author_facet CARRIQUÍ, M.
CABRERA, H. M.
CONESA, M. À.
COOPMAN, R. E.
DOUTHE, C.
GAGO, J.
GALLÉ, A.
GALMÉS, J.
RIBAS‐CARBO, M.
TOMÁS, M.
FLEXAS, J.
CARRIQUÍ, M.
CABRERA, H. M.
CONESA, M. À.
COOPMAN, R. E.
DOUTHE, C.
GAGO, J.
GALLÉ, A.
GALMÉS, J.
RIBAS‐CARBO, M.
TOMÁS, M.
FLEXAS, J.
author CARRIQUÍ, M.
CABRERA, H. M.
CONESA, M. À.
COOPMAN, R. E.
DOUTHE, C.
GAGO, J.
GALLÉ, A.
GALMÉS, J.
RIBAS‐CARBO, M.
TOMÁS, M.
FLEXAS, J.
spellingShingle CARRIQUÍ, M.
CABRERA, H. M.
CONESA, M. À.
COOPMAN, R. E.
DOUTHE, C.
GAGO, J.
GALLÉ, A.
GALMÉS, J.
RIBAS‐CARBO, M.
TOMÁS, M.
FLEXAS, J.
Plant, Cell & Environment
Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
Plant Science
Physiology
author_sort carriquí, m.
spelling CARRIQUÍ, M. CABRERA, H. M. CONESA, M. À. COOPMAN, R. E. DOUTHE, C. GAGO, J. GALLÉ, A. GALMÉS, J. RIBAS‐CARBO, M. TOMÁS, M. FLEXAS, J. 0140-7791 1365-3040 Wiley Plant Science Physiology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.12402 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Ferns are thought to have lower photosynthetic rates than angiosperms and they lack fine stomatal regulation. However, no study has directly compared photosynthesis in plants of both groups grown under optimal conditions in a common environment. We present a common garden comparison of seven angiosperms and seven ferns paired by habitat preference, with the aims of (1) confirming that ferns do have lower photosynthesis capacity than angiosperms and quantifying these differences; (2) determining the importance of diffusional versus biochemical limitations; and (3) analysing the potential implication of leaf anatomical traits in setting the photosynthesis capacity in both groups.</jats:p><jats:p>On average, the photosynthetic rate of ferns was about half that of angiosperms, and they exhibited lower stomatal and mesophyll conductance to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub></jats:italic></jats:styled-content> (<jats:italic>g</jats:italic><jats:sub>m</jats:sub>), maximum velocity of carboxylation and electron transport rate. A quantitative limitation analysis revealed that stomatal and mesophyll conductances were co‐responsible for the lower photosynthesis of ferns as compared with angiosperms. However, <jats:italic>g</jats:italic><jats:sub>m</jats:sub> alone was the most constraining factor for photosynthesis in ferns. Consistently, leaf anatomy showed important differences between angiosperms and ferns, especially in cell wall thickness and the surface of chloroplasts exposed to intercellular air spaces.</jats:p> Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study Plant, Cell & Environment
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pce.12402
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Biologie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9wY2UuMTI0MDI
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9wY2UuMTI0MDI
institution DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint Wiley, 2015
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2015
issn 1365-3040
0140-7791
issn_str_mv 1365-3040
0140-7791
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str carriqui2015diffusionallimitationsexplainthelowerphotosyntheticcapacityoffernsascomparedwithangiospermsinacommongardenstudy
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Plant, Cell & Environment
source_id 49
title Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_unstemmed Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_full Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_fullStr Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_full_unstemmed Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_short Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_sort diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
topic Plant Science
Physiology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.12402
publishDate 2015
physical 448-460
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Ferns are thought to have lower photosynthetic rates than angiosperms and they lack fine stomatal regulation. However, no study has directly compared photosynthesis in plants of both groups grown under optimal conditions in a common environment. We present a common garden comparison of seven angiosperms and seven ferns paired by habitat preference, with the aims of (1) confirming that ferns do have lower photosynthesis capacity than angiosperms and quantifying these differences; (2) determining the importance of diffusional versus biochemical limitations; and (3) analysing the potential implication of leaf anatomical traits in setting the photosynthesis capacity in both groups.</jats:p><jats:p>On average, the photosynthetic rate of ferns was about half that of angiosperms, and they exhibited lower stomatal and mesophyll conductance to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub></jats:italic></jats:styled-content> (<jats:italic>g</jats:italic><jats:sub>m</jats:sub>), maximum velocity of carboxylation and electron transport rate. A quantitative limitation analysis revealed that stomatal and mesophyll conductances were co‐responsible for the lower photosynthesis of ferns as compared with angiosperms. However, <jats:italic>g</jats:italic><jats:sub>m</jats:sub> alone was the most constraining factor for photosynthesis in ferns. Consistently, leaf anatomy showed important differences between angiosperms and ferns, especially in cell wall thickness and the surface of chloroplasts exposed to intercellular air spaces.</jats:p>
container_issue 3
container_start_page 448
container_title Plant, Cell & Environment
container_volume 38
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792345317711020032
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:21:34.979Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Diffusional+limitations+explain+the+lower+photosynthetic+capacity+of+ferns+as+compared+with+angiosperms+in+a+common+garden+study&rft.date=2015-03-01&genre=article&issn=1365-3040&volume=38&issue=3&spage=448&epage=460&pages=448-460&jtitle=Plant%2C+Cell+%26+Environment&atitle=Diffusional+limitations+explain+the+lower+photosynthetic+capacity+of+ferns+as+compared+with+angiosperms+in+a+common+garden+study&aulast=FLEXAS&aufirst=J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fpce.12402&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792345317711020032
author CARRIQUÍ, M., CABRERA, H. M., CONESA, M. À., COOPMAN, R. E., DOUTHE, C., GAGO, J., GALLÉ, A., GALMÉS, J., RIBAS‐CARBO, M., TOMÁS, M., FLEXAS, J.
