Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Mi...
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Global Oncology |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
| In: | Journal of Global Oncology, 4, 2018, Supplement 2, S. 202s-202s |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Qiu, Y. Jiang, Y. Qiu, Y. Jiang, Y. |
|---|---|
| author |
Qiu, Y. Jiang, Y. |
| spellingShingle |
Qiu, Y. Jiang, Y. Journal of Global Oncology Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis Oncology Cancer Research |
| author_sort |
qiu, y. |
| spelling |
Qiu, Y. Jiang, Y. 2378-9506 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Oncology Cancer Research http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jgo.18.81700 <jats:p> Background: Early diagnosis and treatment is essential for curing breast tumors. In recent years, the number of diagnosed nonpalpable breast lesions has risen rapidly following increased breast cancer awareness and the broad promotion of mammography (MMG) screening. Aim: A comparison of the effect and accuracy between the superficial mark guided localization technique (SGL) and the hook wire guided localization technique (WGL) for nonpalpable breast microcalcifications. Methods: Retrospective research was conducted to compare SGL and WGL techniques. These techniques were performed on 51 patients with nonpalpable breast microcalcifications from the months of Jan 2015 to May 2016. Results: A total of 51 patients with ages ranging from 32 to 72 years were included in the study; 25 (49.01%) patients were randomly selected for the WGL group, while the other 26 (50.99%) patients were randomly selected for the SGL group. One case in the WGL group was treated with the SGL technology due to technical difficulties with the localization procedure. No statistically significant association was found between the 2 groups within the specified diameter of excised tissue. For the WGL group and SGL group, the average diameter of excised tissue was 78.4 mm and 78.9 mm, respectively. No complications were observed for patients in the SGL group, whereas 4 patients in the WGL group experienced complications. Two patients had a vasovagal reaction and another 2 experienced ecchymoma or shifting of the hook wire. According to the paraffin result, we found 3 (12%) malignant cases in the WGL group and 6 (23%) malignant cases in the SGL group. Conclusion: The superficial mark localization technique is as accurate as the hook wire guided localization technique. The procedure has the advantages of being less expensive and causes less complications. </jats:p> Clinical advances in diagnosis Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis Journal of Global Oncology |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1200/jgo.18.81700 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qZ28uMTguODE3MDA |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qZ28uMTguODE3MDA |
| institution |
DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 DE-Ch1 |
| imprint |
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018 |
| imprint_str_mv |
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018 |
| issn |
2378-9506 |
| issn_str_mv |
2378-9506 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
qiu2018retrospectiveclinicalresearchcomparingthevalueofthesuperficialmarkguidedlocalizationtechniquewiththehookwireguidedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastmicrocalcificationsclinicaladvancesindiagnosisclinicaladvancesindiagnosis |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| publisher |
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Journal of Global Oncology |
| source_id |
49 |
| title_sub |
Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title |
Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_unstemmed |
Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_full |
Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_fullStr |
Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_short |
Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_sort |
retrospective clinical research comparing the value of the superficial mark guided localization technique with the hook wire guided localization technique for nonpalpable breast microcalcifications : clinical advances in diagnosis |
| topic |
Oncology Cancer Research |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jgo.18.81700 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| physical |
202s-202s |
| description |
<jats:p> Background: Early diagnosis and treatment is essential for curing breast tumors. In recent years, the number of diagnosed nonpalpable breast lesions has risen rapidly following increased breast cancer awareness and the broad promotion of mammography (MMG) screening. Aim: A comparison of the effect and accuracy between the superficial mark guided localization technique (SGL) and the hook wire guided localization technique (WGL) for nonpalpable breast microcalcifications. Methods: Retrospective research was conducted to compare SGL and WGL techniques. These techniques were performed on 51 patients with nonpalpable breast microcalcifications from the months of Jan 2015 to May 2016. Results: A total of 51 patients with ages ranging from 32 to 72 years were included in the study; 25 (49.01%) patients were randomly selected for the WGL group, while the other 26 (50.99%) patients were randomly selected for the SGL group. One case in the WGL group was treated with the SGL technology due to technical difficulties with the localization procedure. No statistically significant association was found between the 2 groups within the specified diameter of excised tissue. For the WGL group and SGL group, the average diameter of excised tissue was 78.4 mm and 78.9 mm, respectively. No complications were observed for patients in the SGL group, whereas 4 patients in the WGL group experienced complications. Two patients had a vasovagal reaction and another 2 experienced ecchymoma or shifting of the hook wire. According to the paraffin result, we found 3 (12%) malignant cases in the WGL group and 6 (23%) malignant cases in the SGL group. Conclusion: The superficial mark localization technique is as accurate as the hook wire guided localization technique. The procedure has the advantages of being less expensive and causes less complications. </jats:p> |
| container_issue |
Supplement 2 |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| container_title |
Journal of Global Oncology |
| container_volume |
