author_facet Kummrow, A.
Frankowski, M.
Bock, N.
Werner, C.
Dziekan, T.
Neukammer, J.
Kummrow, A.
Frankowski, M.
Bock, N.
Werner, C.
Dziekan, T.
Neukammer, J.
author Kummrow, A.
Frankowski, M.
Bock, N.
Werner, C.
Dziekan, T.
Neukammer, J.
spellingShingle Kummrow, A.
Frankowski, M.
Bock, N.
Werner, C.
Dziekan, T.
Neukammer, J.
Cytometry Part A
Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
Cell Biology
Histology
Pathology and Forensic Medicine
author_sort kummrow, a.
spelling Kummrow, A. Frankowski, M. Bock, N. Werner, C. Dziekan, T. Neukammer, J. 1552-4922 1552-4930 Wiley Cell Biology Histology Pathology and Forensic Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22213 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We compare flow cytometric and microscopic determination of cell viability by fluorescence labeling using calcein acetoxy‐methyl‐ester and ethidium homodimer‐1 as live and dead stain, respectively. Peripheral blood monocytes served as model system and were accumulated applying density gradients. Subsequently, monocytes were further enriched by magnetic‐activated or fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (MACS, FACS) targeting the antigen CD14. Identical samples were used for flow cytometric and microscopic analysis to allow direct comparison of both analysis methods. More than 1,000 cells were measured for each sample to minimize the measurement uncertainty caused by counting statistics. We observed good agreement of flow cytometric and microscopic viability measurements. On average, the difference in viability measured by flow cytometry and microscopy amounted to (2.7 ± 1.4)% for live staining and (1.7 ± 1.2)% for dead staining. These deviations were similar to the uncertainty of measurement for cell viability, thus demonstrating that both methods delivered equal results. Besides monocytes, comparison of flow cytometric and microscopy viability for MACS enriched CD34‐positive cells also showed consistent results. © 2012 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry</jats:p> Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy Cytometry Part A
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cyto.a.22213
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Biologie
Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9jeXRvLmEuMjIyMTM
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9jeXRvLmEuMjIyMTM
institution DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
imprint Wiley, 2013
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2013
issn 1552-4922
1552-4930
issn_str_mv 1552-4922
1552-4930
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str kummrow2013quantitativeassessmentofcellviabilitybasedonflowcytometryandmicroscopy
publishDateSort 2013
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Cytometry Part A
source_id 49
title Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_unstemmed Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_full Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_fullStr Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_short Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_sort quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
topic Cell Biology
Histology
Pathology and Forensic Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22213
publishDate 2013
physical 197-204
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We compare flow cytometric and microscopic determination of cell viability by fluorescence labeling using calcein acetoxy‐methyl‐ester and ethidium homodimer‐1 as live and dead stain, respectively. Peripheral blood monocytes served as model system and were accumulated applying density gradients. Subsequently, monocytes were further enriched by magnetic‐activated or fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (MACS, FACS) targeting the antigen CD14. Identical samples were used for flow cytometric and microscopic analysis to allow direct comparison of both analysis methods. More than 1,000 cells were measured for each sample to minimize the measurement uncertainty caused by counting statistics. We observed good agreement of flow cytometric and microscopic viability measurements. On average, the difference in viability measured by flow cytometry and microscopy amounted to (2.7 ± 1.4)% for live staining and (1.7 ± 1.2)% for dead staining. These deviations were similar to the uncertainty of measurement for cell viability, thus demonstrating that both methods delivered equal results. Besides monocytes, comparison of flow cytometric and microscopy viability for MACS enriched CD34‐positive cells also showed consistent results. © 2012 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry</jats:p>
container_issue 2
container_start_page 197
container_title Cytometry Part A
container_volume 83A
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792344738451423238
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:12:17.935Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Quantitative+assessment+of+cell+viability+based+on+flow+cytometry+and+microscopy&rft.date=2013-02-01&genre=article&issn=1552-4930&volume=83A&issue=2&spage=197&epage=204&pages=197-204&jtitle=Cytometry+Part+A&atitle=Quantitative+assessment+of+cell+viability+based+on+flow+cytometry+and+microscopy&aulast=Neukammer&aufirst=J.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fcyto.a.22213&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792344738451423238
author Kummrow, A., Frankowski, M., Bock, N., Werner, C., Dziekan, T., Neukammer, J.
