Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Dam removal: Listening in
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Water Resources Research |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| In: | Water Resources Research, 53, 2017, 7, S. 5229-5246 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Foley, M. M. Bellmore, J. R. O'Connor, J. E. Duda, J. J. East, A. E. Grant, G. E. Anderson, C. W. Bountry, J. A. Collins, M. J. Connolly, P. J. Craig, L. S. Evans, J. E. Greene, S. L. Magilligan, F. J. Magirl, C. S. Major, J. J. Pess, G. R. Randle, T. J. Shafroth, P. B. Torgersen, C. E. Tullos, D. Wilcox, A. C. Foley, M. M. Bellmore, J. R. O'Connor, J. E. Duda, J. J. East, A. E. Grant, G. E. Anderson, C. W. Bountry, J. A. Collins, M. J. Connolly, P. J. Craig, L. S. Evans, J. E. Greene, S. L. Magilligan, F. J. Magirl, C. S. Major, J. J. Pess, G. R. Randle, T. J. Shafroth, P. B. Torgersen, C. E. Tullos, D. Wilcox, A. C. |
|---|---|
| author |
Foley, M. M. Bellmore, J. R. O'Connor, J. E. Duda, J. J. East, A. E. Grant, G. E. Anderson, C. W. Bountry, J. A. Collins, M. J. Connolly, P. J. Craig, L. S. Evans, J. E. Greene, S. L. Magilligan, F. J. Magirl, C. S. Major, J. J. Pess, G. R. Randle, T. J. Shafroth, P. B. Torgersen, C. E. Tullos, D. Wilcox, A. C. |
| spellingShingle |
Foley, M. M. Bellmore, J. R. O'Connor, J. E. Duda, J. J. East, A. E. Grant, G. E. Anderson, C. W. Bountry, J. A. Collins, M. J. Connolly, P. J. Craig, L. S. Evans, J. E. Greene, S. L. Magilligan, F. J. Magirl, C. S. Major, J. J. Pess, G. R. Randle, T. J. Shafroth, P. B. Torgersen, C. E. Tullos, D. Wilcox, A. C. Water Resources Research Dam removal: Listening in Water Science and Technology |
| author_sort |
foley, m. m. |
| spelling |
Foley, M. M. Bellmore, J. R. O'Connor, J. E. Duda, J. J. East, A. E. Grant, G. E. Anderson, C. W. Bountry, J. A. Collins, M. J. Connolly, P. J. Craig, L. S. Evans, J. E. Greene, S. L. Magilligan, F. J. Magirl, C. S. Major, J. J. Pess, G. R. Randle, T. J. Shafroth, P. B. Torgersen, C. E. Tullos, D. Wilcox, A. C. 0043-1397 1944-7973 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Water Science and Technology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017wr020457 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Dam removal is widely used as an approach for river restoration in the United States. The increase in dam removals—particularly large dams—and associated dam‐removal studies over the last few decades motivated a working group at the USGS John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis to review and synthesize available studies of dam removals and their findings. Based on dam removals thus far, some general conclusions have emerged: (1) physical responses are typically fast, with the rate of sediment erosion largely dependent on sediment characteristics and dam‐removal strategy; (2) ecological responses to dam removal differ among the affected upstream, downstream, and reservoir reaches; (3) dam removal tends to quickly reestablish connectivity, restoring the movement of material and organisms between upstream and downstream river reaches; (4) geographic context, river history, and land use significantly influence river restoration trajectories and recovery potential because they control broader physical and ecological processes and conditions; and (5) quantitative modeling capability is improving, particularly for physical and broad‐scale ecological effects, and gives managers information needed to understand and predict long‐term effects of dam removal on riverine ecosystems. Although these studies collectively enhance our understanding of how riverine ecosystems respond to dam removal, knowledge gaps remain because most studies have been short (< 5 years) and do not adequately represent the diversity of dam types, watershed conditions, and dam‐removal methods in the U.S.</jats:p> Dam removal: Listening in Water Resources Research |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1002/2017wr020457 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Geographie Technik |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi8yMDE3d3IwMjA0NTc |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi8yMDE3d3IwMjA0NTc |
| institution |
DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 |
| imprint |
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2017 |
| imprint_str_mv |
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2017 |
| issn |
0043-1397 1944-7973 |
| issn_str_mv |
0043-1397 1944-7973 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
foley2017damremovallisteningin |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| publisher |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Water Resources Research |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Dam removal: Listening in |
