author_facet Keiling, A.
Angelopoulos, V.
Larson, D.
Lin, R.
McFadden, J.
Carlson, C.
Bonnell, J. W.
Mozer, F. S.
Glassmeier, K.‐H.
Auster, H. U.
Magnes, W.
Mende, S.
Frey, H.
Roux, A.
LeContel, O.
Frey, S.
Phan, T.
Donovan, E.
Russell, C. T.
Mann, I.
Liu, W.
Li, X.
Fillingim, M.
Parks, G.
Shiokawa, K.
Raeder, J.
Keiling, A.
Angelopoulos, V.
Larson, D.
Lin, R.
McFadden, J.
Carlson, C.
Bonnell, J. W.
Mozer, F. S.
Glassmeier, K.‐H.
Auster, H. U.
Magnes, W.
Mende, S.
Frey, H.
Roux, A.
LeContel, O.
Frey, S.
Phan, T.
Donovan, E.
Russell, C. T.
Mann, I.
Liu, W.
Li, X.
Fillingim, M.
Parks, G.
Shiokawa, K.
Raeder, J.
author Keiling, A.
Angelopoulos, V.
Larson, D.
Lin, R.
McFadden, J.
Carlson, C.
Bonnell, J. W.
Mozer, F. S.
Glassmeier, K.‐H.
Auster, H. U.
Magnes, W.
Mende, S.
Frey, H.
Roux, A.
LeContel, O.
Frey, S.
Phan, T.
Donovan, E.
Russell, C. T.
Mann, I.
Liu, W.
Li, X.
Fillingim, M.
Parks, G.
Shiokawa, K.
Raeder, J.
spellingShingle Keiling, A.
Angelopoulos, V.
Larson, D.
Lin, R.
McFadden, J.
Carlson, C.
Bonnell, J. W.
Mozer, F. S.
Glassmeier, K.‐H.
Auster, H. U.
Magnes, W.
Mende, S.
Frey, H.
Roux, A.
LeContel, O.
Frey, S.
Phan, T.
Donovan, E.
Russell, C. T.
Mann, I.
Liu, W.
Li, X.
Fillingim, M.
Parks, G.
Shiokawa, K.
Raeder, J.
Geophysical Research Letters
Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Geophysics
author_sort keiling, a.
spelling Keiling, A. Angelopoulos, V. Larson, D. Lin, R. McFadden, J. Carlson, C. Bonnell, J. W. Mozer, F. S. Glassmeier, K.‐H. Auster, H. U. Magnes, W. Mende, S. Frey, H. Roux, A. LeContel, O. Frey, S. Phan, T. Donovan, E. Russell, C. T. Mann, I. Liu, W. Li, X. Fillingim, M. Parks, G. Shiokawa, K. Raeder, J. 0094-8276 1944-8007 American Geophysical Union (AGU) General Earth and Planetary Sciences Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008gl033969 <jats:p>In this case study we report a substorm, 23 March 2007, which exhibited oscillations with a period of ∼135 s in three substorm phenomena all of which were one‐to‐one correlated. The in‐situ observations are from one THEMIS spacecraft (8.3 <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>E</jats:italic></jats:sub> geocentric distance) and the geosynchronous LANL‐97A spacecraft. The focus here is on the intensification phase during which THEMIS was conjugate to the region of auroral brightening and its foot point was near the high‐latitude ground station Kiana. The following results will be demonstrated: (1) THEMIS and LANL‐97A (time‐delayed) recorded periodic ion injections (&gt;100 keV). (2) Near‐conjugate high‐latitude ground magnetometer data show very large Pi2 (<jats:italic>δH</jats:italic>∼150 nT) with a 6‐s time delay compared to the THEMIS ion injections. (3) Low‐latitude ground magnetometer data also show Pi2 with the same waveform as the high‐latitude Pi2 but with longer time delays (20–31 s). (4) Auroral luminosity was periodically modulated during the intensification phase. (5) All three signatures (ion injections, ground Pi2, optical modulation) had the same periodicity of ∼135 s but with various time delays with respect to the THEMIS ion injections. These observations demonstrate that the three substorm phenomena had a common source which controlled the periodicity.</jats:p> Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2 Geophysical Research Letters
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2008gl033969
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie
Geographie
Physik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA4Z2wwMzM5Njk
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA4Z2wwMzM5Njk
institution DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2008
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2008
issn 1944-8007
0094-8276
issn_str_mv 1944-8007
0094-8276
language English
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
match_str keiling2008correlationofsubstorminjectionsauroralmodulationsandgroundpi2
