author_facet Kumar, R.
Kang, J.
Herman, J. M.
Tuli, R.
Pawlik, T. M.
Tryggestad, E.
Smith, K.
DeWeese, T. L.
Wong, J.
Ford, E. C.
Kumar, R.
Kang, J.
Herman, J. M.
Tuli, R.
Pawlik, T. M.
Tryggestad, E.
Smith, K.
DeWeese, T. L.
Wong, J.
Ford, E. C.
author Kumar, R.
Kang, J.
Herman, J. M.
Tuli, R.
Pawlik, T. M.
Tryggestad, E.
Smith, K.
DeWeese, T. L.
Wong, J.
Ford, E. C.
spellingShingle Kumar, R.
Kang, J.
Herman, J. M.
Tuli, R.
Pawlik, T. M.
Tryggestad, E.
Smith, K.
DeWeese, T. L.
Wong, J.
Ford, E. C.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
Cancer Research
Oncology
author_sort kumar, r.
spelling Kumar, R. Kang, J. Herman, J. M. Tuli, R. Pawlik, T. M. Tryggestad, E. Smith, K. DeWeese, T. L. Wong, J. Ford, E. C. 0732-183X 1527-7755 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Cancer Research Oncology http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.301 <jats:p> 301 </jats:p><jats:p> Background: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for intensity-modulated radiation delivery with faster treatment times and fewer delivered monitor units (MU). The dose-limiting structure for pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the duodenum. We evaluate VMAT dose distribution, delivery times, and the effect of duodenal sparing (DS) for pancreas SBRT. </jats:p><jats:p> Methods: Plans of 15 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (14 head/1 tail) were selected. VMAT treatment planning with the “SmartArc” function of Pinnacle v. 8.9 was used to plan one fraction of 25 Gy to the PTV (gross tumor + 2 mm expansion) normalized to the 80% isodose line. Two VMAT SBRT plans were conducted for each case; the first did not attempt to spare the duodenum (non DS) while the second did (DS). Constraints were stomach/duodenum any point max &lt;30 Gy (for DS plan), liver D<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy, ipsilateral kidney D<jats:sub>25</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy, cord D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy and stomach D<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> &lt; 22.5 Gy. </jats:p><jats:p> Results: Gross tumor volume ranged from 58.4cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> to 320.3 cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>. The average overlap volume between PTV and the duodenum was 8.4 cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>. In 10/15 non-DS plans, the duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> exceeded 30 Gy. With DS optimization, only 1/15 plans exceeded the 30 Gy threshold. These differences were statistically significant (p&lt;0.001). Typical MU and delivery times, as calculated by the planning software, were 5494 MU and 775 secs vs. 5296 MU and 703 secs for the DS and non-DS plans, respectively. The difference in delivery times was significant (p=0.01), but amounted to only 1.2 min on average. The average duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> for non-DS plans was 30.4Gy, D<jats:sub>4%</jats:sub> was 23.4 Gy. With DS, the average D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> was reduced to 28.1Gy and D<jats:sub>4%</jats:sub> to &lt;19.7 Gy (p&lt;0.001). As expected, VMAT plans with greater overlap between the duodenum and PTV had a higher duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub>. </jats:p><jats:p> Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of VMAT for high-dose SBRT treatment of pancreatic cancer incorporating constraints to limit the dose to the duodenum. Future studies will evaluate whether VMAT with fractionated SBRT results in improved duodenal sparing more efficiently than traditional IMRT. </jats:p><jats:p> No significant financial relationships to disclose. </jats:p> Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage. Journal of Clinical Oncology
doi_str_mv 10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.301
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qY28uMjAxMS4yOS40X3N1cHBsLjMwMQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qY28uMjAxMS4yOS40X3N1cHBsLjMwMQ
institution DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
imprint American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2011
imprint_str_mv American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2011
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
issn_str_mv 0732-183X
1527-7755
language English
mega_collection American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (CrossRef)
match_str kumar2011stereotacticradiationtreatmentplanningwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyimpactofduodenalsparingonpancreatictumorcoverage
publishDateSort 2011
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Clinical Oncology
