Using EPIC to find conflicts, inconsistencies, and gaps in Department of Defense policies

Gespeichert in:

Personen und Körperschaften:	Wong, Carolyn (VerfasserIn), Ohlandt, Chad J. R. (VerfasserIn), Gonzales, Daniel (VerfasserIn), Landree, Eric (VerfasserIn), Hollywood, John S. (VerfasserIn), Acquisition and Technology Policy Center (Sonstige), Rand Corporation (Sonstige), United States Navy (Sonstige)
Titel:	Using EPIC to find conflicts, inconsistencies, and gaps in Department of Defense policies/ Carolyn Wong, Daniel Gonzales, Chad J.R. Ohlandt, Eric Landree, John Hollywood
Format:	E-Book
Sprache:	Englisch
veröffentlicht:	Santa Monica, CA RAND 2013
Gesamtaufnahme:	Technical report Using EPIC to find conflicts, inconsistencies, and gaps in Department of Defense policies
Schlagwörter:	United States > Department of Defense > Personnel management > Data processing United States > Department of Defense > Officials and employees > Selection and appointment United States Manpower > United States Manpower Military & Naval Science Law, Politics & Government Military Administration POLITICAL SCIENCE ; Political Freedom Personnel management ; Data processing Electronic books
Weitere Ausgaben:	Using EPIC to Find Conflicts, Inconsistencies, and Gaps in Department of Defense Policies
Quelle:	Verbunddaten SWB Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen

Details
Zusammenfassung:	The authors present a framework and methodology to identify the roles and responsibilities (R & R) of those implementing Department of Defense policies and also potential conflicts, ambiguities, gaps, inconsistencies, and redundancies in those policies. They introduce a new software tool that automates one step of the methodology-EPIC-and demonstrate its use with three case studies to illustrate the technique and also the tool's flexibility. EPIC allows analysts to efficiently analyze multiple policy documents to detect potential conflicts in policy early on, thereby allowing policy developers to focus their attention on the need for clarification and, possibly, changes in policy. The authors relate executive positions to R & R and the products that result from their execution. If it can be shown that more than one actor is assigned to take the same action on the same product, then a potential conflict exists in the body of policy. If, on the other hand, no executive is assigned to take action on a product, then there is a potential gap in the body of policy. Use of this new tool will result in better and more consistent defense policy The authors present a framework and methodology to identify the roles and responsibilities (R & R) of those implementing Department of Defense policies and also potential conflicts, ambiguities, gaps, inconsistencies, and redundancies in those policies. They introduce a new software tool that automates one step of the methodology-EPIC-and demonstrate its use with three case studies to illustrate the technique and also the tool's flexibility. EPIC allows analysts to efficiently analyze multiple policy documents to detect potential conflicts in policy early on, thereby allowing policy developers to focus their attention on the need for clarification and, possibly, changes in policy. The authors relate executive positions to R & R and the products that result from their execution. If it can be shown that more than one actor is assigned to take the same action on the same product, then a potential conflict exists in the body of policy. If, on the other hand, no executive is assigned to take action on a product, then there is a potential gap in the body of policy. Use of this new tool will result in better and more consistent defense policy
Beschreibung:	"RAND National Defense Research Institute "This research was conducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center (ATPC) of RAND National Defense Research Institute"--Preface Includes bibliographical references (pages 61-63)
Umfang:	1 Online-Ressource (xxii, 63 pages)
ISBN:	9780833076762 0833081926 0833076760 9780833081926