author_facet Ommering, Belinda WC
van Blankenstein, Floris M
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
van Diepen, Merel
Dekker, Friedo W
Ommering, Belinda WC
van Blankenstein, Floris M
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
van Diepen, Merel
Dekker, Friedo W
author Ommering, Belinda WC
van Blankenstein, Floris M
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
van Diepen, Merel
Dekker, Friedo W
spellingShingle Ommering, Belinda WC
van Blankenstein, Floris M
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
van Diepen, Merel
Dekker, Friedo W
BMJ Open
Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
General Medicine
author_sort ommering, belinda wc
spelling Ommering, Belinda WC van Blankenstein, Floris M Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo van Diepen, Merel Dekker, Friedo W 2044-6055 2044-6055 BMJ General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028034 <jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>The medical field is facing a physician–scientist shortage. Medical schools could contribute to developing physician–scientists by stimulating student involvement in research. Studies have examined motivation for research as a key parameter of success. However, previous studies did not investigate if students act on their self-reported motivation. The aim of this study is to examine if motivation for research of medical students is related to actual research involvement. Furthermore, this study distinguishes intrinsic (IM) and extrinsic motivation (EM) for research and aims to investigate if a type of motivation matters in the relation between research motivation and involvement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design and setting</jats:title><jats:p>Prospective cohort study in which students were surveyed at the start of medical school and reported IM and EM for research, self-efficacy, perceptions of research and curiosity on a 7-point Likert scale. One year later, students involved in research were identified. Logistic regression was used to examine influences of IM and EM on research involvement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>All undergraduate medical students starting at one medical school in the Netherlands in 2016. In total, 315 out of 316 students participated (99.7%), of whom 55 became involved in research (17.5%).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcome measure</jats:title><jats:p>Research involvement, which was operationalised as the enrolment of students in the research-based honours programme or the involvement of students in voluntary research activities outside of the regular curriculum.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Students with higher levels of IM were more often involved in research (OR 3.4; 95% CI 2.08 to 5.61), also after adjusting for gender, age, extracurricular high school activities, self-efficacy, perceptions and curiosity (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.35 to 4.78). Higher levels of EM increased the odds of research involvement (OR 1.4; 95% CI 0.96 to 2.11). However, the effect of EM disappeared after adjusting for the above-mentioned factors (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.63). Furthermore, the effect of IM remained after adjusting for EM, whereas the effect of EM disappeared after adjusting for IM.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Our findings suggest that the type of motivation matters and IM influences research involvement. Therefore, IM could be targeted to stimulate research involvement and could be seen as the first step towards success in fostering the physician–scientist workforce.</jats:p></jats:sec> Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement BMJ Open
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028034
facet_avail Online
Free
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTgtMDI4MDM0
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTgtMDI4MDM0
institution DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
imprint BMJ, 2019
imprint_str_mv BMJ, 2019
issn 2044-6055
issn_str_mv 2044-6055
language English
mega_collection BMJ (CrossRef)
match_str ommering2019fosteringthephysicianscientistworkforceaprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatetheeffectofundergraduatemedicalstudentsmotivationforresearchonactualresearchinvolvement
publishDateSort 2019
publisher BMJ
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series BMJ Open
source_id 49
title Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_unstemmed Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_full Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_fullStr Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_full_unstemmed Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_short Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_sort fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028034
publishDate 2019
physical e028034
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>The medical field is facing a physician–scientist shortage. Medical schools could contribute to developing physician–scientists by stimulating student involvement in research. Studies have examined motivation for research as a key parameter of success. However, previous studies did not investigate if students act on their self-reported motivation. The aim of this study is to examine if motivation for research of medical students is related to actual research involvement. Furthermore, this study distinguishes intrinsic (IM) and extrinsic motivation (EM) for research and aims to investigate if a type of motivation matters in the relation between research motivation and involvement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design and setting</jats:title><jats:p>Prospective cohort study in which students were surveyed at the start of medical school and reported IM and EM for research, self-efficacy, perceptions of research and curiosity on a 7-point Likert scale. One year later, students involved in research were identified. Logistic regression was used to examine influences of IM and EM on research involvement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>All undergraduate medical students starting at one medical school in the Netherlands in 2016. In total, 315 out of 316 students participated (99.7%), of whom 55 became involved in research (17.5%).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcome measure</jats:title><jats:p>Research involvement, which was operationalised as the enrolment of students in the research-based honours programme or the involvement of students in voluntary research activities outside of the regular curriculum.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Students with higher levels of IM were more often involved in research (OR 3.4; 95% CI 2.08 to 5.61), also after adjusting for gender, age, extracurricular high school activities, self-efficacy, perceptions and curiosity (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.35 to 4.78). Higher levels of EM increased the odds of research involvement (OR 1.4; 95% CI 0.96 to 2.11). However, the effect of EM disappeared after adjusting for the above-mentioned factors (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.63). Furthermore, the effect of IM remained after adjusting for EM, whereas the effect of EM disappeared after adjusting for IM.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Our findings suggest that the type of motivation matters and IM influences research involvement. Therefore, IM could be targeted to stimulate research involvement and could be seen as the first step towards success in fostering the physician–scientist workforce.</jats:p></jats:sec>
container_issue 7
container_start_page 0
container_title BMJ Open
container_volume 9
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792343563606949889
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:53:41.916Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Fostering+the+physician%E2%80%93scientist+workforce%3A+a+prospective+cohort+study+to+investigate+the+effect+of+undergraduate+medical+students%E2%80%99+motivation+for+research+on+actual+research+involvement&rft.date=2019-07-01&genre=article&issn=2044-6055&volume=9&issue=7&pages=e028034&jtitle=BMJ+Open&atitle=Fostering+the+physician%E2%80%93scientist+workforce%3A+a+prospective+cohort+study+to+investigate+the+effect+of+undergraduate+medical+students%E2%80%99+motivation+for+research+on+actual+research+involvement&aulast=Dekker&aufirst=Friedo+W&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1136%2Fbmjopen-2018-028034&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792343563606949889
