|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
03409cam a22005772 4500 |
| 001 |
0-1046726897 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20220726203400.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
190116s2000 xxu|||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.3386/h0131
|2 doi
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1046726897
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)GBV1046726897
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1144550774
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NBER)h0131
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (EBP)055477151
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 044 |
|
|
|c XD-US
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Alston, Lee J.
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Social Reformers and Regulation
|b The Prohibition of Cigarettes in the U.S. and Canada
|c Lee J. Alston, Ruth Dupre, Tomas Nonnenmacher
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Cambridge, Mass
|b National Bureau of Economic Research
|c November 2000
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 Online-Ressource
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a NBER historical working paper series
|v no. h0131
|
| 506 |
0 |
|
|a Open Access
|e Controlled Vocabulary for Access Rights
|u http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
|f unrestricted online access
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The apogee of anti-smoking legislation in North America was reached early in the last century. In 1903, the Canadian Parliament passed a resolution prohibiting the manufacture, importation, and sale of cigarettes. Around the same time, fifteen states in the United States banned the sale of cigarettes and thirty-five states considered prohibitory legislation. In both the United States and Canada, prohibition was part of a broad political, economic, and social coalition termed the Progressive Movement. Cigarette prohibition was special interest regulation, though not of the usual narrow neoclassical genre; it was the means by which a group of crusaders sought to alter the behavior of a much larger segment of the population. The opponents of cigarette regulation were cigarette smokers and the more organized cigarette lobby. An active Progressive Movement was the necessary condition for generating interest in prohibition, while the anti-prohibition forces played a more significant role later in the legislative process. The moral reformers' succeeded when they faced little opposition because few constituents smoked and/or no jobs were at stake because there was no cigarette industry. In other words, reform is easy when you are preaching to the converted
|
| 530 |
|
|
|a Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers.
|
| 533 |
|
|
|n Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
|
| 538 |
|
|
|a Mode of access: World Wide Web.
|
| 538 |
|
|
|a System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Dupre, Ruth
|4 oth
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Nonnenmacher, Tomas
|4 oth
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a National Bureau of Economic Research
|4 oth
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.nber.org/papers/h0131
|m X:NBER
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/h0131
|m X:NBER
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a ZDB-194-NBW
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/h0131
|9 DE-14
|
| 852 |
|
|
|a DE-14
|z 2020-03-13T12:33:00Z
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/h0131
|9 LFER
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.nber.org/papers/h0131
|9 LFER
|
| 852 |
|
|
|a LFER
|z 2020-12-13T11:22:12Z
|
| 970 |
|
|
|c OD
|
| 971 |
|
|
|c EBOOK
|
| 972 |
|
|
|c EBOOK
|
| 973 |
|
|
|c EB
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a lfer
|
| 980 |
|
|
|a 1046726897
|b 0
|k 1046726897
|c lfer
|
SOLR
| _version_ |
1785966565380849664 |
| access_facet |
Electronic Resources |
| access_state_str |
Open Access |
| author |
Alston, Lee J. |
| author2 |
Dupre, Ruth, Nonnenmacher, Tomas |
| author2_role |
oth, oth |
| author2_variant |
r d rd, t n tn |
| author_corporate |
National Bureau of Economic Research |
| author_corporate_role |
oth |
| author_facet |
Alston, Lee J., Dupre, Ruth, Nonnenmacher, Tomas, National Bureau of Economic Research |
| author_role |
aut |
| author_sort |
Alston, Lee J. |
| author_variant |
l j a lj lja |
| callnumber-sort |
|
| collection |
ZDB-194-NBW, lfer |
| contents |
The apogee of anti-smoking legislation in North America was reached early in the last century. In 1903, the Canadian Parliament passed a resolution prohibiting the manufacture, importation, and sale of cigarettes. Around the same time, fifteen states in the United States banned the sale of cigarettes and thirty-five states considered prohibitory legislation. In both the United States and Canada, prohibition was part of a broad political, economic, and social coalition termed the Progressive Movement. Cigarette prohibition was special interest regulation, though not of the usual narrow neoclassical genre; it was the means by which a group of crusaders sought to alter the behavior of a much larger segment of the population. The opponents of cigarette regulation were cigarette smokers and the more organized cigarette lobby. An active Progressive Movement was the necessary condition for generating interest in prohibition, while the anti-prohibition forces played a more significant role later in the legislative process. The moral reformers' succeeded when they faced little opposition because few constituents smoked and/or no jobs were at stake because there was no cigarette industry. In other words, reform is easy when you are preaching to the converted |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)1046726897, (DE-599)GBV1046726897, (OCoLC)1144550774, (NBER)h0131, (EBP)055477151 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3386/h0131 |
| facet_912a |
ZDB-194-NBW |
| facet_avail |
Online, Free |
| format |
eBook |
| format_access_txtF_mv |
Book, E-Book |
| format_de105 |
Ebook |
| format_de14 |
Book, E-Book |
| format_de15 |
Book, E-Book |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_detail_txtF_mv |
text-online-monograph-independent |
