author_facet Chang, Hasok
Duncan, Katherine
Kim, Kihyang
Paik, Seoung-Hey
Chang, Hasok
Duncan, Katherine
Kim, Kihyang
Paik, Seoung-Hey
author Chang, Hasok
Duncan, Katherine
Kim, Kihyang
Paik, Seoung-Hey
spellingShingle Chang, Hasok
Duncan, Katherine
Kim, Kihyang
Paik, Seoung-Hey
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
Education
Chemistry (miscellaneous)
author_sort chang, hasok
spelling Chang, Hasok Duncan, Katherine Kim, Kihyang Paik, Seoung-Hey 1109-4028 1756-1108 Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) Education Chemistry (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00218a <p>We present a critical discussion of how chemistry textbooks treat the electrolysis of water and aqueous salt solutions, based on a survey of general chemistry textbooks in English and Korean at secondary and tertiary levels, also informed by the historical background of 19th-century debates. English-language textbooks present various and contradictory accounts of the electrolysis of water; a key point of disagreement is whether hydrogen and oxygen gases originate from pre-existing H<sup>+</sup>and OH<sup>−</sup>ions, or from the direct reduction and oxidation of H<sub>2</sub>O molecules. School textbooks in South Korea all present the same account, with no indication of alternative views. A vast majority of all texts ignore the possibility that H<sub>2</sub>and O<sub>2</sub>may result from secondary reactions, which was a standard view in the late 19th century following the works of Daniell and Miller. Concerning the electrolysis of aqueous salt solutions, all texts give oversimplified views of competing reactions based on standard reduction/oxidation potentials. It is understandable that textbooks try to present sufficiently simple pictures that students at each level can handle; however, this should not be done in a way that shuts down questions. We recommend that students should be made aware that textbook accounts are only models, and encouraged to extend their learning beyond the models. The plausibility of our recommendations is shown in a pilot study we conducted with secondary school students in South Korea.</p> Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us Chemistry Education Research and Practice
doi_str_mv 10.1039/c9rp00218a
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Pädagogik
Chemie und Pharmazie
Technik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAzOS9jOXJwMDAyMThh
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAzOS9jOXJwMDAyMThh
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Zwi2
imprint Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), 2020
imprint_str_mv Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), 2020
issn 1109-4028
1756-1108
issn_str_mv 1109-4028
1756-1108
language English
mega_collection Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) (CrossRef)
match_str chang2020electrolysiswhattextbooksdonttellus
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Chemistry Education Research and Practice
source_id 49
title Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
title_unstemmed Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
title_full Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
title_fullStr Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
title_full_unstemmed Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
title_short Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
title_sort electrolysis: what textbooks don’t tell us
topic Education
Chemistry (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00218a
publishDate 2020
physical 806-822
description <p>We present a critical discussion of how chemistry textbooks treat the electrolysis of water and aqueous salt solutions, based on a survey of general chemistry textbooks in English and Korean at secondary and tertiary levels, also informed by the historical background of 19th-century debates. English-language textbooks present various and contradictory accounts of the electrolysis of water; a key point of disagreement is whether hydrogen and oxygen gases originate from pre-existing H<sup>+</sup>and OH<sup>−</sup>ions, or from the direct reduction and oxidation of H<sub>2</sub>O molecules. School textbooks in South Korea all present the same account, with no indication of alternative views. A vast majority of all texts ignore the possibility that H<sub>2</sub>and O<sub>2</sub>may result from secondary reactions, which was a standard view in the late 19th century following the works of Daniell and Miller. Concerning the electrolysis of aqueous salt solutions, all texts give oversimplified views of competing reactions based on standard reduction/oxidation potentials. It is understandable that textbooks try to present sufficiently simple pictures that students at each level can handle; however, this should not be done in a way that shuts down questions. We recommend that students should be made aware that textbook accounts are only models, and encouraged to extend their learning beyond the models. The plausibility of our recommendations is shown in a pilot study we conducted with secondary school students in South Korea.</p>
container_issue 3
container_start_page 806
container_title Chemistry Education Research and Practice
container_volume 21
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792346159310700549
