author_facet Joussen, Antonia M.
Kirchhof, Bernd
Schrage, Norbert
Ocklenburg, Christina
Hilgers, Ralf‐Dieter
Joussen, Antonia M.
Kirchhof, Bernd
Schrage, Norbert
Ocklenburg, Christina
Hilgers, Ralf‐Dieter
author Joussen, Antonia M.
Kirchhof, Bernd
Schrage, Norbert
Ocklenburg, Christina
Hilgers, Ralf‐Dieter
spellingShingle Joussen, Antonia M.
Kirchhof, Bernd
Schrage, Norbert
Ocklenburg, Christina
Hilgers, Ralf‐Dieter
Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica
Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
Ophthalmology
author_sort joussen, antonia m.
spelling Joussen, Antonia M. Kirchhof, Bernd Schrage, Norbert Ocklenburg, Christina Hilgers, Ralf‐Dieter 1395-3907 1600-0420 Wiley Ophthalmology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00898.x <jats:title>Abstract.</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose: </jats:bold> Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the most important reason for blindness following retinal detachment. Presently, vitreous tamponades such as gas or silicone oil cannot contact the lower part of the retina. A heavier‐than‐water tamponade displaces the inflammatory and PVR‐stimulating environment from the inferior area of the retina. The Heavy Silicone Oil versus Standard Silicone Oil Study (HSO Study) is designed to answer the question of whether a heavier‐than‐water tamponade improves the prognosis of eyes with PVR of the lower retina.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods: </jats:bold> The HSO Study is a multicentre, randomized, prospective controlled clinical trial comparing two endotamponades within a two‐arm parallel group design. Patients with inferiorly and posteriorly located PVR are randomized to either heavy silicone oil or standard silicone oil as a tamponading agent. Three hundred and fifty consecutive patients are recruited per group. After intraoperative re‐attachment, patients are randomized to either standard silicone oil (1000 cSt or 5000 cSt) or Densiron<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> as a tamponading agent. The main endpoint criteria are complete retinal attachment at 12 months and change of visual acuity (VA) 12 months postoperatively compared with the preoperative VA. Secondary endpoints include complete retinal attachment before endotamponade removal, quality of life analysis and the number of retina affecting re‐operation within 1 year of follow‐up.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> The design and early recruitment phase of the study are described.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions: </jats:bold> The results of this study will uncover whether or not heavy silicone oil improves the prognosis of eyes with PVR.</jats:p> Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00898.x
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE2MDAtMDQyMC4yMDA3LjAwODk4Lng
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE2MDAtMDQyMC4yMDA3LjAwODk4Lng
institution DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
imprint Wiley, 2007
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2007
issn 1395-3907
1600-0420
issn_str_mv 1395-3907
1600-0420
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str joussen2007heavysiliconeoilversusstandardsiliconeoilasvitreoustamponadeininferiorpvrhsostudydesignissuesandimplications
publishDateSort 2007
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica
source_id 49
title Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
title_unstemmed Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
title_full Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
title_fullStr Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
title_full_unstemmed Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
title_short Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
title_sort heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior pvr (hso study): design issues and implications
topic Ophthalmology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00898.x
publishDate 2007
physical 623-630
description <jats:title>Abstract.</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose: </jats:bold> Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the most important reason for blindness following retinal detachment. Presently, vitreous tamponades such as gas or silicone oil cannot contact the lower part of the retina. A heavier‐than‐water tamponade displaces the inflammatory and PVR‐stimulating environment from the inferior area of the retina. The Heavy Silicone Oil versus Standard Silicone Oil Study (HSO Study) is designed to answer the question of whether a heavier‐than‐water tamponade improves the prognosis of eyes with PVR of the lower retina.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods: </jats:bold> The HSO Study is a multicentre, randomized, prospective controlled clinical trial comparing two endotamponades within a two‐arm parallel group design. Patients with inferiorly and posteriorly located PVR are randomized to either heavy silicone oil or standard silicone oil as a tamponading agent. Three hundred and fifty consecutive patients are recruited per group. After intraoperative re‐attachment, patients are randomized to either standard silicone oil (1000 cSt or 5000 cSt) or Densiron<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> as a tamponading agent. The main endpoint criteria are complete retinal attachment at 12 months and change of visual acuity (VA) 12 months postoperatively compared with the preoperative VA. Secondary endpoints include complete retinal attachment before endotamponade removal, quality of life analysis and the number of retina affecting re‐operation within 1 year of follow‐up.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> The design and early recruitment phase of the study are described.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions: </jats:bold> The results of this study will uncover whether or not heavy silicone oil improves the prognosis of eyes with PVR.</jats:p>
container_issue 6
container_start_page 623
container_title Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica
container_volume 85
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792346467969531911
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:39:51.878Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Heavy+silicone+oil+versus+standard+silicone+oil+as+vitreous+tamponade+in+inferior+PVR+%28HSO+Study%29%3A+design+issues+and+implications&rft.date=2007-09-01&genre=article&issn=1600-0420&volume=85&issue=6&spage=623&epage=630&pages=623-630&jtitle=Acta+Ophthalmologica+Scandinavica&atitle=Heavy+silicone+oil+versus+standard+silicone+oil+as+vitreous+tamponade+in+inferior+PVR+%28HSO+Study%29%3A+design+issues+and+implications&aulast=Hilgers&aufirst=Ralf%E2%80%90Dieter&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fj.1600-0420.2007.00898.x&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792346467969531911
author Joussen, Antonia M., Kirchhof, Bernd, Schrage, Norbert, Ocklenburg, Christina, Hilgers, Ralf‐Dieter
author_facet Joussen, Antonia M., Kirchhof, Bernd, Schrage, Norbert, Ocklenburg, Christina, Hilgers, Ralf‐Dieter, Joussen, Antonia M., Kirchhof, Bernd, Schrage, Norbert, Ocklenburg, Christina, Hilgers, Ralf‐Dieter
author_sort joussen, antonia m.
