author_facet Gougoulias, N.
Dawe, E. J. C.
Sakellariou, A.
Gougoulias, N.
Dawe, E. J. C.
Sakellariou, A.
author Gougoulias, N.
Dawe, E. J. C.
Sakellariou, A.
spellingShingle Gougoulias, N.
Dawe, E. J. C.
Sakellariou, A.
The Bone & Joint Journal
The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Surgery
author_sort gougoulias, n.
spelling Gougoulias, N. Dawe, E. J. C. Sakellariou, A. 2049-4394 2049-4408 British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Surgery http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.95b10.32527 <jats:p> Most posterior hindfoot procedures have been described with the patient positioned prone. This affords excellent access to posterior hindfoot structures but has several disadvantages for the management of the airway, the requirement for an endotracheal tube in all patients, difficulty with ventilation and an increased risk of pressure injuries, especially with regard to reduced ocular perfusion. </jats:p><jats:p> We describe use of the ‘recovery position’, which affords equivalent access to the posterior aspect of the ankle and hindfoot without the morbidity associated with the prone position. A laryngeal mask rather than endotracheal tube may be used in most patients. In this annotation we describe this technique, which offers a safe and simple alternative method of positioning patients for posterior hindfoot and ankle surgery. </jats:p><jats:p> Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1317–19. </jats:p> The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot The Bone & Joint Journal
doi_str_mv 10.1302/0301-620x.95b10.32527
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTMwMi8wMzAxLTYyMHguOTViMTAuMzI1Mjc
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTMwMi8wMzAxLTYyMHguOTViMTAuMzI1Mjc
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2013
imprint_str_mv British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2013
issn 2049-4394
2049-4408
issn_str_mv 2049-4394
2049-4408
language English
mega_collection British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery (CrossRef)
match_str gougoulias2013therecoverypositionforposteriorsurgeryoftheankleandhindfoot
publishDateSort 2013
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series The Bone & Joint Journal
source_id 49
title The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_unstemmed The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_full The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_fullStr The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_full_unstemmed The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_short The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_sort the recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
topic Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Surgery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.95b10.32527
publishDate 2013
physical 1317-1319
description <jats:p> Most posterior hindfoot procedures have been described with the patient positioned prone. This affords excellent access to posterior hindfoot structures but has several disadvantages for the management of the airway, the requirement for an endotracheal tube in all patients, difficulty with ventilation and an increased risk of pressure injuries, especially with regard to reduced ocular perfusion. </jats:p><jats:p> We describe use of the ‘recovery position’, which affords equivalent access to the posterior aspect of the ankle and hindfoot without the morbidity associated with the prone position. A laryngeal mask rather than endotracheal tube may be used in most patients. In this annotation we describe this technique, which offers a safe and simple alternative method of positioning patients for posterior hindfoot and ankle surgery. </jats:p><jats:p> Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1317–19. </jats:p>
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1317
container_title The Bone & Joint Journal
container_volume 95-B
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792333961292152841
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:20:46.106Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+recovery+position+for+posterior+surgery+of+the+ankle+and+hindfoot&rft.date=2013-10-01&genre=article&issn=2049-4408&volume=95-B&issue=10&spage=1317&epage=1319&pages=1317-1319&jtitle=The+Bone+%26+Joint+Journal&atitle=The+recovery+position+for+posterior+surgery+of+the+ankle+and+hindfoot&aulast=Sakellariou&aufirst=A.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1302%2F0301-620x.95b10.32527&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792333961292152841
author Gougoulias, N., Dawe, E. J. C., Sakellariou, A.
author_facet Gougoulias, N., Dawe, E. J. C., Sakellariou, A., Gougoulias, N., Dawe, E. J. C., Sakellariou, A.
author_sort gougoulias, n.
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1317
container_title The Bone & Joint Journal
container_volume 95-B
description <jats:p> Most posterior hindfoot procedures have been described with the patient positioned prone. This affords excellent access to posterior hindfoot structures but has several disadvantages for the management of the airway, the requirement for an endotracheal tube in all patients, difficulty with ventilation and an increased risk of pressure injuries, especially with regard to reduced ocular perfusion. </jats:p><jats:p> We describe use of the ‘recovery position’, which affords equivalent access to the posterior aspect of the ankle and hindfoot without the morbidity associated with the prone position. A laryngeal mask rather than endotracheal tube may be used in most patients. In this annotation we describe this technique, which offers a safe and simple alternative method of positioning patients for posterior hindfoot and ankle surgery. </jats:p><jats:p> Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1317–19. </jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1302/0301-620x.95b10.32527
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTMwMi8wMzAxLTYyMHguOTViMTAuMzI1Mjc
imprint British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2013
imprint_str_mv British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2013
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 2049-4394, 2049-4408
issn_str_mv 2049-4394, 2049-4408
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:20:46.106Z
match_str gougoulias2013therecoverypositionforposteriorsurgeryoftheankleandhindfoot
mega_collection British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery (CrossRef)
physical 1317-1319
publishDate 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series The Bone & Joint Journal
source_id 49
spelling Gougoulias, N. Dawe, E. J. C. Sakellariou, A. 2049-4394 2049-4408 British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Surgery http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.95b10.32527 <jats:p> Most posterior hindfoot procedures have been described with the patient positioned prone. This affords excellent access to posterior hindfoot structures but has several disadvantages for the management of the airway, the requirement for an endotracheal tube in all patients, difficulty with ventilation and an increased risk of pressure injuries, especially with regard to reduced ocular perfusion. </jats:p><jats:p> We describe use of the ‘recovery position’, which affords equivalent access to the posterior aspect of the ankle and hindfoot without the morbidity associated with the prone position. A laryngeal mask rather than endotracheal tube may be used in most patients. In this annotation we describe this technique, which offers a safe and simple alternative method of positioning patients for posterior hindfoot and ankle surgery. </jats:p><jats:p> Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1317–19. </jats:p> The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot The Bone & Joint Journal
spellingShingle Gougoulias, N., Dawe, E. J. C., Sakellariou, A., The Bone & Joint Journal, The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery
title The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_full The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_fullStr The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_full_unstemmed The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_short The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_sort the recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
title_unstemmed The recovery position for posterior surgery of the ankle and hindfoot
topic Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.95b10.32527