author_facet HOOD, Lon L.
WEIDENSCHILLING, Stuart J.
HOOD, Lon L.
WEIDENSCHILLING, Stuart J.
author HOOD, Lon L.
WEIDENSCHILLING, Stuart J.
spellingShingle HOOD, Lon L.
WEIDENSCHILLING, Stuart J.
Meteoritics & Planetary Science
The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
Space and Planetary Science
Geophysics
author_sort hood, lon l.
spelling HOOD, Lon L. WEIDENSCHILLING, Stuart J. 1086-9379 1945-5100 Wiley Space and Planetary Science Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/maps.12006 <jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract–</jats:bold> One transient heating mechanism that can potentially explain the formation of most meteoritic chondrules 1–3 Myr after CAIs is shock waves produced by planetary embryos perturbed into eccentric orbits via resonances with Jupiter following its formation. The mechanism includes both bow shocks upstream of resonant bodies and impact vapor plume shocks produced by high‐velocity collisions of the embryos with small nonresonant planetesimals. Here, we investigate the efficiency of both shock processes using an improved planetesimal accretion and orbital evolution code together with previous simulations of vapor plume expansion in the nebula. Only the standard version of the model (with Jupiter assumed to have its present semimajor axis and eccentricity) is considered. After several hundred thousand years of integration time, about 4–5% of remaining embryos have eccentricities greater than about 0.33 and shock velocities at 3 AU exceeding 6 km s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, currently considered to be a minimum for melting submillimeter‐sized silicate precursors in bow shocks. Most embryos perturbed into highly eccentric orbits are relatively large—half as large as the Moon or larger. Bodies of this size could yield chondrule‐cooling rates during bow shock passage compatible with furnace experiment results. The cumulative area of the midplane that would be traversed by highly eccentric embryos and their associated bow shocks over a period of 1–2 Myr is &lt;1% of the total area. However, future simulations that consider a radially migrating Jupiter and alternate initial distributions of the planetesimal swarm may yield higher efficiencies.</jats:p> The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case Meteoritics & Planetary Science
doi_str_mv 10.1111/maps.12006
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie
Geographie
Physik
Technik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9tYXBzLjEyMDA2
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9tYXBzLjEyMDA2
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2012
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2012
issn 1086-9379
1945-5100
issn_str_mv 1086-9379
1945-5100
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str hood2012theplanetesimalbowshockmodelforchondruleformationamorequantitativeassessmentofthestandardfixedjupitercase
publishDateSort 2012
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Meteoritics & Planetary Science
source_id 49
title The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
title_unstemmed The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
title_full The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
title_fullStr The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
title_full_unstemmed The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
title_short The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
title_sort the planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: a more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed jupiter) case
topic Space and Planetary Science
Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/maps.12006
publishDate 2012
physical 1715-1727
description <jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract–</jats:bold> One transient heating mechanism that can potentially explain the formation of most meteoritic chondrules 1–3 Myr after CAIs is shock waves produced by planetary embryos perturbed into eccentric orbits via resonances with Jupiter following its formation. The mechanism includes both bow shocks upstream of resonant bodies and impact vapor plume shocks produced by high‐velocity collisions of the embryos with small nonresonant planetesimals. Here, we investigate the efficiency of both shock processes using an improved planetesimal accretion and orbital evolution code together with previous simulations of vapor plume expansion in the nebula. Only the standard version of the model (with Jupiter assumed to have its present semimajor axis and eccentricity) is considered. After several hundred thousand years of integration time, about 4–5% of remaining embryos have eccentricities greater than about 0.33 and shock velocities at 3 AU exceeding 6 km s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, currently considered to be a minimum for melting submillimeter‐sized silicate precursors in bow shocks. Most embryos perturbed into highly eccentric orbits are relatively large—half as large as the Moon or larger. Bodies of this size could yield chondrule‐cooling rates during bow shock passage compatible with furnace experiment results. The cumulative area of the midplane that would be traversed by highly eccentric embryos and their associated bow shocks over a period of 1–2 Myr is &lt;1% of the total area. However, future simulations that consider a radially migrating Jupiter and alternate initial distributions of the planetesimal swarm may yield higher efficiencies.</jats:p>
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1715
container_title Meteoritics & Planetary Science
container_volume 47
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792342710421553166
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:40:05.475Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+planetesimal+bow+shock+model+for+chondrule+formation%3A+A+more+quantitative+assessment+of+the+standard+%28fixed+Jupiter%29+case&rft.date=2012-11-01&genre=article&issn=1945-5100&volume=47&issue=11&spage=1715&epage=1727&pages=1715-1727&jtitle=Meteoritics+%26+Planetary+Science&atitle=The+planetesimal+bow+shock+model+for+chondrule+formation%3A+A+more+quantitative+assessment+of+the+standard+%28fixed+Jupiter%29+case&aulast=WEIDENSCHILLING&aufirst=Stuart+J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fmaps.12006&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792342710421553166
author HOOD, Lon L., WEIDENSCHILLING, Stuart J.
author_facet HOOD, Lon L., WEIDENSCHILLING, Stuart J., HOOD, Lon L., WEIDENSCHILLING, Stuart J.
author_sort hood, lon l.
