author_facet Jeryczynski, Georg
Thiele, Jürgen
Gisslinger, Bettina
Wölfler, Albert
Schalling, Martin
Gleiß, Andreas
Burgstaller, Sonja
Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika
Sliwa, Thamer
Schlögl, Ernst
Geissler, Klaus
Krauth, Maria‐Theresa
Nader, Alexander
Vesely, Michael
Simonitsch‐Klupp, Ingrid
Müllauer, Leonhard
Beham‐Schmid, Christine
Gisslinger, Heinz
Jeryczynski, Georg
Thiele, Jürgen
Gisslinger, Bettina
Wölfler, Albert
Schalling, Martin
Gleiß, Andreas
Burgstaller, Sonja
Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika
Sliwa, Thamer
Schlögl, Ernst
Geissler, Klaus
Krauth, Maria‐Theresa
Nader, Alexander
Vesely, Michael
Simonitsch‐Klupp, Ingrid
Müllauer, Leonhard
Beham‐Schmid, Christine
Gisslinger, Heinz
author Jeryczynski, Georg
Thiele, Jürgen
Gisslinger, Bettina
Wölfler, Albert
Schalling, Martin
Gleiß, Andreas
Burgstaller, Sonja
Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika
Sliwa, Thamer
Schlögl, Ernst
Geissler, Klaus
Krauth, Maria‐Theresa
Nader, Alexander
Vesely, Michael
Simonitsch‐Klupp, Ingrid
Müllauer, Leonhard
Beham‐Schmid, Christine
Gisslinger, Heinz
spellingShingle Jeryczynski, Georg
Thiele, Jürgen
Gisslinger, Bettina
Wölfler, Albert
Schalling, Martin
Gleiß, Andreas
Burgstaller, Sonja
Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika
Sliwa, Thamer
Schlögl, Ernst
Geissler, Klaus
Krauth, Maria‐Theresa
Nader, Alexander
Vesely, Michael
Simonitsch‐Klupp, Ingrid
Müllauer, Leonhard
Beham‐Schmid, Christine
Gisslinger, Heinz
American Journal of Hematology
Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
Hematology
author_sort jeryczynski, georg
spelling Jeryczynski, Georg Thiele, Jürgen Gisslinger, Bettina Wölfler, Albert Schalling, Martin Gleiß, Andreas Burgstaller, Sonja Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika Sliwa, Thamer Schlögl, Ernst Geissler, Klaus Krauth, Maria‐Theresa Nader, Alexander Vesely, Michael Simonitsch‐Klupp, Ingrid Müllauer, Leonhard Beham‐Schmid, Christine Gisslinger, Heinz 0361-8609 1096-8652 Wiley Hematology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24788 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The 2016 revised WHO criteria for the diagnosis of pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (pre‐PMF) require at least one of the following four borderline expressed minor clinical criteria: anemia, leukocytosis, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and splenomegaly. In this study, we evaluated the relative frequency of these four criteria in a group of 170 pre‐PMF patients and compared them to 225 ET cases. More than 91% of pre‐PMF cases showed one or more of these features required for diagnosis, by contrast with only 48% of ET patients. According to clinical data the cumulative risk of progression to advanced/overt PMF in pre‐PMF was 36.9% after 15 years. After fitting cox regression models to analyze the impact of the minor criteria on overall survival, only leukocytosis remained as a significant predictor of survival in both pre‐PMF and ET. Molecular characterization showed differences in survival in pre‐PMF but not ET, with <jats:italic>CALR</jats:italic> being a more favorable mutation than <jats:italic>JAK2</jats:italic>. The different outcome of pre‐PMF versus ET and associated molecular genetic data supports the concept of two different entities, rather than a continuum of the same disease. Although slightly less than 50% of ET patients also show one or more minor clinical criteria, accurate distinction between ET and pre‐PMF is possible by following an integrated approach including histomorphological diagnosis and presence of minor clinical criteria.</jats:p> Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease American Journal of Hematology
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajh.24788
facet_avail Online
Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hamguMjQ3ODg
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hamguMjQ3ODg
institution DE-Zi4
DE-Gla1
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
DE-14
DE-105
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-Zwi2
DE-D161
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
issn 0361-8609
1096-8652
issn_str_mv 0361-8609
1096-8652
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str jeryczynski2017prefibroticearlyprimarymyelofibrosisvswhodefinedessentialthrombocythemiatheimpactofminorclinicaldiagnosticcriteriaontheoutcomeofthedisease
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series American Journal of Hematology
source_id 49
title Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_unstemmed Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_full Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_fullStr Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_full_unstemmed Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_short Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_sort pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. who‐defined essential thrombocythemia: the impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
