|
|
|
|
LEADER |
04580cam a2200757 4500 |
001 |
0-1657031896 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20171108103144.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
171107s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 1814/45605
|2 hdl
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1657031896
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-576)495079197
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)BSZ495079197
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Fabbrini, Federico
|d 1985-
|e VerfasserIn
|0 (DE-588)1049533232
|0 (DE-627)78227255X
|0 (DE-576)312355645
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Constitutional identity in Italy
|b European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution
|c Federico Fabbrini, Oreste Pollicino
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a San Domenico
|b European University Institute, Department of Law
|c [2017]
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 Online-Ressource (15 Seiten)
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a EUI working paper / LAW
|v 2017,06
|
520 |
|
|
|a The paper examines the notion of constitutional identity in Italy, with the aim to question whether the highest constitutional authorities of the Italian state have identified a core or fundamental elements of the Constitution which define its individuality. By analyzing the words and deeds of the President of the Republic and the case law of the Constitutional Court the paper claims that these two supreme constitutional authorities always refused to identify a set of constitutional values which cannot be touched by the European Union (EU). On the contrary, the paper suggests that both the President of the Republic and the Constitutional Court have endeavoured to emphasize the axiological overlap between the Italian Constitution and the project of European integration, considering Italy’s membership to the EU as the best way to fulfil the Constitution’s mandate. As the paper maintains, the same approach is visible in the recent Taricco judgment of the Italian Constitutional Court: while in this reference to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) the Constitutional Court mentioned for the first time ever the words ‘constitutional identity’, its ruling was mostly grounded on the notion of common constitutional traditions. The Constitutional Court invited the ECJ to revisit a previous ruling, emphasizing how that substantially conflicted not only with Italy’s Constitution, but also with the principles enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. As the paper suggests, therefore, the Italian case offers an example of a founding EU member state where no identity narrative has been developed as a defense against the EU
|
689 |
0 |
0 |
|D b
|0 (DE-588)4338619-2
|0 (DE-627)152412433
|0 (DE-576)211390070
|a Italien
|b Ministerpräsident
|2 gnd
|
689 |
0 |
1 |
|D b
|0 (DE-588)36400-9
|0 (DE-627)10083700X
|0 (DE-576)190346140
|a Italien
|b Corte Costituzionale
|2 gnd
|
689 |
0 |
2 |
|D s
|0 (DE-588)4026482-8
|0 (DE-627)106288199
|0 (DE-576)208966544
|a Identität
|2 gnd
|
689 |
0 |
3 |
|D u
|0 (DE-588)4162608-4
|0 (DE-627)105460990
|0 (DE-576)209874724
|a Italien
|t Costituzione della Repubblica Italiana
|f 1948
|2 gnd
|
689 |
0 |
|
|5 (DE-627)
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Pollicino, Oreste
|d 1975-
|e VerfasserIn
|0 (DE-588)1016271972
|0 (DE-627)705508935
|0 (DE-576)264406885
|4 aut
|
810 |
2 |
|
|a European University Institute
|t EUI working paper / LAW
|v 2017,06
|9 2017,06
|w (DE-627)366928031
|w (DE-576)281229171
|w (DE-600)2114445-X
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1814/45605
|x Resolving-System
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1814/45605
|9 LFER
|
852 |
|
|
|a LFER
|z 2017-11-13T00:00:00Z
|
970 |
|
|
|c OD
|
971 |
|
|
|c EBOOK
|
972 |
|
|
|c EBOOK
|
973 |
|
|
|c EB
|
935 |
|
|
|a lfer
|
900 |
|
|
|a Pollicino, O.