publishDateSort 2008
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Geophysical Research Letters
source_id 49
title Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
title_unstemmed Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
title_full Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
title_fullStr Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
title_full_unstemmed Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
title_short Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
title_sort correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground pi2
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008gl033969
publishDate 2008
physical
description <jats:p>In this case study we report a substorm, 23 March 2007, which exhibited oscillations with a period of ∼135 s in three substorm phenomena all of which were one‐to‐one correlated. The in‐situ observations are from one THEMIS spacecraft (8.3 <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>E</jats:italic></jats:sub> geocentric distance) and the geosynchronous LANL‐97A spacecraft. The focus here is on the intensification phase during which THEMIS was conjugate to the region of auroral brightening and its foot point was near the high‐latitude ground station Kiana. The following results will be demonstrated: (1) THEMIS and LANL‐97A (time‐delayed) recorded periodic ion injections (&gt;100 keV). (2) Near‐conjugate high‐latitude ground magnetometer data show very large Pi2 (<jats:italic>δH</jats:italic>∼150 nT) with a 6‐s time delay compared to the THEMIS ion injections. (3) Low‐latitude ground magnetometer data also show Pi2 with the same waveform as the high‐latitude Pi2 but with longer time delays (20–31 s). (4) Auroral luminosity was periodically modulated during the intensification phase. (5) All three signatures (ion injections, ground Pi2, optical modulation) had the same periodicity of ∼135 s but with various time delays with respect to the THEMIS ion injections. These observations demonstrate that the three substorm phenomena had a common source which controlled the periodicity.</jats:p>
container_issue 17
container_start_page 0
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 35
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792341777253924868
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:24:12.715Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Correlation+of+substorm+injections%2C+auroral+modulations%2C+and+ground+Pi2&rft.date=2008-09-01&genre=article&issn=1944-8007&volume=35&issue=17&jtitle=Geophysical+Research+Letters&atitle=Correlation+of+substorm+injections%2C+auroral+modulations%2C+and+ground+Pi2&aulast=Raeder&aufirst=J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1029%2F2008gl033969&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792341777253924868
author Keiling, A., Angelopoulos, V., Larson, D., Lin, R., McFadden, J., Carlson, C., Bonnell, J. W., Mozer, F. S., Glassmeier, K.‐H., Auster, H. U., Magnes, W., Mende, S., Frey, H., Roux, A., LeContel, O., Frey, S., Phan, T., Donovan, E., Russell, C. T., Mann, I., Liu, W., Li, X., Fillingim, M., Parks, G., Shiokawa, K., Raeder, J.
author_facet Keiling, A., Angelopoulos, V., Larson, D., Lin, R., McFadden, J., Carlson, C., Bonnell, J. W., Mozer, F. S., Glassmeier, K.‐H., Auster, H. U., Magnes, W., Mende, S., Frey, H., Roux, A., LeContel, O., Frey, S., Phan, T., Donovan, E., Russell, C. T., Mann, I., Liu, W., Li, X., Fillingim, M., Parks, G., Shiokawa, K., Raeder, J., Keiling, A., Angelopoulos, V., Larson, D., Lin, R., McFadden, J., Carlson, C., Bonnell, J. W., Mozer, F. S., Glassmeier, K.‐H., Auster, H. U., Magnes, W., Mende, S., Frey, H., Roux, A., LeContel, O., Frey, S., Phan, T., Donovan, E., Russell, C. T., Mann, I., Liu, W., Li, X., Fillingim, M., Parks, G., Shiokawa, K., Raeder, J.
author_sort keiling, a.