source_id 49
title Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_unstemmed Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_full Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_fullStr Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_short Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_sort stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
topic Cancer Research
Oncology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.301
publishDate 2011
physical 301-301
description <jats:p> 301 </jats:p><jats:p> Background: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for intensity-modulated radiation delivery with faster treatment times and fewer delivered monitor units (MU). The dose-limiting structure for pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the duodenum. We evaluate VMAT dose distribution, delivery times, and the effect of duodenal sparing (DS) for pancreas SBRT. </jats:p><jats:p> Methods: Plans of 15 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (14 head/1 tail) were selected. VMAT treatment planning with the “SmartArc” function of Pinnacle v. 8.9 was used to plan one fraction of 25 Gy to the PTV (gross tumor + 2 mm expansion) normalized to the 80% isodose line. Two VMAT SBRT plans were conducted for each case; the first did not attempt to spare the duodenum (non DS) while the second did (DS). Constraints were stomach/duodenum any point max &lt;30 Gy (for DS plan), liver D<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy, ipsilateral kidney D<jats:sub>25</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy, cord D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy and stomach D<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> &lt; 22.5 Gy. </jats:p><jats:p> Results: Gross tumor volume ranged from 58.4cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> to 320.3 cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>. The average overlap volume between PTV and the duodenum was 8.4 cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>. In 10/15 non-DS plans, the duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> exceeded 30 Gy. With DS optimization, only 1/15 plans exceeded the 30 Gy threshold. These differences were statistically significant (p&lt;0.001). Typical MU and delivery times, as calculated by the planning software, were 5494 MU and 775 secs vs. 5296 MU and 703 secs for the DS and non-DS plans, respectively. The difference in delivery times was significant (p=0.01), but amounted to only 1.2 min on average. The average duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> for non-DS plans was 30.4Gy, D<jats:sub>4%</jats:sub> was 23.4 Gy. With DS, the average D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> was reduced to 28.1Gy and D<jats:sub>4%</jats:sub> to &lt;19.7 Gy (p&lt;0.001). As expected, VMAT plans with greater overlap between the duodenum and PTV had a higher duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub>. </jats:p><jats:p> Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of VMAT for high-dose SBRT treatment of pancreatic cancer incorporating constraints to limit the dose to the duodenum. Future studies will evaluate whether VMAT with fractionated SBRT results in improved duodenal sparing more efficiently than traditional IMRT. </jats:p><jats:p> No significant financial relationships to disclose. </jats:p>
container_issue 4_suppl
container_start_page 301
container_title Journal of Clinical Oncology
container_volume 29
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792328208548364298
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:48:32.367Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Stereotactic+radiation+treatment+planning+with+volumetric+modulated+arc+therapy%3A+Impact+of+duodenal+sparing+on+pancreatic+tumor+coverage.&rft.date=2011-02-01&genre=article&issn=1527-7755&volume=29&issue=4_suppl&spage=301&epage=301&pages=301-301&jtitle=Journal+of+Clinical+Oncology&atitle=Stereotactic+radiation+treatment+planning+with+volumetric+modulated+arc+therapy%3A+Impact+of+duodenal+sparing+on+pancreatic+tumor+coverage.&aulast=Ford&aufirst=E.+C.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1200%2Fjco.2011.29.4_suppl.301&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792328208548364298
author Kumar, R., Kang, J., Herman, J. M., Tuli, R., Pawlik, T. M., Tryggestad, E., Smith, K., DeWeese, T. L., Wong, J., Ford, E. C.
author_facet Kumar, R., Kang, J., Herman, J. M., Tuli, R., Pawlik, T. M., Tryggestad, E., Smith, K., DeWeese, T. L., Wong, J., Ford, E. C., Kumar, R., Kang, J., Herman, J. M., Tuli, R., Pawlik, T. M., Tryggestad, E., Smith, K., DeWeese, T. L., Wong, J., Ford, E. C.
author_sort kumar, r.
