Eintrag weiter verarbeiten

Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent

Gespeichert in:

Veröffentlicht in: Energy procedia 63(2014), Seite 1029-1039
Personen und Körperschaften: Ehlers, Sören (VerfasserIn), Roeder, Volker (VerfasserIn), Kather, Alfons (VerfasserIn), Singh, Prachi (VerfasserIn), Davison, John (VerfasserIn), Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg (Sonstige), Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg Institut für Energietechnik (Sonstige)
Titel: Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent/ Sören Ehlers; Volker Roeder; Alfons Kather; Prachi Singh; John Davison
Format: E-Book-Kapitel
Sprache: Englisch
veröffentlicht:
2014
Gesamtaufnahme: : Energy procedia, 63(2014), Seite 1029-1039
, volume:63
Schlagwörter:
Quelle: Verbunddaten SWB
Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen
LEADER 05173caa a2200901 4500
001 0-1680004352
003 DE-627
005 20200504143229.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 191025s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.051547  |2 urn 
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.110  |2 doi 
024 7 |a 10.15480/882.2429  |2 doi 
024 7 |a 11420/3537  |2 hdl 
035 |a (DE-627)1680004352 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1680004352 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
082 0 |a 620: Ingenieurwissenschaften 
082 0 4 |a 620 
100 1 |a Ehlers, Sören  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1209507048  |0 (DE-627)1697036600  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent  |c Sören Ehlers; Volker Roeder; Alfons Kather; Prachi Singh; John Davison 
264 1 |c 2014 
300 |b Diagramme 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Sonstige Körperschaft: Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg 
500 |a Sonstige Körperschaft: Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Institut für Energietechnik 
520 |a © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. The post-combustion capture (PCC) technology is a promising possibility to reduce CO2 emissions of fossil fuel fired power plants. One of the main concerns for the PCC is the loss in electric power output. A reduction in efficiency penalty for solvent based PCC can be achieved by improving the solvent properties as well as by improving the process design. There are many different process flow sheet modifications with an improvement in process design reported in literature. In this work two of these modifications for a capture plant are evaluated. To be able to compare these process modifications it is necessary to evaluate them on identical solvent and process conditions. The modified processes are compared to base cases processing the flue gas from a supercritical pulverised coal fired power plant as well as a natural gas combined cycle power plant. The solvent used in the capture plant is a generic improved solvent, representing possible future solvents. The main advantages of the flow sheet modifications are pointed out. Subsequent, the specific reboiler heat duty, the specific cooling duty and the specific auxiliary power for the capture plant are shown for the flow sheet modifications. The overall efficiency penalties for the flow sheet modifications are compared and differences are highlighted. 
650 7 |a Carbon dioxide  |2 DSpace 
650 7 |a Post combustion capture  |2 DSpace 
650 7 |a Process modifications  |2 DSpace 
700 1 |a Roeder, Volker  |d 1984-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1122650604  |0 (DE-627)87595989X  |0 (DE-576)481410961  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kather, Alfons  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1135158746  |0 (DE-627)89012762X  |0 (DE-576)489661653  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Singh, Prachi  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Davison, John  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
710 2 |a Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg  |0 (DE-588)2067664-5  |0 (DE-627)103632417  |0 (DE-576)192125400  |4 oth 
710 2 |a Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg  |b Institut für Energietechnik  |0 (DE-588)10196915-6  |0 (DE-627)559390874  |0 (DE-576)278216498  |4 oth 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Energy procedia  |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2009  |g 63(2014), Seite 1029-1039  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)598096337  |w (DE-600)2490671-2  |w (DE-576)306838575  |x 1876-6102 
773 1 8 |g volume:63  |g year:2014  |g pages:1029-1039 
856 4 0 |u http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.051547  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2429  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei 
856 4 0 |u http://hdl.handle.net/11420/3537  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.110  |x Verlag 
935 |i DSpace 
936 u w |d 63  |j 2014  |h 1029-1039 
951 |a AR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.110  |9 LFER 
856 4 0 |u http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.051547  |9 LFER 
852 |a LFER  |z 2019-11-13T00:00:00Z 
970 |c OD 
971 |c EBOOK 
972 |c EBOOK 
973 |c Aufsatz 
935 |a lfer 
900 |a Kather, A. 
