author_facet Schildbach, Joel F.
Near, Richard I.
Bruccoleri, Robert E.
Haber, Edgar
Jeffrey, Philip D.
Novotny, Jiri
Sheriff, Steven
Margolies, Michael N.
Schildbach, Joel F.
Near, Richard I.
Bruccoleri, Robert E.
Haber, Edgar
Jeffrey, Philip D.
Novotny, Jiri
Sheriff, Steven
Margolies, Michael N.
author Schildbach, Joel F.
Near, Richard I.
Bruccoleri, Robert E.
Haber, Edgar
Jeffrey, Philip D.
Novotny, Jiri
Sheriff, Steven
Margolies, Michael N.
spellingShingle Schildbach, Joel F.
Near, Richard I.
Bruccoleri, Robert E.
Haber, Edgar
Jeffrey, Philip D.
Novotny, Jiri
Sheriff, Steven
Margolies, Michael N.
Protein Science
Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
author_sort schildbach, joel f.
spelling Schildbach, Joel F. Near, Richard I. Bruccoleri, Robert E. Haber, Edgar Jeffrey, Philip D. Novotny, Jiri Sheriff, Steven Margolies, Michael N. 0961-8368 1469-896X Wiley Molecular Biology Biochemistry http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560020209 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Antibody LB4, produced by a spontaneous variant of the murine anti‐digoxin monoclonal antibody 26–10, has an affinity for digoxin two orders of magnitude lower than that of the parent antibody due to replacement of serine with phenylalanine at position 52 of the heavy chain variable region (Schildbach, J.F., Panka, D.J., Parks, D.R., et al., 1991, <jats:italic>J. Biol. Chem. 266</jats:italic>, 4640–4647). To examine the basis for the decreased affinity, a panel of engineered antibodies with substitutions at position 52 was created, and their affinities for digoxin were measured. The antibody affinities decreased concomitantly with increasing size of the substituted side chains, although the shape of the side chains also influenced affinity. The crystal structure of the 26–10 Fab complexed with digoxin (P.D.J., R.K. Strong, L.C. Sieker, C. Chang, R.L. Campbell, G.A. Petsko, E.H., M.N.M., &amp; S.S., submitted for publication) shows that the serine at heavy chain position 52 is not in contact with hapten, but is adjacent to a tyrosine at heavy chain position 33 that is a contact residue. The mutant antibodies were modeled by applying a conformational search procedure to position side chains, using the 26–10 Fab crystal structure as a starting point. The results suggest that each of the substituted side chains may be accommodated within the antibody without substantial structural rearrangement, and that none of these substituted side chains are able to contact hapten. These modeling results are consistent with the substituents at position 52 having only an indirect influence upon antibody affinity. The mutagenesis and modeling results suggest that even conservative replacements of non‐contact residues can alter affinity indirectly through their impact on contact residue placement.</jats:p> Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue Protein Science
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pro.5560020209
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Chemie und Pharmazie
Biologie
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9wcm8uNTU2MDAyMDIwOQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9wcm8uNTU2MDAyMDIwOQ
institution DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
imprint Wiley, 1993
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 1993
issn 1469-896X
0961-8368
issn_str_mv 1469-896X
0961-8368
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str schildbach1993modulationofantibodyaffinitybyanoncontactresidue
publishDateSort 1993
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Protein Science
source_id 49
title Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_unstemmed Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_full Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_fullStr Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_full_unstemmed Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_short Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_sort modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
topic Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560020209
publishDate 1993
physical 206-214
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Antibody LB4, produced by a spontaneous variant of the murine anti‐digoxin monoclonal antibody 26–10, has an affinity for digoxin two orders of magnitude lower than that of the parent antibody due to replacement of serine with phenylalanine at position 52 of the heavy chain variable region (Schildbach, J.F., Panka, D.J., Parks, D.R., et al., 1991, <jats:italic>J. Biol. Chem. 266</jats:italic>, 4640–4647). To examine the basis for the decreased affinity, a panel of engineered antibodies with substitutions at position 52 was created, and their affinities for digoxin were measured. The antibody affinities decreased concomitantly with increasing size of the substituted side chains, although the shape of the side chains also influenced affinity. The crystal structure of the 26–10 Fab complexed with digoxin (P.D.J., R.K. Strong, L.C. Sieker, C. Chang, R.L. Campbell, G.A. Petsko, E.H., M.N.M., &amp; S.S., submitted for publication) shows that the serine at heavy chain position 52 is not in contact with hapten, but is adjacent to a tyrosine at heavy chain position 33 that is a contact residue. The mutant antibodies were modeled by applying a conformational search procedure to position side chains, using the 26–10 Fab crystal structure as a starting point. The results suggest that each of the substituted side chains may be accommodated within the antibody without substantial structural rearrangement, and that none of these substituted side chains are able to contact hapten. These modeling results are consistent with the substituents at position 52 having only an indirect influence upon antibody affinity. The mutagenesis and modeling results suggest that even conservative replacements of non‐contact residues can alter affinity indirectly through their impact on contact residue placement.</jats:p>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 206
container_title Protein Science
container_volume 2
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792338994591170566
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:41:03.098Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Modulation+of+antibody+affinity+by+a+non%E2%80%90contact+residue&rft.date=1993-02-01&genre=article&issn=1469-896X&volume=2&issue=2&spage=206&epage=214&pages=206-214&jtitle=Protein+Science&atitle=Modulation+of+antibody+affinity+by+a+non%E2%80%90contact+residue&aulast=Margolies&aufirst=Michael+N.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fpro.5560020209&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792338994591170566
author Schildbach, Joel F., Near, Richard I., Bruccoleri, Robert E., Haber, Edgar, Jeffrey, Philip D., Novotny, Jiri, Sheriff, Steven, Margolies, Michael N.