|
950 |
|
|
|a Italien
|
950 |
|
|
|a Präsident des Ministerrats
|
950 |
|
|
|a Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri
|
950 |
|
|
|a Ministerrat
|
950 |
|
|
|a Ministerpräsident
|
950 |
|
|
|a Corte Costituzionale
|
950 |
|
|
|a Cour Constitutionnelle
|
950 |
|
|
|a Constitutional Court
|
950 |
|
|
|a Verfassungsgericht
|
950 |
|
|
|a Verfassungsgerichtshof
|
950 |
|
|
|a Corte costituzionale della Repubblica italiana
|
950 |
|
|
|a Selbst
|
950 |
|
|
|a Nichtidentität
|
950 |
|
|
|a Identitätsphilosophie
|
950 |
|
|
|a Identitätstheorie
|
950 |
|
|
|a 身份
|
950 |
|
|
|a Личная идентификация
|
950 |
|
|
|a Verfassung der Italienischen Republik
|
950 |
|
|
|a Verfassung
|
950 |
|
|
|a Verfassungsrecht
|
951 |
|
|
|a XA-IT
|
951 |
|
|
|b XA-IT
|
951 |
|
|
|b XA-DK
|
980 |
|
|
|a 1657031896
|b 0
|k 1657031896
|o 495079197
|c lfer
|
SOLR
_version_ |
1757960960744620032 |
access_facet |
Electronic Resources |
author |
Fabbrini, Federico, Pollicino, Oreste |
author_facet |
Fabbrini, Federico, Pollicino, Oreste |
author_role |
aut, aut |
author_sort |
Fabbrini, Federico 1985- |
author_variant |
f f ff, o p op |
callnumber-sort |
|
collection |
lfer |
contents |
The paper examines the notion of constitutional identity in Italy, with the aim to question whether the highest constitutional authorities of the Italian state have identified a core or fundamental elements of the Constitution which define its individuality. By analyzing the words and deeds of the President of the Republic and the case law of the Constitutional Court the paper claims that these two supreme constitutional authorities always refused to identify a set of constitutional values which cannot be touched by the European Union (EU). On the contrary, the paper suggests that both the President of the Republic and the Constitutional Court have endeavoured to emphasize the axiological overlap between the Italian Constitution and the project of European integration, considering Italy’s membership to the EU as the best way to fulfil the Constitution’s mandate. As the paper maintains, the same approach is visible in the recent Taricco judgment of the Italian Constitutional Court: while in this reference to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) the Constitutional Court mentioned for the first time ever the words ‘constitutional identity’, its ruling was mostly grounded on the notion of common constitutional traditions. The Constitutional Court invited the ECJ to revisit a previous ruling, emphasizing how that substantially conflicted not only with Italy’s Constitution, but also with the principles enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. As the paper suggests, therefore, the Italian case offers an example of a founding EU member state where no identity narrative has been developed as a defense against the EU |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)1657031896, (DE-576)495079197, (DE-599)BSZ495079197 |
facet_avail |
Online, Free |
facet_local_del330 |
Italien, Identität |
finc_class_facet |
not assigned |
finc_id_str |
0020640102 |
format |
eBook |
format_access_txtF_mv |
Book, E-Book |
format_de105 |
Ebook |
format_de14 |
Book, E-Book |
format_de15 |
Book, E-Book |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_detail_txtF_mv |
text-online-monograph-independent |
format_dezi4 |
e-Book |
format_finc |
Book, E-Book |
format_legacy |
ElectronicBook |
format_legacy_nrw |
Book, E-Book |
format_nrw |
Book, E-Book |
format_strict_txtF_mv |
E-Book |
geogr_code |
Europe, Italy |
geogr_code_person |
Italy, Denmark |
hierarchy_parent_id |
0-366928031 |
hierarchy_parent_title |
European University Institute: EUI working paper / LAW |
hierarchy_sequence |
2017,06 |
hierarchy_top_id |
0-366928031 |
hierarchy_top_title |
European University Institute: EUI working paper / LAW |
id |
0-1657031896 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
imprint |
San Domenico, European University Institute, Department of Law, [2017] |
imprint_str_mv |
San Domenico: European University Institute, Department of Law, [2017] |
institution |
DE-D117, DE-105, LFER, DE-Ch1, DE-15, DE-14, DE-Zwi2 |
is_hierarchy_id |
0-1657031896 |
is_hierarchy_title |
Constitutional identity in Italy: European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution |
isil_str_mv |
LFER |
kxp_id_str |
1657031896 |
language |
English |
last_indexed |
2023-02-16T04:36:55.236Z |
local_heading_facet_dezwi2 |
Italien, Identität |
marc024a_ct_mv |
1814/45605 |
match_str |
fabbrini2017constitutionalidentityinitalyeuropeanintegrationasthefulfilmentoftheconstitution |
mega_collection |
Verbunddaten SWB, Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen |
misc_de105 |
EBOOK |
multipart_link |
281229171 |
multipart_part |
(281229171)2017,06 |
names_id_str_mv |
(DE-588)1049533232, (DE-627)78227255X, (DE-576)312355645, (DE-588)1016271972, (DE-627)705508935, (DE-576)264406885 |
physical |
1 Online-Ressource (15 Seiten) |
publishDate |
[2017] |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
publishPlace |
San Domenico |
publisher |
European University Institute, Department of Law |
record_format |
marcfinc |
record_id |
495079197 |
recordtype |
marcfinc |
rvk_facet |
No subject assigned |
series |
European University Institute, EUI working paper / LAW, 2017,06 |
series2 |
EUI working paper / LAW ; 2017,06 |
source_id |
0 |
spelling |
