Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Energy procedia 155(2018), Seite 412-430 |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | , , , |
| Titel: | Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables/ Carsten Bode, Gerhard Schmitz |
| Format: | E-Book-Kapitel |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
2018
|
| Gesamtaufnahme: |
: Energy procedia, 155(2018), Seite 412-430
, volume:155 |
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Quelle: | Verbunddaten SWB Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen |
| LEADER | 05667caa a2200829 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 0-1067687386 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190729230346.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190312s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.027677 |2 urn | |
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.037 |2 doi | |
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.15480/882.2087 |2 doi | |
| 024 | 7 | |a 11420/2091 |2 hdl | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1067687386 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBV1067687386 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 620: Ingenieurwissenschaften | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |
| 100 | 1 | |a Bode, Carsten |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1179852834 |0 (DE-627)1067533508 |0 (DE-576)518388506 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables |c Carsten Bode, Gerhard Schmitz |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |b Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a For the successful transition to a renewable energy source powered society, coupling of different energy sectors is inevitable. The extreme case of a future German energy system consisting of power, heat and gas consumers supplied with 100% renewables is analyzed here. To find the most cost-effective system configuration, different combinations of storage and conversion technologies are compared by performing dynamic simulations and evaluating the average costs over the period of one year. Renewable power production is modeled by using actual power-generation curves and extrapolating the installed power for each technology according to the German energy system framework. Final energy curves for power, heat and gas demand are created as a result of the study. The gas demand only arises from industries using hydrocarbons as a product in processes and for high temperature process heat. The components of the energy system, e.g. storage and conversion technologies are modeled using the equation-based open-source TransiEnt Library based on Modelica®. To obtain the boundaries of the solution scope, the comparison is started by analyzing homogeneous scenarios, e.g. All-Electric or All-Gas with Power-to-Gas with reconversion to power and heat. To find the optimal configuration within this scope, different combinations of power (adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES), lithium-ion battery, pumped hydro storage), heat storage (hot water storage) and gas storage (underground storage) technologies as well as conversion technologies, i.e. Power-to- Gas (electrolyzer with methanation), Power-to-Heat (electric heat pump, electric boiler), Gas-to-Heat (gas boiler, gas heat pump), and Gas-to-Power (gas turbine, combined cycle gas turbine) are simulated. The results show that a homogeneous energy system configuration where all services are supplied by either power or gas are technically possible but not economic. Due to the limited technical potential of renewables, ecological feasibility of All-Gas systems is limited. A combination of Power-to-Gas with combined cycle gas turbines, electric heat pumps, a lithium-ion battery and pumped hydro storage is the option with the lowest cost. Using an A-CAES instead of the battery or adding an A-CAES to the battery does not lower the cost. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Coupled Energy System | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dynamic Simulation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a 100 % Renewables | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cost Optimization | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schmitz, Gerhard |d 1955- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)14162552X |0 (DE-627)630395063 |0 (DE-576)324447833 |4 aut | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Technische Universität Hamburg |e Sonstige Körperschaft |e 4oth |0 (DE-588)1112763473 |0 (DE-627)866918418 |0 (DE-576)476770564 |4 oth | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Technische Universität Hamburg |b Institut für Technische Thermodynamik |e Sonstige Körperschaft |e 4othf |0 (DE-588)1126767204 |0 (DE-627)881359149 |0 (DE-576)484783777 |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Energy procedia |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2009 |g 155(2018), Seite 412-430 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)598096337 |w (DE-600)2490671-2 |w (DE-576)306838575 |x 1876-6102 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:155 |g year:2018 |g pages:412-430 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.037 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://hdl.handle.net/11420/2091 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.027677 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2087 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |i DSpace | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 155 |j 2018 |h 412-430 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://hdl.handle.net/11420/2091 |9 LFER |