| title_unstemmed |
Dam removal: Listening in |
| title_full |
Dam removal: Listening in |
| title_fullStr |
Dam removal: Listening in |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Dam removal: Listening in |
| title_short |
Dam removal: Listening in |
| title_sort |
dam removal: listening in |
| topic |
Water Science and Technology |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017wr020457 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| physical |
5229-5246 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Dam removal is widely used as an approach for river restoration in the United States. The increase in dam removals—particularly large dams—and associated dam‐removal studies over the last few decades motivated a working group at the USGS John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis to review and synthesize available studies of dam removals and their findings. Based on dam removals thus far, some general conclusions have emerged: (1) physical responses are typically fast, with the rate of sediment erosion largely dependent on sediment characteristics and dam‐removal strategy; (2) ecological responses to dam removal differ among the affected upstream, downstream, and reservoir reaches; (3) dam removal tends to quickly reestablish connectivity, restoring the movement of material and organisms between upstream and downstream river reaches; (4) geographic context, river history, and land use significantly influence river restoration trajectories and recovery potential because they control broader physical and ecological processes and conditions; and (5) quantitative modeling capability is improving, particularly for physical and broad‐scale ecological effects, and gives managers information needed to understand and predict long‐term effects of dam removal on riverine ecosystems. Although these studies collectively enhance our understanding of how riverine ecosystems respond to dam removal, knowledge gaps remain because most studies have been short (< 5 years) and do not adequately represent the diversity of dam types, watershed conditions, and dam‐removal methods in the U.S.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
7 |
| container_start_page |
5229 |
| container_title |
Water Resources Research |
| container_volume |
53 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792347985768611850 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T18:03:57.772Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Dam+removal%3A+Listening+in&rft.date=2017-07-01&genre=article&issn=1944-7973&volume=53&issue=7&spage=5229&epage=5246&pages=5229-5246&jtitle=Water+Resources+Research&atitle=Dam+removal%3A+Listening+in&aulast=Wilcox&aufirst=A.+C.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2F2017wr020457&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792347985768611850 |
| author | Foley, M. M., Bellmore, J. R., O'Connor, J. E., Duda, J. J., East, A. E., Grant, G. E., Anderson, C. W., Bountry, J. A., Collins, M. J., Connolly, P. J., Craig, L. S., Evans, J. E., Greene, S. L., Magilligan, F. J., Magirl, C. S., Major, J. J., Pess, G. R., Randle, T. J., Shafroth, P. B., Torgersen, C. E., Tullos, D., Wilcox, A. C. |
| author_facet | Foley, M. M., Bellmore, J. R., O'Connor, J. E., Duda, J. J., East, A. E., Grant, G. E., Anderson, C. W., Bountry, J. A., Collins, M. J., Connolly, P. J., Craig, L. S., Evans, J. E., Greene, S. L., Magilligan, F. J., Magirl, C. S., Major, J. J., Pess, G. R., Randle, T. J., Shafroth, P. B., Torgersen, C. E., Tullos, D., Wilcox, A. C., Foley, M. M., Bellmore, J. R., O'Connor, J. E., Duda, J. J., East, A. E., Grant, G. E., Anderson, C. W., Bountry, J. A., Collins, M. J., Connolly, P. J., Craig, L. S., Evans, J. E., Greene, S. L., Magilligan, F. J., Magirl, C. S., Major, J. J., Pess, G. R., Randle, T. J., Shafroth, P. B., Torgersen, C. E., Tullos, D., Wilcox, A. C. |
| author_sort | foley, m. m. |
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 5229 |
| container_title | Water Resources Research |
| container_volume | 53 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Dam removal is widely used as an approach for river restoration in the United States. The increase in dam removals—particularly large dams—and associated dam‐removal studies over the last few decades motivated a working group at the USGS John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis to review and synthesize available studies of dam removals and their findings. Based on dam removals thus far, some general conclusions have emerged: (1) physical responses are typically fast, with the rate of sediment erosion largely dependent on sediment characteristics and dam‐removal strategy; (2) ecological responses to dam removal differ among the affected upstream, downstream, and reservoir reaches; (3) dam removal tends to quickly