4 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792327950009368585 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T12:44:27.545Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Retrospective+Clinical+Research+Comparing+the+Value+of+the+Superficial+Mark+Guided+Localization+Technique+With+the+Hook+Wire+Guided+Localization+Technique+for+Nonpalpable+Breast+Microcalcifications+%3A+Clinical+advances+in+diagnosis&rft.date=2018-10-01&genre=article&issn=2378-9506&volume=4&issue=Supplement+2&pages=202s-202s&jtitle=Journal+of+Global+Oncology&atitle=Retrospective+Clinical+Research+Comparing+the+Value+of+the+Superficial+Mark+Guided+Localization+Technique+With+the+Hook+Wire+Guided+Localization+Technique+for+Nonpalpable+Breast+Microcalcifications+%3A+Clinical+advances+in+diagnosis&aulast=Jiang&aufirst=Y.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1200%2Fjgo.18.81700&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792327950009368585 |
| author | Qiu, Y., Jiang, Y. |
| author_facet | Qiu, Y., Jiang, Y., Qiu, Y., Jiang, Y. |
| author_sort | qiu, y. |
| container_issue | Supplement 2 |
| container_start_page | 0 |
| container_title | Journal of Global Oncology |
| container_volume | 4 |
| description | <jats:p> Background: Early diagnosis and treatment is essential for curing breast tumors. In recent years, the number of diagnosed nonpalpable breast lesions has risen rapidly following increased breast cancer awareness and the broad promotion of mammography (MMG) screening. Aim: A comparison of the effect and accuracy between the superficial mark guided localization technique (SGL) and the hook wire guided localization technique (WGL) for nonpalpable breast microcalcifications. Methods: Retrospective research was conducted to compare SGL and WGL techniques. These techniques were performed on 51 patients with nonpalpable breast microcalcifications from the months of Jan 2015 to May 2016. Results: A total of 51 patients with ages ranging from 32 to 72 years were included in the study; 25 (49.01%) patients were randomly selected for the WGL group, while the other 26 (50.99%) patients were randomly selected for the SGL group. One case in the WGL group was treated with the SGL technology due to technical difficulties with the localization procedure. No statistically significant association was found between the 2 groups within the specified diameter of excised tissue. For the WGL group and SGL group, the average diameter of excised tissue was 78.4 mm and 78.9 mm, respectively. No complications were observed for patients in the SGL group, whereas 4 patients in the WGL group experienced complications. Two patients had a vasovagal reaction and another 2 experienced ecchymoma or shifting of the hook wire. According to the paraffin result, we found 3 (12%) malignant cases in the WGL group and 6 (23%) malignant cases in the SGL group. Conclusion: The superficial mark localization technique is as accurate as the hook wire guided localization technique. The procedure has the advantages of being less expensive and causes less complications. </jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1200/jgo.18.81700 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qZ28uMTguODE3MDA |
| imprint | American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018 |
| imprint_str_mv | American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018 |
| institution | DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1 |
| issn | 2378-9506 |
| issn_str_mv | 2378-9506 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T12:44:27.545Z |
| match_str | qiu2018retrospectiveclinicalresearchcomparingthevalueofthesuperficialmarkguidedlocalizationtechniquewiththehookwireguidedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastmicrocalcificationsclinicaladvancesindiagnosisclinicaladvancesindiagnosis |
| mega_collection | American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (CrossRef) |
| physical | 202s-202s |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Journal of Global Oncology |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Qiu, Y. Jiang, Y. 2378-9506 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Oncology Cancer Research http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jgo.18.81700 <jats:p> Background: Early diagnosis and treatment is essential for curing breast tumors. In recent years, the number of diagnosed nonpalpable breast lesions has risen rapidly following increased breast cancer awareness and the broad promotion of mammography (MMG) screening. Aim: A comparison of the effect and accuracy between the superficial mark guided localization technique (SGL) and the hook wire guided localization technique (WGL) for nonpalpable breast microcalcifications. Methods: Retrospective research was conducted to compare SGL and WGL techniques. These techniques were performed on 51 patients with nonpalpable breast microcalcifications from the months of Jan 2015 to May 2016. Results: A total of 51 patients with ages ranging from 32 to 72 years were included in the study; 25 (49.01%) patients were randomly selected for the WGL group, while the other 26 (50.99%) patients were randomly selected for the SGL group. One case in the WGL group was treated with the SGL technology due to technical difficulties with the localization procedure. No statistically significant association was found between the 2 groups within the specified diameter of excised tissue. For the WGL group and SGL group, the average diameter of excised tissue was 78.4 mm and 78.9 mm, respectively. No complications were observed for patients in the SGL group, whereas 4 patients in the WGL group experienced complications. Two patients had a vasovagal reaction and another 2 experienced ecchymoma or shifting of the hook wire. According to the paraffin result, we found 3 (12%) malignant cases in the WGL group and 6 (23%) malignant cases in the SGL group. Conclusion: The superficial mark localization technique is as accurate as the hook wire guided localization technique. The procedure has the advantages of being less expensive and causes less complications. </jats:p> Clinical advances in diagnosis Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis Journal of Global Oncology |
| spellingShingle | Qiu, Y., Jiang, Y., Journal of Global Oncology, Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis, Oncology, Cancer Research |
| title | Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_full | Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_fullStr | Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_short | Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_sort | retrospective clinical research comparing the value of the superficial mark guided localization technique with the hook wire guided localization technique for nonpalpable breast microcalcifications : clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_sub | Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| title_unstemmed | Retrospective Clinical Research Comparing the Value of the Superficial Mark Guided Localization Technique With the Hook Wire Guided Localization Technique for Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications : Clinical advances in diagnosis |
| topic | Oncology, Cancer Research |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jgo.18.81700 |