author_facet Glick, Alexander
Marquez, Kyara
Migotsky, Michael
Dreyer, Benard
Tomopoulos, Suzy
Fierman, Arthur
Mendelsohn, Alan
Shonna Yin, H.
Glick, Alexander
Marquez, Kyara
Migotsky, Michael
Dreyer, Benard
Tomopoulos, Suzy
Fierman, Arthur
Mendelsohn, Alan
Shonna Yin, H.
author Glick, Alexander
Marquez, Kyara
Migotsky, Michael
Dreyer, Benard
Tomopoulos, Suzy
Fierman, Arthur
Mendelsohn, Alan
Shonna Yin, H.
spellingShingle Glick, Alexander
Marquez, Kyara
Migotsky, Michael
Dreyer, Benard
Tomopoulos, Suzy
Fierman, Arthur
Mendelsohn, Alan
Shonna Yin, H.
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
General Medicine
author_sort glick, alexander
spelling Glick, Alexander Marquez, Kyara Migotsky, Michael Dreyer, Benard Tomopoulos, Suzy Fierman, Arthur Mendelsohn, Alan Shonna Yin, H. 2059-8661 Cambridge University Press (CUP) General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.214 <jats:p>OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Parents often make errors in comprehending and executing their child’s inpatient discharge instructions, putting their child at risk for adverse post-discharge outcomes. Suboptimal provider-caregiver communication has been linked to errors in comprehension and execution of provider instructions, especially for parents with limited health literacy. Few studies have systematically examined features of pediatric inpatient written discharge instructions that may contribute to errors. Our objective was to assess the readability, understandability, and actionability of pediatric inpatient written discharge instructions. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the written discharge instructions (standardized template, content not standardized) provided to parents at an urban public hospital, enrolled as part of a prospective cohort study (n=171) focused on parent ability to comprehend their child’s discharge instructions. Inclusion criteria were: English/Spanish-speaking parents of children ≤12 years old discharged on ≥1 daily medicine. Discharge instructions were assessed for: 1) Readability (Average of 5 formulas [Flesh Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Forcast]), 2) Understandability and actionability (AHRQ Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool [2 independent reviewers; κ&gt;0.8 for both]). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Mean (SD) reading grade level was 11.4 (0.7); none of the instructions were written at a recommended reading level of 6<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> to 8<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> grade or below. Mean (SD) understandability was 37.7 (6.9)%; mean actionability was 41.7 (8.4)%. All 171 sets of instructions used medical terminology without adequate plain language explanations and included information that was not relevant to the child’s diagnosis and associated care (e.g., obesity counseling, smoking cessation given to a child with appendicitis). None of the sets of instructions presented information in a logical sequence (e.g., diet instructions in more than one location) or included any pictographic information or other visual aids to support the text (e.g., diagram of medication dose within a dosing tool). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Written discharge instructions provided in the pediatric inpatient setting were suboptimal. Use of a systematic approach to improve discharge instructions, using a health literacy perspective, has the potential to improve post-discharge outcomes in children.</jats:p> 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
doi_str_mv 10.1017/cts.2019.214
facet_avail Online
Free
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9jdHMuMjAxOS4yMTQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9jdHMuMjAxOS4yMTQ
institution DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019
issn 2059-8661
issn_str_mv 2059-8661
language English
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
match_str glick20193464readabilityunderstandabilityandactionabilityofinpatientdischargeinstructionsahealthliteracyperspective
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
source_id 49
title 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
title_unstemmed 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
title_full 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