| 852 | |a LFER |z 2019-05-07T00:00:00Z | ||
| 970 | |c OD | ||
| 971 | |c EBOOK | ||
| 972 | |c EBOOK | ||
| 973 | |c Aufsatz | ||
| 935 | |a lfer | ||
| 900 | |a Schmitz, G. | ||
| 910 | |a Hamburg University of Technology | ||
| 910 | |a Technical University | ||
| 910 | |a Hamburg | ||
| 910 | |a Université de Technologie de Hambourg | ||
| 910 | |a TU Hamburg | ||
| 910 | |a TUHH | ||
| 910 | |a University of Technology | ||
| 910 | |a Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg | ||
| 910 | |a Institut für Technische Thermodynamik | ||
| 910 | |a Technische Universität Hamburg | ||
| 910 | |a Technische Thermodynamik M-21 | ||
| 910 | |a Engineering Thermodynamics M-21 | ||
| 910 | |a Institut M-21 | ||
| 910 | |a Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics | ||
| 910 | |a Institute for Engineering Thermodynamics | ||
| 910 | |a Studiendekanat Maschinenbau | ||
| 910 | |a TT | ||
| 910 | |a Institut für Thermofluiddynamik | ||
| 951 | |b XA-DE | ||
| 980 | |a 1067687386 |b 0 |k 1067687386 |c lfer | ||
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Dynamic+simulation+and+comparison+of+different+configurations+for+a+coupled+energy+system+with+100%25+renewables&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.creator=Bode%2C+Carsten&rft.pub=&rft.format=Journal&rft.language=English&rft.issn=1876-6102 |
|---|
| _version_ | 1785967033311035392 |
|---|---|
| access_facet | Electronic Resources |
| author | Bode, Carsten, Schmitz, Gerhard |
| author_corporate | Technische Universität Hamburg, Technische Universität Hamburg, Technische Universität Hamburg, Technische Universität Hamburg Institut für Technische Thermodynamik, Technische Universität Hamburg Institut für Technische Thermodynamik, Technische Universität Hamburg Institut für Technische Thermodynamik |
| author_corporate_role | oth, Sonstige Körperschaft, 4oth, oth, Sonstige Körperschaft, 4othf |
| author_facet | Bode, Carsten, Schmitz, Gerhard, Technische Universität Hamburg, Technische Universität Hamburg, Technische Universität Hamburg, Technische Universität Hamburg Institut für Technische Thermodynamik, Technische Universität Hamburg Institut für Technische Thermodynamik, Technische Universität Hamburg Institut für Technische Thermodynamik |
| author_role | aut, aut |
| author_sort | Bode, Carsten |
| author_variant | c b cb, g s gs |
| callnumber-sort | |
| collection | lfer |
| container_reference | 155(2018), Seite 412-430 |
| container_title | Energy procedia |
| contents | For the successful transition to a renewable energy source powered society, coupling of different energy sectors is inevitable. The extreme case of a future German energy system consisting of power, heat and gas consumers supplied with 100% renewables is analyzed here. To find the most cost-effective system configuration, different combinations of storage and conversion technologies are compared by performing dynamic simulations and evaluating the average costs over the period of one year. Renewable power production is modeled by using actual power-generation curves and extrapolating the installed power for each technology according to the German energy system framework. Final energy curves for power, heat and gas demand are created as a result of the study. The gas demand only arises from industries using hydrocarbons as a product in processes and for high temperature process heat. The components of the energy system, e.g. storage and conversion technologies are modeled using the equation-based open-source TransiEnt Library based on Modelica®. To obtain the boundaries of the solution scope, the comparison is started by analyzing homogeneous scenarios, e.g. All-Electric or All-Gas with Power-to-Gas with reconversion to power and heat. To find the optimal configuration within this scope, different combinations of power (adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES), lithium-ion battery, pumped hydro storage), heat storage (hot water storage) and gas storage (underground storage) technologies as well as conversion technologies, i.e. Power-to- Gas (electrolyzer with methanation), Power-to-Heat (electric heat pump, electric boiler), Gas-to-Heat (gas boiler, gas heat pump), and Gas-to-Power (gas turbine, combined cycle gas turbine) are simulated. The results show that a homogeneous energy system configuration where all services are supplied by either power or gas are technically possible but not economic. Due to the limited technical potential of renewables, ecological feasibility of All-Gas systems is limited. A combination of Power-to-Gas with combined cycle gas turbines, electric heat pumps, a lithium-ion battery and pumped hydro storage is the option with the lowest cost. Using an A-CAES instead of the battery or adding an A-CAES to the battery does not lower the cost. |
