Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , , |
| In: | Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 26, 2017, 3, S. 397-403 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Dabbous, Firas M. Dolecek, Therese A. Berbaum, Michael L. Friedewald, Sarah M. Summerfelt, Wm. Thomas Hoskins, Kent Rauscher, Garth H. Dabbous, Firas M. Dolecek, Therese A. Berbaum, Michael L. Friedewald, Sarah M. Summerfelt, Wm. Thomas Hoskins, Kent Rauscher, Garth H. |
|---|---|
| author |
Dabbous, Firas M. Dolecek, Therese A. Berbaum, Michael L. Friedewald, Sarah M. Summerfelt, Wm. Thomas Hoskins, Kent Rauscher, Garth H. |
| spellingShingle |
Dabbous, Firas M. Dolecek, Therese A. Berbaum, Michael L. Friedewald, Sarah M. Summerfelt, Wm. Thomas Hoskins, Kent Rauscher, Garth H. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis Oncology Epidemiology |
| author_sort |
dabbous, firas m. |
| spelling |
Dabbous, Firas M. Dolecek, Therese A. Berbaum, Michael L. Friedewald, Sarah M. Summerfelt, Wm. Thomas Hoskins, Kent Rauscher, Garth H. 1055-9965 1538-7755 American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Oncology Epidemiology http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0524 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Background: Experiencing a false positive (FP) screening mammogram is economically, physically, and emotionally burdensome, which may affect future screening behavior by delaying the next scheduled mammogram or by avoiding screening altogether. We sought to examine the impact of a FP screening mammogram on the subsequent screening mammography behavior.</jats:p> <jats:p>Methods: Delay in obtaining subsequent screening was defined as any mammogram performed more than 12 months from index mammogram. The Kaplan–Meier (product limit) estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate the unadjusted delay and the hazard ratio (HR) of delay of the subsequent screening mammogram within the next 36 months from the index mammogram date.</jats:p> <jats:p>Results: A total of 650,232 true negative (TN) and 90,918 FP mammograms from 261,767 women were included. The likelihood of a subsequent mammogram was higher in women experiencing a TN result than women experiencing a FP result (85.0% vs. 77.9%, P &lt; 0.001). The median delay in returning to screening was higher for FP versus TN (13 months vs. 3 months, P &lt; 0.001). Women with TN result were 36% more likely to return to screening in the next 36 months compared with women with a FP result HR = 1.36 (95% CI, 1.35–1.37). Experiencing a FP mammogram increases the risk of late stage at diagnosis compared with prior TN mammogram (P &lt; 0.001).</jats:p> <jats:p>Conclusions: Women with a FP mammogram were more likely to delay their subsequent screening compared with women with a TN mammogram.</jats:p> <jats:p>Impact: A prior FP experience may subsequently increase the 4-year cumulative risk of late stage at diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(3); 397–403. ©2017 AACR.</jats:p> Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0524 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Medizin |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE1OC8xMDU1LTk5NjUuZXBpLTE2LTA1MjQ |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE1OC8xMDU1LTk5NjUuZXBpLTE2LTA1MjQ |
| institution |
DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 |
| imprint |
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2017 |
| imprint_str_mv |
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2017 |
| issn |
1055-9965 1538-7755 |
| issn_str_mv |
1055-9965 1538-7755 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
dabbous2017impactofafalsepositivescreeningmammogramonsubsequentscreeningbehaviorandstageatbreastcancerdiagnosis |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| publisher |
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| title_unstemmed |
Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| title_full |
Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| title_fullStr |
Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| title_short |
Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| title_sort |
impact of a false-positive screening mammogram on subsequent screening behavior and stage at breast cancer diagnosis |
| topic |
Oncology Epidemiology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0524 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| physical |
397-403 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>Background: Experiencing a false positive (FP) screening mammogram is economically, physically, and emotionally burdensome, which may affect future screening behavior by delaying the next scheduled mammogram or by avoiding screening altogether. We sought to examine the impact of a FP screening mammogram on the subsequent screening mammography behavior.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Methods: Delay in obtaining subsequent screening was defined as any mammogram performed more than 12 months from index mammogram. The Kaplan–Meier (product limit) estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate the unadjusted delay and the hazard ratio (HR) of delay of the subsequent screening mammogram within the next 36 months from the index mammogram date.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Results: A total of 650,232 true negative (TN) and 90,918 FP mammograms from 261,767 women were included. The likelihood of a subsequent mammogram was higher in women experiencing a TN result than women experiencing a FP result (85.0% vs. 77.9%, P &lt; 0.001). The median delay in returning to screening was higher for FP versus TN (13 months vs. 3 months, P &lt; 0.001). Women with TN result were 36% more likely to return to screening in the next 36 months compared with women with a FP result HR = 1.36 (95% CI, 1.35–1.37). Experiencing a FP mammogram increases the risk of late stage at diagnosis compared with prior TN mammogram (P &lt; 0.001).</jats:p>
<jats:p>Conclusions: Women with a FP mammogram were more likely to delay their subsequent screening compared with women with a TN mammogram.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Impact: A prior FP experience may subsequently increase the 4-year cumulative risk of late stage at diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(3); 397–403. ©2017 AACR.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
3 |
| container_start_page |
397 |
| container_title |
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention |
| container_volume |