title_fullStr 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
title_full_unstemmed 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
title_short 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
title_sort 3464 readability, understandability, and actionability of inpatient discharge instructions: a health literacy perspective
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.214
publishDate 2019
physical 94-94
description <jats:p>OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Parents often make errors in comprehending and executing their child’s inpatient discharge instructions, putting their child at risk for adverse post-discharge outcomes. Suboptimal provider-caregiver communication has been linked to errors in comprehension and execution of provider instructions, especially for parents with limited health literacy. Few studies have systematically examined features of pediatric inpatient written discharge instructions that may contribute to errors. Our objective was to assess the readability, understandability, and actionability of pediatric inpatient written discharge instructions. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the written discharge instructions (standardized template, content not standardized) provided to parents at an urban public hospital, enrolled as part of a prospective cohort study (n=171) focused on parent ability to comprehend their child’s discharge instructions. Inclusion criteria were: English/Spanish-speaking parents of children ≤12 years old discharged on ≥1 daily medicine. Discharge instructions were assessed for: 1) Readability (Average of 5 formulas [Flesh Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Forcast]), 2) Understandability and actionability (AHRQ Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool [2 independent reviewers; κ&gt;0.8 for both]). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Mean (SD) reading grade level was 11.4 (0.7); none of the instructions were written at a recommended reading level of 6<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> to 8<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> grade or below. Mean (SD) understandability was 37.7 (6.9)%; mean actionability was 41.7 (8.4)%. All 171 sets of instructions used medical terminology without adequate plain language explanations and included information that was not relevant to the child’s diagnosis and associated care (e.g., obesity counseling, smoking cessation given to a child with appendicitis). None of the sets of instructions presented information in a logical sequence (e.g., diet instructions in more than one location) or included any pictographic information or other visual aids to support the text (e.g., diagram of medication dose within a dosing tool). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Written discharge instructions provided in the pediatric inpatient setting were suboptimal. Use of a systematic approach to improve discharge instructions, using a health literacy perspective, has the potential to improve post-discharge outcomes in children.</jats:p>
container_issue s1
container_start_page 94
container_title Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
container_volume 3
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792331454766645260
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T13:40:51.272Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=3464+Readability%2C+Understandability%2C+and+Actionability+of+Inpatient+Discharge+Instructions%3A+A+Health+Literacy+Perspective&rft.date=2019-03-01&genre=article&issn=2059-8661&volume=3&issue=s1&spage=94&epage=94&pages=94-94&jtitle=Journal+of+Clinical+and+Translational+Science&atitle=3464+Readability%2C+Understandability%2C+and+Actionability+of+Inpatient+Discharge+Instructions%3A+A+Health+Literacy+Perspective&aulast=Shonna+Yin&aufirst=H.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1017%2Fcts.2019.214&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792331454766645260
author Glick, Alexander, Marquez, Kyara, Migotsky, Michael, Dreyer, Benard, Tomopoulos, Suzy, Fierman, Arthur, Mendelsohn, Alan, Shonna Yin, H.
author_facet Glick, Alexander, Marquez, Kyara, Migotsky, Michael, Dreyer, Benard, Tomopoulos, Suzy, Fierman, Arthur, Mendelsohn, Alan, Shonna Yin, H., Glick, Alexander, Marquez, Kyara, Migotsky, Michael, Dreyer, Benard, Tomopoulos, Suzy, Fierman, Arthur, Mendelsohn, Alan, Shonna Yin, H.