| format_dezi4 |
e-Book |
| format_finc |
Book, E-Book |
| format_legacy |
ElectronicBook |
| format_legacy_nrw |
Book, E-Book |
| format_nrw |
Book, E-Book |
| format_strict_txtF_mv |
E-Book |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| id |
0-1046726897 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| imprint |
Cambridge, Mass, National Bureau of Economic Research, November 2000 |
| imprint_str_mv |
Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research, November 2000 |
| institution |
DE-D117, DE-105, LFER, DE-Ch1, DE-15, DE-14, DE-Zwi2 |
| is_hierarchy_id |
|
| is_hierarchy_title |
|
| kxp_id_str |
1046726897 |
| language |
English |
| last_indexed |
2023-12-22T07:34:02.564Z |
| marc024a_ct_mv |
10.3386/h0131 |
| match_str |
alston2000socialreformersandregulationtheprohibitionofcigarettesintheusandcanada |
| mega_collection |
Verbunddaten SWB, Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen |
| misc_de105 |
EBOOK |
| oclc_num |
1144550774 |
| physical |
1 Online-Ressource |
| publishDate |
November 2000 |
| publishDateSort |
2000 |
| publishPlace |
Cambridge, Mass |
| publisher |
National Bureau of Economic Research |
| record_format |
marcfinc |
| record_id |
1046726897 |
| recordtype |
marcfinc |
| rvk_facet |
No subject assigned |
| series2 |
NBER historical working paper series ; no. h0131 |
| source_id |
0 |
| spelling |
Alston, Lee J. aut, Social Reformers and Regulation The Prohibition of Cigarettes in the U.S. and Canada Lee J. Alston, Ruth Dupre, Tomas Nonnenmacher, Cambridge, Mass National Bureau of Economic Research November 2000, 1 Online-Ressource, Text txt rdacontent, Computermedien c rdamedia, Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier, NBER historical working paper series no. h0131, Open Access Controlled Vocabulary for Access Rights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 unrestricted online access, The apogee of anti-smoking legislation in North America was reached early in the last century. In 1903, the Canadian Parliament passed a resolution prohibiting the manufacture, importation, and sale of cigarettes. Around the same time, fifteen states in the United States banned the sale of cigarettes and thirty-five states considered prohibitory legislation. In both the United States and Canada, prohibition was part of a broad political, economic, and social coalition termed the Progressive Movement. Cigarette prohibition was special interest regulation, though not of the usual narrow neoclassical genre; it was the means by which a group of crusaders sought to alter the behavior of a much larger segment of the population. The opponents of cigarette regulation were cigarette smokers and the more organized cigarette lobby. An active Progressive Movement was the necessary condition for generating interest in prohibition, while the anti-prohibition forces played a more significant role later in the legislative process. The moral reformers' succeeded when they faced little opposition because few constituents smoked and/or no jobs were at stake because there was no cigarette industry. In other words, reform is easy when you are preaching to the converted, Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers., Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers, Mode of access: World Wide Web., System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files., Dupre, Ruth oth, Nonnenmacher, Tomas oth, National Bureau of Economic Research oth, http://www.nber.org/papers/h0131 X:NBER Verlag kostenfrei, http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/h0131 X:NBER Verlag kostenfrei, http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/h0131 DE-14, DE-14 2020-03-13T12:33:00Z, http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/h0131 LFER, http://www.nber.org/papers/h0131 LFER, LFER 2020-12-13T11:22:12Z |
| spellingShingle |
Alston, Lee J., Social Reformers and Regulation: The Prohibition of Cigarettes in the U.S. and Canada, The apogee of anti-smoking legislation in North America was reached early in the last century. In 1903, the Canadian Parliament passed a resolution prohibiting the manufacture, importation, and sale of cigarettes. Around the same time, fifteen states in the United States banned the sale of cigarettes and thirty-five states considered prohibitory legislation. In both the United States and Canada, prohibition was part of a broad political, economic, and social coalition termed the Progressive Movement. Cigarette prohibition was special interest regulation, though not of the usual narrow neoclassical genre; it was the means by which a group of crusaders sought to alter the behavior of a much larger segment of the population. The opponents of cigarette regulation were cigarette smokers and the more organized cigarette lobby. An active Progressive Movement was the necessary condition for generating interest in prohibition, while the anti-prohibition forces played a more significant role later in the legislative process. The moral reformers' succeeded when they faced little opposition because few constituents smoked and/or no jobs were at stake because there was no cigarette industry. In other words, reform is easy when you are preaching to the converted |
| title |
Social Reformers and Regulation: The Prohibition of Cigarettes in the U.S. and Canada |
| title_auth |
Social Reformers and Regulation The Prohibition of Cigarettes in the U.S. and Canada |
| title_full |
Social Reformers and Regulation The Prohibition of Cigarettes in the U.S. and Canada Lee J. Alston, Ruth Dupre, Tomas Nonnenmacher |
| title_fullStr |
Social Reformers and Regulation The Prohibition of Cigarettes in the U.S. and Canada Lee J. Alston, Ruth Dupre, Tomas Nonnenmacher |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Social Reformers and Regulation The Prohibition of Cigarettes in the U.S. and Canada Lee J. Alston, Ruth Dupre, Tomas Nonnenmacher |
| title_short |
Social Reformers and Regulation |
| title_sort |
social reformers and regulation the prohibition of cigarettes in the u s and canada |
| title_sub |
The Prohibition of Cigarettes in the U.S. and Canada |
| title_unstemmed |
Social Reformers and Regulation: The Prohibition of Cigarettes in the U.S. and Canada |
| url |
http://www.nber.org/papers/h0131, http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/h0131 |
