author_facet Lebeau, Annette
Turzynski, Andreas
Braun, Susanne
Behrhof, Wera
Fleige, Barbara
Schmitt, Wolfgang D.
Grob, Tobias J.
Burkhardt, Lia
Hölzel, Dieter
Jackisch, Christian
Thomssen, Christoph
Müller, Volkmar
Untch, Michael
Lebeau, Annette
Turzynski, Andreas
Braun, Susanne
Behrhof, Wera
Fleige, Barbara
Schmitt, Wolfgang D.
Grob, Tobias J.
Burkhardt, Lia
Hölzel, Dieter
Jackisch, Christian
Thomssen, Christoph
Müller, Volkmar
Untch, Michael
author Lebeau, Annette
Turzynski, Andreas
Braun, Susanne
Behrhof, Wera
Fleige, Barbara
Schmitt, Wolfgang D.
Grob, Tobias J.
Burkhardt, Lia
Hölzel, Dieter
Jackisch, Christian
Thomssen, Christoph
Müller, Volkmar
Untch, Michael
spellingShingle Lebeau, Annette
Turzynski, Andreas
Braun, Susanne
Behrhof, Wera
Fleige, Barbara
Schmitt, Wolfgang D.
Grob, Tobias J.
Burkhardt, Lia
Hölzel, Dieter
Jackisch, Christian
Thomssen, Christoph
Müller, Volkmar
Untch, Michael
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
Cancer Research
Oncology
author_sort lebeau, annette
spelling Lebeau, Annette Turzynski, Andreas Braun, Susanne Behrhof, Wera Fleige, Barbara Schmitt, Wolfgang D. Grob, Tobias J. Burkhardt, Lia Hölzel, Dieter Jackisch, Christian Thomssen, Christoph Müller, Volkmar Untch, Michael 0732-183X 1527-7755 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Cancer Research Oncology http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.25.9366 <jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p> Core needle biopsies (CNBs) are widely used to determine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer. Recent publications reported up to 20% false-positive results on CNBs if immunohistochemistry (IHC) is compared with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). To clarify, if confirmation of IHC positivity by FISH is generally required, we analyzed the reliability of IHC positivity on CNBs versus surgical specimens in a multi-institutional study. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Patients and Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Five pathologic laboratories contributed to this study by performing IHC on 500 CNBs and the corresponding surgical specimens overall. If IHC revealed score 2+ or 3+, HER2 status was confirmed by FISH in a central laboratory. We compared evaluation according to US Food and Drug Administration–approved scoring criteria and recently published American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)–College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> CNBs scored 3+ revealed five false-positive results if scoring followed the US Food and Drug Administration criteria (five of 40; 12.5%) and two false-positives in terms of the ASCO-CAP criteria (two of 33; 6.1%). IHC was false negative in one CNB only. By contrast, IHC on surgical specimens revealed five false-negative results, but only one false-positive result (one of 35; 2.9%) if scored following US Food and Drug Administration–approved criteria. With the aid of the ASCO-CAP criteria, false-positive IHC results were obtained in only one of the five participating institutions. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> IHC 3+ scores on CNBs proved to be reliable in four of the five participating institutions if scoring followed the ASCO-CAP criteria. Therefore, accurate determination of HER2 status in breast cancer is possible on CNB using the common strategy to screen all cases by IHC and retest only 2+ scores by FISH. Prerequisites are quality assurance and the application of the new ASCO-CAP criteria. </jats:p></jats:sec> Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies Journal of Clinical Oncology
doi_str_mv 10.1200/jco.2009.25.9366
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qY28uMjAwOS4yNS45MzY2
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qY28uMjAwOS4yNS45MzY2
institution DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2010
imprint_str_mv American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2010
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
issn_str_mv 0732-183X
1527-7755
language English
mega_collection American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (CrossRef)
match_str lebeau2010reliabilityofhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2immunohistochemistryinbreastcoreneedlebiopsies
publishDateSort 2010
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Clinical Oncology
source_id 49
title Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
title_unstemmed Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
title_full Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
title_fullStr Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
title_short Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
title_sort reliability of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry in breast core needle biopsies
topic Cancer Research
Oncology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.25.9366
publishDate 2010
physical 3264-3270
