Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | BMJ Open |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , |
| In: | BMJ Open, 9, 2019, 5, S. e029354 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
BMJ
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Bailey, Sarah Louise Boivin, Jacky Cheong, Ying C Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen Bailey, Christopher Macklon, Nick Bailey, Sarah Louise Boivin, Jacky Cheong, Ying C Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen Bailey, Christopher Macklon, Nick |
|---|---|
| author |
Bailey, Sarah Louise Boivin, Jacky Cheong, Ying C Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen Bailey, Christopher Macklon, Nick |
| spellingShingle |
Bailey, Sarah Louise Boivin, Jacky Cheong, Ying C Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen Bailey, Christopher Macklon, Nick BMJ Open Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy General Medicine |
| author_sort |
bailey, sarah louise |
| spelling |
Bailey, Sarah Louise Boivin, Jacky Cheong, Ying C Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen Bailey, Christopher Macklon, Nick 2044-6055 2044-6055 BMJ General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029354 <jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To investigate how women experience the initial period of a new pregnancy after suffering recurrent miscarriage (RM).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>A qualitative study, nested within a randomised controlled feasibility study of a coping intervention for RM, used semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic network approach.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Participants were recruited from the Recurrent Miscarriage Clinic and Early Pregnancy Unit in two tertiary referral hospitals in the UK.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>14 women with RMs and who had previously participated in the randomised controlled trial (RCT) feasibility component of the study were recruited.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Seven organising themes emerged from the data: (1) turmoil of emotions, (2) preparing for the worst, (3) setting of personal milestones, (4) hypervigilance, (5) social isolation, (6) adoption of pragmatic approaches, (7) need for professional affirmation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The study established that for women with a history of RM, the waiting period of a new pregnancy is a traumatic time of great uncertainty and emotional turmoil and one in which they express a need for emotional support. Consideration should be given to the manner in which supportive care is best delivered within the constraints of current health service provision.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p><jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="ISRCTN43571276" ext-link-type="isrctn">ISRCTN43571276</jats:ext-link></jats:p></jats:sec> Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy BMJ Open |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029354 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTktMDI5MzU0 |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTktMDI5MzU0 |
| institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Zwi2 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
| imprint |
BMJ, 2019 |
| imprint_str_mv |
BMJ, 2019 |
| issn |
2044-6055 |
| issn_str_mv |
2044-6055 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
BMJ (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
bailey2019hopeforthebestbutexpecttheworstaqualitativestudytoexplorehowwomenwithrecurrentmiscarriageexperiencetheearlywaitingperiodofanewpregnancy |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| publisher |
BMJ |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
BMJ Open |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_unstemmed |
Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_full |
Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_fullStr |
Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_short |
Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_sort |
hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| topic |
General Medicine |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029354 |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| physical |
e029354 |
| description |
<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To investigate how women experience the initial period of a new pregnancy after suffering recurrent miscarriage (RM).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>A qualitative study, nested within a randomised controlled feasibility study of a coping intervention for RM, used semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic network approach.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Participants were recruited from the Recurrent Miscarriage Clinic and Early Pregnancy Unit in two tertiary referral hospitals in the UK.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>14 women with RMs and who had previously participated in the randomised controlled trial (RCT) feasibility component of the study were recruited.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Seven organising themes emerged from the data: (1) turmoil of emotions, (2) preparing for the worst, (3) setting of personal milestones, (4) hypervigilance, (5) social isolation, (6) adoption of pragmatic approaches, (7) need for professional affirmation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The study established that for women with a history of RM, the waiting period of a new pregnancy is a traumatic time of great uncertainty and emotional turmoil and one in which they express a need for emotional support. Consideration should be given to the manner in which supportive care is best delivered within the constraints of current health service provision.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p><jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="ISRCTN43571276" ext-link-type="isrctn">ISRCTN43571276</jats:ext-link></jats:p></jats:sec> |
| container_issue |
5 |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| container_title |
BMJ Open |
| container_volume |
