author_facet Arrigo, Kevin R.
Matrai, Patricia A.
van Dijken, Gert L.
Arrigo, Kevin R.
Matrai, Patricia A.
van Dijken, Gert L.
author Arrigo, Kevin R.
Matrai, Patricia A.
van Dijken, Gert L.
spellingShingle Arrigo, Kevin R.
Matrai, Patricia A.
van Dijken, Gert L.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
Paleontology
Space and Planetary Science
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Atmospheric Science
Earth-Surface Processes
Geochemistry and Petrology
Soil Science
Water Science and Technology
Ecology
Aquatic Science
Forestry
Oceanography
Geophysics
author_sort arrigo, kevin r.
spelling Arrigo, Kevin R. Matrai, Patricia A. van Dijken, Gert L. 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011jc007273 <jats:p>The Arctic Ocean is an optically complex environment and presents unique challenges for ocean color satellite remote sensing. Phytoplankton pigment packaging, high concentrations of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM), and the frequent presence of subsurface chlorophyll <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> (Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic>) maxima (SCM), complicate satellite measurement of surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic>. However, the impact of likely errors in surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> on satellite‐based estimates of depth‐integrated daily net primary production (NPP) have yet to be quantified. Here we use a large in situ Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> and primary production database (ARCSS‐PP) to calculate the magnitude of the error that likely results from both omission of SCM and overestimated phytoplankton biomass when satellite‐based Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> is used as input to an NPP algorithm. Results show that errors in pan‐Arctic NPP, due to omission of the SCM, increase from 0.2% in January to 16% in July and are largest in the Beaufort and Chukchi Sea. Over an annual cycle, the error is approximately 8%. Errors in regional NPP resulting from overestimates of surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> by Sea‐viewing Wide Field‐of‐view Sensor can be larger, particularly when surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> and NPP are low, but are partially offset by underestimates in NPP due to omission of NPP at the SCM. As a result, the combined effect of underestimates in NPP due to omission of the SCM and overestimates in NPP due to high satellite Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> yields a total error in annual pan‐Arctic, depth‐integrated NPP of &lt;1%. The reasons for this surprisingly low error are discussed.</jats:p> Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2011jc007273
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie
Geographie
Chemie und Pharmazie
Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
Biologie
Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft
Physik
Technik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDExamMwMDcyNzM
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDExamMwMDcyNzM
institution DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2011
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2011
issn 0148-0227
issn_str_mv 0148-0227
language English
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
match_str arrigo2011primaryproductivityinthearcticoceanimpactsofcomplexopticalpropertiesandsubsurfacechlorophyllmaximaonlargescaleestimates
publishDateSort 2011
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
source_id 49
title Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_unstemmed Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_full Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_fullStr Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_full_unstemmed Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_short Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_sort primary productivity in the arctic ocean: impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
topic Paleontology
Space and Planetary Science
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Atmospheric Science
Earth-Surface Processes
Geochemistry and Petrology
Soil Science
Water Science and Technology
Ecology
Aquatic Science
Forestry
Oceanography
Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011jc007273
publishDate 2011
physical
description <jats:p>The Arctic Ocean is an optically complex environment and presents unique challenges for ocean color satellite remote sensing. Phytoplankton pigment packaging, high concentrations of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM), and the frequent presence of subsurface chlorophyll <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> (Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic>) maxima (SCM), complicate satellite measurement of surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic>. However, the impact of likely errors in surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> on satellite‐based estimates of depth‐integrated daily net primary production (NPP) have yet to be quantified. Here we use a large in situ Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> and primary production database (ARCSS‐PP) to calculate the magnitude of the error that likely results from both omission of SCM and overestimated phytoplankton biomass when satellite‐based Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> is used as input to an NPP algorithm. Results show that errors in pan‐Arctic NPP, due to omission of the SCM, increase from 0.2% in January to 16% in July and are largest in the Beaufort and Chukchi Sea. Over an annual cycle, the error is approximately 8%. Errors in regional NPP resulting from overestimates of surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> by Sea‐viewing Wide Field‐of‐view Sensor can be larger, particularly when surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> and NPP are low, but are partially offset by underestimates in NPP due to omission of NPP at the SCM. As a result, the combined effect of underestimates in NPP due to omission of the SCM and overestimates in NPP due to high satellite Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> yields a total error in annual pan‐Arctic, depth‐integrated NPP of &lt;1%. The reasons for this surprisingly low error are discussed.</jats:p>
container_issue C11
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
container_volume 116
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792346838653730818
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:45:45.104Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Primary+productivity+in+the+Arctic+Ocean%3A+Impacts+of+complex+optical+properties+and+subsurface+chlorophyll+maxima+on+large%E2%80%90scale+estimates&rft.date=2011-11-01&genre=article&issn=0148-0227&volume=116&issue=C11&jtitle=Journal+of+Geophysical+Research%3A+Oceans&atitle=Primary+productivity+in+the+Arctic+Ocean%3A+Impacts+of+complex+optical+properties+and+subsurface+chlorophyll+maxima+on+large%E2%80%90scale+estimates&aulast=van+Dijken&aufirst=Gert+L.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1029%2F2011jc007273&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792346838653730818
author Arrigo, Kevin R., Matrai, Patricia A., van Dijken, Gert L.
