricula, educational process, its methods, tools are adjusted, rebuilt and replaced if they do not contribute to the development of such skills, e. g. the results of the training determine its system and act not as a goal, but as a means of achieving it. The structure of results manages all educational activities, and their evaluation is carried out according to clear initially defined criteria, combined with flexible personalised requirements in order to get students to fully self-realise personal potential during a training course. To improve the initial design of curriculum, it is necessary to provide constant feedback “student-teacher”. The teacher has to organise and focus the learning process to give each student confidence in the acquired experience and to guarantee his or her success in further professional activities and life in general.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Practical significance.</jats:italic> The OBE concept fully complies with the needs and demands of modern society and modern people – it is no coincidence that such training has become one of the most popular forms of education in many countries, including the field of the humanities education in China. The present research leads to the conclusion that in the humanities field, notably in the teaching of foreign languages, a significant improvement in the quality of training of students can be achieved through the use of OBE teaching tools. In this model of training, practice is more important than theory. Moreover, this model assumes understanding to be more valuable than memory; the traditional “cramming” of educational information by students can be completely excluded; also, such model provides an opportunity to establish a continuous productive dialogue between the participants of educational process and to transform a classroom into a laboratory. The student becomes an active, self-motivated and responsible actor of his or her own individual educational trajectory, not a passive consumer of information, and the teacher – active assistant and coordinator of education.</jats:p>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 78
container_title The Education and science journal
container_volume 22
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792345802523279363
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:29:15.197Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Humanities+education+reform+exploration+and+practice+under+outcomes-based+education+%28OBE%29&rft.date=2020-03-04&genre=article&issn=1994-5639&volume=22&issue=2&spage=78&epage=97&pages=78-97&jtitle=The+Education+and+science+journal&atitle=Humanities+education+reform+exploration+and+practice+under+outcomes-based+education+%28OBE%29&aulast=Yang&aufirst=P.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.17853%2F1994-5639-2020-2-78-97&rft.language%5B0%5D=und
SOLR
_version_ 1792345802523279363
author Yang, P.
author_facet Yang, P., Yang, P.
author_sort yang, p.
container_issue 2
container_start_page 78
container_title The Education and science journal
container_volume 22
description <jats:p><jats:italic>Introduction.</jats:italic> The concept of outcomes-based education (OBE) was first put forward in 1981 by the educator W. Spady, and has been widely valued and applied in a rapid speed. During the next 10 years, OBE has formed a relatively complete theoretical system and became the mainstream ideas of national education reform in the United States, Britain, Canada and other counties. At present, the technology and tools of OBE, despite the criticism, remain relevant for the development and optimisation of the humanities education system.</jats:p><jats:p>The <jats:italic>aim</jats:italic> of the present research is to study and analyse the theory of OBE and the practice on the application of pedagogical principles for modernisation of the humanities education in China.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Results and scientific novelty.</jats:italic> Chinese education certification system has made notable progress in recent years. More universities and colleges are pursuing a quality improvement strategy focused on three main components – learning outcomes, student personality and continuous improvement. OBE establishes the same priorities; OBE is considered as a special type of effective pedagogical design. The features of this model implementation are briefly described – the structure of the training process, its stages and characteristics. The opportunities for improving humanities education based on OBE framework were considered. The OBE operates within the framework of the following core issues: the things students learn and the extent of student success, not the manner of learning; the place, the time of learning and the duration of training.</jats:p><jats:p>OBE process implies ultimate involvement of students’ individual cognitive abilities to master competencies, which help adapt to future life. The knowledge of actual material (content of the programme) is not the key element of the education process, but the skills of knowledge application are important when solving specific tasks. The curricula, educational process, its methods, tools are adjusted, rebuilt and replaced if they do not contribute to the development of such skills, e. g. the results of the training determine its system and act not as a goal, but as a means of achieving it. The structure of results manages all educational activities, and their evaluation is carried out according to clear initially defined criteria, combined with flexible personalised requirements in order to get students to fully self-realise personal potential during a training course. To improve the initial design of curriculum, it is necessary to provide constant feedback “student-teacher”. The teacher has to organise and focus the learning process to give each student confidence in the acquired experience and to guarantee his or her success in further professional activities and life in general.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Practical significance.</jats:italic> The OBE concept fully complies with the needs and demands of modern society and modern people – it is no coincidence that such training has become one of the most popular forms of education in many countries, including the field of the humanities education in China. The present research leads to the conclusion that in the humanities field, notably in the teaching of foreign languages, a significant improvement in the quality of training of students can be achieved through the use of OBE teaching tools. In this model of training, practice is more important than theory. Moreover, this model assumes understanding to be more valuable than memory; the traditional “cramming” of educational information by students can be completely excluded; also, such model provides an opportunity to establish a continuous productive dialogue between the participants of educational process and to transform a classroom into a laboratory. The student becomes an active, self-motivated and responsible actor of his or her own individual educational trajectory, not a passive consumer of information, and the teacher – active assistant and coordinator of education.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-2-78-97
