Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , |
| In: | Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 35, 1997, 7, S. 1902-1903 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
American Society for Microbiology
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
O'Shaughnessy, E M Fahle, G A Witebsky, F G O'Shaughnessy, E M Fahle, G A Witebsky, F G |
|---|---|
| author |
O'Shaughnessy, E M Fahle, G A Witebsky, F G |
| spellingShingle |
O'Shaughnessy, E M Fahle, G A Witebsky, F G Journal of Clinical Microbiology Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli Microbiology (medical) |
| author_sort |
o'shaughnessy, e m |
| spelling |
O'Shaughnessy, E M Fahle, G A Witebsky, F G 0095-1137 1098-660X American Society for Microbiology Microbiology (medical) http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.7.1902-1903.1997 <jats:p>The results of amoxicillin-clavulanate (AUG) and ampicillin-sulbactam (A/S) susceptibility testing by three different susceptibility testing methods, the MicroScan, Etest, and Kirby-Bauer methods, for 61 consecutive isolates of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli from different patients were compared. There was poor correlation of results for the two agents, the most and least marked discrepancies being observed by the MicroScan method (86.9% susceptible to AUG and 4.9% susceptible to A/S) and the Kirby-Bauer method (39.4% susceptible to AUG and 32.8% susceptible to A/S), respectively. More organisms were susceptible to AUG than A/S, regardless of the susceptibility testing methodology. The results from a College of American Pathologists survey with one E. coli isolate tested at different institutions also indicated greater susceptibility to AUG than to A/S. These agents are thought to be equally efficacious clinically. The discrepancies observed among methods for each antimicrobial inhibitor combination and the discrepancies observed between the two agents by each testing method suggest that the breakpoints for these agents need to be reevaluated.</jats:p> Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1128/jcm.35.7.1902-1903.1997 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Biologie |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEyOC9qY20uMzUuNy4xOTAyLTE5MDMuMTk5Nw |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEyOC9qY20uMzUuNy4xOTAyLTE5MDMuMTk5Nw |
| institution |
DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 |
| imprint |
American Society for Microbiology, 1997 |
| imprint_str_mv |
American Society for Microbiology, 1997 |
| issn |
1098-660X 0095-1137 |
| issn_str_mv |
1098-660X 0095-1137 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
American Society for Microbiology (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
oshaughnessy1997correlationofinvitrosusceptibilityresultsforamoxicillinclavulanateandampicillinsulbactamtestedagainstescherichiacoli |
| publishDateSort |
1997 |
| publisher |
American Society for Microbiology |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| title_unstemmed |
Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| title_full |
Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| title_fullStr |
Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| title_short |
Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| title_sort |
correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against escherichia coli |
| topic |
Microbiology (medical) |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.7.1902-1903.1997 |
| publishDate |
1997 |
| physical |
1902-1903 |
| description |
<jats:p>The results of amoxicillin-clavulanate (AUG) and ampicillin-sulbactam (A/S) susceptibility testing by three different susceptibility testing methods, the MicroScan, Etest, and Kirby-Bauer methods, for 61 consecutive isolates of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli from different patients were compared. There was poor correlation of results for the two agents, the most and least marked discrepancies being observed by the MicroScan method (86.9% susceptible to AUG and 4.9% susceptible to A/S) and the Kirby-Bauer method (39.4% susceptible to AUG and 32.8% susceptible to A/S), respectively. More organisms were susceptible to AUG than A/S, regardless of the susceptibility testing methodology. The results from a College of American Pathologists survey with one E. coli isolate tested at different institutions also indicated greater susceptibility to AUG than to A/S. These agents are thought to be equally efficacious clinically. The discrepancies observed among methods for each antimicrobial inhibitor combination and the discrepancies observed between the two agents by each testing method suggest that the breakpoints for these agents need to be reevaluated.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
7 |
| container_start_page |
1902 |
| container_title |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
| container_volume |