author_facet Schildbach, Joel F., Near, Richard I., Bruccoleri, Robert E., Haber, Edgar, Jeffrey, Philip D., Novotny, Jiri, Sheriff, Steven, Margolies, Michael N., Schildbach, Joel F., Near, Richard I., Bruccoleri, Robert E., Haber, Edgar, Jeffrey, Philip D., Novotny, Jiri, Sheriff, Steven, Margolies, Michael N.
author_sort schildbach, joel f.
container_issue 2
container_start_page 206
container_title Protein Science
container_volume 2
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Antibody LB4, produced by a spontaneous variant of the murine anti‐digoxin monoclonal antibody 26–10, has an affinity for digoxin two orders of magnitude lower than that of the parent antibody due to replacement of serine with phenylalanine at position 52 of the heavy chain variable region (Schildbach, J.F., Panka, D.J., Parks, D.R., et al., 1991, <jats:italic>J. Biol. Chem. 266</jats:italic>, 4640–4647). To examine the basis for the decreased affinity, a panel of engineered antibodies with substitutions at position 52 was created, and their affinities for digoxin were measured. The antibody affinities decreased concomitantly with increasing size of the substituted side chains, although the shape of the side chains also influenced affinity. The crystal structure of the 26–10 Fab complexed with digoxin (P.D.J., R.K. Strong, L.C. Sieker, C. Chang, R.L. Campbell, G.A. Petsko, E.H., M.N.M., &amp; S.S., submitted for publication) shows that the serine at heavy chain position 52 is not in contact with hapten, but is adjacent to a tyrosine at heavy chain position 33 that is a contact residue. The mutant antibodies were modeled by applying a conformational search procedure to position side chains, using the 26–10 Fab crystal structure as a starting point. The results suggest that each of the substituted side chains may be accommodated within the antibody without substantial structural rearrangement, and that none of these substituted side chains are able to contact hapten. These modeling results are consistent with the substituents at position 52 having only an indirect influence upon antibody affinity. The mutagenesis and modeling results suggest that even conservative replacements of non‐contact residues can alter affinity indirectly through their impact on contact residue placement.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pro.5560020209
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Chemie und Pharmazie, Biologie
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9wcm8uNTU2MDAyMDIwOQ
imprint Wiley, 1993
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 1993
institution DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1
issn 1469-896X, 0961-8368
issn_str_mv 1469-896X, 0961-8368
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T15:41:03.098Z
match_str schildbach1993modulationofantibodyaffinitybyanoncontactresidue
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 206-214
publishDate 1993
publishDateSort 1993
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Protein Science
source_id 49
spelling Schildbach, Joel F. Near, Richard I. Bruccoleri, Robert E. Haber, Edgar Jeffrey, Philip D. Novotny, Jiri Sheriff, Steven Margolies, Michael N. 0961-8368 1469-896X Wiley Molecular Biology Biochemistry http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560020209 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Antibody LB4, produced by a spontaneous variant of the murine anti‐digoxin monoclonal antibody 26–10, has an affinity for digoxin two orders of magnitude lower than that of the parent antibody due to replacement of serine with phenylalanine at position 52 of the heavy chain variable region (Schildbach, J.F., Panka, D.J., Parks, D.R., et al., 1991, <jats:italic>J. Biol. Chem. 266</jats:italic>, 4640–4647). To examine the basis for the decreased affinity, a panel of engineered antibodies with substitutions at position 52 was created, and their affinities for digoxin were measured. The antibody affinities decreased concomitantly with increasing size of the substituted side chains, although the shape of the side chains also influenced affinity. The crystal structure of the 26–10 Fab complexed with digoxin (P.D.J., R.K. Strong, L.C. Sieker, C. Chang, R.L. Campbell, G.A. Petsko, E.H., M.N.M., &amp; S.S., submitted for publication) shows that the serine at heavy chain position 52 is not in contact with hapten, but is adjacent to a tyrosine at heavy chain position 33 that is a contact residue. The mutant antibodies were modeled by applying a conformational search procedure to position side chains, using the 26–10 Fab crystal structure as a starting point. The results suggest that each of the substituted side chains may be accommodated within the antibody without substantial structural rearrangement, and that none of these substituted side chains are able to contact hapten. These modeling results are consistent with the substituents at position 52 having only an indirect influence upon antibody affinity. The mutagenesis and modeling results suggest that even conservative replacements of non‐contact residues can alter affinity indirectly through their impact on contact residue placement.</jats:p> Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue Protein Science
spellingShingle Schildbach, Joel F., Near, Richard I., Bruccoleri, Robert E., Haber, Edgar, Jeffrey, Philip D., Novotny, Jiri, Sheriff, Steven, Margolies, Michael N., Protein Science, Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry
title Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_full Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_fullStr Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_full_unstemmed Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_short Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_sort modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
title_unstemmed Modulation of antibody affinity by a non‐contact residue
topic Molecular Biology, Biochemistry
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560020209