Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Sign Systems Studies |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , |
| In: | Sign Systems Studies, 41, 2013, 1, S. 93-115 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Unbestimmt |
| veröffentlicht: |
University of Tartu
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Petrilli, Susan Ponzio, Augusto Petrilli, Susan Ponzio, Augusto |
|---|---|
| author |
Petrilli, Susan Ponzio, Augusto |
| spellingShingle |
Petrilli, Susan Ponzio, Augusto Sign Systems Studies Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics |
| author_sort |
petrilli, susan |
| spelling |
Petrilli, Susan Ponzio, Augusto 1736-7409 1406-4243 University of Tartu Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2013.41.1.06 <jats:p>Charles Peirce, Mikhail Bakhtin and Thomas Sebeok all develop original research itineraries around the sign and, despite terminological differences, can be related with reference to the concept of dialogism and modelling. Jakob von Uexküll's biosemiosic "functional cycle", a model for semiosic processes, is also implied in the relation between dialogue and communication. Biological models which describe communication as a self-referential, autopoietic and semiotically closed system (e.g., the models proposed by Maturana, Varela, and Thure von Uexküll) contrast with both the linear (Shannon and Weaver) and the circular (Saussure) paradigms. The theory of autopoietic systems is only incompatible with dialogism if reference is to a linear causal model which describes communication as developing from source to destination, or to the conversation model governed by the turning around together rule. Dialogism understood in biosemiotic terms overlaps with the concepts of interconnectivity, interrelation, intercorporeity and presupposes the otherness relation. As Uexküll says, the relation with the umwelt in nonhuman living beings is stable and concerns the species; on the contrary, in human beings it is, changeable and concerns the single individual, which is at once an advantage and a disadvantage. Thanks to "syntactics", human beings can construct, deconstruct and reconstruct an infinite number of worlds from a finite number of elements. This distinguishes human beings from other animals and determines their capacity for posing problems and asking questions. The human being not only produces his or her own world, but can also endanger it, and even destroy it to the point of causing the extinction of all other life forms on Earth. The unique capacity for reflection on signs makes human beings responsible for life across the planet, both human and nonhuman. Such reflections shift semiotic research in the direction of semioethics.</jats:p> Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights Sign Systems Studies |
| doi_str_mv |
10.12697/sss.2013.41.1.06 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTI2OTcvc3NzLjIwMTMuNDEuMS4wNg |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTI2OTcvc3NzLjIwMTMuNDEuMS4wNg |
| institution |
DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 |
| imprint |
University of Tartu, 2013 |
| imprint_str_mv |
University of Tartu, 2013 |
| issn |
1406-4243 1736-7409 |
| issn_str_mv |
1406-4243 1736-7409 |
| language |
Undetermined |
| mega_collection |
University of Tartu (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
petrilli2013modellingdialogismandthefunctionalcyclebiosemioticandphilosophicalinsights |
| publishDateSort |
2013 |
| publisher |
University of Tartu |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Sign Systems Studies |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_unstemmed |
Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_full |
Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_fullStr |
Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_short |
Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_sort |
modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| topic |
Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2013.41.1.06 |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| physical |
93-115 |
| description |
<jats:p>Charles Peirce, Mikhail Bakhtin and Thomas Sebeok all develop original research itineraries around the sign and, despite terminological differences, can be related with reference to the concept of dialogism and modelling. Jakob von Uexküll's biosemiosic "functional cycle", a model for semiosic processes, is also implied in the relation between dialogue and communication. Biological models which describe communication as a self-referential, autopoietic and semiotically closed system (e.g., the models proposed by Maturana, Varela, and Thure von Uexküll) contrast with both the linear (Shannon and Weaver) and the circular (Saussure) paradigms. The theory of autopoietic systems is only incompatible with dialogism if reference is to a linear causal model which describes communication as developing from source to destination, or to the conversation model governed by the turning around together rule. Dialogism understood in biosemiotic terms overlaps with the concepts of interconnectivity, interrelation, intercorporeity and presupposes the otherness relation. As Uexküll says, the relation with the umwelt in nonhuman living beings is stable and concerns the species; on the contrary, in human beings it is, changeable and concerns the single individual, which is at once an advantage and a disadvantage. Thanks to "syntactics", human beings can construct, deconstruct and reconstruct an infinite number of worlds from a finite number of elements. This distinguishes human beings from other animals and determines their capacity for posing problems and asking questions. The human being not only produces his or her own world, but can also endanger it, and even destroy it to the point of causing the extinction of all other life forms on Earth. The unique capacity for reflection on signs makes human beings responsible for life across the planet, both human and nonhuman. Such reflections shift semiotic research in the direction of semioethics.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
1 |
| container_start_page |
93 |
| container_title |
Sign Systems Studies |
| container_volume |