910 |a Institut für Energietechnik 
910 |a Hamburg-Harburg 
910 |a Institute of Energy Systems 
910 |a Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg 
910 |a Institut M-5 
910 |a IET 
910 |a Studiendekanat Maschinenbau 
910 |a Studienbereich Maschinenbau 
910 |a Arbeitsbereich Wärmekraftanlagen und Schiffsmaschinen 
910 |a Technische Universität Hamburg 
910 |a Technische Universität Harburg 
910 |a Technical University 
910 |a Harburg 
910 |a TU Harburg 
910 |a Hamburg University of Technology 
910 |a University of Technology 
910 |a TUHH 
910 |a TU Hamburg-Harburg 
910 |a Techn. Univ. Hamburg-Harburg 
951 |b XA-DE 
980 |a 1680004352  |b 0  |k 1680004352  |c lfer 
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Energetic+evaluation+of+different+flow+sheet+modifications+of+post-combustion+CO2+capture+plant+at+coal+and+natural+gas+fired+power+plant+for+a+generic+improved+solvent&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.creator=Ehlers%2C+S%C3%B6ren&rft.pub=&rft.format=Journal&rft.language=English&rft.issn=1876-6102
SOLR
_version_ 1757963998137942016
access_facet Electronic Resources
author Ehlers, Sören, Roeder, Volker, Kather, Alfons, Singh, Prachi, Davison, John
author_corporate Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg Institut für Energietechnik
author_corporate_role oth, oth
author_facet Ehlers, Sören, Roeder, Volker, Kather, Alfons, Singh, Prachi, Davison, John, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg Institut für Energietechnik
author_role aut, aut, aut, aut, aut
author_sort Ehlers, Sören
author_variant s e se, v r vr, a k ak, p s ps, j d jd
callnumber-sort
collection lfer
container_reference 63(2014), Seite 1029-1039
container_title Energy procedia
contents © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. The post-combustion capture (PCC) technology is a promising possibility to reduce CO2 emissions of fossil fuel fired power plants. One of the main concerns for the PCC is the loss in electric power output. A reduction in efficiency penalty for solvent based PCC can be achieved by improving the solvent properties as well as by improving the process design. There are many different process flow sheet modifications with an improvement in process design reported in literature. In this work two of these modifications for a capture plant are evaluated. To be able to compare these process modifications it is necessary to evaluate them on identical solvent and process conditions. The modified processes are compared to base cases processing the flue gas from a supercritical pulverised coal fired power plant as well as a natural gas combined cycle power plant. The solvent used in the capture plant is a generic improved solvent, representing possible future solvents. The main advantages of the flow sheet modifications are pointed out. Subsequent, the specific reboiler heat duty, the specific cooling duty and the specific auxiliary power for the capture plant are shown for the flow sheet modifications. The overall efficiency penalties for the flow sheet modifications are compared and differences are highlighted.
ctrlnum (DE-627)1680004352, (DE-599)KXP1680004352
dewey-full 620:INGENIEURWISSENSCHAFTEN, 620
dewey-hundreds 600 - Technology
dewey-ones 620 - Engineering & allied operations
dewey-raw 620: Ingenieurwissenschaften, 620
dewey-search 620: Ingenieurwissenschaften, 620
dewey-sort 3620 INGENIEURWISSENSCHAFTEN
dewey-tens 620 - Engineering
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.110, 10.15480/882.2429
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Technik
fincclass_txtF_mv technology, engineering-process
footnote Sonstige Körperschaft: Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Sonstige Körperschaft: Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Institut für Energietechnik
format ElectronicBookComponentPart
format_access_txtF_mv Article, E-Article
format_de105 Ebook
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_detail_txtF_mv text-online-monograph-child
format_dezi4 e-Book
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_legacy ElectronicBookPart
format_strict_txtF_mv E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person Germany
hierarchy_parent_id 0-598096337
hierarchy_parent_title Energy procedia
hierarchy_sequence 63(2014), Seite 1029-1039
hierarchy_top_id 0-598096337
hierarchy_top_title Energy procedia
id 0-1680004352
illustrated Not Illustrated
imprint 2014
imprint_str_mv 2014
institution DE-D117, DE-105, LFER, DE-Ch1, DE-15, DE-14, DE-Zwi2
is_hierarchy_id 0-1680004352
is_hierarchy_title Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent
isil_str_mv LFER
issn 1876-6102
kxp_id_str 1680004352
language English
last_indexed 2023-02-16T05:25:13.501Z
local_heading_facet_dezwi2 Carbon dioxide, Post combustion capture, Process modifications
marc024a_ct_mv urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.051547, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.110, 10.15480/882.2429, 11420/3537
match_str ehlers2014energeticevaluationofdifferentflowsheetmodificationsofpostcombustionco2captureplantatcoalandnaturalgasfiredpowerplantforagenericimprovedsolvent
mega_collection Verbunddaten SWB, Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen
misc_de105 EBOOK
multipart_link 306838575
multipart_part (306838575)63(2014), Seite 1029-1039
names_id_str_mv (DE-588)1209507048, (DE-627)1697036600, (DE-588)1122650604, (DE-627)87595989X, (DE-576)481410961, (DE-588)1135158746, (DE-627)89012762X, (DE-576)489661653, (DE-588)2067664-5, (DE-627)103632417, (DE-576)192125400, (DE-588)10196915-6, (DE-627)559390874, (DE-576)278216498
physical Diagramme
publishDate 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publishPlace
publisher
record_format marcfinc
record_id 1680004352
recordtype marcfinc
rvk_facet No subject assigned
source_id 0