topic Hematology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24788
publishDate 2017
physical 885-891
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The 2016 revised WHO criteria for the diagnosis of pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (pre‐PMF) require at least one of the following four borderline expressed minor clinical criteria: anemia, leukocytosis, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and splenomegaly. In this study, we evaluated the relative frequency of these four criteria in a group of 170 pre‐PMF patients and compared them to 225 ET cases. More than 91% of pre‐PMF cases showed one or more of these features required for diagnosis, by contrast with only 48% of ET patients. According to clinical data the cumulative risk of progression to advanced/overt PMF in pre‐PMF was 36.9% after 15 years. After fitting cox regression models to analyze the impact of the minor criteria on overall survival, only leukocytosis remained as a significant predictor of survival in both pre‐PMF and ET. Molecular characterization showed differences in survival in pre‐PMF but not ET, with <jats:italic>CALR</jats:italic> being a more favorable mutation than <jats:italic>JAK2</jats:italic>. The different outcome of pre‐PMF versus ET and associated molecular genetic data supports the concept of two different entities, rather than a continuum of the same disease. Although slightly less than 50% of ET patients also show one or more minor clinical criteria, accurate distinction between ET and pre‐PMF is possible by following an integrated approach including histomorphological diagnosis and presence of minor clinical criteria.</jats:p>
container_issue 9
container_start_page 885
container_title American Journal of Hematology
container_volume 92
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792344051016531973
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:01:22.991Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Pre%E2%80%90fibrotic%2Fearly+primary+myelofibrosis+vs.+WHO%E2%80%90defined+essential+thrombocythemia%3A+The+impact+of+minor+clinical+diagnostic+criteria+on+the+outcome+of+the+disease&rft.date=2017-09-01&genre=article&issn=1096-8652&volume=92&issue=9&spage=885&epage=891&pages=885-891&jtitle=American+Journal+of+Hematology&atitle=Pre%E2%80%90fibrotic%2Fearly+primary+myelofibrosis+vs.+WHO%E2%80%90defined+essential+thrombocythemia%3A+The+impact+of+minor+clinical+diagnostic+criteria+on+the+outcome+of+the+disease&aulast=Gisslinger&aufirst=Heinz&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2Fajh.24788&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792344051016531973
author Jeryczynski, Georg, Thiele, Jürgen, Gisslinger, Bettina, Wölfler, Albert, Schalling, Martin, Gleiß, Andreas, Burgstaller, Sonja, Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika, Sliwa, Thamer, Schlögl, Ernst, Geissler, Klaus, Krauth, Maria‐Theresa, Nader, Alexander, Vesely, Michael, Simonitsch‐Klupp, Ingrid, Müllauer, Leonhard, Beham‐Schmid, Christine, Gisslinger, Heinz
author_facet Jeryczynski, Georg, Thiele, Jürgen, Gisslinger, Bettina, Wölfler, Albert, Schalling, Martin, Gleiß, Andreas, Burgstaller, Sonja, Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika, Sliwa, Thamer, Schlögl, Ernst, Geissler, Klaus, Krauth, Maria‐Theresa, Nader, Alexander, Vesely, Michael, Simonitsch‐Klupp, Ingrid, Müllauer, Leonhard, Beham‐Schmid, Christine, Gisslinger, Heinz, Jeryczynski, Georg, Thiele, Jürgen, Gisslinger, Bettina, Wölfler, Albert, Schalling, Martin, Gleiß, Andreas, Burgstaller, Sonja, Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika, Sliwa, Thamer, Schlögl, Ernst, Geissler, Klaus, Krauth, Maria‐Theresa, Nader, Alexander, Vesely, Michael, Simonitsch‐Klupp, Ingrid, Müllauer, Leonhard, Beham‐Schmid, Christine, Gisslinger, Heinz
author_sort jeryczynski, georg
container_issue 9
container_start_page 885
container_title American Journal of Hematology
container_volume 92
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The 2016 revised WHO criteria for the diagnosis of pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (pre‐PMF) require at least one of the following four borderline expressed minor clinical criteria: anemia, leukocytosis, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and splenomegaly. In this study, we evaluated the relative frequency of these four criteria in a group of 170 pre‐PMF patients and compared them to 225 ET cases. More than 91% of pre‐PMF cases showed one or more of these features required for diagnosis, by contrast with only 48% of ET patients. According to clinical data the cumulative risk of progression to advanced/overt PMF in pre‐PMF was 36.9% after 15 years. After fitting cox regression models to analyze