container_issue 17
container_start_page 0
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 35
description <jats:p>In this case study we report a substorm, 23 March 2007, which exhibited oscillations with a period of ∼135 s in three substorm phenomena all of which were one‐to‐one correlated. The in‐situ observations are from one THEMIS spacecraft (8.3 <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>E</jats:italic></jats:sub> geocentric distance) and the geosynchronous LANL‐97A spacecraft. The focus here is on the intensification phase during which THEMIS was conjugate to the region of auroral brightening and its foot point was near the high‐latitude ground station Kiana. The following results will be demonstrated: (1) THEMIS and LANL‐97A (time‐delayed) recorded periodic ion injections (&gt;100 keV). (2) Near‐conjugate high‐latitude ground magnetometer data show very large Pi2 (<jats:italic>δH</jats:italic>∼150 nT) with a 6‐s time delay compared to the THEMIS ion injections. (3) Low‐latitude ground magnetometer data also show Pi2 with the same waveform as the high‐latitude Pi2 but with longer time delays (20–31 s). (4) Auroral luminosity was periodically modulated during the intensification phase. (5) All three signatures (ion injections, ground Pi2, optical modulation) had the same periodicity of ∼135 s but with various time delays with respect to the THEMIS ion injections. These observations demonstrate that the three substorm phenomena had a common source which controlled the periodicity.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2008gl033969
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Geologie und Paläontologie, Geographie, Physik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAyOS8yMDA4Z2wwMzM5Njk
imprint American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2008
imprint_str_mv American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2008
institution DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1
issn 1944-8007, 0094-8276
issn_str_mv 1944-8007, 0094-8276
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:24:12.715Z
match_str keiling2008correlationofsubstorminjectionsauroralmodulationsandgroundpi2
mega_collection American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2008
publishDateSort 2008
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Geophysical Research Letters
source_id 49
spelling Keiling, A. Angelopoulos, V. Larson, D. Lin, R. McFadden, J. Carlson, C. Bonnell, J. W. Mozer, F. S. Glassmeier, K.‐H. Auster, H. U. Magnes, W. Mende, S. Frey, H. Roux, A. LeContel, O. Frey, S. Phan, T. Donovan, E. Russell, C. T. Mann, I. Liu, W. Li, X. Fillingim, M. Parks, G. Shiokawa, K. Raeder, J. 0094-8276 1944-8007 American Geophysical Union (AGU) General Earth and Planetary Sciences Geophysics http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008gl033969 <jats:p>In this case study we report a substorm, 23 March 2007, which exhibited oscillations with a period of ∼135 s in three substorm phenomena all of which were one‐to‐one correlated. The in‐situ observations are from one THEMIS spacecraft (8.3 <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>E</jats:italic></jats:sub> geocentric distance) and the geosynchronous LANL‐97A spacecraft. The focus here is on the intensification phase during which THEMIS was conjugate to the region of auroral brightening and its foot point was near the high‐latitude ground station Kiana. The following results will be demonstrated: (1) THEMIS and LANL‐97A (time‐delayed) recorded periodic ion injections (&gt;100 keV). (2) Near‐conjugate high‐latitude ground magnetometer data show very large Pi2 (<jats:italic>δH</jats:italic>∼150 nT) with a 6‐s time delay compared to the THEMIS ion injections. (3) Low‐latitude ground magnetometer data also show Pi2 with the same waveform as the high‐latitude Pi2 but with longer time delays (20–31 s). (4) Auroral luminosity was periodically modulated during the intensification phase. (5) All three signatures (ion injections, ground Pi2, optical modulation) had the same periodicity of ∼135 s but with various time delays with respect to the THEMIS ion injections. These observations demonstrate that the three substorm phenomena had a common source which controlled the periodicity.</jats:p> Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2 Geophysical Research Letters
spellingShingle Keiling, A., Angelopoulos, V., Larson, D., Lin, R., McFadden, J., Carlson, C., Bonnell, J. W., Mozer, F. S., Glassmeier, K.‐H., Auster, H. U., Magnes, W., Mende, S., Frey, H., Roux, A., LeContel, O., Frey, S., Phan, T., Donovan, E., Russell, C. T., Mann, I., Liu, W., Li, X., Fillingim, M., Parks, G., Shiokawa, K., Raeder, J., Geophysical Research Letters, Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2, General Earth and Planetary Sciences, Geophysics
title Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
title_full Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
title_fullStr Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
title_full_unstemmed Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
title_short Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
title_sort correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground pi2
title_unstemmed Correlation of substorm injections, auroral modulations, and ground Pi2
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences, Geophysics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008gl033969