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p> Core needle biopsies (CNBs) are widely used to determine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer. Recent publications reported up to 20% false-positive results on CNBs if immunohistochemistry (IHC) is compared with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). To clarify, if confirmation of IHC positivity by FISH is generally required, we analyzed the reliability of IHC positivity on CNBs versus surgical specimens in a multi-institutional study. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Patients and Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Five pathologic laboratories contributed to this study by performing IHC on 500 CNBs and the corresponding surgical specimens overall. If IHC revealed score 2+ or 3+, HER2 status was confirmed by FISH in a central laboratory. We compared evaluation according to US Food and Drug Administration–approved scoring criteria and recently published American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)–College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> CNBs scored 3+ revealed five false-positive results if scoring followed the US Food and Drug Administration criteria (five of 40; 12.5%) and two false-positives in terms of the ASCO-CAP criteria (two of 33; 6.1%). IHC was false negative in one CNB only. By contrast, IHC on surgical specimens revealed five false-negative results, but only one false-positive result (one of 35; 2.9%) if scored following US Food and Drug Administration–approved criteria. With the aid of the ASCO-CAP criteria, false-positive IHC results were obtained in only one of the five participating institutions. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> IHC 3+ scores on CNBs proved to be reliable in four of the five participating institutions if scoring followed the ASCO-CAP criteria. Therefore, accurate determination of HER2 status in breast cancer is possible on CNB using the common strategy to screen all cases by IHC and retest only 2+ scores by FISH. Prerequisites are quality assurance and the application of the new ASCO-CAP criteria. </jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 20
container_start_page 3264
container_title Journal of Clinical Oncology
container_volume 28
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792335052666830859
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:38:25.632Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Reliability+of+Human+Epidermal+Growth+Factor+Receptor+2+Immunohistochemistry+in+Breast+Core+Needle+Biopsies&rft.date=2010-07-10&genre=article&issn=1527-7755&volume=28&issue=20&spage=3264&epage=3270&pages=3264-3270&jtitle=Journal+of+Clinical+Oncology&atitle=Reliability+of+Human+Epidermal+Growth+Factor+Receptor+2+Immunohistochemistry+in+Breast+Core+Needle+Biopsies&aulast=Untch&aufirst=Michael&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1200%2Fjco.2009.25.9366&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792335052666830859
author Lebeau, Annette, Turzynski, Andreas, Braun, Susanne, Behrhof, Wera, Fleige, Barbara, Schmitt, Wolfgang D., Grob, Tobias J., Burkhardt, Lia, Hölzel, Dieter, Jackisch, Christian, Thomssen, Christoph, Müller, Volkmar, Untch, Michael
author_facet Lebeau, Annette, Turzynski, Andreas, Braun, Susanne, Behrhof, Wera, Fleige, Barbara, Schmitt, Wolfgang D., Grob, Tobias J., Burkhardt, Lia, Hölzel, Dieter, Jackisch, Christian, Thomssen, Christoph, Müller, Volkmar, Untch, Michael, Lebeau, Annette, Turzynski, Andreas, Braun, Susanne, Behrhof, Wera, Fleige, Barbara, Schmitt, Wolfgang D., Grob, Tobias J., Burkhardt, Lia, Hölzel, Dieter, Jackisch, Christian, Thomssen, Christoph, Müller, Volkmar, Untch, Michael
author_sort lebeau, annette
container_issue 20
container_start_page 3264
container_title Journal of Clinical Oncology
container_volume 28
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p> Core needle biopsies (CNBs) are widely used to determine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer. Recent publications reported up to 20% false-positive results on CNBs if immunohistochemistry (IHC) is compared with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). To clarify, if confirmation of IHC positivity by FISH is generally required, we analyzed the reliability of IHC positivity on CNBs versus surgical specimens in a multi-institutional study. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Patients and Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Five pathologic laboratories contributed to this study by performing IHC on 500 CNBs and the corresponding surgical specimens overall. If IHC revealed score 2+ or 3+, HER2 status was confirmed by FISH in a central laboratory. We compared evaluation according to US Food and Drug Administration–approved scoring criteria and recently published American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)–College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> CNBs scored 3+ revealed five false-positive results if scoring followed the US Food and Drug Administration criteria (five of 40; 12.5%) and two false-positives in terms of the ASCO-CAP criteria (two of 33; 6.1%). IHC was false negative in one CNB only. By contrast, IHC on surgical specimens revealed five false-negative results, but only one false-positive result (one of 35; 2.9%) if scored following US Food and Drug Administration–approved criteria. With the aid of the ASCO-CAP criteria, false-positive IHC results were obtained in only one of the five participating institutions. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> IHC 3+ scores on CNBs proved to be reliable in four of the five participating institutions if scoring followed the ASCO-CAP criteria. Therefore, accurate determination of HER2 status in breast cancer is possible on CNB using the common strategy to screen all cases by IHC and retest only 2+ scores by FISH. Prerequisites are quality assurance and the application of the new ASCO-CAP criteria. </jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1200/jco.2009.25.9366
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTIwMC9qY28uMjAwOS4yNS45MzY2
imprint American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2010
imprint_str_mv American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2010
institution DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 0732-183X, 1527-7755
issn_str_mv 0732-183X, 1527-7755
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:38:25.632Z
match_str lebeau2010reliabilityofhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2immunohistochemistryinbreastcoreneedlebiopsies
mega_collection American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (CrossRef)
physical 3264-3270
publishDate 2010
publishDateSort 2010
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Clinical Oncology
source_id 49
spelling Lebeau, Annette Turzynski, Andreas Braun, Susanne Behrhof, Wera Fleige, Barbara Schmitt, Wolfgang D. Grob, Tobias J. Burkhardt, Lia Hölzel, Dieter Jackisch, Christian Thomssen, Christoph Müller, Volkmar Untch, Michael 0732-183X 1527-7755 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Cancer Research Oncology http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.25.9366 <jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p> Core needle biopsies (CNBs) are widely used to determine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer. Recent publications reported up to 20% false-positive results on CNBs if immunohistochemistry (IHC) is compared with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). To clarify, if confirmation of IHC positivity by FISH is generally required, we analyzed the reliability of IHC positivity on CNBs versus surgical specimens in a multi-institutional study. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Patients and Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Five pathologic laboratories contributed to this study by performing IHC on 500 CNBs and the corresponding surgical specimens overall. If IHC revealed score 2+ or 3+, HER2 status was confirmed by FISH in a central laboratory. We compared evaluation according to US Food and Drug Administration–approved scoring criteria and recently published American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)–College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> CNBs scored 3+ revealed five false-positive results if scoring followed the US Food and Drug Administration criteria (five of 40; 12.5%) and two false-positives in terms of the ASCO-CAP criteria (two of 33; 6.1%). IHC was false negative in one CNB only. By contrast, IHC on surgical specimens revealed five false-negative results, but only one false-positive result (one of 35; 2.9%) if scored following US Food and Drug Administration–approved criteria. With the aid of the ASCO-CAP criteria, false-positive IHC results were obtained in only one of the five participating institutions. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> IHC 3+ scores on CNBs proved to be reliable in four of the five participating institutions if scoring followed the ASCO-CAP criteria. Therefore, accurate determination of HER2 status in breast cancer is possible on CNB using the common strategy to screen all cases by IHC and retest only 2+ scores by FISH. Prerequisites are quality assurance and the application of the new ASCO-CAP criteria. </jats:p></jats:sec> Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies Journal of Clinical Oncology
spellingShingle Lebeau, Annette, Turzynski, Andreas, Braun, Susanne, Behrhof, Wera, Fleige, Barbara, Schmitt, Wolfgang D., Grob, Tobias J., Burkhardt, Lia, Hölzel, Dieter, Jackisch, Christian, Thomssen, Christoph, Müller, Volkmar, Untch, Michael, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies, Cancer Research, Oncology
title Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
title_full Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
title_fullStr Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
title_short Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
title_sort reliability of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry in breast core needle biopsies
title_unstemmed Reliability of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Core Needle Biopsies
topic Cancer Research, Oncology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.25.9366