author_facet Kummrow, A., Frankowski, M., Bock, N., Werner, C., Dziekan, T., Neukammer, J., Kummrow, A., Frankowski, M., Bock, N., Werner, C., Dziekan, T., Neukammer, J.
author_sort kummrow, a.
container_issue 2
container_start_page 197
container_title Cytometry Part A
container_volume 83A
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We compare flow cytometric and microscopic determination of cell viability by fluorescence labeling using calcein acetoxy‐methyl‐ester and ethidium homodimer‐1 as live and dead stain, respectively. Peripheral blood monocytes served as model system and were accumulated applying density gradients. Subsequently, monocytes were further enriched by magnetic‐activated or fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (MACS, FACS) targeting the antigen CD14. Identical samples were used for flow cytometric and microscopic analysis to allow direct comparison of both analysis methods. More than 1,000 cells were measured for each sample to minimize the measurement uncertainty caused by counting statistics. We observed good agreement of flow cytometric and microscopic viability measurements. On average, the difference in viability measured by flow cytometry and microscopy amounted to (2.7 ± 1.4)% for live staining and (1.7 ± 1.2)% for dead staining. These deviations were similar to the uncertainty of measurement for cell viability, thus demonstrating that both methods delivered equal results. Besides monocytes, comparison of flow cytometric and microscopy viability for MACS enriched CD34‐positive cells also showed consistent results. © 2012 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cyto.a.22213
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Biologie, Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9jeXRvLmEuMjIyMTM
imprint Wiley, 2013
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2013
institution DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275
issn 1552-4922, 1552-4930
issn_str_mv 1552-4922, 1552-4930
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:12:17.935Z
match_str kummrow2013quantitativeassessmentofcellviabilitybasedonflowcytometryandmicroscopy
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 197-204
publishDate 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Cytometry Part A
source_id 49
spelling Kummrow, A. Frankowski, M. Bock, N. Werner, C. Dziekan, T. Neukammer, J. 1552-4922 1552-4930 Wiley Cell Biology Histology Pathology and Forensic Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22213 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We compare flow cytometric and microscopic determination of cell viability by fluorescence labeling using calcein acetoxy‐methyl‐ester and ethidium homodimer‐1 as live and dead stain, respectively. Peripheral blood monocytes served as model system and were accumulated applying density gradients. Subsequently, monocytes were further enriched by magnetic‐activated or fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (MACS, FACS) targeting the antigen CD14. Identical samples were used for flow cytometric and microscopic analysis to allow direct comparison of both analysis methods. More than 1,000 cells were measured for each sample to minimize the measurement uncertainty caused by counting statistics. We observed good agreement of flow cytometric and microscopic viability measurements. On average, the difference in viability measured by flow cytometry and microscopy amounted to (2.7 ± 1.4)% for live staining and (1.7 ± 1.2)% for dead staining. These deviations were similar to the uncertainty of measurement for cell viability, thus demonstrating that both methods delivered equal results. Besides monocytes, comparison of flow cytometric and microscopy viability for MACS enriched CD34‐positive cells also showed consistent results. © 2012 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry</jats:p> Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy Cytometry Part A
spellingShingle Kummrow, A., Frankowski, M., Bock, N., Werner, C., Dziekan, T., Neukammer, J., Cytometry Part A, Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy, Cell Biology, Histology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine
title Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_full Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_fullStr Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_short Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_sort quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
title_unstemmed Quantitative assessment of cell viability based on flow cytometry and microscopy
topic Cell Biology, Histology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22213