Eintrag weiter verarbeiten

Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme: who is afraid of cross-subsidisation?

Gespeichert in:

Personen und Körperschaften: Carmassi, Jacopo (VerfasserIn), Dobkowitz, Sonja (VerfasserIn), Evrard, Johanne (VerfasserIn), Parisi, Laura (VerfasserIn), Silva, André (VerfasserIn), Wedow, Michael (VerfasserIn)
Titel: Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme: who is afraid of cross-subsidisation?/ Jacopo Carmassi, Sonja Dobkowitz, Johanne Evrard, Laura Parisi, André Silva, Michael Wedow
Format: E-Book
Sprache: Englisch
veröffentlicht:
Frankfurt am Main, Germany European Central Bank [2018]
Gesamtaufnahme: Europäische Zentralbank: Occasional paper series ; no 208 (April 2018)
Schlagwörter:
Quelle: Verbunddaten SWB
Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen
LEADER 05689cam a2200937 4500
001 0-1018503137
003 DE-627
005 20201126152315.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180412s2018 gw |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10419/192956  |2 hdl 
035 |a (DE-627)1018503137 
035 |a (DE-599)GBV1018503137 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
044 |c XA-DE  |c XP 
084 |a G21  |a G28  |2 JEL 
100 1 |a Carmassi, Jacopo  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme  |b who is afraid of cross-subsidisation?  |c Jacopo Carmassi, Sonja Dobkowitz, Johanne Evrard, Laura Parisi, André Silva, Michael Wedow 
264 1 |a Frankfurt am Main, Germany  |b European Central Bank  |c [2018] 
300 |a 1 Online-Ressource (55 Seiten)  |b Illustrationen 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Occasional paper series / European Central Bank  |v no 208 (April 2018) 
520 |a On 24 November 2015, the European Commission published a proposal to establish a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS). The proposal provides for the creation of a Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) with a target size of 0.8% of covered deposits in the euro area and the progressive mutualisation of its resources until a fully-fledged scheme is introduced by 2024. This paper investigates the potential impact and appropriateness of several features of EDIS in the steady state. The main findings are the following: first, a fully-funded DIF would be sufficient to cover payouts even in a severe banking crisis. Second, risk-based contributions can and should internalise specificities of banks and banking systems. This would tackle moral hazard and facilitate moving forward with risk sharing measures towards the completion of the Banking Union in parallel with risk reduction measures; this approach would also be preferable to lowering the target level of the DIF to take into account banking system specificities. Third, smaller and larger banks would not excessively contribute to EDIS relative to the amount of covered deposits in their balance sheet. Fourth, there would be no unwarranted systematic cross-subsidisation within EDIS in the sense of some banking systems systematically contributing less than they would benefit from the DIF. This result holds also when country-specific shocks are simulated. Fifth, under a mixed deposit insurance scheme composed of national deposit insurance funds bearing the first burden and a European deposit insurance fund intervening only afterwards, cross-subsidisation would increase relative to a fully-fledged EDIS. The key drivers behind these results are: i) a significant risk-reduction in the banking system and increase in banks' loss-absorbing capacity in the aftermath of the global financial crisis; ii) a super priority for covered deposits, further contributing to protect EDIS; iii) an appropriate design of risk-based contributions, benchmarked at the euro area level, following a "polluter-pays" approach. 