41 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792339712419037191 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T15:52:24.572Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Modelling%2C+dialogism+and+the+functional+cycle%3A+biosemiotic+and+philosophical+insights&rft.date=2013-05-17&genre=article&issn=1406-4243&volume=41&issue=1&spage=93&epage=115&pages=93-115&jtitle=Sign+Systems+Studies&atitle=Modelling%2C+dialogism+and+the+functional+cycle%3A+biosemiotic+and+philosophical+insights&aulast=Ponzio&aufirst=Augusto&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.12697%2Fsss.2013.41.1.06&rft.language%5B0%5D=und |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792339712419037191 |
| author | Petrilli, Susan, Ponzio, Augusto |
| author_facet | Petrilli, Susan, Ponzio, Augusto, Petrilli, Susan, Ponzio, Augusto |
| author_sort | petrilli, susan |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 93 |
| container_title | Sign Systems Studies |
| container_volume | 41 |
| description | <jats:p>Charles Peirce, Mikhail Bakhtin and Thomas Sebeok all develop original research itineraries around the sign and, despite terminological differences, can be related with reference to the concept of dialogism and modelling. Jakob von Uexküll's biosemiosic "functional cycle", a model for semiosic processes, is also implied in the relation between dialogue and communication. Biological models which describe communication as a self-referential, autopoietic and semiotically closed system (e.g., the models proposed by Maturana, Varela, and Thure von Uexküll) contrast with both the linear (Shannon and Weaver) and the circular (Saussure) paradigms. The theory of autopoietic systems is only incompatible with dialogism if reference is to a linear causal model which describes communication as developing from source to destination, or to the conversation model governed by the turning around together rule. Dialogism understood in biosemiotic terms overlaps with the concepts of interconnectivity, interrelation, intercorporeity and presupposes the otherness relation. As Uexküll says, the relation with the umwelt in nonhuman living beings is stable and concerns the species; on the contrary, in human beings it is, changeable and concerns the single individual, which is at once an advantage and a disadvantage. Thanks to "syntactics", human beings can construct, deconstruct and reconstruct an infinite number of worlds from a finite number of elements. This distinguishes human beings from other animals and determines their capacity for posing problems and asking questions. The human being not only produces his or her own world, but can also endanger it, and even destroy it to the point of causing the extinction of all other life forms on Earth. The unique capacity for reflection on signs makes human beings responsible for life across the planet, both human and nonhuman. Such reflections shift semiotic research in the direction of semioethics.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.12697/sss.2013.41.1.06 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTI2OTcvc3NzLjIwMTMuNDEuMS4wNg |
| imprint | University of Tartu, 2013 |
| imprint_str_mv | University of Tartu, 2013 |
| institution | DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1 |
| issn | 1406-4243, 1736-7409 |
| issn_str_mv | 1406-4243, 1736-7409 |
| language | Undetermined |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T15:52:24.572Z |
| match_str | petrilli2013modellingdialogismandthefunctionalcyclebiosemioticandphilosophicalinsights |
| mega_collection | University of Tartu (CrossRef) |
| physical | 93-115 |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | University of Tartu |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Sign Systems Studies |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Petrilli, Susan Ponzio, Augusto 1736-7409 1406-4243 University of Tartu Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2013.41.1.06 <jats:p>Charles Peirce, Mikhail Bakhtin and Thomas Sebeok all develop original research itineraries around the sign and, despite terminological differences, can be related with reference to the concept of dialogism and modelling. Jakob von Uexküll's biosemiosic "functional cycle", a model for semiosic processes, is also implied in the relation between dialogue and communication. Biological models which describe communication as a self-referential, autopoietic and semiotically closed system (e.g., the models proposed by Maturana, Varela, and Thure von Uexküll) contrast with both the linear (Shannon and Weaver) and the circular (Saussure) paradigms. The theory of autopoietic systems is only incompatible with dialogism if reference is to a linear causal model which describes communication as developing from source to destination, or to the conversation model governed by the turning around together rule. Dialogism understood in biosemiotic terms overlaps with the concepts of interconnectivity, interrelation, intercorporeity and presupposes the otherness relation. As Uexküll says, the relation with the umwelt in nonhuman living beings is stable and concerns the species; on the contrary, in human beings it is, changeable and concerns the single individual, which is at once an advantage and a disadvantage. Thanks to "syntactics", human beings can construct, deconstruct and reconstruct an infinite number of worlds from a finite number of elements. This distinguishes human beings from other animals and determines their capacity for posing problems and asking questions. The human being not only produces his or her own world, but can also endanger it, and even destroy it to the point of causing the extinction of all other life forms on Earth. The unique capacity for reflection on signs makes human beings responsible for life across the planet, both human and nonhuman. Such reflections shift semiotic research in the direction of semioethics.</jats:p> Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights Sign Systems Studies |
| spellingShingle | Petrilli, Susan, Ponzio, Augusto, Sign Systems Studies, Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights, Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics |
| title | Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_full | Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_fullStr | Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_full_unstemmed | Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_short | Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_sort | modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| title_unstemmed | Modelling, dialogism and the functional cycle: biosemiotic and philosophical insights |
| topic | Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2013.41.1.06 |