author_facet O'Brien, C.
Urquhart, C. S.
Allam, S
Anderson, K. J.
Leitch, J. A.
Macpherson, A.
Kenny, G. N. C.
O'Brien, C.
Urquhart, C. S.
Allam, S
Anderson, K. J.
Leitch, J. A.
Macpherson, A.
Kenny, G. N. C.
author O'Brien, C.
Urquhart, C. S.
Allam, S
Anderson, K. J.
Leitch, J. A.
Macpherson, A.
Kenny, G. N. C.
spellingShingle O'Brien, C.
Urquhart, C. S.
Allam, S
Anderson, K. J.
Leitch, J. A.
Macpherson, A.
Kenny, G. N. C.
Anaesthesia
Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
author_sort o'brien, c.
spelling O'Brien, C. Urquhart, C. S. Allam, S Anderson, K. J. Leitch, J. A. Macpherson, A. Kenny, G. N. C. 0003-2409 1365-2044 Wiley Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.12291 <jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>Previous volunteer studies of an effect‐site controlled patient‐maintained sedation system using propofol have demonstrated a risk of oversedation. We have incorporated a reaction time monitor into the handset to add an individualised patient‐feedback mechanism. This pilot study assessed if the reaction time‐feedback modification would prove safe and effective in 20 healthy patients receiving sedation while undergoing oral surgery. All patients successfully sedated themselves without reaching any unsafe endpoints. All 20 maintained verbal contact throughout. The mean (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SD</jats:styled-content>) lowest peripheral blood oxygen saturation was 98.0 (2.1)% breathing room air. No patient required supplementary oxygen. The mean (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SD</jats:styled-content>) maximum effect‐site propofol concentration reached was 1.6 (0.5) μg.ml<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. The present system was found to be safe and effective, allowing oral surgery treatment under conscious sedation, but preventing oversedation.</jats:p> Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients Anaesthesia
doi_str_mv 10.1111/anae.12291
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hbmFlLjEyMjkx
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hbmFlLjEyMjkx
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Wiley, 2013
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2013
issn 0003-2409
1365-2044
issn_str_mv 0003-2409
1365-2044
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str obrien2013reactiontimemonitoredpatientmaintainedpropofolsedationapilotstudyinoralsurgerypatients
publishDateSort 2013
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Anaesthesia
source_id 49
title Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_unstemmed Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_full Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_fullStr Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_full_unstemmed Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_short Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_sort reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
topic Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.12291
publishDate 2013
physical 760-764
description <jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>Previous volunteer studies of an effect‐site controlled patient‐maintained sedation system using propofol have demonstrated a risk of oversedation. We have incorporated a reaction time monitor into the handset to add an individualised patient‐feedback mechanism. This pilot study assessed if the reaction time‐feedback modification would prove safe and effective in 20 healthy patients receiving sedation while undergoing oral surgery. All patients successfully sedated themselves without reaching any unsafe endpoints. All 20 maintained verbal contact throughout. The mean (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SD</jats:styled-content>) lowest peripheral blood oxygen saturation was 98.0 (2.1)% breathing room air. No patient required supplementary oxygen. The mean (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SD</jats:styled-content>) maximum effect‐site propofol concentration reached was 1.6 (0.5) μg.ml<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. The present system was found to be safe and effective, allowing oral surgery treatment under conscious sedation, but preventing oversedation.</jats:p>
container_issue 7
container_start_page 760
container_title Anaesthesia
container_volume 68
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792335764228407302
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:49:44.11Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Reaction+time%E2%80%90monitored+patient%E2%80%90maintained+propofol+sedation%3A+a+pilot+study+in+oral+surgery+patients&rft.date=2013-07-01&genre=article&issn=1365-2044&volume=68&issue=7&spage=760&epage=764&pages=760-764&jtitle=Anaesthesia&atitle=Reaction+time%E2%80%90monitored+patient%E2%80%90maintained+propofol+sedation%3A+a+pilot+study+in+oral+surgery+patients&aulast=Kenny&aufirst=G.+N.+C.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fanae.12291&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792335764228407302
author O'Brien, C., Urquhart, C. S., Allam, S, Anderson, K. J., Leitch, J. A., Macpherson, A., Kenny, G. N. C.
author_facet O'Brien, C., Urquhart, C. S., Allam, S, Anderson, K. J., Leitch, J. A., Macpherson, A., Kenny, G. N. C., O'Brien, C., Urquhart, C. S., Allam, S, Anderson, K. J., Leitch, J. A., Macpherson, A., Kenny, G. N. C.
author_sort o'brien, c.
container_issue 7
container_start_page 760
container_title Anaesthesia
container_volume 68
description <jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>Previous volunteer studies of an effect‐site controlled patient‐maintained sedation system using propofol have demonstrated a risk of oversedation. We have incorporated a reaction time monitor into the handset to add an individualised patient‐feedback mechanism. This pilot study assessed if the reaction time‐feedback modification would prove safe and effective in 20 healthy patients receiving sedation while undergoing oral surgery. All patients successfully sedated themselves without reaching any unsafe endpoints. All 20 maintained verbal contact throughout. The mean (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SD</jats:styled-content>) lowest peripheral blood oxygen saturation was 98.0 (2.1)% breathing room air. No patient required supplementary oxygen. The mean (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SD</jats:styled-content>) maximum effect‐site propofol concentration reached was 1.6 (0.5) μg.ml<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. The present system was found to be safe and effective, allowing oral surgery treatment under conscious sedation, but preventing oversedation.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/anae.12291
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9hbmFlLjEyMjkx
imprint Wiley, 2013
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2013
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0003-2409, 1365-2044
issn_str_mv 0003-2409, 1365-2044
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T14:49:44.11Z
match_str obrien2013reactiontimemonitoredpatientmaintainedpropofolsedationapilotstudyinoralsurgerypatients
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 760-764
publishDate 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Anaesthesia
source_id 49
spelling O'Brien, C. Urquhart, C. S. Allam, S Anderson, K. J. Leitch, J. A. Macpherson, A. Kenny, G. N. C. 0003-2409 1365-2044 Wiley Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.12291 <jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>Previous volunteer studies of an effect‐site controlled patient‐maintained sedation system using propofol have demonstrated a risk of oversedation. We have incorporated a reaction time monitor into the handset to add an individualised patient‐feedback mechanism. This pilot study assessed if the reaction time‐feedback modification would prove safe and effective in 20 healthy patients receiving sedation while undergoing oral surgery. All patients successfully sedated themselves without reaching any unsafe endpoints. All 20 maintained verbal contact throughout. The mean (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SD</jats:styled-content>) lowest peripheral blood oxygen saturation was 98.0 (2.1)% breathing room air. No patient required supplementary oxygen. The mean (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">SD</jats:styled-content>) maximum effect‐site propofol concentration reached was 1.6 (0.5) μg.ml<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. The present system was found to be safe and effective, allowing oral surgery treatment under conscious sedation, but preventing oversedation.</jats:p> Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients Anaesthesia
spellingShingle O'Brien, C., Urquhart, C. S., Allam, S, Anderson, K. J., Leitch, J. A., Macpherson, A., Kenny, G. N. C., Anaesthesia, Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
title Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_full Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_fullStr Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_full_unstemmed Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_short Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_sort reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
title_unstemmed Reaction time‐monitored patient‐maintained propofol sedation: a pilot study in oral surgery patients
topic Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.12291