Fabbrini, Federico 1985- VerfasserIn (DE-588)1049533232 (DE-627)78227255X (DE-576)312355645 aut, Constitutional identity in Italy European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution Federico Fabbrini, Oreste Pollicino, San Domenico European University Institute, Department of Law [2017], 1 Online-Ressource (15 Seiten), Text txt rdacontent, Computermedien c rdamedia, Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier, EUI working paper / LAW 2017,06, The paper examines the notion of constitutional identity in Italy, with the aim to question whether the highest constitutional authorities of the Italian state have identified a core or fundamental elements of the Constitution which define its individuality. By analyzing the words and deeds of the President of the Republic and the case law of the Constitutional Court the paper claims that these two supreme constitutional authorities always refused to identify a set of constitutional values which cannot be touched by the European Union (EU). On the contrary, the paper suggests that both the President of the Republic and the Constitutional Court have endeavoured to emphasize the axiological overlap between the Italian Constitution and the project of European integration, considering Italy’s membership to the EU as the best way to fulfil the Constitution’s mandate. As the paper maintains, the same approach is visible in the recent Taricco judgment of the Italian Constitutional Court: while in this reference to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) the Constitutional Court mentioned for the first time ever the words ‘constitutional identity’, its ruling was mostly grounded on the notion of common constitutional traditions. The Constitutional Court invited the ECJ to revisit a previous ruling, emphasizing how that substantially conflicted not only with Italy’s Constitution, but also with the principles enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. As the paper suggests, therefore, the Italian case offers an example of a founding EU member state where no identity narrative has been developed as a defense against the EU, b (DE-588)4338619-2 (DE-627)152412433 (DE-576)211390070 Italien Ministerpräsident gnd, b (DE-588)36400-9 (DE-627)10083700X (DE-576)190346140 Italien Corte Costituzionale gnd, s (DE-588)4026482-8 (DE-627)106288199 (DE-576)208966544 Identität gnd, u (DE-588)4162608-4 (DE-627)105460990 (DE-576)209874724 Italien Costituzione della Repubblica Italiana 1948 gnd, (DE-627), Pollicino, Oreste 1975- VerfasserIn (DE-588)1016271972 (DE-627)705508935 (DE-576)264406885 aut, European University Institute EUI working paper / LAW 2017,06 2017,06 (DE-627)366928031 (DE-576)281229171 (DE-600)2114445-X, http://hdl.handle.net/1814/45605 Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext, http://hdl.handle.net/1814/45605 LFER, LFER 2017-11-13T00:00:00Z |
spellingShingle |
Fabbrini, Federico, Pollicino, Oreste, Constitutional identity in Italy: European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution, European University Institute, EUI working paper / LAW, 2017,06, The paper examines the notion of constitutional identity in Italy, with the aim to question whether the highest constitutional authorities of the Italian state have identified a core or fundamental elements of the Constitution which define its individuality. By analyzing the words and deeds of the President of the Republic and the case law of the Constitutional Court the paper claims that these two supreme constitutional authorities always refused to identify a set of constitutional values which cannot be touched by the European Union (EU). On the contrary, the paper suggests that both the President of the Republic and the Constitutional Court have endeavoured to emphasize the axiological overlap between the Italian Constitution and the project of European integration, considering Italy’s membership to the EU as the best way to fulfil the Constitution’s mandate. As the paper maintains, the same approach is visible in the recent Taricco judgment of the Italian Constitutional Court: while in this reference to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) the Constitutional Court mentioned for the first time ever the words ‘constitutional identity’, its ruling was mostly grounded on the notion of common constitutional traditions. The Constitutional Court invited the ECJ to revisit a previous ruling, emphasizing how that substantially conflicted not only with Italy’s Constitution, but also with the principles enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. As the paper suggests, therefore, the Italian case offers an example of a founding EU member state where no identity narrative has been developed as a defense against the EU, Italien, Identität |
swb_id_str |
495079197 |
title |
Constitutional identity in Italy: European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution |
title_auth |
Constitutional identity in Italy European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution |
title_full |
Constitutional identity in Italy European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution Federico Fabbrini, Oreste Pollicino |
title_fullStr |
Constitutional identity in Italy European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution Federico Fabbrini, Oreste Pollicino |
title_full_unstemmed |
Constitutional identity in Italy European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution Federico Fabbrini, Oreste Pollicino |
title_in_hierarchy |
2017,06. Constitutional identity in Italy: European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution ([2017]) |
title_short |
Constitutional identity in Italy |
title_sort |
constitutional identity in italy european integration as the fulfilment of the constitution |
title_sub |
European integration as the fulfilment of the constitution |
topic |
Italien, Identität |
topic_facet |
Italien, Identität |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1814/45605 |