35 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792332868018503690 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:03:42.571Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Correlation+of+in+vitro+susceptibility+results+for+amoxicillin-clavulanate+and+ampicillin-sulbactam+tested+against+Escherichia+coli&rft.date=1997-07-01&genre=article&issn=1098-660X&volume=35&issue=7&spage=1902&epage=1903&pages=1902-1903&jtitle=Journal+of+Clinical+Microbiology&atitle=Correlation+of+in+vitro+susceptibility+results+for+amoxicillin-clavulanate+and+ampicillin-sulbactam+tested+against+Escherichia+coli&aulast=Witebsky&aufirst=F+G&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1128%2Fjcm.35.7.1902-1903.1997&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792332868018503690 |
| author | O'Shaughnessy, E M, Fahle, G A, Witebsky, F G |
| author_facet | O'Shaughnessy, E M, Fahle, G A, Witebsky, F G, O'Shaughnessy, E M, Fahle, G A, Witebsky, F G |
| author_sort | o'shaughnessy, e m |
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1902 |
| container_title | Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
| container_volume | 35 |
| description | <jats:p>The results of amoxicillin-clavulanate (AUG) and ampicillin-sulbactam (A/S) susceptibility testing by three different susceptibility testing methods, the MicroScan, Etest, and Kirby-Bauer methods, for 61 consecutive isolates of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli from different patients were compared. There was poor correlation of results for the two agents, the most and least marked discrepancies being observed by the MicroScan method (86.9% susceptible to AUG and 4.9% susceptible to A/S) and the Kirby-Bauer method (39.4% susceptible to AUG and 32.8% susceptible to A/S), respectively. More organisms were susceptible to AUG than A/S, regardless of the susceptibility testing methodology. The results from a College of American Pathologists survey with one E. coli isolate tested at different institutions also indicated greater susceptibility to AUG than to A/S. These agents are thought to be equally efficacious clinically. The discrepancies observed among methods for each antimicrobial inhibitor combination and the discrepancies observed between the two agents by each testing method suggest that the breakpoints for these agents need to be reevaluated.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1128/jcm.35.7.1902-1903.1997 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Biologie |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTEyOC9qY20uMzUuNy4xOTAyLTE5MDMuMTk5Nw |
| imprint | American Society for Microbiology, 1997 |
| imprint_str_mv | American Society for Microbiology, 1997 |
| institution | DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105 |
| issn | 1098-660X, 0095-1137 |
| issn_str_mv | 1098-660X, 0095-1137 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:03:42.571Z |
| match_str | oshaughnessy1997correlationofinvitrosusceptibilityresultsforamoxicillinclavulanateandampicillinsulbactamtestedagainstescherichiacoli |
| mega_collection | American Society for Microbiology (CrossRef) |
| physical | 1902-1903 |
| publishDate | 1997 |
| publishDateSort | 1997 |
| publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | O'Shaughnessy, E M Fahle, G A Witebsky, F G 0095-1137 1098-660X American Society for Microbiology Microbiology (medical) http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.7.1902-1903.1997 <jats:p>The results of amoxicillin-clavulanate (AUG) and ampicillin-sulbactam (A/S) susceptibility testing by three different susceptibility testing methods, the MicroScan, Etest, and Kirby-Bauer methods, for 61 consecutive isolates of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli from different patients were compared. There was poor correlation of results for the two agents, the most and least marked discrepancies being observed by the MicroScan method (86.9% susceptible to AUG and 4.9% susceptible to A/S) and the Kirby-Bauer method (39.4% susceptible to AUG and 32.8% susceptible to A/S), respectively. More organisms were susceptible to AUG than A/S, regardless of the susceptibility testing methodology. The results from a College of American Pathologists survey with one E. coli isolate tested at different institutions also indicated greater susceptibility to AUG than to A/S. These agents are thought to be equally efficacious clinically. The discrepancies observed among methods for each antimicrobial inhibitor combination and the discrepancies observed between the two agents by each testing method suggest that the breakpoints for these agents need to be reevaluated.</jats:p> Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
| spellingShingle | O'Shaughnessy, E M, Fahle, G A, Witebsky, F G, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli, Microbiology (medical) |
| title | Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| title_full | Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| title_fullStr | Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| title_full_unstemmed | Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| title_short | Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| title_sort | correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against escherichia coli |
| title_unstemmed | Correlation of in vitro susceptibility results for amoxicillin-clavulanate and ampicillin-sulbactam tested against Escherichia coli |
| topic | Microbiology (medical) |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.7.1902-1903.1997 |