author_facet Kudela, Raphael M.
Peterson, Tawnya D.
Kudela, Raphael M.
Peterson, Tawnya D.
author Kudela, Raphael M.
Peterson, Tawnya D.
spellingShingle Kudela, Raphael M.
Peterson, Tawnya D.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
Paleontology
Space and Planetary Science
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Atmospheric Science
Earth-Surface Processes
Geochemistry and Petrology
Soil Science
Water Science and Technology
Ecology
Aquatic Science
Forestry
Oceanography
Geophysics
author_sort kudela, raphael m.
spelling Kudela, Raphael M. Peterson, Tawnya D. 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jc004913 <jats:p>The influence of the Columbia River plume on phytoplankton rates and biomass accumulation was examined using multiday deckboard incubations as part of the coastal ocean processes River Influences on Shelf Ecosystems field program in August 2005. At a set of five stations encompassing the near‐field plume (three stations) on the Oregon and Washington coasts, treatments consisting of control, added nitrate, and added nitrate with 0.45 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m filtered plume water were used to assess the phytoplankton community response to macronutrients and micronutrients. For a subset of these stations, nutrient (nitrate, ammonium, and ammonium inhibition of nitrate) kinetics were obtained, as well as carbon‐based estimates of productivity. For all experiments, nitrogen (nitrate) was clearly controlling both biomass accumulation and growth rates. Despite the apparent poleward trend toward increasing biomass in this region, there were no obvious differences in phytoplankton physiological capacity, nor were there any symptoms of iron limitation in the short term. We conclude that phytoplankton in this region are predominantly nitrogen limited but that upon release from this limiting factor, phosphorous and/or silicic acid (in waters not influenced by the Columbia River plume) would quickly become limiting. Evidence suggests that the mesoscale differences in phytoplankton biomass between the Oregon and Washington coasts result from a combination of enhanced grazing downstream and the physically retentive and dispersive effects of the plume itself.</jats:p> Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity? Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2008jc004913
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Physik
Technik
Geologie und Paläontologie
Geographie
Chemie und Pharmazie
Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft
Biologie
Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA4amMwMDQ5MTM
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA4amMwMDQ5MTM
institution DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2009
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2009
issn 0148-0227
issn_str_mv 0148-0227
language English
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
match_str kudela2009influenceofabuoyantriverplumeonphytoplanktonnutrientdynamicswhatcontrolsstandingstocksandproductivity
publishDateSort 2009
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
source_id 49
title Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_unstemmed Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_full Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_fullStr Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_full_unstemmed Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_short Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_sort influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: what controls standing stocks and productivity?
topic Paleontology
Space and Planetary Science
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Atmospheric Science
Earth-Surface Processes
Geochemistry and Petrology
Soil Science
Water Science and Technology
Ecology
Aquatic Science
Forestry
Oceanography
Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jc004913
publishDate 2009
physical
description <jats:p>The influence of the Columbia River plume on phytoplankton rates and biomass accumulation was examined using multiday deckboard incubations as part of the coastal ocean processes River Influences on Shelf Ecosystems field program in August 2005. At a set of five stations encompassing the near‐field plume (three stations) on the Oregon and Washington coasts, treatments consisting of control, added nitrate, and added nitrate with 0.45 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m filtered plume water were used to assess the phytoplankton community response to macronutrients and micronutrients. For a subset of these stations, nutrient (nitrate, ammonium, and ammonium inhibition of nitrate) kinetics were obtained, as well as carbon‐based estimates of productivity. For all experiments, nitrogen (nitrate) was clearly controlling both biomass accumulation and growth rates. Despite the apparent poleward trend toward increasing biomass in this region, there were no obvious differences in phytoplankton physiological capacity, nor were there any symptoms of iron limitation in the short term. We conclude that phytoplankton in this region are predominantly nitrogen limited but that upon release from this limiting factor, phosphorous and/or silicic acid (in waters not influenced by the Columbia River plume) would quickly become limiting. Evidence suggests that the mesoscale differences in phytoplankton biomass between the Oregon and Washington coasts result from a combination of enhanced grazing downstream and the physically retentive and dispersive effects of the plume itself.</jats:p>
container_issue C2
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
container_volume 114
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792339778461499403
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:53:32.426Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Influence+of+a+buoyant+river+plume+on+phytoplankton+nutrient+dynamics%3A+What+controls+standing+stocks+and+productivity%3F&rft.date=2009-02-01&genre=article&issn=0148-0227&volume=114&issue=C2&jtitle=Journal+of+Geophysical+Research%3A+Oceans&atitle=Influence+of+a+buoyant+river+plume+on+phytoplankton+nutrient+dynamics%3A+What+controls+standing+stocks+and+productivity%3F&aulast=Peterson&aufirst=Tawnya+D.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1029%2F2008jc004913&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792339778461499403
author Kudela, Raphael M., Peterson, Tawnya D.