author_sort glick, alexander
container_issue s1
container_start_page 94
container_title Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
container_volume 3
description <jats:p>OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Parents often make errors in comprehending and executing their child’s inpatient discharge instructions, putting their child at risk for adverse post-discharge outcomes. Suboptimal provider-caregiver communication has been linked to errors in comprehension and execution of provider instructions, especially for parents with limited health literacy. Few studies have systematically examined features of pediatric inpatient written discharge instructions that may contribute to errors. Our objective was to assess the readability, understandability, and actionability of pediatric inpatient written discharge instructions. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the written discharge instructions (standardized template, content not standardized) provided to parents at an urban public hospital, enrolled as part of a prospective cohort study (n=171) focused on parent ability to comprehend their child’s discharge instructions. Inclusion criteria were: English/Spanish-speaking parents of children ≤12 years old discharged on ≥1 daily medicine. Discharge instructions were assessed for: 1) Readability (Average of 5 formulas [Flesh Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Forcast]), 2) Understandability and actionability (AHRQ Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool [2 independent reviewers; κ&gt;0.8 for both]). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Mean (SD) reading grade level was 11.4 (0.7); none of the instructions were written at a recommended reading level of 6<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> to 8<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> grade or below. Mean (SD) understandability was 37.7 (6.9)%; mean actionability was 41.7 (8.4)%. All 171 sets of instructions used medical terminology without adequate plain language explanations and included information that was not relevant to the child’s diagnosis and associated care (e.g., obesity counseling, smoking cessation given to a child with appendicitis). None of the sets of instructions presented information in a logical sequence (e.g., diet instructions in more than one location) or included any pictographic information or other visual aids to support the text (e.g., diagram of medication dose within a dosing tool). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Written discharge instructions provided in the pediatric inpatient setting were suboptimal. Use of a systematic approach to improve discharge instructions, using a health literacy perspective, has the potential to improve post-discharge outcomes in children.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1017/cts.2019.214
facet_avail Online, Free
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAxNy9jdHMuMjAxOS4yMTQ
imprint Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019
imprint_str_mv Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019
institution DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229
issn 2059-8661
issn_str_mv 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T13:40:51.272Z
match_str glick20193464readabilityunderstandabilityandactionabilityofinpatientdischargeinstructionsahealthliteracyperspective
mega_collection Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef)
physical 94-94
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
source_id 49
spelling Glick, Alexander Marquez, Kyara Migotsky, Michael Dreyer, Benard Tomopoulos, Suzy Fierman, Arthur Mendelsohn, Alan Shonna Yin, H. 2059-8661 Cambridge University Press (CUP) General Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.214 <jats:p>OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Parents often make errors in comprehending and executing their child’s inpatient discharge instructions, putting their child at risk for adverse post-discharge outcomes. Suboptimal provider-caregiver communication has been linked to errors in comprehension and execution of provider instructions, especially for parents with limited health literacy. Few studies have systematically examined features of pediatric inpatient written discharge instructions that may contribute to errors. Our objective was to assess the readability, understandability, and actionability of pediatric inpatient written discharge instructions. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the written discharge instructions (standardized template, content not standardized) provided to parents at an urban public hospital, enrolled as part of a prospective cohort study (n=171) focused on parent ability to comprehend their child’s discharge instructions. Inclusion criteria were: English/Spanish-speaking parents of children ≤12 years old discharged on ≥1 daily medicine. Discharge instructions were assessed for: 1) Readability (Average of 5 formulas [Flesh Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Forcast]), 2) Understandability and actionability (AHRQ Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool [2 independent reviewers; κ&gt;0.8 for both]). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Mean (SD) reading grade level was 11.4 (0.7); none of the instructions were written at a recommended reading level of 6<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> to 8<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> grade or below. Mean (SD) understandability was 37.7 (6.9)%; mean actionability was 41.7 (8.4)%. All 171 sets of instructions used medical terminology without adequate plain language explanations and included information that was not relevant to the child’s diagnosis and associated care (e.g., obesity counseling, smoking cessation given to a child with appendicitis). None of the sets of instructions presented information in a logical sequence (e.g., diet instructions in more than one location) or included any pictographic information or other visual aids to support the text (e.g., diagram of medication dose within a dosing tool). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Written discharge instructions provided in the pediatric inpatient setting were suboptimal. Use of a systematic approach to improve discharge instructions, using a health literacy perspective, has the potential to improve post-discharge outcomes in children.</jats:p> 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spellingShingle Glick, Alexander, Marquez, Kyara, Migotsky, Michael, Dreyer, Benard, Tomopoulos, Suzy, Fierman, Arthur, Mendelsohn, Alan, Shonna Yin, H., Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective, General Medicine
title 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
title_full 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
title_fullStr 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
title_full_unstemmed 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
title_short 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
title_sort 3464 readability, understandability, and actionability of inpatient discharge instructions: a health literacy perspective
title_unstemmed 3464 Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Inpatient Discharge Instructions: A Health Literacy Perspective
topic General Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.214