Eintrag weiter verarbeiten

Has regulatory capital made banks safer?: skin in the game vs moral hazard

Gespeichert in:

Personen und Körperschaften: Dautovic, Ernest (VerfasserIn)
Titel: Has regulatory capital made banks safer?: skin in the game vs moral hazard/ Ernest Dautović
Format: E-Book
Sprache: Englisch
veröffentlicht:
Frankfurt am Main, Germany European Central Bank [2020]
Gesamtaufnahme: Europäische Zentralbank: Working paper series ; no 2449 (July 2020)
Quelle: Verbunddaten SWB
Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen
Details
Zusammenfassung: The paper evaluates the impact of a phased-in introduction of capital requirements on equity, risk-taking, and probability of default for a sample of European systemically important banks. Contrary to the case of a one-off introduction of capital requirements, this study does not find evidence of deleveraging through asset sales. A phased-in tightening promotes adjustment to lower leverage via an increase in equity thereby improving resilience and loss absorption capacity. The higher resilience comes at the cost of a portfolio reallocation towards riskier assets. Consistently with models on agency costs and gambling for resurrection, the risk-taking is driven by large and less profitable banks. The net impact on bank probabilities of default is positive albeit statistically insignificant, suggesting that risk-taking may crowd-out solvency.
Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 77 Seiten); Illustrationen
ISBN: 9789289943673
928994367X
DOI: 10.2866/002634