author_facet Landgren, O.
Iskander, K.
Landgren, O.
Iskander, K.
author Landgren, O.
Iskander, K.
spellingShingle Landgren, O.
Iskander, K.
Journal of Internal Medicine
Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
Internal Medicine
author_sort landgren, o.
spelling Landgren, O. Iskander, K. 0954-6820 1365-2796 Wiley Internal Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.12590 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the USA at the beginning of this century, the average overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma was about 3 years. Around that time, three drugs (bortezomib, lenalidomide and thalidomide) were introduced for the treatment of multiple myeloma and, in 2012, carfilzomib received accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Driven by access to better drugs, median overall survival in younger patients (aged &lt;50 years) was &gt;10 years by 2014. The FDA approved 14 new drugs for the treatment of cancer in 2015; four of these were approved for the treatment of myeloma (panobinostat, daratumumab, elotuzumab and ixazomib). In 2015 and 2016, expanded label indications were approved by the FDA for lenalidomide and carfilzomib, respectively. The recent increase in approved, highly effective combination therapies for patients with multiple myeloma has led the way to redefining the goals of therapy. Here, we review and provide a clinical perspective on the treatment goals and management of multiple myeloma in the era of modern therapy. Recent meta‐analyses show that minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity is associated with longer progression‐free and overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma. With the use of modern combination therapy, large proportions (&gt;60–70%) of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients achieve complete responses and MRD negativity. Modern combination therapies induce rapid, deep and sustainable responses (including MRD negativity), supporting a treatment paradigm shift away from palliative two‐drug combinations towards the use of modern, potent, three‐ or four‐drug combination regimens in early lines of therapy. Data support the use of modern therapy upfront rather than reserving it for later stages of the disease. As survival time increases with modern combination therapies, development of early reliable surrogate end‐points for survival, such as MRD negativity, are needed for expedited read‐out of future randomized clinical trials.</jats:p> Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes Journal of Internal Medicine
doi_str_mv 10.1111/joim.12590
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qb2ltLjEyNTkw
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qb2ltLjEyNTkw
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
issn 0954-6820
1365-2796
issn_str_mv 0954-6820
1365-2796
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str landgren2017modernmultiplemyelomatherapydeepsustainedtreatmentresponseandgoodclinicaloutcomes
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Internal Medicine
source_id 49
title Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_unstemmed Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_full Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_fullStr Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_short Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_sort modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
topic Internal Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.12590
publishDate 2017
physical 365-382
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the USA at the beginning of this century, the average overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma was about 3 years. Around that time, three drugs (bortezomib, lenalidomide and thalidomide) were introduced for the treatment of multiple myeloma and, in 2012, carfilzomib received accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Driven by access to better drugs, median overall survival in younger patients (aged &lt;50 years) was &gt;10 years by 2014. The FDA approved 14 new drugs for the treatment of cancer in 2015; four of these were approved for the treatment of myeloma (panobinostat, daratumumab, elotuzumab and ixazomib). In 2015 and 2016, expanded label indications were approved by the FDA for lenalidomide and carfilzomib, respectively. The recent increase in approved, highly effective combination therapies for patients with multiple myeloma has led the way to redefining the goals of therapy. Here, we review and provide a clinical perspective on the treatment goals and management of multiple myeloma in the era of modern therapy. Recent meta‐analyses show that minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity is associated with longer progression‐free and overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma. With the use of modern combination therapy, large proportions (&gt;60–70%) of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients achieve complete responses and MRD negativity. Modern combination therapies induce rapid, deep and sustainable responses (including MRD negativity), supporting a treatment paradigm shift away from palliative two‐drug combinations towards the use of modern, potent, three‐ or four‐drug combination regimens in early lines of therapy. Data support the use of modern therapy upfront rather than reserving it for later stages of the disease. As survival time increases with modern combination therapies, development of early reliable surrogate end‐points for survival, such as MRD negativity, are needed for expedited read‐out of future randomized clinical trials.</jats:p>
container_issue 4
container_start_page 365
container_title Journal of Internal Medicine
container_volume 281
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792344740364025867
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:12:22.887Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Modern+multiple+myeloma+therapy%3A+deep%2C+sustained+treatment+response+and+good+clinical+outcomes&rft.date=2017-04-01&genre=article&issn=1365-2796&volume=281&issue=4&spage=365&epage=382&pages=365-382&jtitle=Journal+of+Internal+Medicine&atitle=Modern+multiple+myeloma+therapy%3A+deep%2C+sustained+treatment+response+and+good+clinical+outcomes&aulast=Iskander&aufirst=K.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fjoim.12590&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792344740364025867
author Landgren, O., Iskander, K.
