author_facet Nolte, Ilja M
de Vries, André R
Spijker, Geert T
Jansen, Ritsert C
Brinza, Dumitru
Zelikovsky, Alexander
te Meerman, Gerard J
Nolte, Ilja M
de Vries, André R
Spijker, Geert T
Jansen, Ritsert C
Brinza, Dumitru
Zelikovsky, Alexander
te Meerman, Gerard J
author Nolte, Ilja M
de Vries, André R
Spijker, Geert T
Jansen, Ritsert C
Brinza, Dumitru
Zelikovsky, Alexander
te Meerman, Gerard J
spellingShingle Nolte, Ilja M
de Vries, André R
Spijker, Geert T
Jansen, Ritsert C
Brinza, Dumitru
Zelikovsky, Alexander
te Meerman, Gerard J
BMC Proceedings
Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
General Medicine
author_sort nolte, ilja m
spelling Nolte, Ilja M de Vries, André R Spijker, Geert T Jansen, Ritsert C Brinza, Dumitru Zelikovsky, Alexander te Meerman, Gerard J 1753-6561 Springer Science and Business Media LLC General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s129 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>We propose two new haplotype-sharing methods for identifying disease loci: the haplotype sharing statistic (HSS), which compares length of shared haplotypes between cases and controls, and the CROSS test, which tests whether a case and a control haplotype show less sharing than two random haplotypes. The significance of the HSS is determined using a variance estimate from the theory of U-statistics, whereas the significance of the CROSS test is estimated from a sequential randomization procedure. Both methods are fast and hence practical, even for whole-genome screens with high marker densities. We analyzed data sets of Problems 2 and 3 of Genetic Analysis Workshop 15 and compared HSS and CROSS to conventional association methods. Problem 2 provided a data set of 2300 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a 10-Mb region of chromosome 18q, which had shown linkage evidence for rheumatoid arthritis. The CROSS test detected a significant association at approximately position 4407 kb. This was supported by single-marker association and HSS. The CROSS test outperformed them both with respect to significance level and signal-to-noise ratio. A 20-kb candidate region could be identified. Problem 3 provided a simulated 10 k SNP data set covering the whole genome. Three known candidate regions for rheumatoid arthritis were detected. Again, the CROSS test gave the most significant results. Furthermore, both the HSS and the CROSS showed better fine-mapping accuracy than straightforward haplotype association. In conclusion, haplotype sharing methods, particularly the CROSS test, show great promise for identifying disease gene loci.</jats:p> Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis BMC Proceedings
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s129
facet_avail Online
Free
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE4Ni8xNzUzLTY1NjEtMS1zMS1zMTI5
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE4Ni8xNzUzLTY1NjEtMS1zMS1zMTI5
institution DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
imprint Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2007
imprint_str_mv Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2007
issn 1753-6561
issn_str_mv 1753-6561
language English
mega_collection Springer Science and Business Media LLC (CrossRef)
match_str nolte2007associationtestingbyhaplotypesharingmethodsapplicabletowholegenomeanalysis
publishDateSort 2007
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series BMC Proceedings
source_id 49
title Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_unstemmed Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_full Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_fullStr Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_short Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_sort association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
topic General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s129
publishDate 2007
physical
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>We propose two new haplotype-sharing methods for identifying disease loci: the haplotype sharing statistic (HSS), which compares length of shared haplotypes between cases and controls, and the CROSS test, which tests whether a case and a control haplotype show less sharing than two random haplotypes. The significance of the HSS is determined using a variance estimate from the theory of U-statistics, whereas the significance of the CROSS test is estimated from a sequential randomization procedure. Both methods are fast and hence practical, even for whole-genome screens with high marker densities. We analyzed data sets of Problems 2 and 3 of Genetic Analysis Workshop 15 and compared HSS and CROSS to conventional association methods. Problem 2 provided a data set of 2300 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a 10-Mb region of chromosome 18q, which had shown linkage evidence for rheumatoid arthritis. The CROSS test detected a significant association at approximately position 4407 kb. This was supported by single-marker association and HSS. The CROSS test outperformed them both with respect to significance level and signal-to-noise ratio. A 20-kb candidate region could be identified. Problem 3 provided a simulated 10 k SNP data set covering the whole genome. Three known candidate regions for rheumatoid arthritis were detected. Again, the CROSS test gave the most significant results. Furthermore, both the HSS and the CROSS showed better fine-mapping accuracy than straightforward haplotype association. In conclusion, haplotype sharing methods, particularly the CROSS test, show great promise for identifying disease gene loci.</jats:p>
container_issue S1
container_start_page 0
container_title BMC Proceedings
container_volume 1
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792341224468774921
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:16:31.975Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Association+testing+by+haplotype-sharing+methods+applicable+to+whole-genome+analysis&rft.date=2007-12-01&genre=article&issn=1753-6561&volume=1&issue=S1&jtitle=BMC+Proceedings&atitle=Association+testing+by+haplotype-sharing+methods+applicable+to+whole-genome+analysis&aulast=te+Meerman&aufirst=Gerard+J&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1186%2F1753-6561-1-s1-s129&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792341224468774921
