Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Verfügbar über Online-Ressource

Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?: a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules

Gespeichert in:

Personen und Körperschaften: Gless, Sabine (HerausgeberIn), Richter, Thomas (HerausgeberIn)
Titel: Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?: a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules/ Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter (editors)
Format: E-Book
Sprache: Englisch
veröffentlicht:
Cham Springer Open [2019]
Gesamtaufnahme: Ius Gentium ; Volume 74
Schlagwörter:
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law
Criminal justice, Administration of
Social justice
Criminal Law
Private international law.
Conflict of laws.
International criminal law.
Human rights.
International law.
Law and the social sciences.
Comparative law.
Inhalte/Bestandteile: 10 Datensätze
Quelle: Verbunddaten SWB
Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen
LEADER 05669cam a2200949 4500
001 0-1666668370
003 DE-627
005 20240209093711.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190604s2019 gw |||||o 00| ||eng c
020 |a 9783030125202  |9 978-3-030-12520-2 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1666668370 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1666668370 
035 |a (DE-He213)978-3-030-12520-2 
035 |a (EBP)043987788 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
044 |c XA-DE 
050 0 |a K7000-7720.22  |a K7073-7078 
072 7 |a LB  |2 thema 
072 7 |a LAM  |2 thema 
072 7 |a LB  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LAW051000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAM  |2 bicssc 
245 1 0 |a Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?  |b a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules  |c Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter (editors) 
264 1 |a Cham  |b Springer Open  |c [2019] 
300 |a 1 Online-Ressource (xv, 380 Seiten) 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Ius Gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice  |v Volume 74 
490 1 |a Springer eBook Collection 
506 0 |a Open Access 
520 |a Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change? 
520 |a This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved 
583 1 |a Archivierung/Langzeitarchivierung gewährleistet  |f SSG  |2 pdager  |5 DE-21 
650 0 |a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law 
650 0 |a Criminal justice, Administration of 
650 0 |a Social justice 
650 0 |a Criminal Law 
650 0 |a Private international law. 
650 0 |a Conflict of laws. 
650 0 |a International criminal law. 
650 0 |a Human rights. 
650 0 |a International law. 
650 0 |a Law and the social sciences. 
650 0 |a Comparative law. 
700 1 |a Gless, Sabine  |d 1966-  |e HerausgeberIn  |0 (DE-588)124400175  |0 (DE-627)363321101  |0 (DE-576)177548681  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Richter, Thomas  |e HerausgeberIn  |4 edt 
776 1 |z 9783030125196 
776 0 8 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druck-Ausgabe  |z 978-3-030-12519-6 
830 0 |a Ius Gentium  |v Volume 74  |9 74  |w (DE-627)56084218X  |w (DE-576)497528452  |w (DE-600)2417166-9  |7 ns 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2  |m X:SPRINGER  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 2 |u https://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz1666668370cov.jpg  |m V:DE-576  |m X:SPRINGER  |q image/jpeg  |v 20200305161139  |3 Cover 
912 |a ZDB-2-LCR  |b 2019 
912 |a ZDB-2-SOB  |b 2019 
912 |a ZDB-2-SXLC  |b 2019 
912 |a ZDB-2-SEB  |b 2019 
912 |a ZDB-2-SEB 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
900 |a Gleß, Sabine 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2  |y Online-Zugriff  |9 DE-15 
852 |a DE-15  |x epn:3481030398  |z 2019-06-04T17:11:50Z 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2  |9 DE-Ch1 
852 |a DE-Ch1  |x epn:3492457827  |z 2019-07-10T13:05:33Z 
852 |d DE-Zwi2  |x epn:3481030436 del:202301280133 
976 |h Elektronischer Volltext - Open Access, Zugang über SpringerLink 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2  |z Zum Online-Dokument  |9 DE-Zi4 
852 |a DE-Zi4  |x epn:4104250333  |z 2023-07-24T09:45:35Z 
852 |a DE-L189  |x epn:3481030444  |z 2019-06-04T17:11:50Z 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2  |9 LFER 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2  |9 LFER 
970 |c OD 
971 |c EBOOK 
972 |c EBOOK 
973 |c EB 
935 |a lfer 
852 |a LFER  |x epn:3796425925  |z 2020-11-10T15:21:47Z 
980 |a 1666668370  |b 0  |k 1666668370  |c lfer 
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Do+exclusionary+rules+ensure+a+fair+trial%3F%3A+a+comparative+perspective+on+evidentiary+rules&rft.date=%5B2019%5D&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=book&rft.btitle=Do+exclusionary+rules+ensure+a+fair+trial%3F%3A+a+comparative+perspective+on+evidentiary+rules&rft.series=Ius+Gentium%2C+Volume+74&rft.au=&rft.pub=Springer+Open&rft.edition=&rft.isbn=3030125203
SOLR
_version_ 1795509288138964992
access_state_str Open Access
author2 Gless, Sabine, Richter, Thomas
author2_role edt, edt
author2_variant s g sg, t r tr
author_facet Gless, Sabine, Richter, Thomas
callnumber-first K - Law
callnumber-label K7000-7720
callnumber-raw K7000-7720.22 K7073-7078
callnumber-search K7000-7720.22 K7073-7078
callnumber-sort K 47000 47720.22 K7073 47078
callnumber-subject K - General Law
collection ZDB-2-LCR, ZDB-2-SOB, ZDB-2-SXLC, ZDB-2-SEB, lfer
contents Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change?, This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved
ctrlnum (DE-627)1666668370, (DE-599)KXP1666668370, (DE-He213)978-3-030-12520-2, (EBP)043987788
de15_date 2019-06-04T17:11:50Z
dech1_date 2019-07-10T13:05:33Z
doi_str_mv 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2
facet_912a ZDB-2-LCR, ZDB-2-SOB, ZDB-2-SXLC, ZDB-2-SEB
facet_avail Online, Free
finc_class_facet Rechtswissenschaft
format eBook
format_access_txtF_mv Book, E-Book
format_de105 Ebook
format_de14 Book, E-Book
format_de15 Book, E-Book
format_del152 Buch
format_detail_txtF_mv text-online-monograph-independent
format_dezi4 e-Book
format_finc Book, E-Book
format_legacy ElectronicBook
format_legacy_nrw Book, E-Book
format_nrw Book, E-Book
format_strict_txtF_mv E-Book
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
