author_facet Vyushin, D. I.
Kushner, P. J.
Zwiers, Francis
Vyushin, D. I.
Kushner, P. J.
Zwiers, Francis
author Vyushin, D. I.
Kushner, P. J.
Zwiers, Francis
spellingShingle Vyushin, D. I.
Kushner, P. J.
Zwiers, Francis
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
Paleontology
Space and Planetary Science
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Atmospheric Science
Earth-Surface Processes
Geochemistry and Petrology
Soil Science
Water Science and Technology
Ecology
Aquatic Science
Forestry
Oceanography
Geophysics
author_sort vyushin, d. i.
spelling Vyushin, D. I. Kushner, P. J. Zwiers, Francis 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018240 <jats:p>In this study, two parsimonious statistical representations of climate variability on interannual to multidecadal timescales are compared: the short‐memory first order autoregressive representation (AR1) and the long‐memory “power law” representation. Parameters for each statistical representation are fitted to observed surface air temperature at each spatial point. The parameter estimates from observations are found in general to be captured credibly in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 3 (CMIP3) simulations. The power law representation provides an upper bound and the AR1 representation provides a lower bound on persistence as measured by the lag‐one autocorrelation. Both representations fit the data equally well according to goodness‐of‐fit‐tests. Comparing simulations with and without external radiative forcings shows that anthropogenic forcing has little effect on the measures of persistence considered (for detrended data). Given that local interannual to multi decadal climate variability appears to be more persistent than an AR1 process and less persistent than a power law process, it is concluded that both representations are potentially useful for statistical applications. It is also concluded that current climate simulations can well represent interannual to multidecadal internal climate persistence in the absence of natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing, at least to within observational uncertainty.</jats:p> Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2012jd018240
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Technik
Geologie und Paläontologie
Geographie
Chemie und Pharmazie
Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
Biologie
Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft
Physik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDEyamQwMTgyNDA
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDEyamQwMTgyNDA
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2012
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2012
issn 0148-0227
issn_str_mv 0148-0227
language English
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
match_str vyushin2012modelingandunderstandingpersistenceofclimatevariability
publishDateSort 2012
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
source_id 49
title Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_unstemmed Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_full Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_fullStr Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_full_unstemmed Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_short Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_sort modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
topic Paleontology
Space and Planetary Science
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Atmospheric Science
Earth-Surface Processes
Geochemistry and Petrology
Soil Science
Water Science and Technology
Ecology
Aquatic Science
Forestry
Oceanography
Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018240
publishDate 2012
physical
description <jats:p>In this study, two parsimonious statistical representations of climate variability on interannual to multidecadal timescales are compared: the short‐memory first order autoregressive representation (AR1) and the long‐memory “power law” representation. Parameters for each statistical representation are fitted to observed surface air temperature at each spatial point. The parameter estimates from observations are found in general to be captured credibly in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 3 (CMIP3) simulations. The power law representation provides an upper bound and the AR1 representation provides a lower bound on persistence as measured by the lag‐one autocorrelation. Both representations fit the data equally well according to goodness‐of‐fit‐tests. Comparing simulations with and without external radiative forcings shows that anthropogenic forcing has little effect on the measures of persistence considered (for detrended data). Given that local interannual to multi decadal climate variability appears to be more persistent than an AR1 process and less persistent than a power law process, it is concluded that both representations are potentially useful for statistical applications. It is also concluded that current climate simulations can well represent interannual to multidecadal internal climate persistence in the absence of natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing, at least to within observational uncertainty.</jats:p>
container_issue D21
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
container_volume 117
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792342317357596675
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:33:43.96Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Modeling+and+understanding+persistence+of+climate+variability&rft.date=2012-11-16&genre=article&issn=0148-0227&volume=117&issue=D21&jtitle=Journal+of+Geophysical+Research%3A+Atmospheres&atitle=Modeling+and+understanding+persistence+of+climate+variability&aulast=Zwiers&aufirst=Francis&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1029%2F2012jd018240&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792342317357596675
author Vyushin, D. I., Kushner, P. J., Zwiers, Francis
author_facet Vyushin, D. I., Kushner, P. J., Zwiers, Francis, Vyushin, D. I., Kushner, P. J., Zwiers, Francis
author_sort vyushin, d. i.
container_issue D21
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
container_volume 117
description <jats:p>In this study, two parsimonious statistical representations of climate variability on interannual to multidecadal timescales are compared: the short‐memory first order autoregressive representation (AR1) and the long‐memory “power law” representation. Parameters for each statistical representation are fitted to observed surface air temperature at each spatial point. The parameter estimates from observations are found in general to be captured credibly in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 3 (CMIP3) simulations. The power law representation provides an upper bound and the AR1 representation provides a lower bound on persistence as measured by the lag‐one autocorrelation. Both representations fit the data equally well according to goodness‐of‐fit‐tests. Comparing simulations with and without external radiative forcings shows that anthropogenic forcing has little effect on the measures of persistence considered (for detrended data). Given that local interannual to multi decadal climate variability appears to be more persistent than an AR1 process and less persistent than a power law process, it is concluded that both representations are potentially useful for statistical applications. It is also concluded that current climate simulations can well represent interannual to multidecadal internal climate persistence in the absence of natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing, at least to within observational uncertainty.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2012jd018240
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Technik, Geologie und Paläontologie, Geographie, Chemie und Pharmazie, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft, Biologie, Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft, Physik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDEyamQwMTgyNDA
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2012
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2012
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 0148-0227
issn_str_mv 0148-0227
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:33:43.96Z
match_str vyushin2012modelingandunderstandingpersistenceofclimatevariability
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
source_id 49
spelling Vyushin, D. I. Kushner, P. J. Zwiers, Francis 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018240 <jats:p>In this study, two parsimonious statistical representations of climate variability on interannual to multidecadal timescales are compared: the short‐memory first order autoregressive representation (AR1) and the long‐memory “power law” representation. Parameters for each statistical representation are fitted to observed surface air temperature at each spatial point. The parameter estimates from observations are found in general to be captured credibly in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 3 (CMIP3) simulations. The power law representation provides an upper bound and the AR1 representation provides a lower bound on persistence as measured by the lag‐one autocorrelation. Both representations fit the data equally well according to goodness‐of‐fit‐tests. Comparing simulations with and without external radiative forcings shows that anthropogenic forcing has little effect on the measures of persistence considered (for detrended data). Given that local interannual to multi decadal climate variability appears to be more persistent than an AR1 process and less persistent than a power law process, it is concluded that both representations are potentially useful for statistical applications. It is also concluded that current climate simulations can well represent interannual to multidecadal internal climate persistence in the absence of natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing, at least to within observational uncertainty.</jats:p> Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
spellingShingle Vyushin, D. I., Kushner, P. J., Zwiers, Francis, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability, Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics
title Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_full Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_fullStr Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_full_unstemmed Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_short Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_sort modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
title_unstemmed Modeling and understanding persistence of climate variability
topic Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018240