26 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792334382368817155 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:27:46.581Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Impact+of+a+False-Positive+Screening+Mammogram+on+Subsequent+Screening+Behavior+and+Stage+at+Breast+Cancer+Diagnosis&rft.date=2017-03-01&genre=article&issn=1538-7755&volume=26&issue=3&spage=397&epage=403&pages=397-403&jtitle=Cancer+Epidemiology%2C+Biomarkers+%26+Prevention&atitle=Impact+of+a+False-Positive+Screening+Mammogram+on+Subsequent+Screening+Behavior+and+Stage+at+Breast+Cancer+Diagnosis&aulast=Rauscher&aufirst=Garth+H.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1158%2F1055-9965.epi-16-0524&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792334382368817155 |
| author | Dabbous, Firas M., Dolecek, Therese A., Berbaum, Michael L., Friedewald, Sarah M., Summerfelt, Wm. Thomas, Hoskins, Kent, Rauscher, Garth H. |
| author_facet | Dabbous, Firas M., Dolecek, Therese A., Berbaum, Michael L., Friedewald, Sarah M., Summerfelt, Wm. Thomas, Hoskins, Kent, Rauscher, Garth H., Dabbous, Firas M., Dolecek, Therese A., Berbaum, Michael L., Friedewald, Sarah M., Summerfelt, Wm. Thomas, Hoskins, Kent, Rauscher, Garth H. |
| author_sort | dabbous, firas m. |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 397 |
| container_title | Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention |
| container_volume | 26 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Background: Experiencing a false positive (FP) screening mammogram is economically, physically, and emotionally burdensome, which may affect future screening behavior by delaying the next scheduled mammogram or by avoiding screening altogether. We sought to examine the impact of a FP screening mammogram on the subsequent screening mammography behavior.</jats:p> <jats:p>Methods: Delay in obtaining subsequent screening was defined as any mammogram performed more than 12 months from index mammogram. The Kaplan–Meier (product limit) estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate the unadjusted delay and the hazard ratio (HR) of delay of the subsequent screening mammogram within the next 36 months from the index mammogram date.</jats:p> <jats:p>Results: A total of 650,232 true negative (TN) and 90,918 FP mammograms from 261,767 women were included. The likelihood of a subsequent mammogram was higher in women experiencing a TN result than women experiencing a FP result (85.0% vs. 77.9%, P &lt; 0.001). The median delay in returning to screening was higher for FP versus TN (13 months vs. 3 months, P &lt; 0.001). Women with TN result were 36% more likely to return to screening in the next 36 months compared with women with a FP result HR = 1.36 (95% CI, 1.35–1.37). Experiencing a FP mammogram increases the risk of late stage at diagnosis compared with prior TN mammogram (P &lt; 0.001).</jats:p> <jats:p>Conclusions: Women with a FP mammogram were more likely to delay their subsequent screening compared with women with a TN mammogram.</jats:p> <jats:p>Impact: A prior FP experience may subsequently increase the 4-year cumulative risk of late stage at diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(3); 397–403. ©2017 AACR.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0524 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Medizin |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE1OC8xMDU1LTk5NjUuZXBpLTE2LTA1MjQ |
| imprint | American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2017 |
| imprint_str_mv | American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2017 |
| institution | DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4 |
| issn | 1055-9965, 1538-7755 |
| issn_str_mv | 1055-9965, 1538-7755 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:27:46.581Z |
| match_str | dabbous2017impactofafalsepositivescreeningmammogramonsubsequentscreeningbehaviorandstageatbreastcancerdiagnosis |
| mega_collection | American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) (CrossRef) |
| physical | 397-403 |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Dabbous, Firas M. Dolecek, Therese A. Berbaum, Michael L. Friedewald, Sarah M. Summerfelt, Wm. Thomas Hoskins, Kent Rauscher, Garth H. 1055-9965 1538-7755 American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Oncology Epidemiology http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0524 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Background: Experiencing a false positive (FP) screening mammogram is economically, physically, and emotionally burdensome, which may affect future screening behavior by delaying the next scheduled mammogram or by avoiding screening altogether. We sought to examine the impact of a FP screening mammogram on the subsequent screening mammography behavior.</jats:p> <jats:p>Methods: Delay in obtaining subsequent screening was defined as any mammogram performed more than 12 months from index mammogram. The Kaplan–Meier (product limit) estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate the unadjusted delay and the hazard ratio (HR) of delay of the subsequent screening mammogram within the next 36 months from the index mammogram date.</jats:p> <jats:p>Results: A total of 650,232 true negative (TN) and 90,918 FP mammograms from 261,767 women were included. The likelihood of a subsequent mammogram was higher in women experiencing a TN result than women experiencing a FP result (85.0% vs. 77.9%, P &lt; 0.001). The median delay in returning to screening was higher for FP versus TN (13 months vs. 3 months, P &lt; 0.001). Women with TN result were 36% more likely to return to screening in the next 36 months compared with women with a FP result HR = 1.36 (95% CI, 1.35–1.37). Experiencing a FP mammogram increases the risk of late stage at diagnosis compared with prior TN mammogram (P &lt; 0.001).</jats:p> <jats:p>Conclusions: Women with a FP mammogram were more likely to delay their subsequent screening compared with women with a TN mammogram.</jats:p> <jats:p>Impact: A prior FP experience may subsequently increase the 4-year cumulative risk of late stage at diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(3); 397–403. ©2017 AACR.</jats:p> Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention |
| spellingShingle | Dabbous, Firas M., Dolecek, Therese A., Berbaum, Michael L., Friedewald, Sarah M., Summerfelt, Wm. Thomas, Hoskins, Kent, Rauscher, Garth H., Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Oncology, Epidemiology |
| title | Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| title_full | Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| title_fullStr | Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| title_short | Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| title_sort | impact of a false-positive screening mammogram on subsequent screening behavior and stage at breast cancer diagnosis |
| title_unstemmed | Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
| topic | Oncology, Epidemiology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0524 |