hierarchy_parent_id 0-56084218X
hierarchy_parent_title Ius Gentium
hierarchy_sequence 74
hierarchy_top_id 0-56084218X
hierarchy_top_title Ius Gentium
id 0-1666668370
illustrated Not Illustrated
imprint Cham, Springer Open, [2019]
imprint_str_mv Cham: Springer Open, [2019]
institution DE-D117, DE-105, LFER, DE-Ch1, DE-15, DE-14, DE-L189, DE-Zi4, DE-Zwi2
is_hierarchy_id 0-1666668370
is_hierarchy_title Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?: a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules
isbn 9783030125202
isbn_isn_mv 9783030125196, 978-3-030-12519-6
kxp_id_str 1666668370
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-05T15:31:32.209Z
local_heading_facet_dezwi2 Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law, Criminal justice, Administration of, Social justice, Criminal Law, Private international law., Conflict of laws., International criminal law., Human rights., International law., Law and the social sciences., Comparative law.
marc024a_ct_mv 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2
marc_error [geogr_code]Unable to make public java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.append(java.lang.String) accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.lang" to unnamed module @7838f2f1
match_str gless2019doexclusionaryrulesensureafairtrialacomparativeperspectiveonevidentiaryrules
mega_collection Verbunddaten SWB, Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen
misc_de105 EBOOK
multipart_link 497528452
multipart_part (497528452)Volume 74
names_id_str_mv (DE-588)124400175, (DE-627)363321101, (DE-576)177548681
physical 1 Online-Ressource (xv, 380 Seiten)
publishDate [2019]
publishDateSort 2019
publishPlace Cham
publisher Springer Open
record_format marcfinc
record_id 1666668370
recordtype marcfinc
rvk_facet No subject assigned
series Ius Gentium, Volume 74
series2 Ius Gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice ; Volume 74, Springer eBook Collection
source_id 0
spelling Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter (editors), Cham Springer Open [2019], 1 Online-Ressource (xv, 380 Seiten), Text txt rdacontent, Computermedien c rdamedia, Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier, Ius Gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice Volume 74, Springer eBook Collection, Open Access, Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change?, This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved, Archivierung/Langzeitarchivierung gewährleistet SSG pdager DE-21, Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law, Criminal justice, Administration of, Social justice, Criminal Law, Private international law., Conflict of laws., International criminal law., Human rights., International law., Law and the social sciences., Comparative law., Gless, Sabine 1966- HerausgeberIn (DE-588)124400175 (DE-627)363321101 (DE-576)177548681 edt, Richter, Thomas HerausgeberIn edt, 9783030125196, Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 978-3-030-12519-6, Ius Gentium Volume 74 74 (DE-627)56084218X (DE-576)497528452 (DE-600)2417166-9 ns, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 Verlag kostenfrei Volltext, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext, https://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz1666668370cov.jpg V:DE-576 X:SPRINGER image/jpeg 20200305161139 Cover, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 Online-Zugriff DE-15, DE-15 epn:3481030398 2019-06-04T17:11:50Z, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 DE-Ch1, DE-Ch1 epn:3492457827 2019-07-10T13:05:33Z, DE-Zwi2 epn:3481030436 del:202301280133, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 Zum Online-Dokument DE-Zi4, DE-Zi4 epn:4104250333 2023-07-24T09:45:35Z, DE-L189 epn:3481030444 2019-06-04T17:11:50Z, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 LFER, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 LFER, LFER epn:3796425925 2020-11-10T15:21:47Z
spellingShingle Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?: a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules, Ius Gentium, Volume 74, Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change?, This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved, Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law, Criminal justice, Administration of, Social justice, Criminal Law, Private international law., Conflict of laws., International criminal law., Human rights., International law., Law and the social sciences., Comparative law.
title Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?: a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules
title_auth Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules
title_full Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter (editors)
title_fullStr Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter (editors)
title_full_unstemmed Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter (editors)
title_in_hierarchy Volume 74. Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?: a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules ([2019])
title_short Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?
title_sort do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules
title_sub a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules
title_unstemmed Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?: a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules
topic Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law, Criminal justice, Administration of, Social justice, Criminal Law, Private international law., Conflict of laws., International criminal law., Human rights., International law., Law and the social sciences., Comparative law.
topic_facet Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law, Criminal justice, Administration of, Social justice, Criminal Law, Private international law., Conflict of laws., International criminal law., Human rights., International law., Law and the social sciences., Comparative law.
url https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2, https://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz1666668370cov.jpg
work_keys_str_mv AT glesssabine doexclusionaryrulesensureafairtrialacomparativeperspectiveonevidentiaryrules, AT richterthomas doexclusionaryrulesensureafairtrialacomparativeperspectiveonevidentiaryrules