container_issue 6
container_start_page 623
container_title Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica
container_volume 85
description <jats:title>Abstract.</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose: </jats:bold> Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the most important reason for blindness following retinal detachment. Presently, vitreous tamponades such as gas or silicone oil cannot contact the lower part of the retina. A heavier‐than‐water tamponade displaces the inflammatory and PVR‐stimulating environment from the inferior area of the retina. The Heavy Silicone Oil versus Standard Silicone Oil Study (HSO Study) is designed to answer the question of whether a heavier‐than‐water tamponade improves the prognosis of eyes with PVR of the lower retina.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods: </jats:bold> The HSO Study is a multicentre, randomized, prospective controlled clinical trial comparing two endotamponades within a two‐arm parallel group design. Patients with inferiorly and posteriorly located PVR are randomized to either heavy silicone oil or standard silicone oil as a tamponading agent. Three hundred and fifty consecutive patients are recruited per group. After intraoperative re‐attachment, patients are randomized to either standard silicone oil (1000 cSt or 5000 cSt) or Densiron<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> as a tamponading agent. The main endpoint criteria are complete retinal attachment at 12 months and change of visual acuity (VA) 12 months postoperatively compared with the preoperative VA. Secondary endpoints include complete retinal attachment before endotamponade removal, quality of life analysis and the number of retina affecting re‐operation within 1 year of follow‐up.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> The design and early recruitment phase of the study are described.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions: </jats:bold> The results of this study will uncover whether or not heavy silicone oil improves the prognosis of eyes with PVR.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00898.x
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9qLjE2MDAtMDQyMC4yMDA3LjAwODk4Lng
imprint Wiley, 2007
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2007
institution DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3
issn 1395-3907, 1600-0420
issn_str_mv 1395-3907, 1600-0420
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:39:51.878Z
match_str joussen2007heavysiliconeoilversusstandardsiliconeoilasvitreoustamponadeininferiorpvrhsostudydesignissuesandimplications
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 623-630
publishDate 2007
publishDateSort 2007
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica
source_id 49
spelling Joussen, Antonia M. Kirchhof, Bernd Schrage, Norbert Ocklenburg, Christina Hilgers, Ralf‐Dieter 1395-3907 1600-0420 Wiley Ophthalmology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00898.x <jats:title>Abstract.</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose: </jats:bold> Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the most important reason for blindness following retinal detachment. Presently, vitreous tamponades such as gas or silicone oil cannot contact the lower part of the retina. A heavier‐than‐water tamponade displaces the inflammatory and PVR‐stimulating environment from the inferior area of the retina. The Heavy Silicone Oil versus Standard Silicone Oil Study (HSO Study) is designed to answer the question of whether a heavier‐than‐water tamponade improves the prognosis of eyes with PVR of the lower retina.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods: </jats:bold> The HSO Study is a multicentre, randomized, prospective controlled clinical trial comparing two endotamponades within a two‐arm parallel group design. Patients with inferiorly and posteriorly located PVR are randomized to either heavy silicone oil or standard silicone oil as a tamponading agent. Three hundred and fifty consecutive patients are recruited per group. After intraoperative re‐attachment, patients are randomized to either standard silicone oil (1000 cSt or 5000 cSt) or Densiron<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> as a tamponading agent. The main endpoint criteria are complete retinal attachment at 12 months and change of visual acuity (VA) 12 months postoperatively compared with the preoperative VA. Secondary endpoints include complete retinal attachment before endotamponade removal, quality of life analysis and the number of retina affecting re‐operation within 1 year of follow‐up.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results: </jats:bold> The design and early recruitment phase of the study are described.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions: </jats:bold> The results of this study will uncover whether or not heavy silicone oil improves the prognosis of eyes with PVR.</jats:p> Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica
spellingShingle Joussen, Antonia M., Kirchhof, Bernd, Schrage, Norbert, Ocklenburg, Christina, Hilgers, Ralf‐Dieter, Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications, Ophthalmology
title Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
title_full Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
title_fullStr Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
title_full_unstemmed Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
title_short Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
title_sort heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior pvr (hso study): design issues and implications
title_unstemmed Heavy silicone oil versus standard silicone oil as vitreous tamponade in inferior PVR (HSO Study): design issues and implications
topic Ophthalmology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00898.x