author_facet Kudela, Raphael M., Peterson, Tawnya D., Kudela, Raphael M., Peterson, Tawnya D.
author_sort kudela, raphael m.
container_issue C2
container_start_page 0
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
container_volume 114
description <jats:p>The influence of the Columbia River plume on phytoplankton rates and biomass accumulation was examined using multiday deckboard incubations as part of the coastal ocean processes River Influences on Shelf Ecosystems field program in August 2005. At a set of five stations encompassing the near‐field plume (three stations) on the Oregon and Washington coasts, treatments consisting of control, added nitrate, and added nitrate with 0.45 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m filtered plume water were used to assess the phytoplankton community response to macronutrients and micronutrients. For a subset of these stations, nutrient (nitrate, ammonium, and ammonium inhibition of nitrate) kinetics were obtained, as well as carbon‐based estimates of productivity. For all experiments, nitrogen (nitrate) was clearly controlling both biomass accumulation and growth rates. Despite the apparent poleward trend toward increasing biomass in this region, there were no obvious differences in phytoplankton physiological capacity, nor were there any symptoms of iron limitation in the short term. We conclude that phytoplankton in this region are predominantly nitrogen limited but that upon release from this limiting factor, phosphorous and/or silicic acid (in waters not influenced by the Columbia River plume) would quickly become limiting. Evidence suggests that the mesoscale differences in phytoplankton biomass between the Oregon and Washington coasts result from a combination of enhanced grazing downstream and the physically retentive and dispersive effects of the plume itself.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2008jc004913
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Physik, Technik, Geologie und Paläontologie, Geographie, Chemie und Pharmazie, Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Gartenbau, Fischereiwirtschaft, Hauswirtschaft, Biologie, Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA4amMwMDQ5MTM
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2009
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2009
institution DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3
issn 0148-0227
issn_str_mv 0148-0227
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:53:32.426Z
match_str kudela2009influenceofabuoyantriverplumeonphytoplanktonnutrientdynamicswhatcontrolsstandingstocksandproductivity
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2009
publishDateSort 2009
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
source_id 49
spelling Kudela, Raphael M. Peterson, Tawnya D. 0148-0227 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Paleontology Space and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) Atmospheric Science Earth-Surface Processes Geochemistry and Petrology Soil Science Water Science and Technology Ecology Aquatic Science Forestry Oceanography Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jc004913 <jats:p>The influence of the Columbia River plume on phytoplankton rates and biomass accumulation was examined using multiday deckboard incubations as part of the coastal ocean processes River Influences on Shelf Ecosystems field program in August 2005. At a set of five stations encompassing the near‐field plume (three stations) on the Oregon and Washington coasts, treatments consisting of control, added nitrate, and added nitrate with 0.45 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m filtered plume water were used to assess the phytoplankton community response to macronutrients and micronutrients. For a subset of these stations, nutrient (nitrate, ammonium, and ammonium inhibition of nitrate) kinetics were obtained, as well as carbon‐based estimates of productivity. For all experiments, nitrogen (nitrate) was clearly controlling both biomass accumulation and growth rates. Despite the apparent poleward trend toward increasing biomass in this region, there were no obvious differences in phytoplankton physiological capacity, nor were there any symptoms of iron limitation in the short term. We conclude that phytoplankton in this region are predominantly nitrogen limited but that upon release from this limiting factor, phosphorous and/or silicic acid (in waters not influenced by the Columbia River plume) would quickly become limiting. Evidence suggests that the mesoscale differences in phytoplankton biomass between the Oregon and Washington coasts result from a combination of enhanced grazing downstream and the physically retentive and dispersive effects of the plume itself.</jats:p> Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity? Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
spellingShingle Kudela, Raphael M., Peterson, Tawnya D., Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?, Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics
title Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_full Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_fullStr Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_full_unstemmed Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_short Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_sort influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: what controls standing stocks and productivity?
title_unstemmed Influence of a buoyant river plume on phytoplankton nutrient dynamics: What controls standing stocks and productivity?
topic Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Geochemistry and Petrology, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Aquatic Science, Forestry, Oceanography, Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jc004913