author_facet Arrigo, Kevin R., Matrai, Patricia A., van Dijken, Gert L., Arrigo, Kevin R., Matrai, Patricia A., van Dijken, Gert L.
author_sort arrigo, kevin r.
container_issue C11
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
container_volume 116
description <jats:p>The Arctic Ocean is an optically complex environment and presents unique challenges for ocean color satellite remote sensing. Phytoplankton pigment packaging, high concentrations of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM), and the frequent presence of subsurface chlorophyll <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> (Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic>) maxima (SCM), complicate satellite measurement of surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic>. However, the impact of likely errors in surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> on satellite‐based estimates of depth‐integrated daily net primary production (NPP) have yet to be quantified. Here we use a large in situ Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> and primary production database (ARCSS‐PP) to calculate the magnitude of the error that likely results from both omission of SCM and overestimated phytoplankton biomass when satellite‐based Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> is used as input to an NPP algorithm. Results show that errors in pan‐Arctic NPP, due to omission of the SCM, increase from 0.2% in January to 16% in July and are largest in the Beaufort and Chukchi Sea. Over an annual cycle, the error is approximately 8%. Errors in regional NPP resulting from overestimates of surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> by Sea‐viewing Wide Field‐of‐view Sensor can be larger, particularly when surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> and NPP are low, but are partially offset by underestimates in NPP due to omission of NPP at the SCM. As a result, the combined effect of underestimates in NPP due to omission of the SCM and overestimates in NPP due to high satellite Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> yields a total error in annual pan‐Arctic, depth‐integrated NPP of &lt;1%. The reasons for this surprisingly low error are discussed.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2011jc007273
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie, Geographie, Chemie und Pharmazie, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft, Biologie, Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft, Physik, Technik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDExamMwMDcyNzM
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2011
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2011
institution DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15
issn 0148-0227
issn_str_mv 0148-0227
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:45:45.104Z
match_str arrigo2011primaryproductivityinthearcticoceanimpactsofcomplexopticalpropertiesandsubsurfacechlorophyllmaximaonlargescaleestimates
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2011
publishDateSort 2011
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
source_id 49
spelling Arrigo, Kevin R. Matrai, Patricia A. van Dijken, Gert L. 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011jc007273 <jats:p>The Arctic Ocean is an optically complex environment and presents unique challenges for ocean color satellite remote sensing. Phytoplankton pigment packaging, high concentrations of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM), and the frequent presence of subsurface chlorophyll <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> (Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic>) maxima (SCM), complicate satellite measurement of surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic>. However, the impact of likely errors in surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> on satellite‐based estimates of depth‐integrated daily net primary production (NPP) have yet to be quantified. Here we use a large in situ Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> and primary production database (ARCSS‐PP) to calculate the magnitude of the error that likely results from both omission of SCM and overestimated phytoplankton biomass when satellite‐based Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> is used as input to an NPP algorithm. Results show that errors in pan‐Arctic NPP, due to omission of the SCM, increase from 0.2% in January to 16% in July and are largest in the Beaufort and Chukchi Sea. Over an annual cycle, the error is approximately 8%. Errors in regional NPP resulting from overestimates of surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> by Sea‐viewing Wide Field‐of‐view Sensor can be larger, particularly when surface Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> and NPP are low, but are partially offset by underestimates in NPP due to omission of NPP at the SCM. As a result, the combined effect of underestimates in NPP due to omission of the SCM and overestimates in NPP due to high satellite Chl <jats:italic>a</jats:italic> yields a total error in annual pan‐Arctic, depth‐integrated NPP of &lt;1%. The reasons for this surprisingly low error are discussed.</jats:p> Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
spellingShingle Arrigo, Kevin R., Matrai, Patricia A., van Dijken, Gert L., Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates, Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics
title Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_full Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_fullStr Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_full_unstemmed Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_short Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_sort primary productivity in the arctic ocean: impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
title_unstemmed Primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean: Impacts of complex optical properties and subsurface chlorophyll maxima on large‐scale estimates
topic Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011jc007273