author Ommering, Belinda WC, van Blankenstein, Floris M, Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo, van Diepen, Merel, Dekker, Friedo W
author_facet Ommering, Belinda WC, van Blankenstein, Floris M, Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo, van Diepen, Merel, Dekker, Friedo W, Ommering, Belinda WC, van Blankenstein, Floris M, Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo, van Diepen, Merel, Dekker, Friedo W
author_sort ommering, belinda wc
container_issue 7
container_start_page 0
container_title BMJ Open
container_volume 9
description <jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>The medical field is facing a physician–scientist shortage. Medical schools could contribute to developing physician–scientists by stimulating student involvement in research. Studies have examined motivation for research as a key parameter of success. However, previous studies did not investigate if students act on their self-reported motivation. The aim of this study is to examine if motivation for research of medical students is related to actual research involvement. Furthermore, this study distinguishes intrinsic (IM) and extrinsic motivation (EM) for research and aims to investigate if a type of motivation matters in the relation between research motivation and involvement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design and setting</jats:title><jats:p>Prospective cohort study in which students were surveyed at the start of medical school and reported IM and EM for research, self-efficacy, perceptions of research and curiosity on a 7-point Likert scale. One year later, students involved in research were identified. Logistic regression was used to examine influences of IM and EM on research involvement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>All undergraduate medical students starting at one medical school in the Netherlands in 2016. In total, 315 out of 316 students participated (99.7%), of whom 55 became involved in research (17.5%).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcome measure</jats:title><jats:p>Research involvement, which was operationalised as the enrolment of students in the research-based honours programme or the involvement of students in voluntary research activities outside of the regular curriculum.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Students with higher levels of IM were more often involved in research (OR 3.4; 95% CI 2.08 to 5.61), also after adjusting for gender, age, extracurricular high school activities, self-efficacy, perceptions and curiosity (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.35 to 4.78). Higher levels of EM increased the odds of research involvement (OR 1.4; 95% CI 0.96 to 2.11). However, the effect of EM disappeared after adjusting for the above-mentioned factors (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.63). Furthermore, the effect of IM remained after adjusting for EM, whereas the effect of EM disappeared after adjusting for IM.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Our findings suggest that the type of motivation matters and IM influences research involvement. Therefore, IM could be targeted to stimulate research involvement and could be seen as the first step towards success in fostering the physician–scientist workforce.</jats:p></jats:sec>
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028034
facet_avail Online, Free
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEzNi9ibWpvcGVuLTIwMTgtMDI4MDM0
imprint BMJ, 2019
imprint_str_mv BMJ, 2019
institution DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14
issn 2044-6055
issn_str_mv 2044-6055
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:53:41.916Z
match_str ommering2019fosteringthephysicianscientistworkforceaprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatetheeffectofundergraduatemedicalstudentsmotivationforresearchonactualresearchinvolvement
mega_collection BMJ (CrossRef)
physical e028034
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher BMJ
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series BMJ Open
source_id 49
spelling Ommering, Belinda WC van Blankenstein, Floris M Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo van Diepen, Merel Dekker, Friedo W 2044-6055 2044-6055 BMJ General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028034 <jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>The medical field is facing a physician–scientist shortage. Medical schools could contribute to developing physician–scientists by stimulating student involvement in research. Studies have examined motivation for research as a key parameter of success. However, previous studies did not investigate if students act on their self-reported motivation. The aim of this study is to examine if motivation for research of medical students is related to actual research involvement. Furthermore, this study distinguishes intrinsic (IM) and extrinsic motivation (EM) for research and aims to investigate if a type of motivation matters in the relation between research motivation and involvement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design and setting</jats:title><jats:p>Prospective cohort study in which students were surveyed at the start of medical school and reported IM and EM for research, self-efficacy, perceptions of research and curiosity on a 7-point Likert scale. One year later, students involved in research were identified. Logistic regression was used to examine influences of IM and EM on research involvement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>All undergraduate medical students starting at one medical school in the Netherlands in 2016. In total, 315 out of 316 students participated (99.7%), of whom 55 became involved in research (17.5%).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcome measure</jats:title><jats:p>Research involvement, which was operationalised as the enrolment of students in the research-based honours programme or the involvement of students in voluntary research activities outside of the regular curriculum.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Students with higher levels of IM were more often involved in research (OR 3.4; 95% CI 2.08 to 5.61), also after adjusting for gender, age, extracurricular high school activities, self-efficacy, perceptions and curiosity (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.35 to 4.78). Higher levels of EM increased the odds of research involvement (OR 1.4; 95% CI 0.96 to 2.11). However, the effect of EM disappeared after adjusting for the above-mentioned factors (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.63). Furthermore, the effect of IM remained after adjusting for EM, whereas the effect of EM disappeared after adjusting for IM.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Our findings suggest that the type of motivation matters and IM influences research involvement. Therefore, IM could be targeted to stimulate research involvement and could be seen as the first step towards success in fostering the physician–scientist workforce.</jats:p></jats:sec> Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement BMJ Open
spellingShingle Ommering, Belinda WC, van Blankenstein, Floris M, Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo, van Diepen, Merel, Dekker, Friedo W, BMJ Open, Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement, General Medicine
title Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_full Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_fullStr Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_full_unstemmed Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_short Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_sort fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
title_unstemmed Fostering the physician–scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028034