author_facet CARRIQUÍ, M., CABRERA, H. M., CONESA, M. À., COOPMAN, R. E., DOUTHE, C., GAGO, J., GALLÉ, A., GALMÉS, J., RIBAS‐CARBO, M., TOMÁS, M., FLEXAS, J., CARRIQUÍ, M., CABRERA, H. M., CONESA, M. À., COOPMAN, R. E., DOUTHE, C., GAGO, J., GALLÉ, A., GALMÉS, J., RIBAS‐CARBO, M., TOMÁS, M., FLEXAS, J.
author_sort carriquí, m.
container_issue 3
container_start_page 448
container_title Plant, Cell & Environment
container_volume 38
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Ferns are thought to have lower photosynthetic rates than angiosperms and they lack fine stomatal regulation. However, no study has directly compared photosynthesis in plants of both groups grown under optimal conditions in a common environment. We present a common garden comparison of seven angiosperms and seven ferns paired by habitat preference, with the aims of (1) confirming that ferns do have lower photosynthesis capacity than angiosperms and quantifying these differences; (2) determining the importance of diffusional versus biochemical limitations; and (3) analysing the potential implication of leaf anatomical traits in setting the photosynthesis capacity in both groups.</jats:p><jats:p>On average, the photosynthetic rate of ferns was about half that of angiosperms, and they exhibited lower stomatal and mesophyll conductance to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub></jats:italic></jats:styled-content> (<jats:italic>g</jats:italic><jats:sub>m</jats:sub>), maximum velocity of carboxylation and electron transport rate. A quantitative limitation analysis revealed that stomatal and mesophyll conductances were co‐responsible for the lower photosynthesis of ferns as compared with angiosperms. However, <jats:italic>g</jats:italic><jats:sub>m</jats:sub> alone was the most constraining factor for photosynthesis in ferns. Consistently, leaf anatomy showed important differences between angiosperms and ferns, especially in cell wall thickness and the surface of chloroplasts exposed to intercellular air spaces.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pce.12402
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Biologie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9wY2UuMTI0MDI
imprint Wiley, 2015
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2015
institution DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 1365-3040, 0140-7791
issn_str_mv 1365-3040, 0140-7791
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:21:34.979Z
match_str carriqui2015diffusionallimitationsexplainthelowerphotosyntheticcapacityoffernsascomparedwithangiospermsinacommongardenstudy
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 448-460
publishDate 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Plant, Cell & Environment
source_id 49
spelling CARRIQUÍ, M. CABRERA, H. M. CONESA, M. À. COOPMAN, R. E. DOUTHE, C. GAGO, J. GALLÉ, A. GALMÉS, J. RIBAS‐CARBO, M. TOMÁS, M. FLEXAS, J. 0140-7791 1365-3040 Wiley Plant Science Physiology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.12402 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Ferns are thought to have lower photosynthetic rates than angiosperms and they lack fine stomatal regulation. However, no study has directly compared photosynthesis in plants of both groups grown under optimal conditions in a common environment. We present a common garden comparison of seven angiosperms and seven ferns paired by habitat preference, with the aims of (1) confirming that ferns do have lower photosynthesis capacity than angiosperms and quantifying these differences; (2) determining the importance of diffusional versus biochemical limitations; and (3) analysing the potential implication of leaf anatomical traits in setting the photosynthesis capacity in both groups.</jats:p><jats:p>On average, the photosynthetic rate of ferns was about half that of angiosperms, and they exhibited lower stomatal and mesophyll conductance to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case"><jats:italic>CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub></jats:italic></jats:styled-content> (<jats:italic>g</jats:italic><jats:sub>m</jats:sub>), maximum velocity of carboxylation and electron transport rate. A quantitative limitation analysis revealed that stomatal and mesophyll conductances were co‐responsible for the lower photosynthesis of ferns as compared with angiosperms. However, <jats:italic>g</jats:italic><jats:sub>m</jats:sub> alone was the most constraining factor for photosynthesis in ferns. Consistently, leaf anatomy showed important differences between angiosperms and ferns, especially in cell wall thickness and the surface of chloroplasts exposed to intercellular air spaces.</jats:p> Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study Plant, Cell & Environment
spellingShingle CARRIQUÍ, M., CABRERA, H. M., CONESA, M. À., COOPMAN, R. E., DOUTHE, C., GAGO, J., GALLÉ, A., GALMÉS, J., RIBAS‐CARBO, M., TOMÁS, M., FLEXAS, J., Plant, Cell & Environment, Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study, Plant Science, Physiology
title Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_full Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_fullStr Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_full_unstemmed Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_short Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_sort diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
title_unstemmed Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study
topic Plant Science, Physiology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.12402