Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Religions 12(2021,1) Artikel 64 |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| Titel: | On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering |
| Format: | E-Book-Kapitel |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
[2021]
|
| Gesamtaufnahme: |
: Religions, 12(2021,1) Artikel 64
, volume:12 |
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Quelle: | Verbunddaten SWB Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen |
| Kommentar in: |
Sterba, James P., 1943 - : Sixteen Contributors
|
| LEADER | 02635caa a22005052 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 0-1745715037 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221012114551.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210126s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel12010064 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1745715037 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1745715037 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Reichenbach, Bruce R. |d 1943- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1052572782 |0 (DE-627)788666991 |0 (DE-576)162684959 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2021] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In his recent book Is a Good God Logically Possible? and article by the same name, James Sterba argued that the existence of significant and horrendous evils, both moral and natural, is incompatible with the existence of God. He advances the discussion by invoking three moral requirements and by creating an analogy with how the just state would address such evils, while protecting significant freedoms and rights to which all are entitled. I respond that his argument has important ambiguities and that consistent application of his moral principles will require that God remove all moral and natural evils. This would deleteriously restrict not only human moral decision making, but also the knowledge necessary to make moral judgments. He replies to this critique by appealing to the possibility of limited divine intervention, to which I rejoin with reasons why his middle ground is not viable. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a James Sterba | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ethical principles | |
| 650 | 4 | |a existence of God | |
| 650 | 4 | |a moral evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a natural evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a problem of evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a theodicies | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 12(2021,1) Artikel 64 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kommentar in |a Sterba, James P., 1943 - |t Sixteen Contributors |d 2021 |w (DE-627)1764664523 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/1/64 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 12 |j 2021 |e 1 |y 12(2021,1) Artikel 64 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/1/64 |9 LFER |
| 852 | |a LFER |z 2021-02-10T04:32:28Z | ||
| 970 | |c OD | ||
| 971 | |c EBOOK | ||
| 972 | |c EBOOK | ||
| 973 | |c Aufsatz | ||
| 935 | |a lfer | ||
| 951 | |b XD-US | ||
| 980 | |a 1745715037 |b 0 |k 1745715037 |c lfer | ||
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=On+James+Sterba%E2%80%99s+Refutation+of+Theistic+Arguments+to+Justify+Suffering&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.creator=Reichenbach%2C+Bruce+R.&rft.pub=&rft.format=Journal&rft.language=English&rft.issn=2077-1444 |
|---|
| _version_ | 1757969500815228928 |
|---|---|
| access_facet | Electronic Resources |
| author | Reichenbach, Bruce R. |
| author_facet | Reichenbach, Bruce R. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Reichenbach, Bruce R. 1943- |
| author_variant | b r r br brr |
| callnumber-sort | |
| collection | lfer |
| container_reference | 12(2021,1) Artikel 64 |
| container_title | Religions |
| contents | In his recent book Is a Good God Logically Possible? and article by the same name, James Sterba argued that the existence of significant and horrendous evils, both moral and natural, is incompatible with the existence of God. He advances the discussion by invoking three moral requirements and by creating an analogy with how the just state would address such evils, while protecting significant freedoms and rights to which all are entitled. I respond that his argument has important ambiguities and that consistent application of his moral principles will require that God remove all moral and natural evils. This would deleteriously restrict not only human moral decision making, but also the knowledge necessary to make moral judgments. He replies to this critique by appealing to the possibility of limited divine intervention, to which I rejoin with reasons why his middle ground is not viable. |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627)1745715037, (DE-599)KXP1745715037 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/rel12010064 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | not assigned |
| format | ElectronicBookComponentPart |
| format_access_txtF_mv | Article, E-Article |
| format_de105 | Ebook |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_detail_txtF_mv | text-online-monograph-child |
| format_dezi4 | e-Book |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_legacy | ElectronicBookPart |