spelling Ehlers, Sören VerfasserIn (DE-588)1209507048 (DE-627)1697036600 aut, Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent Sören Ehlers; Volker Roeder; Alfons Kather; Prachi Singh; John Davison, 2014, Diagramme, Text txt rdacontent, Computermedien c rdamedia, Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier, Sonstige Körperschaft: Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Sonstige Körperschaft: Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Institut für Energietechnik, © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. The post-combustion capture (PCC) technology is a promising possibility to reduce CO2 emissions of fossil fuel fired power plants. One of the main concerns for the PCC is the loss in electric power output. A reduction in efficiency penalty for solvent based PCC can be achieved by improving the solvent properties as well as by improving the process design. There are many different process flow sheet modifications with an improvement in process design reported in literature. In this work two of these modifications for a capture plant are evaluated. To be able to compare these process modifications it is necessary to evaluate them on identical solvent and process conditions. The modified processes are compared to base cases processing the flue gas from a supercritical pulverised coal fired power plant as well as a natural gas combined cycle power plant. The solvent used in the capture plant is a generic improved solvent, representing possible future solvents. The main advantages of the flow sheet modifications are pointed out. Subsequent, the specific reboiler heat duty, the specific cooling duty and the specific auxiliary power for the capture plant are shown for the flow sheet modifications. The overall efficiency penalties for the flow sheet modifications are compared and differences are highlighted., Carbon dioxide DSpace, Post combustion capture DSpace, Process modifications DSpace, Roeder, Volker 1984- VerfasserIn (DE-588)1122650604 (DE-627)87595989X (DE-576)481410961 aut, Kather, Alfons VerfasserIn (DE-588)1135158746 (DE-627)89012762X (DE-576)489661653 aut, Singh, Prachi VerfasserIn aut, Davison, John VerfasserIn aut, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg (DE-588)2067664-5 (DE-627)103632417 (DE-576)192125400 oth, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg Institut für Energietechnik (DE-588)10196915-6 (DE-627)559390874 (DE-576)278216498 oth, Enthalten in Energy procedia Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2009 63(2014), Seite 1029-1039 Online-Ressource (DE-627)598096337 (DE-600)2490671-2 (DE-576)306838575 1876-6102, volume:63 year:2014 pages:1029-1039, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.051547 Resolving-System kostenfrei, https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2429 Resolving-System kostenfrei, http://hdl.handle.net/11420/3537 Resolving-System kostenfrei, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.110 Verlag, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.110 LFER, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.051547 LFER, LFER 2019-11-13T00:00:00Z
spellingShingle Ehlers, Sören, Roeder, Volker, Kather, Alfons, Singh, Prachi, Davison, John, Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent, © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. The post-combustion capture (PCC) technology is a promising possibility to reduce CO2 emissions of fossil fuel fired power plants. One of the main concerns for the PCC is the loss in electric power output. A reduction in efficiency penalty for solvent based PCC can be achieved by improving the solvent properties as well as by improving the process design. There are many different process flow sheet modifications with an improvement in process design reported in literature. In this work two of these modifications for a capture plant are evaluated. To be able to compare these process modifications it is necessary to evaluate them on identical solvent and process conditions. The modified processes are compared to base cases processing the flue gas from a supercritical pulverised coal fired power plant as well as a natural gas combined cycle power plant. The solvent used in the capture plant is a generic improved solvent, representing possible future solvents. The main advantages of the flow sheet modifications are pointed out. Subsequent, the specific reboiler heat duty, the specific cooling duty and the specific auxiliary power for the capture plant are shown for the flow sheet modifications. The overall efficiency penalties for the flow sheet modifications are compared and differences are highlighted., Carbon dioxide, Post combustion capture, Process modifications
title Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent
title_auth Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent
title_full Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent Sören Ehlers; Volker Roeder; Alfons Kather; Prachi Singh; John Davison
title_fullStr Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent Sören Ehlers; Volker Roeder; Alfons Kather; Prachi Singh; John Davison
title_full_unstemmed Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent Sören Ehlers; Volker Roeder; Alfons Kather; Prachi Singh; John Davison
title_in_hierarchy Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent / Sören Ehlers; Volker Roeder; Alfons Kather; Prachi Singh; John Davison,
title_short Energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post-combustion CO2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent
title_sort energetic evaluation of different flow sheet modifications of post combustion co2 capture plant at coal and natural gas fired power plant for a generic improved solvent
topic Carbon dioxide, Post combustion capture, Process modifications
topic_facet Carbon dioxide, Post combustion capture, Process modifications
url http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.051547, https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2429, http://hdl.handle.net/11420/3537, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.110
urn urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.051547