reestablish connectivity, restoring the movement of material and organisms between upstream and downstream river reaches; (4) geographic context, river history, and land use significantly influence river restoration trajectories and recovery potential because they control broader physical and ecological processes and conditions; and (5) quantitative modeling capability is improving, particularly for physical and broad‐scale ecological effects, and gives managers information needed to understand and predict long‐term effects of dam removal on riverine ecosystems. Although these studies collectively enhance our understanding of how riverine ecosystems respond to dam removal, knowledge gaps remain because most studies have been short (< 5 years) and do not adequately represent the diversity of dam types, watershed conditions, and dam‐removal methods in the U.S.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2017wr020457 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Geographie, Technik |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi8yMDE3d3IwMjA0NTc |
| imprint | American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2017 |
| imprint_str_mv | American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2017 |
| institution | DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1 |
| issn | 0043-1397, 1944-7973 |
| issn_str_mv | 0043-1397, 1944-7973 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T18:03:57.772Z |
| match_str | foley2017damremovallisteningin |
| mega_collection | American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef) |
| physical | 5229-5246 |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Water Resources Research |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Foley, M. M. Bellmore, J. R. O'Connor, J. E. Duda, J. J. East, A. E. Grant, G. E. Anderson, C. W. Bountry, J. A. Collins, M. J. Connolly, P. J. Craig, L. S. Evans, J. E. Greene, S. L. Magilligan, F. J. Magirl, C. S. Major, J. J. Pess, G. R. Randle, T. J. Shafroth, P. B. Torgersen, C. E. Tullos, D. Wilcox, A. C. 0043-1397 1944-7973 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Water Science and Technology http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017wr020457 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Dam removal is widely used as an approach for river restoration in the United States. The increase in dam removals—particularly large dams—and associated dam‐removal studies over the last few decades motivated a working group at the USGS John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis to review and synthesize available studies of dam removals and their findings. Based on dam removals thus far, some general conclusions have emerged: (1) physical responses are typically fast, with the rate of sediment erosion largely dependent on sediment characteristics and dam‐removal strategy; (2) ecological responses to dam removal differ among the affected upstream, downstream, and reservoir reaches; (3) dam removal tends to quickly reestablish connectivity, restoring the movement of material and organisms between upstream and downstream river reaches; (4) geographic context, river history, and land use significantly influence river restoration trajectories and recovery potential because they control broader physical and ecological processes and conditions; and (5) quantitative modeling capability is improving, particularly for physical and broad‐scale ecological effects, and gives managers information needed to understand and predict long‐term effects of dam removal on riverine ecosystems. Although these studies collectively enhance our understanding of how riverine ecosystems respond to dam removal, knowledge gaps remain because most studies have been short (< 5 years) and do not adequately represent the diversity of dam types, watershed conditions, and dam‐removal methods in the U.S.</jats:p> Dam removal: Listening in Water Resources Research |
| spellingShingle | Foley, M. M., Bellmore, J. R., O'Connor, J. E., Duda, J. J., East, A. E., Grant, G. E., Anderson, C. W., Bountry, J. A., Collins, M. J., Connolly, P. J., Craig, L. S., Evans, J. E., Greene, S. L., Magilligan, F. J., Magirl, C. S., Major, J. J., Pess, G. R., Randle, T. J., Shafroth, P. B., Torgersen, C. E., Tullos, D., Wilcox, A. C., Water Resources Research, Dam removal: Listening in, Water Science and Technology |
| title | Dam removal: Listening in |
| title_full | Dam removal: Listening in |
| title_fullStr | Dam removal: Listening in |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dam removal: Listening in |
| title_short | Dam removal: Listening in |
| title_sort | dam removal: listening in |
| title_unstemmed | Dam removal: Listening in |
| topic | Water Science and Technology |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017wr020457 |