| ctrlnum | (DE-627)1067687386, (DE-599)GBV1067687386 |
| dewey-full | 620:INGENIEURWISSENSCHAFTEN, 620 |
| dewey-hundreds | 600 - Technology |
| dewey-ones | 620 - Engineering & allied operations |
| dewey-raw | 620: Ingenieurwissenschaften, 620 |
| dewey-search | 620: Ingenieurwissenschaften, 620 |
| dewey-sort | 3620 INGENIEURWISSENSCHAFTEN |
| dewey-tens | 620 - Engineering |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.037, 10.15480/882.2087 |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| finc_class_facet | Technik |
| fincclass_txtF_mv | engineering-process, technology |
| format | ElectronicBookComponentPart |
| format_access_txtF_mv | Article, E-Article |
| format_de105 | Ebook |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_detail_txtF_mv | text-online-monograph-child |
| format_dezi4 | e-Book |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_legacy | ElectronicBookPart |
| format_strict_txtF_mv | E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | Germany |
| hierarchy_parent_id | 0-598096337 |
| hierarchy_parent_title | Energy procedia |
| hierarchy_sequence | 155(2018), Seite 412-430 |
| hierarchy_top_id | 0-598096337 |
| hierarchy_top_title | Energy procedia |
| id | 0-1067687386 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| imprint | 2018 |
| imprint_str_mv | 2018 |
| institution | DE-D117, DE-105, LFER, DE-Ch1, DE-15, DE-14, DE-Zwi2 |
| is_hierarchy_id | 0-1067687386 |
| is_hierarchy_title | Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables |
| issn | 1876-6102 |
| kxp_id_str | 1067687386 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2023-12-22T07:41:29.136Z |
| local_heading_facet_dezwi2 | Coupled Energy System, Dynamic Simulation, 100 % Renewables, Cost Optimization |
| marc024a_ct_mv | urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.027677, 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.037, 10.15480/882.2087, 11420/2091 |
| match_str | bode2018dynamicsimulationandcomparisonofdifferentconfigurationsforacoupledenergysystemwith100renewables |
| mega_collection | Verbunddaten SWB, Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen |
| misc_de105 | EBOOK |
| multipart_link | 306838575 |
| multipart_part | (306838575)155(2018), Seite 412-430 |
| names_id_str_mv | (DE-588)1179852834, (DE-627)1067533508, (DE-576)518388506, (DE-588)14162552X, (DE-627)630395063, (DE-576)324447833, (DE-588)1112763473, (DE-627)866918418, (DE-576)476770564, (DE-588)1126767204, (DE-627)881359149, (DE-576)484783777 |
| physical | Diagramme |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publishPlace | |
| publisher | |
| record_format | marcfinc |
| record_id | 1067687386 |
| recordtype | marcfinc |
| rvk_facet | No subject assigned |
| source_id | 0 |
| spelling | Bode, Carsten VerfasserIn (DE-588)1179852834 (DE-627)1067533508 (DE-576)518388506 aut, Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables Carsten Bode, Gerhard Schmitz, 2018, Diagramme, Text txt rdacontent, Computermedien c rdamedia, Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier, For the successful transition to a renewable energy source powered society, coupling of different energy sectors is inevitable. The extreme case of a future German energy system consisting of power, heat and gas consumers supplied with 100% renewables is analyzed here. To find the most cost-effective system configuration, different combinations of storage and conversion technologies are compared by performing dynamic simulations and evaluating the average costs over the period of one year. Renewable power production is modeled by using actual power-generation curves and extrapolating the installed power for each technology according to the German energy system framework. Final energy curves for power, heat and gas demand are created as a result of the study. The gas demand only arises from industries using hydrocarbons as a product in processes and for high temperature process heat. The components of the energy system, e.g. storage and conversion technologies are modeled using the equation-based open-source TransiEnt Library based on Modelica®. To obtain the boundaries of the solution scope, the comparison is started by analyzing homogeneous scenarios, e.g. All-Electric or All-Gas with Power-to-Gas with reconversion to power and heat. To find the optimal configuration within this scope, different combinations of power (adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES), lithium-ion battery, pumped hydro storage), heat storage (hot water storage) and gas storage (underground storage) technologies as well as conversion technologies, i.e. Power-to- Gas (electrolyzer with methanation), Power-to-Heat (electric heat pump, electric boiler), Gas-to-Heat (gas boiler, gas heat pump), and Gas-to-Power (gas turbine, combined cycle gas turbine) are simulated. The results show that a homogeneous energy system configuration where all services are supplied by either power or gas are technically possible but not economic. Due to the limited technical potential of renewables, ecological