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:34:56.309Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Electrolysis%3A+What+textbooks+don%E2%80%99t+tell+us&rft.date=2020-01-01&genre=article&issn=1756-1108&volume=21&issue=3&spage=806&epage=822&pages=806-822&jtitle=Chemistry+Education+Research+and+Practice&atitle=Electrolysis%3A+What+textbooks+don%E2%80%99t+tell+us&aulast=Paik&aufirst=Seoung-Hey&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1039%2Fc9rp00218a&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792346159310700549
author Chang, Hasok, Duncan, Katherine, Kim, Kihyang, Paik, Seoung-Hey
author_facet Chang, Hasok, Duncan, Katherine, Kim, Kihyang, Paik, Seoung-Hey, Chang, Hasok, Duncan, Katherine, Kim, Kihyang, Paik, Seoung-Hey
author_sort chang, hasok
container_issue 3
container_start_page 806
container_title Chemistry Education Research and Practice
container_volume 21
description <p>We present a critical discussion of how chemistry textbooks treat the electrolysis of water and aqueous salt solutions, based on a survey of general chemistry textbooks in English and Korean at secondary and tertiary levels, also informed by the historical background of 19th-century debates. English-language textbooks present various and contradictory accounts of the electrolysis of water; a key point of disagreement is whether hydrogen and oxygen gases originate from pre-existing H<sup>+</sup>and OH<sup>−</sup>ions, or from the direct reduction and oxidation of H<sub>2</sub>O molecules. School textbooks in South Korea all present the same account, with no indication of alternative views. A vast majority of all texts ignore the possibility that H<sub>2</sub>and O<sub>2</sub>may result from secondary reactions, which was a standard view in the late 19th century following the works of Daniell and Miller. Concerning the electrolysis of aqueous salt solutions, all texts give oversimplified views of competing reactions based on standard reduction/oxidation potentials. It is understandable that textbooks try to present sufficiently simple pictures that students at each level can handle; however, this should not be done in a way that shuts down questions. We recommend that students should be made aware that textbook accounts are only models, and encouraged to extend their learning beyond the models. The plausibility of our recommendations is shown in a pilot study we conducted with secondary school students in South Korea.</p>
doi_str_mv 10.1039/c9rp00218a
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Pädagogik, Chemie und Pharmazie, Technik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAzOS9jOXJwMDAyMThh
imprint Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), 2020
imprint_str_mv Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), 2020
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zwi2
issn 1109-4028, 1756-1108
issn_str_mv 1109-4028, 1756-1108
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:34:56.309Z
match_str chang2020electrolysiswhattextbooksdonttellus
mega_collection Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) (CrossRef)
physical 806-822
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Chemistry Education Research and Practice
source_id 49
spelling Chang, Hasok Duncan, Katherine Kim, Kihyang Paik, Seoung-Hey 1109-4028 1756-1108 Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) Education Chemistry (miscellaneous) http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00218a <p>We present a critical discussion of how chemistry textbooks treat the electrolysis of water and aqueous salt solutions, based on a survey of general chemistry textbooks in English and Korean at secondary and tertiary levels, also informed by the historical background of 19th-century debates. English-language textbooks present various and contradictory accounts of the electrolysis of water; a key point of disagreement is whether hydrogen and oxygen gases originate from pre-existing H<sup>+</sup>and OH<sup>−</sup>ions, or from the direct reduction and oxidation of H<sub>2</sub>O molecules. School textbooks in South Korea all present the same account, with no indication of alternative views. A vast majority of all texts ignore the possibility that H<sub>2</sub>and O<sub>2</sub>may result from secondary reactions, which was a standard view in the late 19th century following the works of Daniell and Miller. Concerning the electrolysis of aqueous salt solutions, all texts give oversimplified views of competing reactions based on standard reduction/oxidation potentials. It is understandable that textbooks try to present sufficiently simple pictures that students at each level can handle; however, this should not be done in a way that shuts down questions. We recommend that students should be made aware that textbook accounts are only models, and encouraged to extend their learning beyond the models. The plausibility of our recommendations is shown in a pilot study we conducted with secondary school students in South Korea.</p> Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us Chemistry Education Research and Practice
spellingShingle Chang, Hasok, Duncan, Katherine, Kim, Kihyang, Paik, Seoung-Hey, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us, Education, Chemistry (miscellaneous)
title Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
title_full Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
title_fullStr Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
title_full_unstemmed Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
title_short Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
title_sort electrolysis: what textbooks don’t tell us
title_unstemmed Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us
topic Education, Chemistry (miscellaneous)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00218a