Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Space Weather |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , , , , , , , |
| In: | Space Weather, 15, 2017, 1, S. 131-149 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Gordeev, E. Sergeev, V. Tsyganenko, N. Kuznetsova, M. Rastäetter, L. Raeder, J. Tóth, G. Lyon, J. Merkin, V. Wiltberger, M. Gordeev, E. Sergeev, V. Tsyganenko, N. Kuznetsova, M. Rastäetter, L. Raeder, J. Tóth, G. Lyon, J. Merkin, V. Wiltberger, M. |
|---|---|
| author |
Gordeev, E. Sergeev, V. Tsyganenko, N. Kuznetsova, M. Rastäetter, L. Raeder, J. Tóth, G. Lyon, J. Merkin, V. Wiltberger, M. |
| spellingShingle |
Gordeev, E. Sergeev, V. Tsyganenko, N. Kuznetsova, M. Rastäetter, L. Raeder, J. Tóth, G. Lyon, J. Merkin, V. Wiltberger, M. Space Weather The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models Atmospheric Science |
| author_sort |
gordeev, e. |
| spelling |
Gordeev, E. Sergeev, V. Tsyganenko, N. Kuznetsova, M. Rastäetter, L. Raeder, J. Tóth, G. Lyon, J. Merkin, V. Wiltberger, M. 1542-7390 1542-7390 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Atmospheric Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016sw001495 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Recently, Gordeev et al. (2015) suggested a method to test global MHD models against statistical empirical data. They showed that four community‐available global MHD models supported by the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC) produce a reasonable agreement with reality for those key parameters (the magnetospheric size, magnetic field, and pressure) that are directly related to the large‐scale equilibria in the outer magnetosphere. Based on the same set of simulation runs, here we investigate how the models reproduce the global loading‐unloading cycle. We found that in terms of global magnetic flux transport, three examined CCMC models display systematically different response to idealized 2 h north then 2 h south interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) <jats:italic>B</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>z</jats:italic></jats:sub> variation. The LFM model shows a depressed return convection and high loading rate during the growth phase as well as enhanced return convection and high unloading rate during the expansion phase, with the amount of loaded/unloaded magnetotail flux and the growth phase duration being the closest to their observed empirical values during isolated substorms. Two other models exhibit drastically different behavior. In the BATS‐R‐US model the plasma sheet convection shows a smooth transition to the steady convection regime after the IMF southward turning. In the Open GGCM a weak plasma sheet convection has comparable intensities during both the growth phase and the following slow unloading phase. We also demonstrate potential technical problem in the publicly available simulations which is related to postprocessing interpolation and could affect the accuracy of magnetic field tracing and of other related procedures.</jats:p> The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models Space Weather |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1002/2016sw001495 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| finc_class_facet |
Physik |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi8yMDE2c3cwMDE0OTU |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi8yMDE2c3cwMDE0OTU |
| institution |
DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 |
| imprint |
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2017 |
| imprint_str_mv |
American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2017 |
| issn |
1542-7390 |
| issn_str_mv |
1542-7390 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
gordeev2017thesubstormcycleasreproducedbyglobalmhdmodels |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| publisher |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Space Weather |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| title_unstemmed |
The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| title_full |
The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| title_fullStr |
The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| title_short |
The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| title_sort |
the substorm cycle as reproduced by global mhd models |
| topic |
Atmospheric Science |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016sw001495 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| physical |
131-149 |
| description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Recently, Gordeev et al. (2015) suggested a method to test global MHD models against statistical empirical data. They showed that four community‐available global MHD models supported by the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC) produce a reasonable agreement with reality for those key parameters (the magnetospheric size, magnetic field, and pressure) that are directly related to the large‐scale equilibria in the outer magnetosphere. Based on the same set of simulation runs, here we investigate how the models reproduce the global loading‐unloading cycle. We found that in terms of global magnetic flux transport, three examined CCMC models display systematically different response to idealized 2 h north then 2 h south interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) <jats:italic>B</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>z</jats:italic></jats:sub> variation. The LFM model shows a depressed return convection and high loading rate during the growth phase as well as enhanced return convection and high unloading rate during the expansion phase, with the amount of loaded/unloaded magnetotail flux and the growth phase duration being the closest to their observed empirical values during isolated substorms. Two other models exhibit drastically different behavior. In the BATS‐R‐US model the plasma sheet convection shows a smooth transition to the steady convection regime after the IMF southward turning. In the Open GGCM a weak plasma sheet convection has comparable intensities during both the growth phase and the following slow unloading phase. We also demonstrate potential technical problem in the publicly available simulations which is related to postprocessing interpolation and could affect the accuracy of magnetic field tracing and of other related procedures.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
1 |
| container_start_page |
131 |
| container_title |
Space Weather |
| container_volume |