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1715
container_title Meteoritics & Planetary Science
container_volume 47
description <jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract–</jats:bold> One transient heating mechanism that can potentially explain the formation of most meteoritic chondrules 1–3 Myr after CAIs is shock waves produced by planetary embryos perturbed into eccentric orbits via resonances with Jupiter following its formation. The mechanism includes both bow shocks upstream of resonant bodies and impact vapor plume shocks produced by high‐velocity collisions of the embryos with small nonresonant planetesimals. Here, we investigate the efficiency of both shock processes using an improved planetesimal accretion and orbital evolution code together with previous simulations of vapor plume expansion in the nebula. Only the standard version of the model (with Jupiter assumed to have its present semimajor axis and eccentricity) is considered. After several hundred thousand years of integration time, about 4–5% of remaining embryos have eccentricities greater than about 0.33 and shock velocities at 3 AU exceeding 6 km s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, currently considered to be a minimum for melting submillimeter‐sized silicate precursors in bow shocks. Most embryos perturbed into highly eccentric orbits are relatively large—half as large as the Moon or larger. Bodies of this size could yield chondrule‐cooling rates during bow shock passage compatible with furnace experiment results. The cumulative area of the midplane that would be traversed by highly eccentric embryos and their associated bow shocks over a period of 1–2 Myr is &lt;1% of the total area. However, future simulations that consider a radially migrating Jupiter and alternate initial distributions of the planetesimal swarm may yield higher efficiencies.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/maps.12006
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie, Geographie, Physik, Technik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9tYXBzLjEyMDA2
imprint Wiley, 2012
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2012
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 1086-9379, 1945-5100
issn_str_mv 1086-9379, 1945-5100
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:40:05.475Z
match_str hood2012theplanetesimalbowshockmodelforchondruleformationamorequantitativeassessmentofthestandardfixedjupitercase
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 1715-1727
publishDate 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Meteoritics & Planetary Science
source_id 49
spelling HOOD, Lon L. WEIDENSCHILLING, Stuart J. 1086-9379 1945-5100 Wiley Space and Planetary Science Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/maps.12006 <jats:p><jats:bold>Abstract–</jats:bold> One transient heating mechanism that can potentially explain the formation of most meteoritic chondrules 1–3 Myr after CAIs is shock waves produced by planetary embryos perturbed into eccentric orbits via resonances with Jupiter following its formation. The mechanism includes both bow shocks upstream of resonant bodies and impact vapor plume shocks produced by high‐velocity collisions of the embryos with small nonresonant planetesimals. Here, we investigate the efficiency of both shock processes using an improved planetesimal accretion and orbital evolution code together with previous simulations of vapor plume expansion in the nebula. Only the standard version of the model (with Jupiter assumed to have its present semimajor axis and eccentricity) is considered. After several hundred thousand years of integration time, about 4–5% of remaining embryos have eccentricities greater than about 0.33 and shock velocities at 3 AU exceeding 6 km s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, currently considered to be a minimum for melting submillimeter‐sized silicate precursors in bow shocks. Most embryos perturbed into highly eccentric orbits are relatively large—half as large as the Moon or larger. Bodies of this size could yield chondrule‐cooling rates during bow shock passage compatible with furnace experiment results. The cumulative area of the midplane that would be traversed by highly eccentric embryos and their associated bow shocks over a period of 1–2 Myr is &lt;1% of the total area. However, future simulations that consider a radially migrating Jupiter and alternate initial distributions of the planetesimal swarm may yield higher efficiencies.</jats:p> The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case Meteoritics & Planetary Science
spellingShingle HOOD, Lon L., WEIDENSCHILLING, Stuart J., Meteoritics & Planetary Science, The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case, Space and Planetary Science, Geophysics
title The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
title_full The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
title_fullStr The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
title_full_unstemmed The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
title_short The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
title_sort the planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: a more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed jupiter) case
title_unstemmed The planetesimal bow shock model for chondrule formation: A more quantitative assessment of the standard (fixed Jupiter) case
topic Space and Planetary Science, Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/maps.12006