650 7 |8 1.1\x  |a Einlagensicherung  |0 (DE-627)091356229  |0 (DE-2867)13694-4  |2 stw 
650 7 |8 1.2\x  |a Bankenregulierung  |0 (DE-627)091349443  |0 (DE-2867)18707-3  |2 stw 
650 7 |8 1.3\x  |a Quersubventionierung  |0 (DE-627)091368774  |0 (DE-2867)20906-3  |2 stw 
650 7 |8 1.4\x  |a EU-Bankrecht  |0 (DE-627)091358299  |0 (DE-2867)18703-4  |2 stw 
650 7 |8 1.5\x  |a Eurozone  |0 (DE-627)091358566  |0 (DE-2867)19336-0  |2 stw 
650 7 |8 1.6\x  |a EU-Staaten  |0 (DE-627)091358639  |0 (DE-2867)17983-5  |2 stw 
655 4 |a Amtsdruckschrift  |5 DE-206 
700 1 |a Dobkowitz, Sonja  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1073267679  |0 (DE-627)828747741  |0 (DE-576)434782564  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Evrard, Johanne  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Parisi, Laura  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Silva, André  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wedow, Michael  |d 1977-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)130462438  |0 (DE-627)501851518  |0 (DE-576)252992075  |4 aut 
810 2 |a Europäische Zentralbank  |t Occasional paper series  |v no 208 (April 2018)  |9 208  |w (DE-627)372371981  |w (DE-576)108090450  |w (DE-600)2123791-8  |x 1725-6534 
856 4 0 |u http://hdl.handle.net/10419/192956  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op208.en.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a BO 
856 4 0 |u http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op208.en.pdf  |9 LFER 
852 |a LFER  |z 2019-05-07T00:00:00Z 
970 |c OD 
971 |c EBOOK 
972 |c EBOOK 
973 |c EB 
935 |a lfer 
950 |a Euro area 
950 |a EEMU 
950 |a EMU (European Monetary Union) 
950 |a Euroland 
950 |a Europäische Währungsunion 
950 |a Europäische Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion 
950 |a European Currency Union 
950 |a European Economic and Monetary Union 
950 |a European Monetary Union 
950 |a Euroraum 
950 |a EWU (Europäische Währungsunion) 
950 |a EWWU 
950 |a Maastricht-Vertrag 
950 |a EU-Staaten 
950 |a Euro 
950 |a Europäisches Währungssystem 
950 |a Konvergenzkriterien 
950 |a Währungsumstellung 
950 |a EU countries 
950 |a EG-Länder 
950 |a EG-Staaten 
950 |a EU-Länder 
950 |a EU-Europäisch 
950 |a EU-Mitgliedschaft 
950 |a EU-Nachbarstaaten 
950 |a Europa 
950 |a Europäische Integration 
950 |a EWR-Staaten 
950 |a Benelux-Staaten 
950 |a Eurozone 
950 |a Visegrad-Staaten 
980 |a 1018503137  |b 0  |k 1018503137  |c lfer 
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Completing+the+banking+union+with+a+European+deposit+insurance+scheme%3A+who+is+afraid+of+cross-subsidisation%3F&rft.date=%5B2018%5D&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.creator=Carmassi%2C+Jacopo&rft.pub=European+Central+Bank&rft.format=eBook&rft.language=English
SOLR
_version_ 1785964916653424640
access_facet Electronic Resources
author Carmassi, Jacopo, Dobkowitz, Sonja, Evrard, Johanne, Parisi, Laura, Silva, André, Wedow, Michael
author_facet Carmassi, Jacopo, Dobkowitz, Sonja, Evrard, Johanne, Parisi, Laura, Silva, André, Wedow, Michael
author_role aut, aut, aut, aut, aut, aut
author_sort Carmassi, Jacopo
author_variant j c jc, s d sd, j e je, l p lp, a s as, m w mw
callnumber-sort
collection lfer
contents On 24 November 2015, the European Commission published a proposal to establish a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS). The proposal provides for the creation of a Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) with a target size of 0.8% of covered deposits in the euro area and the progressive mutualisation of its resources until a fully-fledged scheme is introduced by 2024. This paper investigates the potential impact and appropriateness of several features of EDIS in the steady state. The main findings are the following: first, a fully-funded DIF would be sufficient to cover payouts even in a severe banking crisis. Second, risk-based contributions can and should internalise specificities of banks and banking systems. This would tackle moral hazard and facilitate moving forward with risk sharing measures towards the completion of the Banking Union in parallel with risk reduction measures; this approach would also be preferable to lowering the target level of the DIF to take into account banking system specificities. Third, smaller and larger banks would not excessively contribute to EDIS relative to the amount of covered deposits in their balance sheet. Fourth, there would be no unwarranted systematic cross-subsidisation within EDIS in the sense of some banking systems systematically contributing less than they would benefit from the DIF. This result holds also when country-specific shocks are simulated. Fifth, under a mixed deposit insurance scheme composed of national deposit insurance funds bearing the first burden and a European deposit insurance fund intervening only afterwards, cross-subsidisation would increase relative to a fully-fledged EDIS. The key drivers behind these results are: i) a significant risk-reduction in the banking system and increase in banks' loss-absorbing capacity in the aftermath of the global financial crisis; ii) a super priority for covered deposits, further contributing to protect EDIS; iii) an appropriate design of risk-based contributions, benchmarked at the euro area level, following a "polluter-pays" approach.