feasibility of All-Gas systems is limited. A combination of Power-to-Gas with combined cycle gas turbines, electric heat pumps, a lithium-ion battery and pumped hydro storage is the option with the lowest cost. Using an A-CAES instead of the battery or adding an A-CAES to the battery does not lower the cost., Coupled Energy System, Dynamic Simulation, 100 % Renewables, Cost Optimization, Schmitz, Gerhard 1955- VerfasserIn (DE-588)14162552X (DE-627)630395063 (DE-576)324447833 aut, Technische Universität Hamburg Sonstige Körperschaft 4oth (DE-588)1112763473 (DE-627)866918418 (DE-576)476770564 oth, Technische Universität Hamburg Institut für Technische Thermodynamik Sonstige Körperschaft 4othf (DE-588)1126767204 (DE-627)881359149 (DE-576)484783777 oth, Enthalten in Energy procedia Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2009 155(2018), Seite 412-430 Online-Ressource (DE-627)598096337 (DE-600)2490671-2 (DE-576)306838575 1876-6102, volume:155 year:2018 pages:412-430, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.037 Resolving-System Volltext, http://hdl.handle.net/11420/2091 Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.027677 Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext, https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2087 Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext, http://hdl.handle.net/11420/2091 LFER, LFER 2019-05-07T00:00:00Z |
| spellingShingle | Bode, Carsten, Schmitz, Gerhard, Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables, For the successful transition to a renewable energy source powered society, coupling of different energy sectors is inevitable. The extreme case of a future German energy system consisting of power, heat and gas consumers supplied with 100% renewables is analyzed here. To find the most cost-effective system configuration, different combinations of storage and conversion technologies are compared by performing dynamic simulations and evaluating the average costs over the period of one year. Renewable power production is modeled by using actual power-generation curves and extrapolating the installed power for each technology according to the German energy system framework. Final energy curves for power, heat and gas demand are created as a result of the study. The gas demand only arises from industries using hydrocarbons as a product in processes and for high temperature process heat. The components of the energy system, e.g. storage and conversion technologies are modeled using the equation-based open-source TransiEnt Library based on Modelica®. To obtain the boundaries of the solution scope, the comparison is started by analyzing homogeneous scenarios, e.g. All-Electric or All-Gas with Power-to-Gas with reconversion to power and heat. To find the optimal configuration within this scope, different combinations of power (adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES), lithium-ion battery, pumped hydro storage), heat storage (hot water storage) and gas storage (underground storage) technologies as well as conversion technologies, i.e. Power-to- Gas (electrolyzer with methanation), Power-to-Heat (electric heat pump, electric boiler), Gas-to-Heat (gas boiler, gas heat pump), and Gas-to-Power (gas turbine, combined cycle gas turbine) are simulated. The results show that a homogeneous energy system configuration where all services are supplied by either power or gas are technically possible but not economic. Due to the limited technical potential of renewables, ecological feasibility of All-Gas systems is limited. A combination of Power-to-Gas with combined cycle gas turbines, electric heat pumps, a lithium-ion battery and pumped hydro storage is the option with the lowest cost. Using an A-CAES instead of the battery or adding an A-CAES to the battery does not lower the cost., Coupled Energy System, Dynamic Simulation, 100 % Renewables, Cost Optimization |
| title | Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables |
| title_auth | Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables |
| title_full | Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables Carsten Bode, Gerhard Schmitz |
| title_fullStr | Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables Carsten Bode, Gerhard Schmitz |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables Carsten Bode, Gerhard Schmitz |
| title_in_hierarchy | Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables / Carsten Bode, Gerhard Schmitz, |
| title_short | Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables |
| title_sort | dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100 renewables |
| title_unstemmed | Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables |
| topic | Coupled Energy System, Dynamic Simulation, 100 % Renewables, Cost Optimization |
| topic_facet | Coupled Energy System, Dynamic Simulation, 100 % Renewables, Cost Optimization |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.037, http://hdl.handle.net/11420/2091, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.027677, https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2087 |
| urn | urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.027677 |