the impact of the minor criteria on overall survival, only leukocytosis remained as a significant predictor of survival in both pre‐PMF and ET. Molecular characterization showed differences in survival in pre‐PMF but not ET, with <jats:italic>CALR</jats:italic> being a more favorable mutation than <jats:italic>JAK2</jats:italic>. The different outcome of pre‐PMF versus ET and associated molecular genetic data supports the concept of two different entities, rather than a continuum of the same disease. Although slightly less than 50% of ET patients also show one or more minor clinical criteria, accurate distinction between ET and pre‐PMF is possible by following an integrated approach including histomorphological diagnosis and presence of minor clinical criteria.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajh.24788
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Medizin
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi9hamguMjQ3ODg
imprint Wiley, 2017
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2017
institution DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161
issn 0361-8609, 1096-8652
issn_str_mv 0361-8609, 1096-8652
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:01:22.991Z
match_str jeryczynski2017prefibroticearlyprimarymyelofibrosisvswhodefinedessentialthrombocythemiatheimpactofminorclinicaldiagnosticcriteriaontheoutcomeofthedisease
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 885-891
publishDate 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series American Journal of Hematology
source_id 49
spelling Jeryczynski, Georg Thiele, Jürgen Gisslinger, Bettina Wölfler, Albert Schalling, Martin Gleiß, Andreas Burgstaller, Sonja Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika Sliwa, Thamer Schlögl, Ernst Geissler, Klaus Krauth, Maria‐Theresa Nader, Alexander Vesely, Michael Simonitsch‐Klupp, Ingrid Müllauer, Leonhard Beham‐Schmid, Christine Gisslinger, Heinz 0361-8609 1096-8652 Wiley Hematology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24788 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The 2016 revised WHO criteria for the diagnosis of pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (pre‐PMF) require at least one of the following four borderline expressed minor clinical criteria: anemia, leukocytosis, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and splenomegaly. In this study, we evaluated the relative frequency of these four criteria in a group of 170 pre‐PMF patients and compared them to 225 ET cases. More than 91% of pre‐PMF cases showed one or more of these features required for diagnosis, by contrast with only 48% of ET patients. According to clinical data the cumulative risk of progression to advanced/overt PMF in pre‐PMF was 36.9% after 15 years. After fitting cox regression models to analyze the impact of the minor criteria on overall survival, only leukocytosis remained as a significant predictor of survival in both pre‐PMF and ET. Molecular characterization showed differences in survival in pre‐PMF but not ET, with <jats:italic>CALR</jats:italic> being a more favorable mutation than <jats:italic>JAK2</jats:italic>. The different outcome of pre‐PMF versus ET and associated molecular genetic data supports the concept of two different entities, rather than a continuum of the same disease. Although slightly less than 50% of ET patients also show one or more minor clinical criteria, accurate distinction between ET and pre‐PMF is possible by following an integrated approach including histomorphological diagnosis and presence of minor clinical criteria.</jats:p> Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease American Journal of Hematology
spellingShingle Jeryczynski, Georg, Thiele, Jürgen, Gisslinger, Bettina, Wölfler, Albert, Schalling, Martin, Gleiß, Andreas, Burgstaller, Sonja, Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika, Sliwa, Thamer, Schlögl, Ernst, Geissler, Klaus, Krauth, Maria‐Theresa, Nader, Alexander, Vesely, Michael, Simonitsch‐Klupp, Ingrid, Müllauer, Leonhard, Beham‐Schmid, Christine, Gisslinger, Heinz, American Journal of Hematology, Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease, Hematology
title Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_full Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_fullStr Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_full_unstemmed Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_short Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_sort pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. who‐defined essential thrombocythemia: the impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
title_unstemmed Pre‐fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO‐defined essential thrombocythemia: The impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease
topic Hematology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24788