ctrlnum (DE-627)1018503137, (DE-599)GBV1018503137
facet_avail Online, Free
format eBook
format_access_txtF_mv Book, E-Book
format_de105 Ebook
format_de14 Book, E-Book
format_de15 Book, E-Book
format_del152 Buch
format_detail_txtF_mv text-online-monograph-independent
format_dezi4 e-Book
format_finc Book, E-Book
format_legacy ElectronicBook
format_legacy_nrw Book, E-Book
format_nrw Book, E-Book
format_strict_txtF_mv E-Book
genre Amtsdruckschrift DE-206
genre_facet Amtsdruckschrift
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
hierarchy_parent_id 0-372371981
hierarchy_parent_title Europäische Zentralbank: Occasional paper series
hierarchy_sequence 208
hierarchy_top_id 0-372371981
hierarchy_top_title Europäische Zentralbank: Occasional paper series
id 0-1018503137
illustrated Not Illustrated
imprint Frankfurt am Main, Germany, European Central Bank, [2018]
imprint_str_mv Frankfurt am Main, Germany: European Central Bank, [2018]
institution DE-D117, DE-105, LFER, DE-Ch1, DE-15, DE-14, DE-L242, DE-Zwi2
is_hierarchy_id 0-1018503137
is_hierarchy_title Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme: who is afraid of cross-subsidisation?
issn_isn_mv 1725-6534
kxp_id_str 1018503137
language English
last_indexed 2023-12-22T07:07:46.766Z
local_heading_facet_dezwi2 Einlagensicherung, Bankenregulierung, Quersubventionierung, EU-Bankrecht, Eurozone, EU-Staaten
marc024a_ct_mv 10419/192956
match_str carmassi2018completingthebankingunionwithaeuropeandepositinsuranceschemewhoisafraidofcrosssubsidisation
mega_collection Verbunddaten SWB, Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen
misc_de105 EBOOK
multipart_link 108090450
multipart_part (108090450)no 208 (April 2018)
names_id_str_mv (DE-588)1073267679, (DE-627)828747741, (DE-576)434782564, (DE-588)130462438, (DE-627)501851518, (DE-576)252992075
physical 1 Online-Ressource (55 Seiten); Illustrationen
publishDate [2018]
publishDateSort 2018
publishPlace Frankfurt am Main, Germany
publisher European Central Bank
record_format marcfinc
record_id 1018503137
recordtype marcfinc
rvk_facet No subject assigned
series Europäische Zentralbank, Occasional paper series, no 208 (April 2018)
series2 Occasional paper series / European Central Bank ; no 208 (April 2018)
source_id 0
spelling Carmassi, Jacopo VerfasserIn aut, Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme who is afraid of cross-subsidisation? Jacopo Carmassi, Sonja Dobkowitz, Johanne Evrard, Laura Parisi, André Silva, Michael Wedow, Frankfurt am Main, Germany European Central Bank [2018], 1 Online-Ressource (55 Seiten) Illustrationen, Text txt rdacontent, Computermedien c rdamedia, Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier, Occasional paper series / European Central Bank no 208 (April 2018), On 24 November 2015, the European Commission published a proposal to establish a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS). The proposal provides for the creation of a Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) with a target size of 0.8% of covered deposits in the euro area and the progressive mutualisation of its resources until a fully-fledged scheme is introduced by 2024. This paper investigates the potential impact and appropriateness of several features of EDIS in the steady state. The main findings are the following: first, a fully-funded DIF would be sufficient to cover payouts even in a severe banking crisis. Second, risk-based contributions can and should internalise specificities of banks and banking systems. This would tackle moral hazard and facilitate moving forward with risk sharing measures towards the completion of the Banking Union in parallel with risk reduction measures; this approach would also be preferable to lowering the target level of the DIF to take into account banking system specificities. Third, smaller and larger banks would not excessively contribute to EDIS relative to the amount of covered deposits in their balance sheet. Fourth, there would be no unwarranted systematic cross-subsidisation within EDIS in the sense of some banking systems systematically contributing less than they would benefit from the DIF. This result holds also when country-specific shocks are simulated. Fifth, under a mixed deposit insurance scheme composed of national deposit insurance funds bearing the first burden and a European deposit insurance fund intervening only afterwards, cross-subsidisation would increase relative to a fully-fledged EDIS. The key drivers behind these results are: i) a significant risk-reduction in the banking system and increase in banks' loss-absorbing capacity in the aftermath of the global financial crisis; ii) a super priority for covered deposits, further contributing to protect EDIS; iii) an appropriate design of risk-based contributions, benchmarked at the euro area level, following a "polluter-pays" approach., 1.1\x Einlagensicherung (DE-627)091356229 (DE-2867)13694-4 stw, 1.2\x Bankenregulierung (DE-627)091349443 (DE-2867)18707-3 stw, 1.3\x Quersubventionierung (DE-627)091368774 (DE-2867)20906-3 