9 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792347084500762626 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T17:49:21.17Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Hope+for+the+best+%E2%80%A6but+expect+the+worst%3A+a+qualitative+study+to+explore+how+women+with+recurrent+miscarriage+experience+the+early+waiting+period+of+a+new+pregnancy&rft.date=2019-05-01&genre=article&issn=2044-6055&volume=9&issue=5&pages=e029354&jtitle=BMJ+Open&atitle=Hope+for+the+best+%E2%80%A6but+expect+the+worst%3A+a+qualitative+study+to+explore+how+women+with+recurrent+miscarriage+experience+the+early+waiting+period+of+a+new+pregnancy&aulast=Macklon&aufirst=Nick&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1136%2Fbmjopen-2019-029354&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792347084500762626 |
| author | Bailey, Sarah Louise, Boivin, Jacky, Cheong, Ying C, Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen, Bailey, Christopher, Macklon, Nick |
| author_facet | Bailey, Sarah Louise, Boivin, Jacky, Cheong, Ying C, Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen, Bailey, Christopher, Macklon, Nick, Bailey, Sarah Louise, Boivin, Jacky, Cheong, Ying C, Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen, Bailey, Christopher, Macklon, Nick |
| author_sort | bailey, sarah louise |
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 0 |
| container_title | BMJ Open |
| container_volume | 9 |
| description | <jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To investigate how women experience the initial period of a new pregnancy after suffering recurrent miscarriage (RM).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>A qualitative study, nested within a randomised controlled feasibility study of a coping intervention for RM, used semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic network approach.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Participants were recruited from the Recurrent Miscarriage Clinic and Early Pregnancy Unit in two tertiary referral hospitals in the UK.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>14 women with RMs and who had previously participated in the randomised controlled trial (RCT) feasibility component of the study were recruited.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Seven organising themes emerged from the data: (1) turmoil of emotions, (2) preparing for the worst, (3) setting of personal milestones, (4) hypervigilance, (5) social isolation, (6) adoption of pragmatic approaches, (7) need for professional affirmation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The study established that for women with a history of RM, the waiting period of a new pregnancy is a traumatic time of great uncertainty and emotional turmoil and one in which they express a need for emotional support. Consideration should be given to the manner in which supportive care is best delivered within the constraints of current health service provision.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p><jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="ISRCTN43571276" ext-link-type="isrctn">ISRCTN43571276</jats:ext-link></jats:p></jats:sec> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029354 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTktMDI5MzU0 |
| imprint | BMJ, 2019 |
| imprint_str_mv | BMJ, 2019 |
| institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zwi2, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| issn_str_mv | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T17:49:21.17Z |
| match_str | bailey2019hopeforthebestbutexpecttheworstaqualitativestudytoexplorehowwomenwithrecurrentmiscarriageexperiencetheearlywaitingperiodofanewpregnancy |
| mega_collection | BMJ (CrossRef) |
| physical | e029354 |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | BMJ |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | BMJ Open |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Bailey, Sarah Louise Boivin, Jacky Cheong, Ying C Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen Bailey, Christopher Macklon, Nick 2044-6055 2044-6055 BMJ General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029354 <jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To investigate how women experience the initial period of a new pregnancy after suffering recurrent miscarriage (RM).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>A qualitative study, nested within a randomised controlled feasibility study of a coping intervention for RM, used semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic network approach.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Participants were recruited from the Recurrent Miscarriage Clinic and Early Pregnancy Unit in two tertiary referral hospitals in the UK.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>14 women with RMs and who had previously participated in the randomised controlled trial (RCT) feasibility component of the study were recruited.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Seven organising themes emerged from the data: (1) turmoil of emotions, (2) preparing for the worst, (3) setting of personal milestones, (4) hypervigilance, (5) social isolation, (6) adoption of pragmatic approaches, (7) need for professional affirmation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The study established that for women with a history of RM, the waiting period of a new pregnancy is a traumatic time of great uncertainty and emotional turmoil and one in which they express a need for emotional support. Consideration should be given to the manner in which supportive care is best delivered within the constraints of current health service provision.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p><jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="ISRCTN43571276" ext-link-type="isrctn">ISRCTN43571276</jats:ext-link></jats:p></jats:sec> Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy BMJ Open |
| spellingShingle | Bailey, Sarah Louise, Boivin, Jacky, Cheong, Ying C, Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen, Bailey, Christopher, Macklon, Nick, BMJ Open, Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy, General Medicine |
| title | Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_full | Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_fullStr | Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_short | Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_sort | hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| title_unstemmed | Hope for the best …but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy |
| topic | General Medicine |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029354 |