author Nolte, Ilja M, de Vries, André R, Spijker, Geert T, Jansen, Ritsert C, Brinza, Dumitru, Zelikovsky, Alexander, te Meerman, Gerard J
author_facet Nolte, Ilja M, de Vries, André R, Spijker, Geert T, Jansen, Ritsert C, Brinza, Dumitru, Zelikovsky, Alexander, te Meerman, Gerard J, Nolte, Ilja M, de Vries, André R, Spijker, Geert T, Jansen, Ritsert C, Brinza, Dumitru, Zelikovsky, Alexander, te Meerman, Gerard J
author_sort nolte, ilja m
container_issue S1
container_start_page 0
container_title BMC Proceedings
container_volume 1
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>We propose two new haplotype-sharing methods for identifying disease loci: the haplotype sharing statistic (HSS), which compares length of shared haplotypes between cases and controls, and the CROSS test, which tests whether a case and a control haplotype show less sharing than two random haplotypes. The significance of the HSS is determined using a variance estimate from the theory of U-statistics, whereas the significance of the CROSS test is estimated from a sequential randomization procedure. Both methods are fast and hence practical, even for whole-genome screens with high marker densities. We analyzed data sets of Problems 2 and 3 of Genetic Analysis Workshop 15 and compared HSS and CROSS to conventional association methods. Problem 2 provided a data set of 2300 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a 10-Mb region of chromosome 18q, which had shown linkage evidence for rheumatoid arthritis. The CROSS test detected a significant association at approximately position 4407 kb. This was supported by single-marker association and HSS. The CROSS test outperformed them both with respect to significance level and signal-to-noise ratio. A 20-kb candidate region could be identified. Problem 3 provided a simulated 10 k SNP data set covering the whole genome. Three known candidate regions for rheumatoid arthritis were detected. Again, the CROSS test gave the most significant results. Furthermore, both the HSS and the CROSS showed better fine-mapping accuracy than straightforward haplotype association. In conclusion, haplotype sharing methods, particularly the CROSS test, show great promise for identifying disease gene loci.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s129
facet_avail Online, Free
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE4Ni8xNzUzLTY1NjEtMS1zMS1zMTI5
imprint Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2007
imprint_str_mv Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2007
institution DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3
issn 1753-6561
issn_str_mv 1753-6561
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:16:31.975Z
match_str nolte2007associationtestingbyhaplotypesharingmethodsapplicabletowholegenomeanalysis
mega_collection Springer Science and Business Media LLC (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2007
publishDateSort 2007
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series BMC Proceedings
source_id 49
spelling Nolte, Ilja M de Vries, André R Spijker, Geert T Jansen, Ritsert C Brinza, Dumitru Zelikovsky, Alexander te Meerman, Gerard J 1753-6561 Springer Science and Business Media LLC General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s129 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>We propose two new haplotype-sharing methods for identifying disease loci: the haplotype sharing statistic (HSS), which compares length of shared haplotypes between cases and controls, and the CROSS test, which tests whether a case and a control haplotype show less sharing than two random haplotypes. The significance of the HSS is determined using a variance estimate from the theory of U-statistics, whereas the significance of the CROSS test is estimated from a sequential randomization procedure. Both methods are fast and hence practical, even for whole-genome screens with high marker densities. We analyzed data sets of Problems 2 and 3 of Genetic Analysis Workshop 15 and compared HSS and CROSS to conventional association methods. Problem 2 provided a data set of 2300 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a 10-Mb region of chromosome 18q, which had shown linkage evidence for rheumatoid arthritis. The CROSS test detected a significant association at approximately position 4407 kb. This was supported by single-marker association and HSS. The CROSS test outperformed them both with respect to significance level and signal-to-noise ratio. A 20-kb candidate region could be identified. Problem 3 provided a simulated 10 k SNP data set covering the whole genome. Three known candidate regions for rheumatoid arthritis were detected. Again, the CROSS test gave the most significant results. Furthermore, both the HSS and the CROSS showed better fine-mapping accuracy than straightforward haplotype association. In conclusion, haplotype sharing methods, particularly the CROSS test, show great promise for identifying disease gene loci.</jats:p> Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis BMC Proceedings
spellingShingle Nolte, Ilja M, de Vries, André R, Spijker, Geert T, Jansen, Ritsert C, Brinza, Dumitru, Zelikovsky, Alexander, te Meerman, Gerard J, BMC Proceedings, Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis, General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, General Medicine
title Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_full Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_fullStr Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_short Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_sort association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
title_unstemmed Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
topic General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s129