15 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792334637545029638 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:31:23.182Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+substorm+cycle+as+reproduced+by+global+MHD+models&rft.date=2017-01-01&genre=article&issn=1542-7390&volume=15&issue=1&spage=131&epage=149&pages=131-149&jtitle=Space+Weather&atitle=The+substorm+cycle+as+reproduced+by+global+MHD+models&aulast=Wiltberger&aufirst=M.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1002%2F2016sw001495&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792334637545029638 |
| author | Gordeev, E., Sergeev, V., Tsyganenko, N., Kuznetsova, M., Rastäetter, L., Raeder, J., Tóth, G., Lyon, J., Merkin, V., Wiltberger, M. |
| author_facet | Gordeev, E., Sergeev, V., Tsyganenko, N., Kuznetsova, M., Rastäetter, L., Raeder, J., Tóth, G., Lyon, J., Merkin, V., Wiltberger, M., Gordeev, E., Sergeev, V., Tsyganenko, N., Kuznetsova, M., Rastäetter, L., Raeder, J., Tóth, G., Lyon, J., Merkin, V., Wiltberger, M. |
| author_sort | gordeev, e. |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 131 |
| container_title | Space Weather |
| container_volume | 15 |
| description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Recently, Gordeev et al. (2015) suggested a method to test global MHD models against statistical empirical data. They showed that four community‐available global MHD models supported by the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC) produce a reasonable agreement with reality for those key parameters (the magnetospheric size, magnetic field, and pressure) that are directly related to the large‐scale equilibria in the outer magnetosphere. Based on the same set of simulation runs, here we investigate how the models reproduce the global loading‐unloading cycle. We found that in terms of global magnetic flux transport, three examined CCMC models display systematically different response to idealized 2 h north then 2 h south interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) <jats:italic>B</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>z</jats:italic></jats:sub> variation. The LFM model shows a depressed return convection and high loading rate during the growth phase as well as enhanced return convection and high unloading rate during the expansion phase, with the amount of loaded/unloaded magnetotail flux and the growth phase duration being the closest to their observed empirical values during isolated substorms. Two other models exhibit drastically different behavior. In the BATS‐R‐US model the plasma sheet convection shows a smooth transition to the steady convection regime after the IMF southward turning. In the Open GGCM a weak plasma sheet convection has comparable intensities during both the growth phase and the following slow unloading phase. We also demonstrate potential technical problem in the publicly available simulations which is related to postprocessing interpolation and could affect the accuracy of magnetic field tracing and of other related procedures.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2016sw001495 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Physik |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTAwMi8yMDE2c3cwMDE0OTU |
| imprint | American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2017 |
| imprint_str_mv | American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2017 |
| institution | DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1 |
| issn | 1542-7390 |
| issn_str_mv | 1542-7390 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:31:23.182Z |
| match_str | gordeev2017thesubstormcycleasreproducedbyglobalmhdmodels |
| mega_collection | American Geophysical Union (AGU) (CrossRef) |
| physical | 131-149 |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Space Weather |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Gordeev, E. Sergeev, V. Tsyganenko, N. Kuznetsova, M. Rastäetter, L. Raeder, J. Tóth, G. Lyon, J. Merkin, V. Wiltberger, M. 1542-7390 1542-7390 American Geophysical Union (AGU) Atmospheric Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016sw001495 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Recently, Gordeev et al. (2015) suggested a method to test global MHD models against statistical empirical data. They showed that four community‐available global MHD models supported by the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC) produce a reasonable agreement with reality for those key parameters (the magnetospheric size, magnetic field, and pressure) that are directly related to the large‐scale equilibria in the outer magnetosphere. Based on the same set of simulation runs, here we investigate how the models reproduce the global loading‐unloading cycle. We found that in terms of global magnetic flux transport, three examined CCMC models display systematically different response to idealized 2 h north then 2 h south interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) <jats:italic>B</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>z</jats:italic></jats:sub> variation. The LFM model shows a depressed return convection and high loading rate during the growth phase as well as enhanced return convection and high unloading rate during the expansion phase, with the amount of loaded/unloaded magnetotail flux and the growth phase duration being the closest to their observed empirical values during isolated substorms. Two other models exhibit drastically different behavior. In the BATS‐R‐US model the plasma sheet convection shows a smooth transition to the steady convection regime after the IMF southward turning. In the Open GGCM a weak plasma sheet convection has comparable intensities during both the growth phase and the following slow unloading phase. We also demonstrate potential technical problem in the publicly available simulations which is related to postprocessing interpolation and could affect the accuracy of magnetic field tracing and of other related procedures.</jats:p> The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models Space Weather |
| spellingShingle | Gordeev, E., Sergeev, V., Tsyganenko, N., Kuznetsova, M., Rastäetter, L., Raeder, J., Tóth, G., Lyon, J., Merkin, V., Wiltberger, M., Space Weather, The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models, Atmospheric Science |
| title | The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| title_full | The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| title_fullStr | The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| title_full_unstemmed | The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| title_short | The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| title_sort | the substorm cycle as reproduced by global mhd models |
| title_unstemmed | The substorm cycle as reproduced by global MHD models |
| topic | Atmospheric Science |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016sw001495 |