| format_strict_txtF_mv | E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | USA |
| hierarchy_parent_id | 0-665435797 |
| hierarchy_parent_title | Religions |
| hierarchy_sequence | 12(2021,1) Artikel 64 |
| hierarchy_top_id | 0-665435797 |
| hierarchy_top_title | Religions |
| id | 0-1745715037 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| imprint | 2021 |
| imprint_str_mv | [2021] |
| institution | DE-D117, DE-105, LFER, DE-Ch1, DE-15, DE-14, DE-Zwi2 |
| is_hierarchy_id | 0-1745715037 |
| is_hierarchy_title | On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering |
| isil_str_mv | LFER |
| issn | 2077-1444 |
| kxp_id_str | 1745715037 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2023-02-16T06:52:41.015Z |
| local_heading_facet_dezwi2 | James Sterba, ethical principles, existence of God, moral evil, natural evil, problem of evil, theodicies |
| marc024a_ct_mv | 10.3390/rel12010064 |
| match_str | reichenbach2021onjamessterbasrefutationoftheisticargumentstojustifysuffering |
| mega_collection | Verbunddaten SWB, Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen |
| misc_de105 | EBOOK |
| multipart_link | 348219067 |
| multipart_part | (348219067)12(2021,1) Artikel 64 |
| names_id_str_mv | (DE-588)1052572782, (DE-627)788666991, (DE-576)162684959 |
| publishDate | [2021] |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publishPlace | |
| publisher | |
| record_format | marcfinc |
| record_id | 1745715037 |
| recordtype | marcfinc |
| rvk_facet | No subject assigned |
| source_id | 0 |
| spelling | Reichenbach, Bruce R. 1943- VerfasserIn (DE-588)1052572782 (DE-627)788666991 (DE-576)162684959 aut, On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering, [2021], Text txt rdacontent, Computermedien c rdamedia, Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier, In his recent book Is a Good God Logically Possible? and article by the same name, James Sterba argued that the existence of significant and horrendous evils, both moral and natural, is incompatible with the existence of God. He advances the discussion by invoking three moral requirements and by creating an analogy with how the just state would address such evils, while protecting significant freedoms and rights to which all are entitled. I respond that his argument has important ambiguities and that consistent application of his moral principles will require that God remove all moral and natural evils. This would deleteriously restrict not only human moral decision making, but also the knowledge necessary to make moral judgments. He replies to this critique by appealing to the possibility of limited divine intervention, to which I rejoin with reasons why his middle ground is not viable., James Sterba, ethical principles, existence of God, moral evil, natural evil, problem of evil, theodicies, Enthalten in Religions Basel : MDPI, 2010 12(2021,1) Artikel 64 Online-Ressource (DE-627)665435797 (DE-600)2620962-7 (DE-576)348219067 2077-1444 nnns, volume:12 year:2021 number:1, Kommentar in Sterba, James P., 1943 - Sixteen Contributors 2021 (DE-627)1764664523, https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/1/64 Verlag kostenfrei Volltext, https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/1/64 LFER, LFER 2021-02-10T04:32:28Z |
| spellingShingle | Reichenbach, Bruce R., On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering, In his recent book Is a Good God Logically Possible? and article by the same name, James Sterba argued that the existence of significant and horrendous evils, both moral and natural, is incompatible with the existence of God. He advances the discussion by invoking three moral requirements and by creating an analogy with how the just state would address such evils, while protecting significant freedoms and rights to which all are entitled. I respond that his argument has important ambiguities and that consistent application of his moral principles will require that God remove all moral and natural evils. This would deleteriously restrict not only human moral decision making, but also the knowledge necessary to make moral judgments. He replies to this critique by appealing to the possibility of limited divine intervention, to which I rejoin with reasons why his middle ground is not viable., James Sterba, ethical principles, existence of God, moral evil, natural evil, problem of evil, theodicies |
| title | On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering |
| title_auth | On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering |
| title_full | On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering |
| title_fullStr | On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering |
| title_full_unstemmed | On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering |
| title_in_hierarchy | On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering, |
| title_short | On James Sterba’s Refutation of Theistic Arguments to Justify Suffering |
| title_sort | on james sterba s refutation of theistic arguments to justify suffering |
| topic | James Sterba, ethical principles, existence of God, moral evil, natural evil, problem of evil, theodicies |
| topic_facet | James Sterba, ethical principles, existence of God, moral evil, natural evil, problem of evil, theodicies |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/1/64 |