author_facet Landgren, O., Iskander, K., Landgren, O., Iskander, K.
author_sort landgren, o.
container_issue 4
container_start_page 365
container_title Journal of Internal Medicine
container_volume 281
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the USA at the beginning of this century, the average overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma was about 3 years. Around that time, three drugs (bortezomib, lenalidomide and thalidomide) were introduced for the treatment of multiple myeloma and, in 2012, carfilzomib received accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Driven by access to better drugs, median overall survival in younger patients (aged &lt;50 years) was &gt;10 years by 2014. The FDA approved 14 new drugs for the treatment of cancer in 2015; four of these were approved for the treatment of myeloma (panobinostat, daratumumab, elotuzumab and ixazomib). In 2015 and 2016, expanded label indications were approved by the FDA for lenalidomide and carfilzomib, respectively. The recent increase in approved, highly effective combination therapies for patients with multiple myeloma has led the way to redefining the goals of therapy. Here, we review and provide a clinical perspective on the treatment goals and management of multiple myeloma in the era of modern therapy. Recent meta‐analyses show that minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity is associated with longer progression‐free and overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma. With the use of modern combination therapy, large proportions (&gt;60–70%) of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients achieve complete responses and MRD negativity. Modern combination therapies induce rapid, deep and sustainable responses (including MRD negativity), supporting a treatment paradigm shift away from palliative two‐drug combinations towards the use of modern, potent, three‐ or four‐drug combination regimens in early lines of therapy. Data support the use of modern therapy upfront rather than reserving it for later stages of the disease. As survival time increases with modern combination therapies, development of early reliable surrogate end‐points for survival, such as MRD negativity, are needed for expedited read‐out of future randomized clinical trials.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/joim.12590
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qb2ltLjEyNTkw
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0954-6820, 1365-2796
issn_str_mv 0954-6820, 1365-2796
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:12:22.887Z
match_str landgren2017modernmultiplemyelomatherapydeepsustainedtreatmentresponseandgoodclinicaloutcomes
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 365-382
publishDate 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Internal Medicine
source_id 49
spelling Landgren, O. Iskander, K. 0954-6820 1365-2796 Wiley Internal Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.12590 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the USA at the beginning of this century, the average overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma was about 3 years. Around that time, three drugs (bortezomib, lenalidomide and thalidomide) were introduced for the treatment of multiple myeloma and, in 2012, carfilzomib received accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Driven by access to better drugs, median overall survival in younger patients (aged &lt;50 years) was &gt;10 years by 2014. The FDA approved 14 new drugs for the treatment of cancer in 2015; four of these were approved for the treatment of myeloma (panobinostat, daratumumab, elotuzumab and ixazomib). In 2015 and 2016, expanded label indications were approved by the FDA for lenalidomide and carfilzomib, respectively. The recent increase in approved, highly effective combination therapies for patients with multiple myeloma has led the way to redefining the goals of therapy. Here, we review and provide a clinical perspective on the treatment goals and management of multiple myeloma in the era of modern therapy. Recent meta‐analyses show that minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity is associated with longer progression‐free and overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma. With the use of modern combination therapy, large proportions (&gt;60–70%) of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients achieve complete responses and MRD negativity. Modern combination therapies induce rapid, deep and sustainable responses (including MRD negativity), supporting a treatment paradigm shift away from palliative two‐drug combinations towards the use of modern, potent, three‐ or four‐drug combination regimens in early lines of therapy. Data support the use of modern therapy upfront rather than reserving it for later stages of the disease. As survival time increases with modern combination therapies, development of early reliable surrogate end‐points for survival, such as MRD negativity, are needed for expedited read‐out of future randomized clinical trials.</jats:p> Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes Journal of Internal Medicine
spellingShingle Landgren, O., Iskander, K., Journal of Internal Medicine, Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes, Internal Medicine
title Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_full Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_fullStr Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_short Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_sort modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
title_unstemmed Modern multiple myeloma therapy: deep, sustained treatment response and good clinical outcomes
topic Internal Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.12590