container_issue 4_suppl
container_start_page 301
container_title Journal of Clinical Oncology
container_volume 29
description <jats:p> 301 </jats:p><jats:p> Background: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for intensity-modulated radiation delivery with faster treatment times and fewer delivered monitor units (MU). The dose-limiting structure for pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the duodenum. We evaluate VMAT dose distribution, delivery times, and the effect of duodenal sparing (DS) for pancreas SBRT. </jats:p><jats:p> Methods: Plans of 15 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (14 head/1 tail) were selected. VMAT treatment planning with the “SmartArc” function of Pinnacle v. 8.9 was used to plan one fraction of 25 Gy to the PTV (gross tumor + 2 mm expansion) normalized to the 80% isodose line. Two VMAT SBRT plans were conducted for each case; the first did not attempt to spare the duodenum (non DS) while the second did (DS). Constraints were stomach/duodenum any point max &lt;30 Gy (for DS plan), liver D<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy, ipsilateral kidney D<jats:sub>25</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy, cord D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy and stomach D<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> &lt; 22.5 Gy. </jats:p><jats:p> Results: Gross tumor volume ranged from 58.4cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> to 320.3 cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>. The average overlap volume between PTV and the duodenum was 8.4 cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>. In 10/15 non-DS plans, the duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> exceeded 30 Gy. With DS optimization, only 1/15 plans exceeded the 30 Gy threshold. These differences were statistically significant (p&lt;0.001). Typical MU and delivery times, as calculated by the planning software, were 5494 MU and 775 secs vs. 5296 MU and 703 secs for the DS and non-DS plans, respectively. The difference in delivery times was significant (p=0.01), but amounted to only 1.2 min on average. The average duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> for non-DS plans was 30.4Gy, D<jats:sub>4%</jats:sub> was 23.4 Gy. With DS, the average D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> was reduced to 28.1Gy and D<jats:sub>4%</jats:sub> to &lt;19.7 Gy (p&lt;0.001). As expected, VMAT plans with greater overlap between the duodenum and PTV had a higher duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub>. </jats:p><jats:p> Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of VMAT for high-dose SBRT treatment of pancreatic cancer incorporating constraints to limit the dose to the duodenum. Future studies will evaluate whether VMAT with fractionated SBRT results in improved duodenal sparing more efficiently than traditional IMRT. </jats:p><jats:p> No significant financial relationships to disclose. </jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.301
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qY28uMjAxMS4yOS40X3N1cHBsLjMwMQ
imprint American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2011
imprint_str_mv American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2011
institution DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14
issn 0732-183X, 1527-7755
issn_str_mv 0732-183X, 1527-7755
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T12:48:32.367Z
match_str kumar2011stereotacticradiationtreatmentplanningwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyimpactofduodenalsparingonpancreatictumorcoverage
mega_collection American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (CrossRef)
physical 301-301
publishDate 2011
publishDateSort 2011
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Clinical Oncology
source_id 49
spelling Kumar, R. Kang, J. Herman, J. M. Tuli, R. Pawlik, T. M. Tryggestad, E. Smith, K. DeWeese, T. L. Wong, J. Ford, E. C. 0732-183X 1527-7755 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Cancer Research Oncology http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.301 <jats:p> 301 </jats:p><jats:p> Background: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for intensity-modulated radiation delivery with faster treatment times and fewer delivered monitor units (MU). The dose-limiting structure for pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the duodenum. We evaluate VMAT dose distribution, delivery times, and the effect of duodenal sparing (DS) for pancreas SBRT. </jats:p><jats:p> Methods: Plans of 15 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (14 head/1 tail) were selected. VMAT treatment planning with the “SmartArc” function of Pinnacle v. 8.9 was used to plan one fraction of 25 Gy to the PTV (gross tumor + 2 mm expansion) normalized to the 80% isodose line. Two VMAT SBRT plans were conducted for each case; the first did not attempt to spare the duodenum (non DS) while the second did (DS). Constraints were stomach/duodenum any point max &lt;30 Gy (for DS plan), liver D<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy, ipsilateral kidney D<jats:sub>25</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy, cord D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> &lt; 5 Gy and stomach D<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> &lt; 22.5 Gy. </jats:p><jats:p> Results: Gross tumor volume ranged from 58.4cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> to 320.3 cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>. The average overlap volume between PTV and the duodenum was 8.4 cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>. In 10/15 non-DS plans, the duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> exceeded 30 Gy. With DS optimization, only 1/15 plans exceeded the 30 Gy threshold. These differences were statistically significant (p&lt;0.001). Typical MU and delivery times, as calculated by the planning software, were 5494 MU and 775 secs vs. 5296 MU and 703 secs for the DS and non-DS plans, respectively. The difference in delivery times was significant (p=0.01), but amounted to only 1.2 min on average. The average duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> for non-DS plans was 30.4Gy, D<jats:sub>4%</jats:sub> was 23.4 Gy. With DS, the average D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub> was reduced to 28.1Gy and D<jats:sub>4%</jats:sub> to &lt;19.7 Gy (p&lt;0.001). As expected, VMAT plans with greater overlap between the duodenum and PTV had a higher duodenal D<jats:sub>max</jats:sub>. </jats:p><jats:p> Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of VMAT for high-dose SBRT treatment of pancreatic cancer incorporating constraints to limit the dose to the duodenum. Future studies will evaluate whether VMAT with fractionated SBRT results in improved duodenal sparing more efficiently than traditional IMRT. </jats:p><jats:p> No significant financial relationships to disclose. </jats:p> Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage. Journal of Clinical Oncology
spellingShingle Kumar, R., Kang, J., Herman, J. M., Tuli, R., Pawlik, T. M., Tryggestad, E., Smith, K., DeWeese, T. L., Wong, J., Ford, E. C., Journal of Clinical Oncology, Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage., Cancer Research, Oncology
title Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_full Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_fullStr Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_short Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_sort stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
title_unstemmed Stereotactic radiation treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy: Impact of duodenal sparing on pancreatic tumor coverage.
topic Cancer Research, Oncology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.301