Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , |
| In: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 2016, 43, S. 12105-12110 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Hameiri, Boaz Porat, Roni Bar-Tal, Daniel Halperin, Eran Hameiri, Boaz Porat, Roni Bar-Tal, Daniel Halperin, Eran |
|---|---|
| author |
Hameiri, Boaz Porat, Roni Bar-Tal, Daniel Halperin, Eran |
| spellingShingle |
Hameiri, Boaz Porat, Roni Bar-Tal, Daniel Halperin, Eran Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention Multidisciplinary |
| author_sort |
hameiri, boaz |
| spelling |
Hameiri, Boaz Porat, Roni Bar-Tal, Daniel Halperin, Eran 0027-8424 1091-6490 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Multidisciplinary http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606182113 <jats:title>Significance</jats:title> <jats:p>Societies involved in intractable conflicts are typically polarized in their views on how to resolve the conflict. Hawkish members of society adhere to an uncompromising and nonconciliatory ideology. Therefore, interventions that may change their attitudes are particularly important but simultaneously are very difficult to apply because hawks tend to reject messages that propagate peaceful resolution of the conflict. In the current investigation, we tested whether a large-scale campaign based on the paradoxical thinking framework can moderate attitudes during a widespread outbreak of violence. We found that rightwing (i.e., hawkish) participants exposed to the campaign decreased their adherence to conflict-supporting attitudes over time, were more supportive of conciliatory policies, and less supportive of aggressive policies.</jats:p> Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1073/pnas.1606182113 |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA3My9wbmFzLjE2MDYxODIxMTM |
| id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA3My9wbmFzLjE2MDYxODIxMTM |
| institution |
DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-Zwi2 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 |
| imprint |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016 |
| issn |
0027-8424 1091-6490 |
| issn_str_mv |
0027-8424 1091-6490 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (CrossRef) |
| match_str |
hameiri2016moderatingattitudesintimesofviolencethroughparadoxicalthinkingintervention |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| publisher |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
| source_id |
49 |
| title |
Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_unstemmed |
Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_full |
Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_fullStr |
Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_short |
Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_sort |
moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| topic |
Multidisciplinary |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606182113 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| physical |
12105-12110 |
| description |
<jats:title>Significance</jats:title>
<jats:p>Societies involved in intractable conflicts are typically polarized in their views on how to resolve the conflict. Hawkish members of society adhere to an uncompromising and nonconciliatory ideology. Therefore, interventions that may change their attitudes are particularly important but simultaneously are very difficult to apply because hawks tend to reject messages that propagate peaceful resolution of the conflict. In the current investigation, we tested whether a large-scale campaign based on the paradoxical thinking framework can moderate attitudes during a widespread outbreak of violence. We found that rightwing (i.e., hawkish) participants exposed to the campaign decreased their adherence to conflict-supporting attitudes over time, were more supportive of conciliatory policies, and less supportive of aggressive policies.</jats:p> |
| container_issue |
43 |
| container_start_page |
12105 |
| container_title |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
| container_volume |
113 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792344029952737301 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T17:01:04.113Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Moderating+attitudes+in+times+of+violence+through+paradoxical+thinking+intervention&rft.date=2016-10-25&genre=article&issn=1091-6490&volume=113&issue=43&spage=12105&epage=12110&pages=12105-12110&jtitle=Proceedings+of+the+National+Academy+of+Sciences&atitle=Moderating+attitudes+in+times+of+violence+through+paradoxical+thinking+intervention&aulast=Halperin&aufirst=Eran&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1073%2Fpnas.1606182113&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792344029952737301 |
| author | Hameiri, Boaz, Porat, Roni, Bar-Tal, Daniel, Halperin, Eran |
| author_facet | Hameiri, Boaz, Porat, Roni, Bar-Tal, Daniel, Halperin, Eran, Hameiri, Boaz, Porat, Roni, Bar-Tal, Daniel, Halperin, Eran |
| author_sort | hameiri, boaz |
| container_issue | 43 |
| container_start_page | 12105 |
| container_title | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
| container_volume | 113 |
| description | <jats:title>Significance</jats:title> <jats:p>Societies involved in intractable conflicts are typically polarized in their views on how to resolve the conflict. Hawkish members of society adhere to an uncompromising and nonconciliatory ideology. Therefore, interventions that may change their attitudes are particularly important but simultaneously are very difficult to apply because hawks tend to reject messages that propagate peaceful resolution of the conflict. In the current investigation, we tested whether a large-scale campaign based on the paradoxical thinking framework can moderate attitudes during a widespread outbreak of violence. We found that rightwing (i.e., hawkish) participants exposed to the campaign decreased their adherence to conflict-supporting attitudes over time, were more supportive of conciliatory policies, and less supportive of aggressive policies.</jats:p> |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1073/pnas.1606182113 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTA3My9wbmFzLjE2MDYxODIxMTM |
| imprint | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016 |
| imprint_str_mv | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016 |
| institution | DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-Zwi2, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1 |
| issn | 0027-8424, 1091-6490 |
| issn_str_mv | 0027-8424, 1091-6490 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T17:01:04.113Z |
| match_str | hameiri2016moderatingattitudesintimesofviolencethroughparadoxicalthinkingintervention |
| mega_collection | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (CrossRef) |
| physical | 12105-12110 |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
| source_id | 49 |
| spelling | Hameiri, Boaz Porat, Roni Bar-Tal, Daniel Halperin, Eran 0027-8424 1091-6490 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Multidisciplinary http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606182113 <jats:title>Significance</jats:title> <jats:p>Societies involved in intractable conflicts are typically polarized in their views on how to resolve the conflict. Hawkish members of society adhere to an uncompromising and nonconciliatory ideology. Therefore, interventions that may change their attitudes are particularly important but simultaneously are very difficult to apply because hawks tend to reject messages that propagate peaceful resolution of the conflict. In the current investigation, we tested whether a large-scale campaign based on the paradoxical thinking framework can moderate attitudes during a widespread outbreak of violence. We found that rightwing (i.e., hawkish) participants exposed to the campaign decreased their adherence to conflict-supporting attitudes over time, were more supportive of conciliatory policies, and less supportive of aggressive policies.</jats:p> Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
| spellingShingle | Hameiri, Boaz, Porat, Roni, Bar-Tal, Daniel, Halperin, Eran, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention, Multidisciplinary |
| title | Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_full | Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_fullStr | Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_full_unstemmed | Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_short | Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_sort | moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| title_unstemmed | Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention |
| topic | Multidisciplinary |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606182113 |