stw, 1.4\x EU-Bankrecht (DE-627)091358299 (DE-2867)18703-4 stw, 1.5\x Eurozone (DE-627)091358566 (DE-2867)19336-0 stw, 1.6\x EU-Staaten (DE-627)091358639 (DE-2867)17983-5 stw, Amtsdruckschrift DE-206, Dobkowitz, Sonja VerfasserIn (DE-588)1073267679 (DE-627)828747741 (DE-576)434782564 aut, Evrard, Johanne VerfasserIn aut, Parisi, Laura VerfasserIn aut, Silva, André VerfasserIn aut, Wedow, Michael 1977- VerfasserIn (DE-588)130462438 (DE-627)501851518 (DE-576)252992075 aut, Europäische Zentralbank Occasional paper series no 208 (April 2018) 208 (DE-627)372371981 (DE-576)108090450 (DE-600)2123791-8 1725-6534, http://hdl.handle.net/10419/192956 Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext, http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op208.en.pdf Verlag kostenfrei Volltext, http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op208.en.pdf LFER, LFER 2019-05-07T00:00:00Z
spellingShingle Carmassi, Jacopo, Dobkowitz, Sonja, Evrard, Johanne, Parisi, Laura, Silva, André, Wedow, Michael, Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme: who is afraid of cross-subsidisation?, Europäische Zentralbank, Occasional paper series, no 208 (April 2018), On 24 November 2015, the European Commission published a proposal to establish a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS). The proposal provides for the creation of a Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) with a target size of 0.8% of covered deposits in the euro area and the progressive mutualisation of its resources until a fully-fledged scheme is introduced by 2024. This paper investigates the potential impact and appropriateness of several features of EDIS in the steady state. The main findings are the following: first, a fully-funded DIF would be sufficient to cover payouts even in a severe banking crisis. Second, risk-based contributions can and should internalise specificities of banks and banking systems. This would tackle moral hazard and facilitate moving forward with risk sharing measures towards the completion of the Banking Union in parallel with risk reduction measures; this approach would also be preferable to lowering the target level of the DIF to take into account banking system specificities. Third, smaller and larger banks would not excessively contribute to EDIS relative to the amount of covered deposits in their balance sheet. Fourth, there would be no unwarranted systematic cross-subsidisation within EDIS in the sense of some banking systems systematically contributing less than they would benefit from the DIF. This result holds also when country-specific shocks are simulated. Fifth, under a mixed deposit insurance scheme composed of national deposit insurance funds bearing the first burden and a European deposit insurance fund intervening only afterwards, cross-subsidisation would increase relative to a fully-fledged EDIS. The key drivers behind these results are: i) a significant risk-reduction in the banking system and increase in banks' loss-absorbing capacity in the aftermath of the global financial crisis; ii) a super priority for covered deposits, further contributing to protect EDIS; iii) an appropriate design of risk-based contributions, benchmarked at the euro area level, following a "polluter-pays" approach., Einlagensicherung, Bankenregulierung, Quersubventionierung, EU-Bankrecht, Eurozone, EU-Staaten, Amtsdruckschrift
title Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme: who is afraid of cross-subsidisation?
title_auth Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme who is afraid of cross-subsidisation?
title_full Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme who is afraid of cross-subsidisation? Jacopo Carmassi, Sonja Dobkowitz, Johanne Evrard, Laura Parisi, André Silva, Michael Wedow
title_fullStr Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme who is afraid of cross-subsidisation? Jacopo Carmassi, Sonja Dobkowitz, Johanne Evrard, Laura Parisi, André Silva, Michael Wedow
title_full_unstemmed Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme who is afraid of cross-subsidisation? Jacopo Carmassi, Sonja Dobkowitz, Johanne Evrard, Laura Parisi, André Silva, Michael Wedow
title_in_hierarchy no 208 (April 2018). Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme: who is afraid of cross-subsidisation? ([2018])
title_short Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme
title_sort completing the banking union with a european deposit insurance scheme who is afraid of cross subsidisation
title_sub who is afraid of cross-subsidisation?
title_unstemmed Completing the banking union with a European deposit insurance scheme: who is afraid of cross-subsidisation?
topic Einlagensicherung, Bankenregulierung, Quersubventionierung, EU-Bankrecht, Eurozone, EU-Staaten, Amtsdruckschrift
topic_facet Einlagensicherung, Bankenregulierung, Quersubventionierung, EU-Bankrecht, Eurozone, EU-Staaten, Amtsdruckschrift
url http://hdl.handle.net/10419/192956, http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op208.en.pdf