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Pädagogik, Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTc4NTMvMTk5NC01NjM5LTIwMjAtMi03OC05Nw
imprint Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University, 2020
imprint_str_mv Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University, 2020
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 2310-5828, 1994-5639
issn_str_mv 2310-5828, 1994-5639
language Undetermined
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:29:15.197Z
match_str yang2020humanitieseducationreformexplorationandpracticeunderoutcomesbasededucationobe
mega_collection Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University (CrossRef)
physical 78-97
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series The Education and science journal
source_id 49
spelling Yang, P. 2310-5828 1994-5639 Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Education http://dx.doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-2-78-97 <jats:p><jats:italic>Introduction.</jats:italic> The concept of outcomes-based education (OBE) was first put forward in 1981 by the educator W. Spady, and has been widely valued and applied in a rapid speed. During the next 10 years, OBE has formed a relatively complete theoretical system and became the mainstream ideas of national education reform in the United States, Britain, Canada and other counties. At present, the technology and tools of OBE, despite the criticism, remain relevant for the development and optimisation of the humanities education system.</jats:p><jats:p>The <jats:italic>aim</jats:italic> of the present research is to study and analyse the theory of OBE and the practice on the application of pedagogical principles for modernisation of the humanities education in China.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Results and scientific novelty.</jats:italic> Chinese education certification system has made notable progress in recent years. More universities and colleges are pursuing a quality improvement strategy focused on three main components – learning outcomes, student personality and continuous improvement. OBE establishes the same priorities; OBE is considered as a special type of effective pedagogical design. The features of this model implementation are briefly described – the structure of the training process, its stages and characteristics. The opportunities for improving humanities education based on OBE framework were considered. The OBE operates within the framework of the following core issues: the things students learn and the extent of student success, not the manner of learning; the place, the time of learning and the duration of training.</jats:p><jats:p>OBE process implies ultimate involvement of students’ individual cognitive abilities to master competencies, which help adapt to future life. The knowledge of actual material (content of the programme) is not the key element of the education process, but the skills of knowledge application are important when solving specific tasks. The curricula, educational process, its methods, tools are adjusted, rebuilt and replaced if they do not contribute to the development of such skills, e. g. the results of the training determine its system and act not as a goal, but as a means of achieving it. The structure of results manages all educational activities, and their evaluation is carried out according to clear initially defined criteria, combined with flexible personalised requirements in order to get students to fully self-realise personal potential during a training course. To improve the initial design of curriculum, it is necessary to provide constant feedback “student-teacher”. The teacher has to organise and focus the learning process to give each student confidence in the acquired experience and to guarantee his or her success in further professional activities and life in general.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Practical significance.</jats:italic> The OBE concept fully complies with the needs and demands of modern society and modern people – it is no coincidence that such training has become one of the most popular forms of education in many countries, including the field of the humanities education in China. The present research leads to the conclusion that in the humanities field, notably in the teaching of foreign languages, a significant improvement in the quality of training of students can be achieved through the use of OBE teaching tools. In this model of training, practice is more important than theory. Moreover, this model assumes understanding to be more valuable than memory; the traditional “cramming” of educational information by students can be completely excluded; also, such model provides an opportunity to establish a continuous productive dialogue between the participants of educational process and to transform a classroom into a laboratory. The student becomes an active, self-motivated and responsible actor of his or her own individual educational trajectory, not a passive consumer of information, and the teacher – active assistant and coordinator of education.</jats:p> Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE) The Education and science journal
spellingShingle Yang, P., The Education and science journal, Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Education
title Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
title_full Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
title_fullStr Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
title_full_unstemmed Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
title_short Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
title_sort humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (obe)
title_unstemmed Humanities education reform exploration and practice under outcomes-based education (OBE)
topic Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Education
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-2-78-97